EUROPEAN PATRIOTIC RESISTANCE


(in English and German)

By Mikis Theodorakis

For a Europe of Nations-Peoples and of States, a Europe of science, art and culture, a Europe of economic, industrial and social development, a Europe of peace and solidarity between peoples.

Today the main contrast is between all the peoples of Europe and the forces that represent and aim at global dominance of global governance, centered on a series of huge banks such as the Rockefeller-Rothschild banks and Goldman Sachs, with Annexes as the Deutsche Bank and the European Bank, with the Bilderberg Club as a “government spokesman” (with Henry Kissinger as President) and its satellites IMF, International Trade Organization and organs such as e.g School of Chicago (Friedman). [See the revelations by Naomi Klein in her book “The Shock Doctrine”].

The aim of this new totalitarianism is globalization, which means the building of a new society of an unknown type on the ruins of nations-peoples-states by creating a new type of citizen, subjugated and obedient to the plans and aspirations of global governance, that will be controlled and directed by, and will serve the interests of, the International Trust Banks.

*

Today’s politicians of the European states are divided into two sections: To those who are aware of the new reality and consciously are serving the forces of global governance and those who ignore the new reality and cooperate, even as opposition, within the political process of the first, the conscious servants of the new Totalitarianism. So the current political powers of all parties, right, centrist, leftist, green, etc. are all within the same political power train, running on the rails that the global governance controls and which lead to the death of Nations-Peoples and replacing them with the creation of a new international society, completely subjugated to the interests and callings of Global Governance.

Therefore the current Parliaments who are currently under the control of the IMF and European banks, have changed into the new Totalitarianism organs, so there is no possibility of resistance through these power systems. The forces that want to remain within these new circumstances, should have the center of their activity to their physical presence among the people.

The experience in my country by the presence of the Troika the last two and a half years, leads us to conclude that the control of the economy from foreign government, poses conditions of substantial foreign occupation. For this reason, the resistance of the people must take forms of a liberation struggle. Our weapon is the active resistance of a truly united nation. Consequently, the patriotic unity of the people is the key.  This means that, because the people are affected as a whole, the form of unity should be above existing class, ideological and political differences; in other words, national-patriotic.

When a nation is not mobilizing all its powers, without exception, against the looting forces of globalization, it is lost.

After all, the attack, with money as weapon, is much more severe and more efficient than any form of police or military force. Because it is an attack on the citizens as a whole. Not only to the integrity of his body but also of his mind and soul. Similar to the experiments of Cameron, that Naomi Klein describes, in which 50 electric shocks erased the memory from the brain, and with it the personality, money with the shock of unemployment, misery and fear, dissolves the individuality of the citizen-personality and destroys social tissue, which establish the form and content of the People-Nation-State.

So it is necessary that each nation is able to mobilize all the forces at its disposal: tradition, history, science, art, culture, national wealth and development potential. Thus, the national-patriotic movement is able to resist from a position of strength. To isolate the forces that serves, or is persistent in ignoring the danger of, the attack from the new totalitarianism. To deepen the unity of the people, which leads to increasingly higher levels of power and determination, yet projecting the plan of a new society in a totally free country (Europe)?

The creation of a united front of opposition from the peoples of Europe, would naturally lead to the total victory over the forces of destructive invasion and the creation of a Europe of peoples, peace and progress . Whose power and influence would be so large that it could play a leading role at international level.

Athens, September 2012

Mikis Theodorakis

____________________________________________________________________________

EUROPÄICHER PATRIOTICHER WIDERSTAND

Von Mikis Theodorakis

Für ein Europa der „Nationen-Völker“ und der Vaterländer
ein Europa der Wissenschaft, der Kunst und der Kultur
ein Europa der wirtschaftlichen, industriellen und sozialen Entwicklung
ein Europa des Friedens und der Solidarität der Völker.

Heutzutage liegt der grundsätzliche Widerspruch im Gegensatzpaar der Gesamtheit der Völker Europas und der Kräfte, die die weltweite Dominanz der Global Governance repräsentieren und diese forcieren, deren Kern aus einer Reihe von enorm großen Banken besteht, wie Rockefeller-Rothschild und Goldman Sachs mit Zweigstellen wie der Deutschen Bank und der Europäischen Bank, mit dem Bilderberg-Club als „Regierungssprecher“ (mit Henry Kissinger als Präsidenten) und dem IWF und der Welthandelsorganisation als Satelliten bzw. Organen, wie zum Beispiel der Chicagoer Schule (Friedman). [vgl. die Enthüllungen von Naomi Klein in ihrem Buch „Die Schock-Strategie“].

Ziel dieses neuen Totalitarismus ist die Globalisierung, das heißt der Aufbau einer neuen Gesellschaft von unbekannter Art auf den Ruinen der Völker-Nationen-Staaten durch die Schaffung eines neuen Typus von Bürger, unterworfen und  gefügig gegenüber den Plänen und Bestrebungen der Global Governance, die von den Interessen der Großkonzerne und der internationalen Banken kontrolliert und gesteuert wird und ihnen dient.

*

Die heutige politische Welt der europäischen Staaten ist in zwei Teile aufgeteilt: In jene, die die neue Realität kennen und bewusst im Dienste der neuen Global Governance stehen und in jene, die die neue Realität nicht kennen und innerhalb des politischen Geschehens mit ersteren, den bewussten Beamten des neuen Totalitarismus, zusammenarbeiten, wenn auch als Opposition. Auf diese Weise befinden sich die heutigen politischen Führungen von allen Parteien, ob die Rechten, die in der Mitte, die Linken, die Grünen usw., im selben Zug der politischen Macht, der auf den Schienen, die die Global Governance kontrolliert, fährt und die zu dem Tod der „Nationen-Völker“ und ihrer Ersetzung durch die Schaffung einer neuen internationalen Gesellschaft führen, die vollkommen den Interessen und dem Diktat der Global Governance unterworfen ist.

Aus diesem Grund haben sich die heutigen Parlamente, die sich aktuell unter der Kontrolle des IWF und dem Europa der Banken befinden, zu Organen des neuen Totalitarismus transformiert, also gibt es keinerlei Chance auf Widerstand durch diese Systeme der Macht. Die Kräfte, die sich unter diesen neuen Bedingungen widersetzen wollen, müssen ihre physische Präsenz inmitten des Volkes zum Mittelpunkt ihres Handelns machen.

Die Erfahrungen meines Landes mit der Präsenz der Troika in den letzten zweieinhalb Jahren lässt uns zu der Überzeugung gelangen, dass die Kontrolle der Wirtschaft und der Regierung durch Fremde uns die Bedingungen von ausländischer Besatzung auferlegt. Aus diesem Grund muss der Widerstand des Volkes Formen eines Befreiungskampfes annehmen. Unsere Waffe ist der aktive Widerstand des vereinten Volkes. Folglich ist die patriotische Einheit des Volkes der Schlüssel. Weil nun das Volk in seiner Gesamtheit betroffen ist, bedeutet das, dass die Form der Einheit jenseits von den vorhandenen Klassen-, ideologischen und politischen Unterschieden sein muss: mit anderen Worten national-patriotisch.

Wenn ein Volk nicht alle seine Kräfte ohne jede Ausnahme dem Wirbelsturm der Kräfte der Globalisierung entgegensetzt, ist es verloren.

Denn der Angriff, dessen Waffe das Geld ist, ist viel heftiger und effizienter als jede Form von polizeilicher oder militärischer Gewalt. Er ist ein Angriff auf den Bürger in seiner Gesamtheit. Nicht nur auf die Unversehrtheit seines Körpers sondern auch auf jene seines Geistes und seiner Seele. Ähnlich wie bei den Experimenten von Cameron, die Naomi Klein beschreibt, bei denen mit 50 Elektroschocks das Gedächtnis aus dem Hirn gelöscht wurde und mit ihm die Persönlichkeit. Das Geld löscht durch den Schock der Arbeitslosigkeit, der Verelendung und der Angst die Individualität und Persönlichkeit des Bürgers aus und zerstört das soziale Gefüge, das die Form und den Inhalt des „Völker-Nationen-Staates“ konstituiert.

Es ist also notwendig, dass jedes Volk es schafft, die Gesamtheit der ihm zur Verfügung stehenden Kräfte zu mobilisieren: Tradition, Geschichte, Wissenschaft, Kunst, Kultur, nationaler Reichtum und Entwicklungspotential. Somit kann die national-patriotische Bewegung aus einer Position der Stärke heraus Widerstand leisten, die Kräfte isolieren, die beharrlich darauf bestehen, die Gefahr eines Angriffs seitens des neuen Totalitarismus zu ignorieren, oder ihn bedienen, die Vereinigung des Volkes vertiefen und zu einer immer höheren Ebene der Stärke und Entschlossenheit führen, indem gleichzeitig das Modell einer neuen Gesellschaft im Rahmen eines vollständig befreiten Vaterlandes gestärkt wird.

Die Schaffung einer einheitlichen Front des Widerstands der Völker Europas würde natürlich zur totalen Niederlage der Kräfte der zerstörerischen Invasion und zur Schaffung eines Europas der Völker, des Friedens und des Fortschritts führen. Seine Kraft und Ausstrahlung wäre so groß, dass es eine führende Rolle auf der internationalen Ebene spielen könnte.

Athen, September 2012

Mikis Theodorakis


About athenianvoice

Kosmas Loumakis - Sociological consultant, analyst, field operative and tactical field coordinator of national and regional social projects in Sweden. Was contracted for almost two decades by governmental bodies and NGO's, in governmental gang crime and extremism preventive efforts. Have produced a number of socio pedagogic action plans and developed methods, field tactics and strategies for gang crime and extremism preventive projects.

Posted on September 16, 2012, in Articles in English, Hot. Bookmark the permalink. 25 Comments.

  1. There is nothing like european patriotism, this is a bourgeois illusion, created to make the mass believe that there is something like common things shared between Greece and Europe. The truth is: 200 years ago and earlier we didn’t even have appreciably to european nations, rather we had bad experience with everything from the north, be it from the barbarians, from the Romans and later from the european Nations. They built our nowadays system, they forced us to accept their concept of government, economy and society, they forced us to fight against our mentality and our nature during the last 200 years but it is enough now! There have to be statement and clear FIGHT against the created socalled european idea, because it’s only created to carry on self assimilation in the name of capitalism and liberal views, which are blown out in the world by western countries to occupy them mentally.

    Γαμώ την Ευρώπη σας, γαμώ τον αστισμό σας! ΣΗΤΩ Η ΕΛΛΑΣ, ΣΗΤΩ ΤΑ ΒΑΛΚΑΝΙΑ, ΖΗΤΩ Ο ΠΟΛΙΤΙΣΜΟΣ, ΖΗΤΩ Η ΟΡΘΟΔΟΞΙΑ! Θα πιάσουμε τους προδότες!

  2. Pay Day Loan

    I am truly grateful to the owner of this web site who has shared this enormous post at here.

  3. I ran across this post through http://athenianvoice.
    wordpress.com/2012/09/16/european-patriotic-resistance/ and if I can I’d like to suggest to you some helpful things or ideas. Perhaps you could write your next articles referring to these ideas. I’m keen to
    read more things related to what you’re talking about.

  4. Σε “Οδηγός επιβίωσης”:… Ναι, μας έσωσες πραγματικά τώρα!… αυτες είναι ακριβώς οι πληροφορίες που χρειαζόμασταν μετά από 2 χρόνια στο Σύνταγμα,… και τι γίνεται με την ασφάλεια κατά τα αρπακτικά ζώα μέσα στο κοινοβούλιο;… Το δάγκωμα τους μπορεί να είναι θανατηφόρο ξερεις!!!

  5. Οδηγός επιβίωσης : Τι να πάρουμε μαζί μας κατεβαίνοντας στις διαδηλώσεις

    Οδηγός επιβίωσης : Τι να πάρουμε μαζί μας κατεβαίνοντας στις διαδηλώσεις (πλήρης Οδηγός αντιμετώπισης δακρυγόνων και Πρώτες Βοήθειες)

    ΣΤΟΙΧΕΙΩΔΗ ΜΕΤΡΑ ΠΡΟΣΤΑΣΙΑΣ ΣΕ ΟΛΕΣ ΤΙΣ ΠΕΡΙΠΤΩΣΕΙΣ

    Α) Σώμα
    Προληπτiκά: Πριν ξεκινήσουμε από το σπίτι, επιβάλλεται να έχει προηγηθεί ένα καλό μπάνιο, ώστε να απομακρυνθούν από το σώμα ακόμα και τα ίχνη λιπαρότητας. και να μειωθεί η δυνατότητα του σώματος να ιδρώνει. Επιβάλλονται τα μακριά ρούχα για να αποφευχθούν τα εγκαύματα ή απλά ο πόνος που προκαλεί το κάψιμο στο δέρμα. Καλό είναι να αποφεύγονται τα συνθετικά ρούχα (για παράδειγμα τα μπουφάν flying) γιατί απορροφούν μεγάλη ποσότητα χημικών καi ενισχύουν τον ιδρώτα, που βοηθά τα δακρυγόνα στη δράση τους και γίνεται πιο έντονο το κάψιμο. Να προτιμούνται τα βαμβακερά υφάσματα (κολεγιακά, φούτερ, τζην, βαμβακερές φόρμες, τα δερμάτινα μπουφάν δεν είναι πρόβλημα αλλά μόνο σε πολύ κρύο καιρό).

    Σε περίπτωση έκθεσης σε δακρυγόνα, τα ρούχα πρέπει να αλλάζουν με την πρώτη ευκαιρία και να μπαίνουν αμέσως σε νερό με πολύ σαπούνι ή σε διάλυμα σόδας (ακολουθούν οδηγίες για την παρασκευή του διαλύματος σόδας) για τουλάχιστον 15 λεπτά. ‘Επειτα μπορούν να πλυθούν κανονικά.

    Β) Λαιμός και πρόσωπο, μάτια

    Οι πιο ευαίσθητες περιοχές είναι αυτές του λαιμού και του προσώπου, οι οποίες είναι συνήθως και οι πιo εκτεθειμένες στα δακρυγόνα. Το χημικό αέριο εκμεταλλεύεται την υγρασία του σώματος στα σημεία αυτά (λιπαρότητα δέρματος και ιδρώτας) για να δράσει.

    Προληπτικά:
    Πριν από οποιοδήποτε άλλο μέσο προστασίας, ο λαιμός και το πρόσωπο πρέπει να πλένονται πολύ καλά (αφήνοντας πυκνό διάλυμα σαπουνιού πάνω στο δέρμα για ένα δίλεπτο) με ένα πολύ αλκαλικά στερεό σαπούνι. Το πλύσιμο ……

    http://lcitynews.blogspot.se/2012/10/blog-post_3657.html

  6. Translation: Thanks for the correction. I don’t know Greek, but was going by the German text, since the English did not make sense. In that case, the German also has to be somehow fixed.

  7. I thank all for the suggestions and I also understand their own need to “inform”, but I only appreciate comments on the actual issue and not side-tracks…

    To all who without being asked want to inform me on what “we” (Greece) should do, I must point out that you need to understand that I am NOT interested in any suggestions… I am not asking for knowledge in this matter through this forum, at least… First because my view on it is that; “advice” given without anyone asking for it, is in fact “imposing ones view on someone”… I use my right to be the only one CHOOSING from where and from whom I will take my advices. Second because simply in this matter I only take advice from people with documented, active and practical experience on opposing dictatorial regimes, resisting occupation and fight against foreign aggressors (this rule out 99,99% of the swedes immediately, for understandable reasons to most I am sure)

    The people who are dealing with the situation from the Greek resistance movement SPITHA’s side, doesn’t need advice… We just need public support in our struggle (very few of the ones cheering or “advising” from the seats in a top range ring-fight, would actually be able to themselves perform the fight)! Actually all the rest of the people in Europe would be benefited by focusing and listening to what Mr Theodorakis, Mr Glezos has to say because they have done these fights properly and successfully before!… Extremely few have their depth of insight and their knowledge on how these forces that are now working in Europe really works,… and how a political, judicial and economic struggle should look like and what form it should take. “Greek resistance” has shown before that, when all the rest of Europe “gave up” to a superior oppressor, they still fought and fought good. Those who did this were our fathers, grandfathers and in few cases us. It wasn’t our ancestors or great grandfathers. We have a living source of experienced “fighters” to be influenced, inspired and taught by… This approach and this attitude is needed now because it is a matter of changing a whole political and economic system and a horrifically misinterpreted law,… and therefore a proper resistance is required, not a compromise. The form that this struggle should take is the form of a ‘liberation struggle’ and it HAS to be considered as a matter of self-defense by the Greek and the European people unified.

    Also in the ring I never took advice from those who just had read about Thai-boxing,… only from those who themselves had proved themselves in the ring as fighters or trainers!!

  8. Thanks Susan, … I have used the google translate which doesn’t always give the best suggestions!… But in fact it shouldn’t be “the forces that want to oppose…” That changes the meaning of the original sentence! The original text in Greek MEAN the forces that want to REMAIN within these new..(meaning forces who want to have the peoples consent for a significant change).” – 🙂

  9. The English version has a mistranslation. It reads: “The forces that want to remain within these new circumstances, should have the center of their activity to their physical presence among the people.” It should say “The forces that want to oppose…” I would also suggest editing the rest to say “should base their activity on their…”

  10. Danke schön ‘Mikis Theodorakis’!

  11. ASTANA (SATANA): η πρωτεύουσα της παγκόσμιας διακυβέρνησης!!!

    ASTANA (SATANA): η πρωτεύουσα της παγκόσμιας διακυβέρνησης!!!

    Ξεκινήσαμε μια έρευνα για την πρωτεύουσα των illuminati και η πορεία μας επιφύλαξε οπως θα δείτε εκπλήξεις..

    Μια πόλη σχεδὸν άγνωστη στον περισσότερο κόσμο. Κάποιοι ήξεραν την ύπαρξή της αλλὰ δεν γνώριζαν την σημασία της και άλλοι, απλὰ ήξεραν αλλὰ δεν μιλούσαν για να μην ταράξουν τα νερὰ πριν την ώρα τους.

    Σε αυτὴ την πόλη λοιπὸν συναντώνται οι ισχυροὶ του πλανήτη, παπάδες κυβερνητικοὶ και στρατιωτικοὶ καταπατώντας τούς όρκους που έχουν κάνει για να αποκτήσουν τα αξιώματά τους και προδίδοντας τις θρησκείες και εθνικὰ συμφέροντά τους για την επιβολὴ της παγκοσμιοποιήσεως και της πανθρησκείας εν ὀνὀματι του κέρδους και της επιβολής εξουσίας σε ολόκληρη την υφήλιο.
    ……. Δεν το γωρίζαμε αλλά προέκυψε μεσα απο την έρευνα για την πόλη Αstana

    Τετάρτη, 1 Δεκεμβρίου 2010

    ΓΙΩΡΓΟΣ ΠΑΠΑΝΔΡΕΟΥ:”Οι αλλαγές που χρειάζεται η χώρα θα γίνουν”

    πατήστε εδώ
    Ξεκίνησαν σήμερα το πρωί στο “Παλάτι της Ανεξαρτησίας”, στην πρωτεύουσα του Καζακστάν, Αστάνα, οι διήμερες εργασίες της Συνόδου Κορυφής του Οργανισμού για την Ασφάλεια και την Συνεργασία στην Ευρώπη (ΟΑΣΕ). Αναμένεται να εξεταστεί ένα ευρύ φάσμα θεμάτων, από το Αφγανιστάν ως την τρομοκρατία και το λαθρεμπόριο ναρκωτικών.H Ελλάδα εκπροσωπείται από τον πρωθυπουργό Γιώργο Παπανδρέου και τον υπουργό Εξωτερικών Δημήτρη Δρούτσα.

    βίντεο
    Θαυμάστε μερικά απο τα καλά που ανέφερε μπροστά στα αφεντικά του:
    00:32′ πρέπει να ξεχάσουμε απαρχαιωμένες έννοιες περί ασφάλειας, που ανήκουν σε άλλες εποχές.
    01:22′ γίνεται αντιληπτό ότι κανένα κράτος-έθνος δεν είναι πλέον ικανό να αντιμετωπίσει από μόνο του προβλήματα τόσο μεγάλης εμβέλειας. Η περιφερειακή και παγκόσμια διακυβέρνησηείναι ουσιαστική για την κοινή μας ασφάλεια και σταθερότητα.
    01:35′ το παράδοξο είναι ότι βλέπουμε συγχρόνως αναζωπύρωση του εθνικισμού. ( μάλλον των ελλήνων εννοεί)
    Την λέξη GLOBAL την είπε 15φορές..
    Ολη η ομιλία εδω: εδώ

    Και αν δεν το προσέξατε στο βιντεο το ταμπελάκι δεν γράφει Ελλάδα αλλά TROIKA-GREECE !!!
    Εσείς θα το δεχόσασταν;;;;

    Από εκεί έπαιρνε τις εντολές το πιόνι της Νέας Τάξης Πραγμάτων και μας δήλωσε μόλις βγήκε πως χρειαζόμαστε μια παγκόσμια κυβέρνηση ???

    βίντεο 1
    βίντεο 2

    ΑΣΤΑ ΝΑ πάνε !! Απο την Αστάνα ξεκινήσαμε στον ΓΑΠ καταλήξαμε, ..μας χάλασε την έρευνα !!!

    Ευχαριστούμε πηγή

    ΕΡΕΥΝΩ!!! ΑΡΑ ΥΠΑΡΧΩ !!! ( What the Bleep Do We Know? )

    http://ethel-sinadelfos.blogspot.com/2012/05/astana-satana.html

  12. ΤΑ ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΚΑ ΧΡΕΗ - HAGEN FLEISCHER

    ΤΑ ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΚΑ ΧΡΕΗ – HAGEN FLEISCHER

    Το κατοχικό δάνειο είναι μια γερμανική υποχρέωση που δεν έχει σχέση με τις πολεμικές αποζημιώσεις»

    Εξι δισεκατομμύρια ευρώ! Αυτό είναι το ύψος σε σημερινές τιμές του κατοχικού δανείου που υποχρεώθηκε να καταβάλει το ’42 η χώρα μας στη ναζιστική Γερμανία. Τι(ς) πταίει και τελικά αυτά τα δανεικά παραμένουν αγύριστα; Η πολιτική τού ένα βήμα μπρος – δύο πίσω που ακολούθησαν όλες οι ελληνικές μεταπολεμικές κυβερνήσεις. Ατολμία; Αδυναμία; Δουλοπρέπεια; Το βέβαιο είναι ότι μπροστά στο θρύλο της «γερμανικής ισχύος» η χώρα συμπεριφέρθηκε με ένα σύμπλεγμα κατωτερότητας. Το αντιλαμβάνεται κανείς και από το 70ετές παρασκήνιο που ξετυλίγει ο καθηγητής Νεότερης Ιστορίας στο Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών Χάγκεν Φλάισερ.

    Τον Μάρτιο του 1942, ενώ ο λιμός θέριζε ήδη την κατεχόμενη Αθήνα, η Γερμανία και η Ιταλία αποφάσισαν στη Ρώμη ότι οι μηνιαίες δαπάνες των κατοχικών στρατευμάτων στην Ελλάδα πάνω από το ποσό του 1,5 δισεκατομμυρίου πληθωριστικών δραχμών θα καλύπτονται με ποσά που η Ελλάδα θα δάνειζε άτοκα στις κατοχικές δυνάμεις. Ηταν μια λύση της τελευταίας στιγμής προκειμένου κάπως να αποτραπεί η κατάρρευση της οικονομίας, καθώς και να αμβλυνθεί η διογκούμενη αντίσταση των Ελλήνων εξαιτίας των άθλιων συνθηκών που είχε δημιουργήσει η Κατοχή. Πράγματι,……………

    http://www.contra-xreos.gr/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=137:-hagen-fleischer&catid=1:articles-greek&Itemid=2

  13. Επιδίωξη της τυραννίας είναι να πτωχεύσουν οι πολίτες.

    «… Επιδίωξη της τυραννίας είναι να πτωχεύσουν οι πολίτες,

    αφ’ ενός για να συντηρείται με τα χρήματά τους η φρουρά του καθεστώτος

    κι αφ’ ετέρου να είναι απασχολημένοι οι πολίτες και να μην τους μένει χρόνος για επιβουλές.

    Σε αυτό αποβλέπει τόσο η επιβολή μεγάλων φόρων,

    η απορρόφηση των περιουσιών των πολιτών,

    όσο και η κατασκευή μεγάλων έργων που εξαντλούν τα δημόσια οικονομικά».

    Αριστοτέλους, Πολιτικά

    Τι σχεδιάζει η τυραννία

    Κι αυτό δεν είναι κάτι νέο. Αποτελεί πανάρχαια πρακτική δεσποτικών καθεστώτων που στηρίζουν την εξουσία τους στην καταδυνάστευση της κοινωνίας.

    Όπως γράφει ο Αριστοτέλης στα «Πολιτικά»: «… Επιδίωξη της τυραννίας είναι να πρωχεύσουν οι πολίτες, αφ’ ενός για να συντηρείται με τα χρήματά τους η φρουρά του καθεστώτος κι αφ’ ετέρου να είναι απασχολημένοι οι πολίτες και να μην τους μένει χρόνος για επιβουλές».

    Αυτό συμβαίνει συχνά στη νεώτερη ιστορία της Ελλάδας. Όποτε καλλιεργείται η ψευδαίσθηση της ευημερίας, ακολουθεί η κρίση, η πτώχευση, ο πόλεμος και η αιχμαλωσία της κοινωνίας από …..

    η πατρίδα στάθηκε στα πόδια της με τις δικές της δυνάμεις για να ξαναμπεί από το φθινόπωρο του 2008 στο τούνελ μιας κρίσης που θέλει να σβήσει τον Ελληνισμό, να υποδουλώσει τον ευρωπαϊκό Νότο και να μετατρέψει την πολιτική από τέχνη του εφικτού σε καταδίκη για το ανέφικτο.

    Στο χέρι του λαού είναι να δείξει το δρόμο και να τον επιβάλλει στην πολιτική ηγεσία.

    Ο πατέρας της πολιτικής επιστήμης, ο Αριστοτέλης μάς δίνει ένα μάθημα ακόμα. Λέει: «οι μη οργιζόμενοι εφ’ οις δει ηλίθιοι δοκούντες είναι», δηλαδή όσοι δεν οργίζονται γι’ αυτά που πρέπει μάλλον είναι ηλίθιοι.

    http://www.newsbomb.gr/politikh/story/235595/epidioxi-tis-tyrannias-einai-na-ptoheysoyn-oi-polites

  14. Το "φαινόμενο" Έλληνες. Οι φονείς των αυτοκρατοριών.

    Το “φαινόμενο” Έλληνες.
    Οι φονείς των αυτοκρατοριών.

    Οι Έλληνες είναι μια μοναδική περίπτωση ανάμεσα στους λαούς. Ως λαός μοιάζουν με ένα φυσικό φαινόμενο, το οποίο έχει φάσεις ύφεσης και έξαρσης. Ένα φαινόμενο, που μοιάζει με τη φωτιά. Με τη φωτιά, που είναι απόλυτα ελεγχόμενη μέσα σε ένα λυχνάρι και απόλυτα ανεξέλεγκτη, όταν αρχίζει και καίει τα πάντα στο διάβα της. Αυτό το φαινόμενο, αν δεν ελεγχθεί από το σύστημα εξουσίας εγκαίρως, μπορεί να το καταστρέψει ολοσχερώς.
    Mιλάμε για την ιστορική πορεία του φαινομένου μέχρι τις ημέρες μας. Δεν μιλάμε μόνον για τους αρχαίους Έλληνες, τους οποίους οι υπόλοιποι λαοί τους γνωρίζουν. Μιλάμε και για τους σύγχρονους Έλληνες. Μιλάμε και για την “άγνωστη” ιστορία των σύγχρονων Ελλήνων. Μιλάμε για μια ιστορία “ολέθρου” για τις σύγχρονες αυτοκρατορίες. Για μια ιστορία, που με μεγάλη προσοχή προσπαθούν οι σημερινοί ισχυροί να κρύψουν, γιατί δεν τους συμφέρουν οι αποκαλύψεις. Δεν τους συμφέρουν τα “κακά” πρότυπα.
    Ούτε οι ίδιοι οι Έλληνες γνωρίζουν τι ακριβώς έχουν κάνει. Δεν γνωρίζουν ότι η συμμετοχή τους στο σημερινό παγκόσμιο κοινωνικό γίγνεσθαι ήταν καθοριστική. Συμμετοχή απολύτως δυσανάλογη του μεγέθους της Ελλάδας. Συμμετοχή μεγαλύτερη από κράτη-γίγαντες, όπως η Γαλλία, η Γερμανία ή η Ρωσία. Συμμετοχή, που αποτελεί το κρυμμένο “μυστικό” του συστήματος, γιατί, αν αποκαλυφθεί, θα έχουμε ακόμα χειρότερες εξελίξεις. Μόνον στον εικοστό αιώνα οι Έλληνες έχουν νικήσει δύο αυτοκρατορίες και έχουν γίνει η αιτία να καταστραφεί η μεγαλύτερη αυτοκρατορία της σύγχρονης ιστορίας……

    http://www.eamb.gr/ellines/ellines.htm

  15. Αμερικανικό Κολέγιο Αθηνών

    Η συνωμοσία του Κολεγίου
    Με τη βοήθεια του παγκόσμιου προτεσταντικού κατεστημένου, εξαπέλυσαν επίθεση
    εναντίον του ελληνικού λαού. Οι “ανώτεροι” προτεστάντες άρχισαν να κατηγορούν τον
    “κατώτερο” ορθόδοξο λαό για τα “λάθη” του και τις “παραλείψεις” του. Πότε και κανένας
    άλλος λαός δεν δέχθηκε τόση μεγάλη και οργανωμένη δυσφημιστική επίθεση όπως η
    σημερινή Ελλάδα. Με ποιον στόχο; Να τον τρομοκρατήσουν και να τον αναγκάσουν ν’
    αποδεχθεί το μοιραίο. Γι’ αυτόν τον λόγο, λίγες στιγμές πριν φανεί η χρεοκοπημένη
    πολιτική του Κολεγίου, φώναξαν “λεφτά υπάρχουν”. Γιατί; Για να πάρουν την εξουσία
    άρον-άρον και να μας “δέσουν” στα “δεσμά” των τοκογλύφων. Όπως πλέον εύκολα
    αποδεικνύεται, την ίδια στιγμή που ο Κολεγιόπαις Γιωργάκης φώναζε “λεφτά υπάρχουν”,
    βρισκόταν σε διαρκή συνεννόηση με τον Στρος Καν του ΔΝΤ …Του αμερικανικού ΔΝΤ, για
    να μην “ξεχνιόμαστε”.

  16. Η συνωμοσία του Κολεγίου Αθηνών

    Η συνωμοσία του Κολεγίου Αθηνών

    Αμερικανικό Κολέγιο Αθηνών…
    …Η συμμορία, η οποία ευθύνεται
    για την παράδοση της Ελλάδας στους “δανειστές” της.
    Πληρωμένο “συμβόλαιο θανάτου” ήταν το Μνημόνιο.
    Οι άνθρωποι, οι οποίοι κάποτε μας παρέδωσαν στους Ναζί του Χίτλερ,
    είναι αυτοί, οι οποίοι σήμερα μας παραδίδουν στους Ναζί της Μέρκελ.

    Αυτό λοιπόν το “ευαγές” εκπαιδευτικό ίδρυμα είχε πάντα έναν και μοναδικό στόχο …Να
    μονοπωλεί την εξουσία και βέβαια την οικονομία στην Ελλάδα. Είχε μάθει να
    εκμεταλλεύεται την έννοια της “κρατικής εξουσίας” και να τη μετατρέπει σε μια πολυτελή
    και άνετη καθημερινότητα για τα μέλη του. Μιλάμε για κανονική Ανώνυμη Εταιρεία, η οποία
    θα μπορούσε αντί για “Κολέγιο Αθηνών” να ονομάζεται “Κολλητοί Βενιζέλου, Μπενάκη και
    Σια”. Γι’ αυτόν τον λόγο η λειτουργία του έλαβε στο τέλος τα χαρακτηριστικά του κοινοβίου.
    Τα μέλη του περιορίζονται εντός μιας κοινοβιακής ζωής. Οι σχέσεις τους δεν τελειώνουν
    μετά το πέρας των σπουδών τους. Καλλιεργούνται και εντείνονται και μετά από αυτές.

    Το Κολέγιο το συμφέρει να κινείται σε όλο το πολιτικό φάσμα
    και να αλληλοβοηθούνται τα μέλη του, προκειμένου να το “καταλαμβάνουν” στο σύνολό
    του …Να το καταλαμβάνουν σαν “ανώτερη” κοινωνική τάξη, η οποία προσφέρει “οδηγούς”
    σε “κατώτερους” με στόχο να τους καθοδηγήσει. Όταν λέμε να το “καταλαμβάνει” στο
    σύνολό του, κυριολεκτούμε. Από τον “ακροδεξιό” Βορίδη μέχρι τον “αριστερό” Μπίστη
    “χωράει” σχεδόν το σύνολο του δικομματισμού της εξουσίας …και “περισσεύει” κιόλας. Από
    τον “πλουτοκράτη” Λάτση μέχρι την “προλετάρια” κόρη τής σταλινικής Παπαρήγα “χωράει”
    ολόκληρη η ελληνική οικονομία …και “περισσεύει” κιόλας

    http://www.eamb.gr/new_text/us_kolege_ath.pdf

  17. Good ideas are always welcome, but in this case, no offense, I believe the best and most serious ideas comes from SPITHA right now… Personal experience from struggle and fighting against nazis in WWII, fascist in the civil war and the military junta 1967-1973 plus the exceptional mind and soul that Mikis posses, makes him one of the strongest cards against the globalist agenda,… at least from a Greek perspective. After the Greek resistance during the war your countries resistance was also very efficient. Ask those of your heroes who are still alive and have the experience and the insight to call the Norwegians for mobilization of the civil forces and the strengthening of the citizens resistance against globalist agenda.

    The purpose of mr Theodorakis article is actually not to “involve” but to call for action in accordance to each countries social and public abilities and resources – If you are truly interested, visit SPITHAS site http://www.spitha-kap.gr/el/ and (google) translate some articles, the petition and the program. It gives very good ideas of how a political and judical struggle should evolve in a truly free society by truly free citizens.

  18. Dear athenianvoice,

    Your message has been received: No new good ideas are needed.

    Assuming that the purpose of Theodorakis* article is to involve countries outside Greece, please let us know in which way we are supposed to act.

    With kind regards,

    Ole Fjord Larsen

  19. Corruption
    Promotion of REALLY green businesses.

    An important issue is fighting corruption.
    http://www.directdemocracy.org may be useful for this purpose as well as for promotion of REALLY green businesses.

  20. You are knocking on open doors Per!…🙂 This call to the European citizens doesn’t mean that Mikis Theodorakis is asking for advice. He knows very well what should, what must and what will be done! Not many in Europe actually have his experience in these matters and the matter that concern us now is to liberate the country and claim our rights back.

    The movement that Mikis started is based on the adequate intelligence,knowledge, insights and extremely good experience from actual resistance in both WWII and against dictatorships! Check thhe site but use google translate since this site is only in Greek…

    http://www.spitha-kap.gr/el/

  21. This has started in Greece a year ago and is now growing to become a considerable movement. The name is SPITHA and the program is liberating the country from foreign occupation!! Those in charge of this movement are probably the heaviest resistance team in Europe with fighters who fought the Nazis, the dictators and the fascists since 1940 up to recent days. Constitutional lawyers, political giants as Mikis himself and a lot of professors and intellectuals alongside with artist, writers and poets has joined this movement as I did from the beginning. You should be familiar of Mikis history (besides being a worldwide known composer) because after the Greek resistance which he fought in, and that resisted for 7 months, your country’s resistance was very efficient with 61 days resistance. Ask those who are still alive from those guys in Norway how a REAL resistance movement is organized!

    The Occupy movements are unfortunately a quite naïve, non-focused movement that has been infiltrated by the globalist agenda already from the Wall Street days. The Occupy was good as a “jump start” of the world’s citizens, but they are not organized in an adequate way for a serious resistance! That is just a spark plug and now the true resistance is needed… The Occupy and The Anonymous works good in order to give false satisfaction that something is being done while in reality nothing at all is achieved…

    SPITHA (Mikis Theodorakis movement) in Greece has really a heavy “artillery” in these guys from the resistance during WWII and against the military dictatorship 1967 to 1973! It is based on real knowledge, experience and insights made under several struggles, political actions and wins. They know how to pin point the actual issues, how to determine necessary actions and how to politically move in an adequate way so that the institutions of Europe MUST consider them as an accountable force. They have over 70 years of experience of winning fights against those who all others turned their asses to… Our site is unfortunately just in Greek so far, because “ground zero” of this fight is still Greece! Try to translate some parts through google translate or send an e-mail and express your interest in taking part of their information.

    http://www.spitha-kap.gr/el/

  22. This is a proposal about how to correct the situation.

    Orderly Exit from the European Monetary Union
    By Per Almgren, MSc (Technical Physics) 1/31/2012
    For a country that wants, or finds it necessary, to leave the European Monetary Union the first
    thing to do is to analyse what is the real cause of the problem with the economy. This is not so
    easy since it requires thinking “outside the box”. You must question some cornerstones of the
    mainstream economy.
    First recognize that the economy is a “zero-sum-game”. Looking at the society in any country,
    you can define three groups:
    1. The government and its associated organisations, mainly financed by taxation.
    2. The commercial business sector, mainly financed by earnings from selling goods and
    services.
    3. The citizens, mainly financing their needs and wants by wages and salaries paid for work
    done and to some extent with contributions from governmental institutions. In order to
    simplify the description the non-commercial enterprises and associations are included here.
    Most people don’t question that the commercial business sector should make a profit, i.e. their
    earnings need to be greater than their costs, at least on average.
    In Sweden, there is now a law which states that the government and its associated
    organisations also should make a profit on average. Within the EMU there is a limit to the
    maximum allowed deficit for the public taxed-financed sector.
    If groups 1 and 2 at least together should earn a profit, it forces group 3 to receive less income
    from the business sector and the public taxed-financed sector than they have to pay in taxes
    and for purchasing goods and services. This is a pure mathematical fact and should not be
    disputed.
    The members of group 3 have to annually increase their accumulated debt or face growing
    unemployment when the business sector and the government make cut-backs in order to at
    least try to maintain profits or reduce deficits.
    If the members of group 3 doesn’t increase their average debt, they can only for a very limited
    time pay more than they earn by using their savings.
    When the savings are emptied, the only way for this group to continue to pay out more money
    than they earn each month, without increasing their debt, is to accept that some members of
    the group will loose their jobs or accept lower wages when the business firms and/or the
    government, from month to month, should pay out less money for wages and salaries. The
    reduced out-payment will of course make the purchasing power of group 3 decrease again.
    This means lower incomes the next month for the business firms. They will have to fire some
    more people and so on. The same holds true for the government and their associated
    organisations.
    In the present economy, the choice is between an “endless” debt-financed growth of the
    economy and a continuing shrinking of the economy, accompanied by a growing number of
    literally starving people. The first alternative will soon be blocked by the limits of usable
    natural resources, both due to physical and biological facts and laws. These conditions are not
    negotiable or possible to change by our efforts. They are just to be accepted and included in
    our calculations.
    It is important to notice that this problem will not be solved by any technological or biological
    break-trough.
    Orderly exit 2(6) Per Almgren 2012-01-31
    The only way out of this dilemma in a money economy is to adjust to the fact that the profits
    and interest payments either should vanish or at least not be added to the money capital which
    then demand larger profits or interest, if the goal is a stable economy, not ending in a crash.
    You could of course point to the fact that some countries have a positive balance of payments
    compared to other countries but that only moves the problems of increasing debt forward, it
    doesn’t solve it.
    If we adhere to the now dominating economic principle that the capital should give a profit,
    part of which should be added to the capital for further growth, we will get the following
    well-known consequences:
    There will be increasing economic differences in group 3 between those people who own
    businesses or have well-paying jobs, and those who own little or nothing and earn less money
    and/or receive welfare. This will cause growing social unrest as we already can see. Even in
    Germany, looked upon as one of the “soundest” economies in Europe, the number of poor
    people is increasing.
    With the growing debt of today’s society follows increased interest costs and, as already seen
    in many countries, and losses when the debtors are unable to repay their loans. For a while the
    break-down could be postponed by debt-financed growth in some sectors, but we are already
    facing the fact that collectively we use more natural resources every year than nature manages
    to restore.
    So far experiences has shown that when we learn to produce goods and services using energy
    and materials more efficiently, we start to buy more instead of actually decrease the total
    amounts used. We therefore have to reduce the drive to increase the economy and reverse it
    for many years, in order to reach a balance between what is actually produced by nature and
    what we consume each year, and for resources that doesn’t regenerate, really refine the
    recycling processes. The conclusion is that we also must shrink the money economy, not
    allow it to grow each year.
    This cannot be done unless at the same time an effective redistribution of economic wealth
    takes place, reducing the economic gap between different groups instead of widening them. A
    growing part of the most poor populations in almost all countries have really experienced a
    continuing decrease in their living standard in the recent years.
    If we don’t manage this redistribution, everybody will be a looser in the long run, and the
    long run may be shorter than most of us can imagine. It will require a taxing system that at the
    same time is effective and acceptable to the great majority of the population in order to
    change this situation.
    In this regard we must also question what profit and interest levels are acceptable for a stable
    society. The simple answer is that they must be so low that they will be completely used up
    by the consumption of goods and services and interest levels even be below zero percent. The
    rule of thumb is that on the average no interest or profit should used to add to the owner’s
    capital. Any other use will increase the debt burden for the less wealthy and thus the demand
    for continued growth or just cause inflation.
    It can be shown, both mathematically and with statistics, quite contrary to what is told in the
    textbooks of economy, that an increase in the interest rate causes a rise in inflation instead of
    a decrease. It ought to be obvious that if you increase one part of the cost of a product the
    price of the product will usually increase.
    Orderly exit 3(6) Per Almgren 2012-01-31
    Now to the practical details.
    This proposed means to reconstruct the economy of the country includes a combined taxation
    and money reform, linked with a basic income for every registered resident of the country.
    The base for taxation will be based upon liquidity (M3), not upon income. The allowed fields
    of business for the Banks will decreased in order to increase the stability of the economy. The
    new type of taxation will reduce administration work and thus improve competitive strength.
    To make a big change in the economy will need a stable support from the population, and the
    citizens should have the possibility to say yes or no to a proposal in a referendum. The main
    parts of the changes have to be described in such a way that a huge majority of the citizens
    will understand them. Perhaps a special law must be passed, stating that all major contracts,
    business agreements and transactions made from now on are conditional and might have to be
    reversed and redone according to new legislation if the result of the referendum is yes.
    The actual transition from one type of money to another should not be a problem. The present
    type of money could be used for a period of say a half year, but their printed face value will
    not be the same as the actual value that will decline according to the time since the decision
    date and the taxation rate. The new type of money ought to be ready for distribution within a
    month or two. The quite simple computer programming for banks and some other institutions
    should also be ready and implemented during that time.
    The larger, or time consuming, problem may be the updating of computer programs and
    equipment for all the shops and service institutions in the society. This kind of programs
    ought of course to be ready, debugged and tested in advance before any country really needs
    to use them.
    The new currency will be allowed to float, demand and supply will establish the value
    compared to other currencies. No decided devaluations or appreciations will be needed.
    There should be no need for surprised redenomination. The starting exchange ratio to the Euro
    might be set to 1:1. Due to the inherent design of the money system, the price level will be
    quite stable.
    The country that wants to resolve its economic problems shall declare that it will pay the
    actual principal of foreign debts, but no more in interest, with exception of what could be a
    small annual fee for the real administration costs of handling the loans.
    If not acceptable to the lenders, the other choice would be a negotiated write-down of the
    debt. In both cases the repaying period should be long enough to be realistic depending on
    what the actual situation within the country dictates.
    Time for repayment of foreign debt should be between 5 and 20 years, depending on the
    circumstances of each case. The sums to be repaid could be fixed in Euro.
    The mortgages could continue to be fixed to the Euro amount after the change of currency.
    The same will be true for part of contracts, but any part containing payment of interest will
    have to be adjusted to just cover real handling costs for credits and fixed penalty amounts
    when not followed.
    The banks that will continue operation will not be allowed to create money by just transfer the
    lended amount into an account belonging to the borrower and do the corresponding
    transaction on the borrowers new debt account. Instead the banks will just have to act as a
    broker between the customer who want to lend/invest his or her money and the borrower. For
    the service done the bank gets a fee. There will not be any governmental unconditional funds
    to cover losses for the depositors. If they want, they can participate in an assurance
    Orderly exit 4(6) Per Almgren 2012-01-31
    association to lower their risk but their fees will have to cover the total losses. The banks will
    of course be able to lend their own capital. This arrangement will make the payment system
    sure and the banking system much more stable than the present system and would not create
    any burden for reconstructions upon people not involved.
    Financing for private and/or small scale projects of different types could be arranged using the
    principles established within the cooperative JAK-Medlemsbank, launched 1983 in Sweden
    and designed by the author. The main principle there is non-profit and balance between what
    you borrow and lend, measured by a money-times-time unit.
    Due to the later described taxation system, most people would probably want to lend or invest
    their surplus money to projects or other persons.
    The money and taxation system proposed will not fuel inflation since the interest on money
    will be low, or even negative if existing, and the average level of profits will be low.
    If the central bank is not owned completely and directly by the government, this should be
    changed so that the central government is the sole owner or, if it will appear more suitable, the
    ownership could also include regional and local government.
    The laws should if necessary be changed so that the government/s is entitled to borrow money
    directly from the central bank. The limit for the total debt should be proportional to the size of
    the population registered to be living permanently in the country (/region/municipality).
    In many countries with the most severe problems there are difficulties for the government to
    collect taxes. To correct this situation, and at the same time do away with a lot of
    administrative, controlling and collecting work, a different method designed as follows should
    be used:
    All taxation of income, VAT, payroll tax, estate tax and special goods are abandoned. Instead
    a daily fee on liquidity (M3), is introduced on all present money accounts. This means that the
    amount deducted will be 0.4 to 0.5 percent of the total amount in the account. Two or maybe
    three types of accounts will not be taxed.
    One is an account into which money that is received when foreign currency is sold directly to
    publicly owned exchange institutions or governmentally owned banks. Another is the
    personal accounts into which a basic income is paid by the local and/or central government.
    This basic income will be large enough to live on and paid out to all registered inhabitants in
    the country, citizens or non-citizens. In order to continue to get this basic income, you have to
    regularly show that you still live in the country. The third account, if implemented, will be
    used by the local or central government when paying for real estate or similar things when
    bought from private persons or business firms. It may also have a substantially lower rate of
    taxation, if not completely free from taxation.
    No other type of deposit to these three accounts should be possible. The holder of the
    accounts (or custodian for children and some other persons) can only make withdrawals,
    either to other (taxed) accounts or as cash.
    Practically no money needs to be transferred electronically from taxed accounts to any
    account belonging to local or central government. They only need to know the total amount
    issued and paid out from the non-taxed accounts in order to calculate how much new money
    could or should be used for their costs without increasing the total amount of circulating
    money above what is limited by the law.
    Orderly exit 5(6) Per Almgren 2012-01-31
    When someone wants to buy foreign currency from the governmentally owned banks, the
    payment must be done direct from one of the non-taxed accounts.
    Cash is taxed in the following way. Each banknote have an issuing date and a table telling the
    actual value each day in steps of for example 1 percent of the initial value. There is also a
    strip code that could be scanned in the same way as price labels in the shops today. This code
    is processed by the computer in the store that calculates the value. After some years the
    banknote has no remaining value. No cash needs to be collected for paying the tax. It is
    enough to know the amount issued one day and what tax rate printed on the bill to know how
    much new money could be spent without increasing the total circulating amount.
    An interesting thing is that this way of taxation means that all money (except those stored in
    the non-taxed accounts) makes all jobs automatically become “white” and a lot of handling,
    reporting and controlling work will no longer be needed. This means lower costs both for the
    government and for the business sector, associations and private persons. Thus the
    competitive power of the country increases and this will ease the payback of foreign debt.
    Since the basic income will be sufficient for the most basic needs, there will be no need for
    special loans to students, insurance systems for sick or disabled people (if not needing special
    care or equipment), people that are unemployed and so on. This means further reductions of
    administrative work and costs.
    Since the tax on liquidity is paid by the holder of the money, buyers will want to pay early or
    in advance, and sellers would prefer late payments, quite the opposite situation of today.
    There will also be easier to be allowed to make partial payments. One possibility to avoid
    being a taxpayer is to directly lend ones money to some other person or business firm. The
    lender is entitled to get the lent sum back and the borrower or his or her suppliers pays the
    tax. The financing of good projects will thus be easier than now to achieve.
    One question that most people will ask when informed about this system is if not everybody
    will try to buy goods that can be saved or real estate in order to escape the taxing. The answer
    to this is that it will have to be at least two parts to making such transactions. One wants to
    buy but the other one may want to wait as long as possible to sell, for the same reasons. So it
    will not be so easy to buy things that have a lasting value. But since some people probably
    want to use the money, it could be an increase in the business for selling services or for
    cultural arrangements.
    In order to avoid speculation with real estate and natural resources, it should be arranged that
    the ownership of such things are transferred to the local governments who then will rent them
    to people or businesses (site leasehold). The price should preferably be decided on by open
    bidding, but for farming and similar things, the user or his/her relatives or children may have
    som type of first right to have the contract transferred to them, maybe even for a lower price
    than the highest bid. Contract time could be long, 49 or even 99 years, if agreed on between
    the local community and the other part.
    In order to test this type of economy system and detect things that ought to be modified, it
    would be very valuable to conduct a real life project in some municipalities. To perform such
    tests agreements with the central government is needed. The area must be large enough to
    have a diversified economy, in order not to be to burdened by a lot of exchange transactions
    between the local and national currency/Euro.
    Islands or archipelagos like Åland, partly self-ruling in the Baltic between Sweden and
    Finland, with 25 000 inhabitants would be suitable areas. Experiences gathered in the 1930-
    ties and later showed that also quite small municipalities, i.e. Wörgl in Austria with less than
    5 000 inhabitants, by implementing a local currency, managed to change the situation quite
    Orderly exit 6(6) Per Almgren 2012-01-31
    quickly to the better for their inhabitants. This project was studied by the American economist
    Irving Fisher who came to the conclusion that implementing this full-scale in the US would
    cure the depressive economy within 6 months.
    When running such a small society, you will have to make agreements with the authorities of
    the country about responsibilities and taxations, handling currency exchanges, payments for
    governmental services that are not so easy to implement in a smaller scale, maybe also for
    some costs for the test and what would occur after the test period.
    Acknowledgement
    The idea of combining a basic income with taxation upon liquidity in accounts was to my
    knowledge first launched in Sweden in 1994 by Åsa Brandberg, Stockholm. How to
    implement this with paper money was designed by this author around 2002.
    Per Almgren
    email: per.almgren@mp.se

  23. Ole Fjord Larsen

    OK, let*s get started !

    Two things are required: A name and a political program.

    To make a shortcut, why not include already existing movements with the same aims, like for instance the European Occupy movements.

    Structurally the new organisation might build on internet based working groups, like http://www.ocwopa.org.

    Although built on direct democracy via the working groups, a deciding forum with elected representatives cannot be avoided.

    But we can avoid the usual catastrophic procedure of electing the least fitted representatives with the lowest mental quotients.

    Let a minimum mental quotient, MQ, of for instance + 0,4 be required by all candidates who want to participate in the elections, http://www.love-the-child-org.

  1. Pingback: Mikis Theodorakis: EUROPÄISCHER PATRIOTISCHER WIDERSTAND – Für ein Europa der „Nationen-Völker“ und der Vaterländer, ein Europa der Wissenschaft, der Kunst und der Kultur, ein Europa der wirtschaftlichen, industriellen und sozialen Entwicklu

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: