Why don’t International Justice call for the arrests of the ‘tops’?

Uploaded on Athenianvoice 29-08-2014



”Peace will not come to Athens (Mankind) until those who are not injured becomes as outraged as those who are injured”

“The nation that will insist on drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking done by cowards.”


The two quotations above gives two very crucial, fundamental warnings, that are absolutely essential to take into account when trying to uphold a true Democracy. They are extracted from speeches on the Peloponnesian Wars by the fifth century BC Athenian, historian, philosopher and general, Thucydides.

The first points at the fatal danger of neglecting people who suffer under oppression and tyranny, and the second points out the crucial importance of a police and an army formed by the citizens themselves for the defense of democracy, the citizens and the good of all (instead of a professional police and army who will always be inclined to serve the elite).

Exactly the neglect of human suffering and the professional police forces and armies (that are directed by private interests) are currently provoking a toxic socio-political climate, in which democracy is receiving blow after blow from those who really benefit by its destruction. Justice is sadly to a dangerously high degree in the hands of the same. The Hydra of the biggest banking families and their subservient beneficiaries have come to own most major businesses over the two centuries during which they have secretly and increasingly organised themselves as controllers of governments worldwide and as arbiters of war and peace.

Unless we understand this we will be unable to understand the real reasons for the two world wars and the impending third world war, a war that is almost certain to begin as a consequence of the US attempt to seize and control Central Asia. The only way out is for the US to back off – something the people of the US and the world want, but the elite does not.

International Justice must be ‘forced’, by the western, united public opinion, to take action against the biggest banking families and their ‘bullies’. The west’s citizens need to produce precise, adequate and comprehensive lawsuits against them in both National and International Court’s. It is mainly the western pseudo-democratic governments that has laid International Justice aside for too long and has failed to actually ever implement real Democracy, due to their obligations to these banking families and their subservient beneficiaries. It is these highly treasonous obligations that has made most citizens in the world very angry and some very vindictive, because these obligations has been proven to mean enforced, neo-colonial treaties and agreements, against the good of their own people and countries.

Standing outside Bilderberg-meetings, parliaments, WTO- and G7-summits shouting slogans, informing them that we know who they are and what they are up to, doesn’t even bring sweat to their foreheads anymore. Why would it? They have the security police, the riot police, the national guard, the paramilitary security companies, the armies (private, national and international), mercenary armies and the loosely or fully allied criminal gangs and militias. The elected ‘politicians’, under the advice of their vulture advisers, also make sure to very quickly and basically unnoticed by the general public, vote through the new legislations that are defending the exaggerated use of repressive forces and excessive violence. They need to ensure that the violence they feel that they have to use against their own citizens becomes, ‘legally valid measures’.  For the public’s safety and to keep order in the society, they claim, while the country’s Constitution Committee and the Supreme Court ‘has gone fishing’! This, despite the fact that it is the public their “robocops” beat, kick, drag, spray with tear gas and water cannons, shoot rubber bullets on, mass arrest, torture and terrorize – and despite the fact that it is the society itself that has been attacked by its bankers and businessmen with their blessing and permission. This is done through undemocratically and unconstitutionally enforced legislations, sure,.. but sadly enough ‘legally valid’ in the eyes of Justice, until the peoples unite and in organised form invalidates these legislations.

As a matter of fact, the most effective form of organisation against Mammon’s tyranny is called DEMOCRACY, but not in its current crippled, blindfolded, mute, finance-dictated, extorted form. Not in its “vote-every-4-years-and-pay-your-taxes-and-leave-the-rest-to-us-because-we-know-better” form. This form is what brought us to this fragile position in the first place. We have to look for solutions in the very foundations of true Democracy, to understand how we can build the ‘defense lines’ against, plutocracy and tyranny with it. Its original form,.. that ancient pre-Roman, Athenian form, is still the only true foundation for a democratic ‘ordering and organisation of the affairs and the concerns of a state and a human society’. It is the only known form that can really provide collective freedom, individual and social self-determination and a consistent self-defense to a whole people or a nation, thus the only one that can really be called Democracy. THAT FORM IS WHAT TODAY’S PREDATORY, FINANCIAL ELITE DREAD MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE IN THIS WORLD. They have encountered it a few times in history, and they didn’t like it at all.

It took them over a century and a lot of conspiracies, secrecy, manipulation and infiltration to really recover since the French slapped them in the face with it. And take into account that, that slap as well as the one the American revolution gave their colonizers, was just cuddles in comparison to what a true and mature Democracy really can do, to these self-proclaimed ‘kings’ and ‘emperors’ of mankind. The French and the Americans as well as most others, who has raised a spirit of freedom against tyranny, has not sufficiently implemented the original and most important principles of Democracy, the ones Thucydides warned about. They managed to leave amazingly democratic constitutions to mankind, but failed to also leave the necessary practical safety locks in order to adequately defend its constitutions and its basic democratic principles. The safety locks that among others, Solon, Thucydides and Pericles, in ancient Athens already had identified as absolutely crucial for a true Democracy to be able to protect itself from, and survive, conspiracies of plutocratic, kleptocratic and oligarchic character, in other words tyranny!

In France in the 18th century, the majority of the simple people was illiterate and therefore unaware of the existence of these ancient but still fundamental principles, so they couldn’t demand them from the revolution. This fact enticed even Robespierre himself to become a self proclaimed ‘headmaster’ of the French people and a power-drunk tyrant and his megalomania finally led to the loss of his head,.. literally. In America the revolution had the same problem, plus the fact that those who fought in the War of Independence came from many different backgrounds, culturally and ethnically, so they could be stilled and satisfied with just a few crumbs compared to what a truly informed and united people can achieve.

Today we are in a different situation altogether because today in the west, nearly nobody is illiterate (at least officially), so today we really can demand that all the fundamental principles of democracy shall be restored and protected in a way only the pre-Roman, Greek Democracy, has ever done. The Roman post-Greek form of Democracy on the other hand laid – through a rigid bureaucracy and far too many highly unnecessary and complex laws – the fundamentals for what still pass as Democracy in the world today. Rome, the vulgar, imperialist copycat of the Hellenic culture actually paved the way for plutocratic and kleptocratic conspiracies through the many ‘loop holes’ that Roman law had left open, without any regard of the fundamental Athenian principles and the original central citizens ethos that must be the basics of the Law in a Democracy.

Our worst enemy today, that keep us from uniting, is not illiteracy like in the end of the 18th century, it is the disinformation and the state sanctioned, deceptive propaganda.

To unite doesn’t at all mean that we have to agree on everything, or even that we have to like eachothers political views. It just mean that we have to identify and focus on the real and highly dangerous common threats to all of us and to our house (our individual and social freedom, our country, our natural resources and our constitutions). It means to use reason and logic before passion, to with united forces first eliminate that threat.  Because without our house being truly ours, it’s pretty pointless to argue about how to share it among ourselves, which house rules should be applied, or how we best use its resources.

If we await a simultaneous global uprising, we are not using reason and logic, but just silly and childish hope and that will just allow the Ukraine-effect and the Syria-effect to spread globally. To just hope for something in the current situation, really means that one already has given up and is just expecting help to come from somewhere else or someone else. The “help” that comes from “somewhere else” and from “someone else” is today gladly provided by the banking-families mercenary armies and their death-squads and militias, which are led by NATO. With the Ukraine-effect and the Syria-effect, I mean extremists and bloodthirsty, fanatic butchers who are unleashed by exactly these banking-families, to act as “revolutionaries defending their land”, in order to prevent the actual majority of the country’s population to unite and demand real Democracy. This is what awaits all of us unless all pull up their pants, roll up their sleeves and really unite in an adequate way against the tyrants. It is proof of great stupidity or great cowardice, or both, to expect tyrants to save mankind from tyrants. Especially when the only thing one have the balls to do as an alleged political reaction today, is to still participate in their ludicrous left-right charade. Today that is like choosing if one wants to be pushed off the cliff edge with the banking-families right hand or left hand.

“Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.”

Dr Martin Luther King Jr

So, the answer to the question in the title of this article is simply: Because, the still free people of the world, don’t unite, organise and demand it strongly enough!

Consequently, the most crucial act of resistance today is the united, determined and well-organised act that will force International Justice to react strongly against the global Hydra of Mammon’s looters, occupiers and war-lords,.. and finally hold them to account for their repeated and extremely serious crimes against humanity.


The puppeteers to prison!

The banking-families Hydra is flying high, far too high and its heads are playing gods using Icaros wings, and even now when these wings are scorched and they are constantly losing power (fewer and fewer believe in their fairy tales), they refuse to realize that the wings are only from wax and removable, and that they in fact can not actually fly without them. The Hydra has during long time learned to act as if it is beyond indictment and above the law but it forgets that the sun melts wax.


Blinded by arrogance and pride, they can’t see their fall coming more than Icaros could, and that is the ultimate proof of not only their blindness but also their simplistic minds. Mankind need to, in its social character and its common approach to life, collectively find Daedalus* (Icaros fathers) balance between ‘flying too high and too low’. Balance between greed and need so to say. The balance can not be restored on the collective level, when the disturbances has become norms, if humanity and society itself doesn’t treat its imbalances with relevance and unity. Balance comes with truth, self-observation, knowledge of microcosmos and macrocosmos and the genuine will to respect the natural principles that upholds life. The beginning of such treatment of the imbalance is to accurately and effectively deal with the worst disturbances and its causes. It means to apply strict legal sanctions and to establish independent and constitutionally protected practical, legal safeguards that protects the fundamental democratic principles and the citizens from power abuse.

Humanity must, except demanding very high prison sentences also demand the annexation of all of their fortunes, in order to compensate at least parts of the unmeasurable damages they have caused mankind, as well as the deprivation of all their public functions, social-economic influence and civil rights (exactly as was done in the Athenian dawn of Democracy). They and all their alike, their ‘servants’, their ‘lapdogs’ and ‘hangarounds’ cannot be allowed anymore to have any influence on either the public or the private influential sectors. Humanity and its societies must once and for all mark and set an example by showing that one risk losing everything, just everything, except food, water and shelter, if one pleases to expose whole societies and humanity to a substantial and fatal danger. These penalties are fully in line with the original legal and practical aspects of democracy.

We must united, incessantly and very loudly and officially ask our legal authorities: Why aren’t the top banking families ‘heads of families’, the directors, the chairmen and boards, the executives, the ministers, the agents and the commanders of their corporations, organizations, and institutions, being brought to justice? It stands very clear today, through whole ‘libraries of evidence’, who in fact are putting the whole world and mankind in a very critical position once again.

In the collective conscience of mankind they are seriously accused:

  • to have achieved their power and created their wealth through frauds, theft, the manipulation of public wealth, elected officials, whole societies and through crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide.
  • to intentionally and in a predetermined manner  have created very serious problems, waited for the carefully evoked reactions  and then presented their own desired solutions.
  • to have manipulated markets, governments, courts, nations, societies, police forces, armies and continents through covert military and paramilitary operations, propaganda, extortion, murder, threats and terror.
  • to through fraud, lies and deceit deliberately have caused economic crisis, geo-political crisis, wars, civil wars, revolutions, dictatorships and to always have financed both sides in big conflicts so that they wouldn’t end before the desired geo-strategic, political and socioeconomic goals has been achieved.

Over 100 million people died just in the 20th century in wars and armed conflicts, caused, provoked and triggered by them and their governments, corporations, organizations and institutions.

Something essential to keep in mind here is that the Law in a Democracy (the Greek form) is meant to express the common morality and ethos of the people, and not to defend the selfish desires and the crimes of a financial, political or clerical elite (the Roman form). We must therefore loudly ask: When is International Justice going to react in accordance with these, by mankind, widely supported accusations?

Of course this will not happen without a very strong pressure from the peoples. The absolute first thing the western citizens and the democratic forces need to organise around now, is the official demand to their national Supreme Courts, Constitutional Committees and the International Criminal Court, to hold the top criminals from these banking families and their organizations to account for high-treason, crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide. What credibility does otherwise people’s democratic struggles really have? If the struggling people doesn’t show also in practice, that they consider these men and women as highly dangerous to human societies and to humanity, why should Justice bother, some might argue?

Apparently, the currently very tired and rather deaf International Justice and its judges and prosecutors must be reminded today what the actual purpose with it was in the first place. It must be ‘told to’ do what it was formed to do, and to not succumb to extortion and threats or expected class obligations. If they can’t resist or avoid such submission, they shouldn’t hold their positions for a minute more, they should step down and leave their places to more courageous and irrepressible “guardians of the law”. Humanity must very strongly demand this now from International Justice by, except the massive citizens law suits, also relocate the large protests outside their headquarters and courts instead of outside parliaments (that really don’t have any particular power today).

International Justice was established primarily to protect peoples, nations and humanity from oppression and tyranny by defending the basic human and civil rights and the peoples rights to resist tyranny and to defend national and international democracy and freedom. Well, it doesn’t! If it did, we would have seen it and felt it over the last four years when mankind in fact has shown more than ever before through massive protests against injustice, dictatorial political decisions and neo-colonial economic solutions, that it want true justice. It would have responded and reacted to the very justified massive reactions and protests against neo-liberal privatizations and the demolition of human and civil rights. Actually they did in fact, but I don’t mean a respond which is first of all police violence and repressive actions and policies against the victims, but a respond with the existing legal tools against the perpetrators.

To defend mankind now means to immediately and through existing International Law and adequate practical mechanisms (their arrests and prosecutions), in a clear and firm way show these banking families and their allies that peoples, nations, cultures cannot be extorted, threatened and terrorized by a few banking families without them being severely and relevantly punished for it. Does these judges and prosecutors exist at all, in any other form than as an endangered species, I wonder, and are we just expecting courage, righteousness and decency from where only cowardice, unrighteousness and indecency exists?


Kosmas Loumakis

Karlshamn 21-08-2014



*Daedalos was a craftsman, considered the inventor of carpentry, who built the labyrinth for Minos, king of Crete. Minos imprisoned him and his son Icaros, but they escaped using wings that Daedalos made and fastened with wax. Icaros, however, flew too near the sun and was killed.

This ‘myth-historic’ (mix of mythology and history) story explain Man’s fall into the abyss of egoism and narcissism and Man’s ability to surmount these self-destructive characteristics through balance and moderation.

The Emperor’s Rage: Let Chaos Envelop the World!


Introduction: Chaos reigns and spreads as enraged leaders in the US, Europe and their clients and allies pursue genocidal wars. Mercenary wars in Syria; Israel’s terror bombing on Gaza; proxy wars in the Ukraine, Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Somalia.

Tens of millions of refugees flee scenes of total destruction. Nothing is sacred. There are no sanctuaries. homes, schools, hospitals and entire families are targeted for destruction.

Chaos by Design

At the center of chaos, the wild-eyed President Obama strikes blindly, oblivious of the consequences, willing to risk a financial debacle or a nuclear war. He enforces sanctions against Iran; imposes sanctions on Russia; sets up missile bases five launch minutes from Moscow; sends killer drones against Pakistan, Yemen and Afghanistan; arms mercenaries in Syria; trains and equips Kurds in Iraq and pays for Israel’s savagery against Gaza.

Nothing works.

The Chaos President is blind to the fact that starving one’s adversaries does not secure submission: it unites them to resist. Regime change, imposing proxies by force and subterfuge, can destroy the social fabric of complex societies: Million of peasants and workers become uprooted refugees. Popular social movements are replaced by organized criminal gangs and bandit armies.

Central America, the product of decades of US direct and proxy military interventions, which prevented the most basic structural changes, has become a chaotic, unlivable inferno for millions. Tens of thousands of children flee from their ‘free market’- induced mass poverty and militarized state and gangster violence. Children refugees at the US border are arrested in mass, and imprisoned in makeshift detention camps, subject to psychological, physical and sexual abuse by officials and guards on the inside. On the outside, these pitiful children are exposed to the racist hatred of a frightened US public unaware of the dangers these children are escaping and the US government’s role in creating these hells.

The US-backed Kiev aviation authorities re-directed international passenger airlines to fly over war zones bristling with anti-aircraft missiles while Kiev’s jets bombed the rebellious cities and towns. One flight was shot down and nearly 300 civilians perished. Immediately an explosion of accusations from Kiev blaming Russian President Putin flooded Western media with no real facts to explain the tragedy/crime. War-crazy President Obama and the slavering prime ministers of the EU ejaculated ultimatums, threatening to convert Russia into a pariah state. ‘Sanctions, sanctions, everywhere . . . but first… France must complete its $1.5 billion sale to the Russian navy.’ And the City of London exempts the Russian oligarchs from the ‘sanctions’, embedded as they are in London’s money-laundering, parasitical FIRE (Fire, Insurance and Real Estate) economy. The Cold War has returned and has taken an ugly turn… with exceptions…for business.

Confrontation among nuclear powers is imminent: And the maniacal Baltic States and Poland bray the loudest for war with Russia, oblivious to their positions on the front lines of incineration…

Each day Israel’s war machine chews up more bodies of Gaza’s children while spitting out more lies. Cheering Israeli Jews perch on their fortified hills to celebrate each missile strike on the apartments and schools in the densely populated Shejaiya neighborhood of besieged Gaza. A group of orthodox and secular entrepreneurs in Brooklyn have organized group tours to visit the Holy Sites by day and enjoy the Gaza pyrotechnics by night . . . night goggles to view the fleeing mothers and burning children are available at a small extra charge…

Again the US Senate votes unanimously in support of Israel’s latest campaign of mass murder – no crime is depraved enough to ruffle the scruples of America’s leaders. They hew close to a script from the 52 Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations. Together they embrace a Beast from the Apocalypse gnawing on the flesh and bones of Palestine.

But, Sacre Bleu! France’s Zionists have prevailed on the ‘President-Socialiste’ Hollande. Paris bans all anti-Israel demonstrations despite the clear reports of genocide. Demonstrators supporting the Gazan resistance are gassed and assaulted by special riot police – ‘Socialist’ Hollande serves the demands of powerful Zionist organizations while trashing his country’s republican traditions and its sacred ‘Rights of Man’.

The young protestors of Paris fought back with barricades and paving stones in the finest traditions of the Paris Commune waving the flags of a free Palestine. Not a single ‘red banner’ was in sight: The French ‘left’ were under their beds or off on vacation.

There are ominous signs away from the killing fields. The stock market is rising while the economy stagnates. Wild speculators have returned in their splendor widening the gap between the fictitious and real economy before the ‘deluge’, the chaos of another inevitable crash.

In industrial America’s once great Detroit, clean water is shut-off to tens of thousands of poor citizens unable to pay for basic service. In the midst of summer, urban families are left to defecate in hallways, alleyways and empty lots. Without water the toilets are clogged, children are not washed. Roscoe, the master plumber, says the job is way beyond him.

According to our famed economists, the economy of Detroit is ‘recovering . . . profits are up, it’s only the people who are suffering’. Productivity has doubled, speculators are satisfied; Pensions are slashed and wages are down; but the Detroit Tigers are in first place.

Public hospitals everywhere are being closed. In the Bronx and Brooklyn, emergency rooms are overwhelmed. Chaos! Interns work 36 hour shifts . . . and the sick and injured take their chances with a sleep-deprived medic. Meanwhile, in Manhattan, private clinics and ‘boutique’ practices for the elite proliferate.

Scandinavians have embraced the putschist power grab in Kiev. The Swedish Foreign Minister Bildt bellows for a new Cold War with Russia. The Danish emissary and NATO leader, Rasmussen, salivates obscenely at the prospect of bombing and destroying Syria in a replay of NATO’s ‘victory’ over Libya.

The German leaders endorse the ongoing Israeli genocide against Gaza; they are comfortably protected from any moral conscience by their nostalgic blanket of ‘guilt’ over Nazi crimes 70 years ago.

Saudi-funded Jihadi terrorists in Iraq showed their “infinite mercy” by… merely driving thousands of Christians from ancient Mosul. Nearly 2,000 years of a continuous Christian presence was long enough! At least most escaped with their heads still attached.

Chaos Everywhere

Over one hundred thousand agents of the US National Security Agency are paid to spy on two million Muslim citizens and residents in the USA. But for all the tens of billions of dollars spent and tens of millions of conversations recorded, Islamic charities are prosecuted and philanthropic individuals are framed in ‘sting operations’.

Where the bombs fall no one knows, but people flee. Millions are fleeing the chaos.

But there is no place to go! The French invade half a dozen African countries but the refugees are denied refuge in France. Thousands die in the desert or drown crossing the Med. Those who do make it, are branded criminals or relegated to ghettos and camps.

Chaos reigns in Africa, the Middle East, Central America and Detroit. The entire US frontier with Mexico has become a militarized detention center, a multi-national prison camp. The border is unrecognizable to our generation.

Chaos reigns in the markets. Chaos masquerades as trade sanctions: Iran yesterday, Russia today and China tomorrow. Washington, Watch out! Your adversaries are finding common ground, trading, forging agreements, building defenses; their ties are growing stronger.

Chaos reigns in Israel. War-obsessed Israelis discover that the Chosen People of God can also bleed and die, lose limbs and eyes in the alleyways of Gaza where poorly armed boys and men stand their ground. When the cheers turn to jeers, will they re-elect Bibi, their current kosher butcher? The overseas brethren, the fundraisers, the lobbyists and the armchair verbal assassins will automatically embrace some new face, without questions, regrets or (god forbid!) self-criticism –if it’s ‘good for Israel and the Jews’ it’s got to be right!

Chaos reigns in New York. Judicial rulings favor the pirates and their vulture funds demanding one-thousand percent returns on old Argentine bonds. If Argentina rejects this financial blackmail and defaults, shock waves will ripple throughout global financial markets. Creditors will tremble in uncertainty: Fears will grow over a new financial crash. Will they squeeze out another trillion-dollar bailout?

But where’s the money? Printing presses are working day and night. There are only a few life boats . . . enough for the bankers and Wall Street, the other ninety-nine percent will have to swim or feed the sharks.

The corrupted financial press now advises warlords on which country to bomb and politicians on how to impose economic sanctions; they no longer provide sound economic information or advise investors on markets. Their editorial rants will incite an investor flight to buy king-sized mattresses for stuffing as the banks fail.

The US President is on the verge of a mental breakdown: He’s a liar of Munchausen proportions with a bad case of political paranoia, war hysteria and megalomania. He’s gone amok, braying, ‘I lead the world: its US leadership or chaos’. Increasingly the world has another message: ‘It’s the US and chaos.’

Wall Street is abandoning him. The Russians have double-crossed him. The Chinese merchants are now doing business everywhere we used to be and we ought to be. They’re playing with loaded dice. The stubborn Somalis refuse to submit to a Black President: they reject this ‘ML King with drones’ . . . The Germans suck on their thumbs in total stupor as Americans monitor and record their every conversation…for their own safety! “Our corporations are ingrates after all we have done for them”, the First Black President whines. “They flee from our taxes while we subsidize their operations!”

Final Solutions: The End of Chaos

The only solution is to move on: Chaos breeds chaos. The President strives to project his ‘Leadership’. He asks his close advisers very hard questions: “Why can’t we bomb Russia, just like Israel bombs Gaza? Why don’t we build an ‘Iron Dome’ over Europe and shoot down Russian nuclear missiles while we fire upon Moscow from our new bases in Ukraine? Which countries will our ‘Dome’ protect? I am sure that the people of East Europe and the Baltic States will gladly make the supreme sacrifice. After all, their leaders were at the very front frothing for a war with Russia. Their reward, a nuclear wasteland, will be a small price to ensure our success!”

The Zionist lobby will insist our ‘Iron Dome’ covers Israel. But the Saudis may try to bribe the Russians to spare the oil fields as Moscow targets the US missile bases near Mecca. Our radio-active allies in the Middle East will just have to relocate to a new Holy Land.

Do Obama and his advisers imagine reducing the Asian population by a billion or two? Do they plan several hundred Hiroshimas because the Chinese crossed the President’s ‘red lines’: China’s economy and trade grew too fast, expanded too far, it was too competitive, too competent, too successful at gaining market shares, and they ignored our warnings and our unparalleled military might.

Most of Asia will inhale nuclear dust, millions of Indians and Indonesians will perish as collateral damage. Their survivors will feast on ‘radiated fish’ in a glowing sea.

Beyond Chaos: The New American Way:

Because our ‘Iron Dome’ will have failed us, we will have to re-emerge out of toxic ashes and crawl from our bunkers, dreaming of a New America free from wars and poverty. The Reign of Chaos will have ended. The ‘peace and order’ of the graveyard will reign supreme.

The emperors will be forgotten.

And we never will have found out who fired that missile at the doomed Malaysian airliner with its 300 passengers and crew. We will have lost count of the thousands of Palestinian parents and children slaughtered in Gaza by the Chosen People of Israel. We will not know how the sanctions against Russia panned out.

It won’t matter in the post-nuclear age, after the Chaos…




the_politics_of_empire_031014_02-235x364Can’t understand how the US Senate can unanimously pass a resolution supporting the murderous Israeli assault on Gaza? Get some clarity. Award-winning Author and Professor Emeritus James Petras gets between 5-7,000 hits on his website every day.

To order the book go to James Petras site


About James Petras

He is the author of more than 62 books published in 29 languages, and over 600 articles in professional journals, including the American Sociological Review, British Journal of Sociology, Social Research, and Journal of Peasant Studies. He has published over 2000 articles in nonprofessional journals such as The New York Times, the Guardian, the Nation, Christian Science Monitor, Foreign Policy, New Left Review, Partisan Review, Temps Moderne, Le Monde Diplomatique, and his commentary is widely carried on the internet.

His publishers have included Random House, John Wiley, Westview, Routledge, Macmillan, Verso, Zed Books and Pluto Books. He is winner of the Career of Distinguished service award from the American Sociological Association’s Marxist Sociology Section, the Robert Kenny Award for Best Book, 2002, and the Best Dissertation, Western Political Science Association in 1968. His most recent titles include Unmasking Globalization: Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century (2001); co-author The Dynamics of Social Change in Latin America (2000), System in Crisis (2003), co-author Social Movements and State Power (2003), co-author Empire With Imperialism (2005), co-author)Multinationals on Trial (2006).

He has a long history of commitment to social justice working in particular with the Brazilian Landless Workers Movement for 11 years. In 1973-76 he was a member of the Bertrand Russell Tribunal on Repression in Latin America. He writes a monthly column for the Mexican newspaper, La Jornada, and previously, for the Spanish daily, El Mundo. He received his B.A. from Boston University and Ph.D. from The University of california at Berkeley.


NATO’s Nazi version of Freedom is Organized Evil against Humanity

Today, only the historically ill-informed, the deeply indoctrinated or the mentally ill, can see the Nazis and their alike as opponents to the globalists, the financial elite, the West’s ‘royal’ families, the ‘aristocrats’ and their ‘courts’ and ‘servants’. Nazism is the expression of ideas that was formed to protect exactly these people from Democracy or a new Bastille! Its logic, methods and tactics are therefore adopted by NATO, IDF, EU and U.S with offspring’s as Al-Qaeda and their latest ‘freak’, Kiev’s NATO assembled Gladio-army. The one who was put in place to prepare NATO’s invasion of Ukraine.

This article deals with the rise of Nazism, its character, its prerequisites, its alike and its heritage and contains the following 5 paragraphs:

  • Background
  • Why do the Nazis stand out as the worst War Criminals in the History of Mankind?
  • Evil is ‘Empathy Erosion’ and the Nazis made it a social norm
  • The devastating misconception of the concept of ‘Freedom’ in the West
  • Nazism and NATO





The EU and U.S supported Kiev-regime, with its hooligan mobs and its NATO assembled, ‘Gladio’ army; have with the Odessa massacre in May 2, 2014 and the ongoing massacres in East Ukraine begun a new era of ethnic cleansings in Europe. The Odessa massacre was a carefully staged covert intelligence operation with the aim to signal the beginning of Nazi terror on the European continent.

There was nothing ‘spontaneous’ or ‘accidental’, as the media suggested, in this diabolical undertaking which included the mass murder of 120+ humans inside the House of Trade Unions in Odessa. The building was quite deliberately set on fire as part of a carefully planned paramilitary operation, executed by American psychopaths of CIA’s special ops.

Israel’s and USA’s armies and their Intelligence services are the direct heirs of the Nazis and their dehumanizing-policies. The recently re-styled Nazi-regime in Ukraine is just a natural result of a 7 decades long CIA and MI6 sponsored Neo-nazism and so are the CIA and Mossad promoted Jihadists in the Arab world.


Today the EU- and U.S-media persistently tries to downplay and diminish the Nazi’s war crimes in WWII and their outstandingly misanthropic (human-hating from Greek μίσος [hate], άνθρωπος [human]) disposition and thereby give another image to Nazism. To slay, pole, rape and burn unarmed women, children and infants was and is, by the Nazis themselves declared to be a part of their ‘warfare tactics’. The exceptionally cruel character of the massacre in Odessa, May 2, 2014, and the ongoing massacres in Lugansk, has the same characteristics as the thousands of the German WWII massacres, performed by the Einsatzgruppen and the Waffen SS. Despite this clear similarities in both cruelty and tactics, the massacre in Odessa was reported and ‘explained’ by the western media, with a ‘logic’ that tried to wave off the staged crime as an unfortunate accident.

The two main prototypes for the war provoking and terrorizing the civilians to obedience tactics, that the Kiev-regime, NATO, IDF and EU are frequently using are two of the major Nazi-policies in WWII: 

  • “Covert Military or Paramilitary Operations Policy(false-flag ops) like the Gleiwitz incident, which ‘gave the excuse’ for the invasion of Poland.  Or a more relevant example as the Stay-Behind operations under the name “Operation Gladio”. They were formed in the end of WWII by the U.S-saved, and CIA supported Nazis and Fascists that the allies helped to reorganize. They have been active in Europe up to current days with Libya, Syria and Ukraine as its latest provoked NATO-engineered civil wars.
  • “Collective Punishment Policy(against unarmed civilians), like in Greece, Belarus, France, Lithuania, Poland, Russia and Ukraine during WWII. Or more recent examples as the Odessa Massacre and the continuous Syria and Gaza massacres.

The Nuremberg trials clearly declared these policies to be criminal. Both these policies are considered as War Crimes according to the Fourth Geneva Convention (GCIV) part III, Article 33 and as  terrorism according to The Geneva Declaration on Terrorism Article I, paragraph 1 and 7. U.S, NATO and the IDF has fully adopted these policies and are since 1946 frequently using them as ordinary ‘warfare methods’ (IDF didn’t exist until 1948, but Haganah did).

It is out of highest importance today that we can understand what exactly Humanity stand against and what separates the Nazis and their alike, from all other mass-murderers in history. Their alike today is of course USA, Israel and the German led EU with NATO and the new EUROGENDFOR (European Gendarmerie Force) as today’s Wehrmacht and Gestapo.

Why does the Nazis stand out as the worst War Criminals in the History of Mankind?

The Nazis stand out from all the rest of humanity’s war criminals in a league of their own, because of their well-documented, unsurpassed cruelty and bloodthirst and their sadistic, misanthropic disposition, especially when dealing with unarmed civilian women, elders, children and infants. What is it that makes them stand out, compared to all other war criminals in the human history? The answer is quite simple really? It is the fact that they managed to turn the organized dehumanization of humans into a suitable ideology/cult, and they managed to make ‘empathy erosion’, the scientific term for evil (explained further down), a highly valued ‘quality’ and a widespread norm in the social character of the German society.  Intentionally, very well planned and well-organized, they nurtured misanthropic sentiments in the German society.

Due to this socio-psychological engineering, the Nazis could construct an unprecedented industrial form of genocide. They organized proper slaughter houses after the Assembly Line Principle, for the mass extermination of human beings. Human Experimentation and Industrial Extermination of humans, as “solutions” to cultural, political, geopolitical and socio-economic problems, were and still are compatible with the Nazi-version of a Human Civilization. No other war criminals, ‘slayers’ or tyrants in the human history, before the Nazis, went that far in their ‘refinement’ of their misanthropic feelings and urges. No one before them, did industrially recycle and use the skin, the fat and different body parts and body tissue from the mass murdered. 

Besides the Human Experimentation’s and the Industrial Extermination of over 15 million human beings, in the 23 main German extermination camps and over 1 200 sub-camps, they were particularly savage in their ‘warfare methods‘ against unarmed civilians. The Einsatzgruppen and the Waffen-SS performed thousands of massacres on unarmed civilians, particularly in Belarus, Greece, France, Lithuania, Poland, Russia and Ukraine.

One example of this fact is from Greece and is very graphically explained by the late Sture Linnér, the Swedish head of the International Red Cross in Greece, when he described the grim reality he saw when he arrived in the little town of Distomo:

Vultures were rising slowly and hesitantly at a low height from the sides of the road when they heard us coming. On hundreds of yards along the road, human bodies were hanging from every tree, pierced with bayonets – some were still alive.

They were the villagers, who were punished this way – they were suspected of providing help to the guerillas of the region, who had ambushed an SS unit.

The odor was unbearable.

In the village the last remnants of the houses were still burning. Hundreds of dead bodies of people of all ages, from elderly to newborns, were strewn around on the dirt. Several women were slaughtered with bayonets, their wombs torn apart and their breasts severed; others were lying strangled with their own intestines wrapped around their necks.


1779 villages were burnt to rubble in Greece and over 430 massacres of unarmed civilians took place from June 1941 to August 1944. Greece lost as many people in WWII as USA and England together… 13% of its population.

Perhaps one of the most moving aspects of this fact comes again from Sture Linnér, who returned to Distomo at the end of the war, two months after the massacre:

When the German occupation forces were forced to leave Greece, things did not go as planned for them. A German unit was surrounded by guerillas exactly in the same area, at Distomo. I thought that this might be taken by the Greeks as an opportunity for a bloody revenge, especially when considering that for quite a while the region had been cut off from any food supplies. I loaded a few lorries with food and necessities, I wired to Distomo a word about our planned arrival, and we found ourselves on the same road, once again, Cleo and I.

When we reached the outskirts of the village, we were met by a committee led by the elderly priest. He was an old fashioned patriarch, with a long, wavy, white beard. Next to him stood the guerilla captain, fully armed. The priest spoke first and thanked us on behalf of the survivors for the food supplies. Then he added: “We are all starving here, both us and the German prisoners. Now, even though we are famished, we are at least in our land. The Germans have not just lost the war; they are also far from their country. Give them the food you have with you, they have a long way ahead.”

At this phrase Cleo turned her eyes to me. I suspected what she wanted to tell me with that look, but I could not see clearly any more. I was just standing there weeping….

“HUMANITY. It’s something the Nazis didn’t have and something the Hellenic people had — and still have — in abundance”.

Sture Linnér

The many thousands of similar examples from Greece, Belarus, France, Lithuania, Poland, Russia and Ukraine, together with their Human Experiments and their Industrial Exterminations, are telling us one certain thing about the Nazis: They managed to organize, make into routine and express the ultimate evil in their ‘policies’, their ‘warfare methods’ and in their behavior against human beings in general. They developed methods, tactics, ‘logic’s’ and behavior that unfortunately many others have adopted since then.

Apart from the advanced Industrial Exterminations, NATO, U.S,  IDF and the German governed EU are permanently using the same ‘routines’ in their behavior against any humans they chose to see as degenerated or even as non-human. Human Experiment’s have been performed in recent years in the Guantanamo Bay medical facilities, in Abu Ghraib prison, and in several University Hospitals or prisons in USA, on the US army’s requests, since 1947.

Evil is ‘Empathy Erosion’ and the Nazis made it a social norm

Dr. Simon Baron-Cohen of Cambridge University describes ‘Empathy Erosion’ as:

“…when people dehumanize other humans, when they turn other people into objects, and can therefore become capable of malevolence and extreme human cruelty”.

The Nazis very much relied on their skillfully tailored ideological, political, scientific and historical propaganda myths, their ritualistic mass-meetings, their SS-brotherhoods elitist, racist indoctrination, their paramilitary political violence and terror, and their youth organizations. They developed a ‘system of education and nurturing‘ for the progress of the suitable norms, beliefs and preconditions, so that the organized ‘dehumanization of humans’ could develop on a mass scale in the German society. The leaders of the Nazi organization’s the Hitlerjugend (60% of all boys) and the Bund Deutscher Mädel (50% of all girls) imposed ‘empathy eroding‘ fostering methods and inside their framework, one of the purposes was to indoctrinate the youth with ‘race’-biological vulgar-science, twisted moralities and with nonsense-historical fairy-tales and myths, presented as historical facts. They did this to point out different ethnic and cultural groups or ‘races’ as non-human, and the progressive thinkers and the dissidents as ‘mentally ill’ or as ‘degenerates’ and therefore less human.

Civilians from the town of Ohrdruf were taken to view the bodies from the extermination camp and the visible, ‘human’ reactions were very few

U.S. Army soldiers show, the German civilians of Weimar, corpses found in Buchenwald concentration camp. One woman in the lower right section of the photo is the only one who seem to react in a normal, human way to the sight.

The Nuremberg trials condemned the indifference and the passivity of the German people living close to the 23 extermination camps, when the mass exterminations of humans took place on a daily basis for well over four years. It was evident that the over 20 years of dehumanization-propaganda and the Nazi-party’s tailored ‘empathy eroding’, education and training methods, in fact had made a majority of the Germans inhumanely tolerant and permissive of such atrocities. They had been fed with all the, according to the ‘logic’ of Nazism, “acceptable reasons” for such crimes against humanity.

Even if the methods differ a bit, they weren’t particularly different in essence, from the ‘dehumanization propaganda’ we are all force-fed with today, by the U.S and the EU governments and their media. This is done so that we shall accept the NATO led massacres and pogroms against unarmed civilians in Palestine, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Ukraine and any other place that U.S, EU and NATO decides to “liberate”. This propaganda is aiming for a clear social-psychological result – the same ‘empathy eroding’ social character as in Nazi-Germany. A historically very bizarre, but unfortunately very obvious, example of a society that has been put under a strict ‘empathy eroding’, social-psychological engineering policy, is the Israeli society.

On Israels war crimes Chris Hedges wrote in Nov, 2013 in IOA (Israeli Occupation Archive):

“Israel has been poisoned by the psychosis of permanent war. It has been morally bankrupted by the sanctification of victimhood, which it uses to justify an occupation that rivals the brutality and racism of apartheid South Africa. Its democracy — which was always exclusively for Jews — has been hijacked by extremists who are pushing the country toward fascism. Many of Israel’s most enlightened and educated citizens — 1 million of them — have left the country. Its most courageous human rights campaigners, intellectuals and journalists — Israeli and Palestinian — are subject to constant state surveillance, arbitrary arrests and government-run smear campaigns. Its educational system, starting in primary school, has become an indoctrination machine for the military.”

Read the whole article here

Now when the NATO led Nazi-massacres has begun also in Europe and the truth behind them are still, to a very high degree, met with indifference and apathy from the western societies, we should at least hold one thing in mind: One day, on the order of a decent and righteous ‘International Criminal Court’ that understands its role, the alleged “civilized” westerners (including the Israelis), might also be forced to walk through hills of hundreds of dead bodies, that the U.S-EU-NATO-IDF proxy wars has left behind. Maybe, we will be collectively judged for the collectively shown indifference and the collectively shown apathy, when our leaders over several decades were feeding us with lies, racist-propaganda, false flag operations, proxy wars, irrational, alleged ‘self-defense’ actions and other ‘acceptable reasons’ for the mass killings of innocent, human beings. We will most likely be condemned for our obvious racist disposition, which is clearly shown in the openly revealed differences in how we value Arab, Asian or African lives and American, European or Israeli lives.

That’s where the ‘ultimate evil‘ begins in our time. It begins with such generalizing, misanthropic sentiments. It begins with these artificially revived remnants of the ‘empathy-eroding’ Nazi-heritage and its ideological, spiritual and cultural foundations. It is this heritage that very strongly has contributed to the “barbarization” rather than the “civilization” of the West. Nowadays this Nazi-heritage of the western societies, has become very obvious through Kiev’s Nazi-regime, its NATO assembled Gladio-army and NATO’s and IDF’s crimes against the Palestinians and the Arabs. Many (including myself) argues that this heritage has been reawakened, most of all through the U.S’s and EU’s neo-liberal, socio-economic IMF/World Bank/WTO-policies with their clear society exhausting and genocidal intentions. Their criminal policies are predestined to increase and hasten the wished destabilization of the European societies and the dismantling of Democracy and Justice. It is a necessity for the neo-liberal “projects” to actually work. And it is a well-tried ‘recipe’ from Latin-America and Southeast-Asia, for Nazi and Fascist ‘dehumanization’ sentiments to rise and spread. This is the ‘ultimate evil’ unfolding again in Europe.

On TutuFoundationUSA.org the following comment was made on ‘erosion of empathy':

“Rather than dismissing the acts of evil as mere acts of insanity, it can be highly valuable to investigate what causes people to act so destructively. Dr Baron-Cohen, the author of the book The Science of Evil look at empathy in general and what a deficit of empathy in people can lead to.

He argues that empathy is distributed throughout the population as a bell curve. Some have a tremendous amount of empathy while others, those often labeled as psychopaths or with other psychiatric diagnoses, reside on the low end of the bell curve. Dr Baron-Cohen explains that the roots of empathy are derived from both nature and nurture. Those with little or no empathy may have different brain structure and functionality, or may have suffered environmental factors such as childhood neglect or abuse.”

Behavioral Cognitive Psychology shows that the absolute majority of individuals with ‘little or no empathy’ have suffered environmental factors as childhood neglect or abuse. It must be noted here that in behavioral research, social phenomenons as poverty and famine during childhood, are considered as environmental factors of childhood neglect and abuse. Sociological and criminological research shows that the type of  ‘empathy erosion’, which gives birth to organized subcultures of cruelty and evil, almost exclusively originates from childhood and adolescence neglect and abuse and long lasting poverty and social misery. Still, a few more ‘ingredients’ are needed in order to actually guarantee the appearance of structured, evil subcultures.

The development of structured, evil subcultures only emerges through the conscious organization of the ‘guidance’ and the ‘leadership’ of these groups. In a human society, this is best accomplished through intentional and continuous propaganda, infiltration, fear and repeated indoctrination. These facts are something that the Nazis understood very well. They had very good social-psychological insights, through the rich German literature on psychology and psychoanalysis, but in particular through a French social psychologist, sociologist and anthropologist, Gustave Le Bon’s and his book, The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. It became a highly useful group-psychological guide when they customized their fostering methods, for the creation of the desired ‘erosion of empathy’ on mass scale. It is inevitable nowadays that these ‘evil subcultures’ primarily emerge in the western societies, since quite a few of the Nazis social engineering projects and methods are still implemented in these societies.

In our days unfortunately the ‘erosion of empathy’ is well inbuilt in almost all the aspects of a typical, western life.

The devastating misconception of the concept of Freedom in the West

The western societies has due to massive ‘empathy erosion’ and and a long lasting Social-Darwinist indoctrination developed a highly immature and very perverted perception of the concept of freedom. Not in words of course, but in behavior and actions. It is usually expressed as a very adolescent, self centered, one-sided, prejudiced and racist kind of freedom, due to a very high degree of ongoing and increasing dehumanization-policies in these societies. That’s from where the worst racist ideologies in the history of mankind has sprung forward, and that’s where the criminal logic of ethnic cleansing, genocide, plundering and colonizing on a global scale, are so blatantly excused.

Why we see most people in the west today more or less, even if maybe not supporting it, at least ‘accepting’ the rise of Nazism, is because:

  1. They are indifferent, arrogant and ignorant and fully preoccupied with satisfying their egoism and their narcissism.
  2. They are just receptive to ‘tailored truths’ that will satisfy their presumptions, theories and prejudices.
  3. They are historically misinformed and relies only on the culturally and socially served, popular, ‘empathy eroding’ tales.
  4. They don’t understand that the only truly effective antifascist-action is to establish real democracy and true justice.
  5. They don’t really believe in democracy and justice because they have accepted very selfish concepts of freedom in their lives for too long.
  6. It doesn’t touch them where it should, because their emotional lives are infected with mental and emotional ‘toxic waste’.

A mature and civilized understanding of freedom, in a truly developed and civilized human society, is NOT mainly expressed through how many natural moral principles one can break. Free to break every moral and ethical limits without any conscience or any responsibility for ones actions, is the most common version of practiced freedom in the western societies today. That alone is a crystal clear evidence of that these societies in fact are socially immature and spiritually backward. Because of these blatantly unacknowledged, collective, social diseases, such societies become extremely accepting towards cruel tyrannies, communal violence and wars. Needless to say, these societies are not particularly sustainable, and almost certain is that they are doomed to perish relatively quickly. It is ignorance, selfishness and indeed a very poor level of critical thinking, that are keeping most citizens in these societies from the necessary commitment, to unified build the adequate political and judicial ‘safety gates’ against tyranny. The real danger lies in the fact that its citizens are still convinced that ‘this kind of society is the best human society there is, even if it’s not perfect‘. What these citizens are incapable to understand, because of their social blinkers and their refusal of any adequate self-criticism, is that what ‘is not perfect‘, actually is exactly the intentionally imposed ‘empathy eroding’ policy, that allows misanthropy to become a highly accepted social norm. This fact put these societies very, very far away from the assessment “perfect” and instead one could argue that they are actually quite defect, at least from a utilitarian, human perspective.

This has happened because in almost every practiced aspect of a typical western life today, EGOISM is highly valued, cherished and developed and ALTRUISM is ignored, ridiculed and crippled. Therefore the western perverted, but nevertheless widely practiced form of freedom, is quite obviously a result of the following doctrine: “Do as you like – seek only constant physical and material satisfaction – have no regrets for whatever damage, affliction, misery or misfortune you might have caused others”. A very destructive doctrine which when it forms the general social character in a society, it causes fraudulent relations, distrust, conflicts, violence, revolts, wars and suffering, and it gives birth to organized ‘subcultures of evil’. What actually happens, when everything of the human side of humans is ignored and ridiculed and therefore numbed, calloused and dried out, is that ‘the empty shell’ of the human turns to Mammon for ‘salvation’ (as the despairing Jews did in Sinai). That is why personal profit and personal wealth is the outermost aim in a western or ‘westernized’ life, and that is why loneliness, hopelessness, depressions, emotional collapses, insanity, suicides and homicides, are far more common in the West (or westernized societies) than anywhere else.

“Start a company – take big loans – make sure that you can afford a few corporate lawyers and your own bodyguards and hit-men, and begin to abuse and misuse the world and the humans, for personal profit and satisfaction”!  This is the actual underlying message of the western, practiced, concept of freedom, based on the “do as you like doctrine”.

The West’s justice departments and legal authorities clear unwillingness, of bringing the obvious top criminals from the top layers of the society to justice, is what – with an indisputable clarity – reveals that the above mentioned doctrine, really is the underlying message of this kind of crime worshiping, western form of freedom.

The common understanding of the concept of freedom in the western societies is in other words not at all based on any particularly wider social insight, or any deeper understanding of what a human society, or a human being, really is. Actually, contrary to that, it is based on clearly immature pseudo-scientific conceptions, very backward minds and ugly emotional lives. Sadly enough, this has evolved in the western societies despite the availability of a very rich classical heritage, which clarifies and explains both very well. It is a heritage that also offers the adequate intellectual, spiritual and practical tools to humanity and the human societies, in order to evolve in accordance with the true nature of Man, and thus leave barbarism and misanthropic sentiments behind. That heritage is highly esteemed and revered in the West, only in words, but unfortunately extremely rarely in individual and social behavior and almost never in the practical expression of education, the law or in the governmental work. It is claimed to form the fundaments of western thinking, yet neither in words or in actions, the West seems to be capable of really understanding the almost 3 000 year old path to truly free, critically thinking humans, personally and socially civilized behavior and thus a real human civilization. One very deep reason behind this is the existence of a very ancient schism between two completely opposite idea-worlds as the basis for Western thinking. A very schizophrenic schism is hidden behind western thinking, which even though many academics actually have alarmed about it, it is never seriously considered, by the mainstream thinkers and scholars. At least not in its right proportions. One of these idea-worlds is the real cradle of western civilization and offers the liberation of the human being, and the other is the burial of this ‘cradle’ and offers the enslavement of the human being. One of them makes Tyrannies as Nazism and Fascism impossible and the other gives birth to them and nourishes them.

“…It is really this ancient schism between two contradicting idea-worlds and spiritual traditions,… this “schizophrenia” between Hellenism and Rothschild-Zionism, that the ruling classes have tried to crowd into ONE in the ‘modern Western civilization’. This paradox and this fundamental clash of ideas, is what really reflects the whole Western society in all its institutions, its culture its societies, its social character and its basic views on humans and Humanity.” - from the article: Hellenism is in danger, humanity is in danger

The Nazis and their alike represented and are still representing, in a very clear way, the morbid discrepancy between what they claim to be and what they actually are. A constantly repeated example of this fact, during the years of the German occupation in Greece, was the following behavior from the Germans: In Athens, the Nazis often went up to the Acropolis to admire the great works of the Greeks, but when walking down from there, in Plaka, underneath the Acropolis, the same officer who had just admired Parthenon could catch a little famished Greek kid, who had reached for a pretzel, and break his little arm over his knee. From the obvious delusion of being a cultivated human being, to one’s true beast-like character in just a few minutes. At such moments these feign civilized Germans, showed in a very clear way that they only understood to admire dead marble, but not what had inspired the art that was carved out from it. They certainly could not understand and much less admire the moral and ethical concepts, the richness of the minds and the humanity of those that brought Greek culture to the point where they created these, unsurpassed expressions of beauty. These inspired conscious expressions, of the FREE, enlightened and conscious human soul, and the true nobility of the human spirit.

The immensely corrupt form of freedom in the west, apparently chooses to value itself through how many of the lower human urges and desires, (characteristics that makes us more beast-like), its citizens can fulfill and satisfy, and not through how many of the higher human urges and desires, (characteristics that makes us more human-like) they can fulfill and satisfy.

U.S and EU are the “delivery boys” of this kind of pseudo-civilized social character and these soul-corrupting sub-cultures, and they make sure to ‘breastfeed’ them both, because it benefits their bankers and businessmen’s aims, but not only. Also NATO, the criminal, dehumanizing war machine, whose movements are controlled by the western banking family-dynasties, benefit tremendously by maintaining a society which produces lots of young people in despair, anxiety, anger and rage. A youth that will be deeply enraged and misled and therefore inclined to choose to kill and die for, what they don’t understand is just shameful, racist, high-tech, looting hordes called “armies”. Armies that in fact works under a handful of company logos and a few banking family-dynasties.

Nazism and NATO

Nazism is in reality not an ideology rooted in any particularly deeper moral philosophical reflections. Or rather, it is based on an emotionally disturbed teenager’s interpretations of a psychotics moral reflections (Nietzsche), a suicidal pessimists agony (Schopenhauer) and a megalomaniacs admiration of  ‘Lucifer’ disguised as an Aryan Christ (Wagner). Nazisms misanthropic “solutions” to political and socio-economic problems, therefore involve mass extermination of other ethnic, religious, social or political populations and experimentation on humans. Since such “solutions” poses an immediate threat to all of Humanity, they are incompatible with a Human civilization. Instead of a truly human civilization, Nazism aim for an anti-human barbarism dressed as an ideology, and it is very well suited to function as the ‘bodyguard’ and the ‘hit man’ of the globalists, the financial elite, the West’s royal families and the ‘aristocracy’ and their ‘courts’ and ‘servants’. Nazism was in fact formed in order to protect exactly these people, from real Democracy or a new Bastille

President Woodrow Wilson signing the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. Source: Woodrow Wilson Birthplace Foundation, painting by Wilbur G. Kurtz Sr.

Woodrow Wilson signing the Federal Reserve Act in 1913

Senator Nelson W. Aldrich a very good friend of J.P. Morgan called the following bankers and businessmen to the meeting on Jekyll Island in November 22, 1910.

  • Paul Warburg – (German representing Baron Alfred Rothschild’s Kuhn, Loeb & Co)
  • Henry P Davidson (Senior partner of J.P Morgan Company)
  • Charles D Norton (President of the Morgan First National Bank Of New York)
  • Abram Piatt Andrews (Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Dept)
  • Frank Vanderlip (President of the National City Bank Of New York)
  • Benjamin Strong (Representing J.P Morgan)

They arrived at the Jekyll Island Club to discuss monetary policy and the banking system, and this led to the creation of the current, privately owned Federal Reserve. Those who attended the meeting were sworn to secrecy and addressed each other only by code names. The use of last names was prohibited and the group therefore later referred to themselves as “The First Name Club”. 


With the birth of the FED, in 1913, in fact these bankers started a 100 year long “Financial Pyramid Game”. Nathan Mayer Rothschild (left) and J.D. Rockefeller (right) was the real ‘powerful’ two, behind the meeting on Jekyll Island even though none of them were there. These two family dynasties were the ones who would concentrate almost all the wealth of the world to themselves within the next 100 years.

A bankers son by the name of Heinrich Heine once said “Money is the god of our time, and Rothschild is his prophet”

Nazism was formed to keep these ‘banker-prophets’, their ‘projects’ and their allies safe from a new Bastille, and to keep the populations that wanted true democracy, terrorized, horrified and divided, fighting eachother, while these bankers gradually centralized power and wealth to themselves. Nazism has served these bankers well through two world wars, several revolutions, dictatorships, imperial wars and depressions. Why wouldn’t it serve them now under NATO’s command, during the ‘harvest times’ of the centuries, and their attack on ‘naughty’ Russia?

Nazism is a manufactured pseudo-ideology which was developed in a few conference rooms in Basel, Zurich, Vienna and Munich, in the late 1800’s, and it was put together by a few nationalist fanatics from Kaisers army, who probably believed in its alleged, anti-capitalist garb. As a political idea the fundamentals of what almost half a century later became Nazism, first emerged in England and USA in the 1870’s. It is based on racial hierarchy and social Darwinism, which means that it seek to apply biological concepts of natural selection and survival of the fittest to sociology and politics.

The fanatics from Kaisers army didn’t realize the fact that a handful of the promoter’s and financier’s, behind Theodore Herzl’s Zionist movement, also had their plans for the anti-capitalistic, national-socialistic currents and sentiments. History have with accuracy proved that Nazism in practice, is anything but anti-capitalistic. Regardless of what Hitler and his mentors knew or didn’t know about the shadowy activities in Basel, Vienna, Zurich and Munich, Nazism was born through capitalists, supported by capitalists and it was and is favored and used by capitalists. These capitalists have used and interlinked nationalistic, pan-German sentiments, with the Rothschild-Zionist aims from the end of the 19th century. These cooperating, informal associations originate from the less known activities of some members of the Burschenschaft, the German nationalist student association, the Mayor of Vienna, Karl Leuger, the founder of the Austrian, Christian Social Party, Colonel Albert Edward Williamson Goldsmid and Frederick I, Grand Duke of Baden.

Ιn the absolute philosophic and spiritual core of Nazism was, as mentioned before, of course Hitler’s own twisted interpretations of Nietzsche’s already twisted theories on morality. Nietzsche, the tragic philosopher, attempts in his book “The Origins of Morality”, to turn all values inside out in order to “prove” that what was called good is actually evil and what was called evil is actually good. The adolescent, existentially very confused, Hitler at the age of 15, interpreted*1 the writings of Nietzsche. He was enchanted by the pessimist Schopenhauer who said that “good and evil doesn’t exist” (this provides good moral excuses for barbarism), and he was greatly inspired by Richard Wagner, who adored ‘Lucifer’, cunningly disguised to an Aryan Christ (the real moral image of the Catholic church).

These three historic figures expressed all the philosophical and spiritual grounds upon which a young Hitler based Nazism, with the help of three of Kaisers generals.

*From a biological-neurological perspective,philosophical and spiritual texts can’t be adequately understood or interpreted by neurologically and emotionally still developing minds, as for instance a 15-year old. Particularly not by emotionally, severely traumatized, still developing minds. The neurological system of a Human being is not fully developed until the age of 19 – 22.

So this surrogate ideologywhich is mentally based on fear, indoctrination, megalomania, superstitions and occultism, was developed with the help of three fanatic generals and occultists from Kaisers army. Karl Haushoffer, Helmuth von Moltke and Konrad von Hotzendorf headhunted and emotionally and spiritually, they ‘prepared and initiated’ Adolf Hitler as the Messianic figure of Nazism, a few years after WWI. They developed Nazisms myths, rites and customs, by using old Germanic legends, the Thule-society’s occult teachings and rituals together with anti-Jewish socio-economic, geopolitical and racial ideas and they molded this into a suitable militarized blood-cult, a hate ideology.

The anti-Jewish sentiments suited the Rothschild-Zionists*2 aims perfect, since this would accelerate their aims, when many of the leaders in Europe were skeptic to the Zionist “project” for a Jewish state. The generals at the time didn’t know that a handful of the conspirators from Basel, Zurich, Vienna and Munich was capitalists and Zionists who wanted an ‘ideological tool’, an anti-Jewish, militant movement that through its actions would bring about the acceptance of a Jewish state. In the 30’s Nazism became a perfect ‘tool’ in order to crush any real democratic, real freedom longing sentiments, with extreme violence, terror and massacres on a mass scale, and that’s what it has become today again. No other -isms are in fact helping the capitalists to centralize power and wealth and defend themselves against democracy or a new Bastille as good, as Nazism and the current Neo-liberalism do.

NATO (our days ‘Wehrmacht’), openly today show that there is truly no place for empathy, humanity and human dignity in the western world anymore. Justice, Righteousness and the Free Word have been sacrificed and replaced with ‘Obedience or Extermination’. This is in accordance with the criminal “Collective Punishment Policy” and the “Covert Military or Paramilitary Operations Policy“, which has become the foundations for their new doctrine – actually not at all essentially different from the logic’s of the Catholic Church’s ‘Holy Inquisition doctrine’ during the dark Middle Ages. The European ‘kingdoms’, ‘empires’ and societies, who together used to aspire for the title ‘Western Civilization’ since the Renaissance, can now only be called an ‘Empire of Misanthropy & Death’.

The Renaissance which was the cultural and intellectual expression of the longing and the rebirth of the ancient Greek heritage, was the way out of the dark Middle Ages. The, by NATO, IMF, USA and EU, aggressively pushed for ‘New World Order‘, is the way back into them again – but now in a new high-tech, vulgar-scientific, mind and soul enslaving and human exterminating version. This was and is the aim of Nazism, regardless whether their “devotees” understands it or not. And that’s why it suits the ‘royals’ and ‘the elite’ so well and that is why such a catastrophic, massive, ‘social-psychological disorder’, is still called an ideology, and can continue to infiltrate the western societies and their social character, with its ‘empathy eroding’ and ‘dehumanizing’ tactics.

Nazism, we must therefore understand, is NOT just another ‘ideology’ and certainly not an answer against Capitalism. It is a skillfully manufactured ‘excuse’ for the intentional, organized ‘erosion of empathy’ and through that, the mass killings and the extermination of human beings. The labels ‘Nazism’ and ‘National-socialism’ have turned out to be just a political and social-economic camouflage, of sheer sadism, bloodthirst and misanthropy. NATO’s Nazi version of freedom is in fact Organized Evil against humanity. That’s how the entirety of Mankind must see it and its alike, and essentially that’s how Justice and the International Legal Authorities and Courts must treat it and its alike.  


Kosmas Loumakis

Stockholm 31-07-2014




In this article, when I refer to Zionism I describe Rothschild’s version of Zionism (identical with ancient Phariseeism), which actually is more about the cultural “hijacking” of the true Jewish religion and its traditions, in order to serve an oligarchic banking-family’s aims for global power, with the current state of Israel as its shield and its vehicle towards this goal and with the USA and UK as its guards…  There are Christian Zionists and Muslim Zionists no matter how strange that can sound, simply because today’s Rothschild-Zionism has not anything particular to do with the real Jewish religion (Moses people’s law) but only with the aims of those families and their plans with the state of Israel (Mammon’s doctrine). They consider themselves as “kings” and “emperors” of humanity and they are using Israel and the Jews in order to fulfill their quest for global dominance and to establish their positions as self appointed demigods of mankind.

Collapse of Kiev Coalition Government, NATO Envisages Military Intervention in East Ukraine

Ukraine prime minister resigns as NATO, Australia prepare intervention in east

The far-right parliamentary coalition in Kiev collapsed yesterday, as the Western-backed regime met with visiting Dutch and Australian officials to prepare a foreign military intervention in war-torn east Ukraine, under cover of investigating the crash of Malaysian Airlines flight MH17.

Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk (Fatherland Party) announced his resignation after the withdrawal from the coalition of the fascist Svoboda Party and the UDAR (“Punch”) party of boxer Vitaly Klitshcko. Yatsenyuk will remain as prime minister until either a new coalition is formed or after elections sometime later this year.

Billionaire oligarch and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko supported the dissolution of the government, claiming it would permit a “full-scale reset” of the Ukrainian state that Ukrainian society desires. Porsoshenko, who assumed office last month, is hoping that new elections, which Poroshenko can call if a new coalition is not formed in 30 days, will be an opportunity to strengthen his own grip on power.

The collapse of the parliamentary coalition points to the weakness of the regime that emerged from the February 22 putsch. As it prepares to support a Western military intervention in the civil war it is waging in east Ukraine, posing the risk of an escalation into a clash between NATO and Russia, the Kiev regime is preparing austerity measures demanded by the EU that will have a devastating impact on broad sections of the population throughout the country.

Under these conditions, the government cannot tolerate any political opposition, even from such establishment forces as the Stalinist Communist Party of Ukraine (KPU). Explaining his party’s decision to leave the government, Svoboda Party leader Oleh Tyahnybok denounced the presence of pro-Russian forces (the KPU) in the Ukrainian legislature: “We believe that in the current situation, such a parliament which protects state criminals, Moscow agents, which refuses to strip immunity from those people who are working for the Kremlin, should not exist.”

These comments were apparently designed to increase pressure for a ban on the KPU. A party that supported the restoration of capitalism in the USSR, the KPU became an ally of the Party of the Regions of former pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, who was ousted in February’s Western-backed, fascist-led putsch that brought the current regime to power.

For his part, Parliamentary speaker Oleksandr Turchynov pledged to destroy the KPU. “We only have to tolerate this party for another day,” he said.

These statements came a day after KPU leader Peter Symonenko accused Svoboda members fighting in east Ukraine of killing Ukrainians and harvesting their organs for the illegal organ trade. Significantly, Svoboda did not even attempt to answer Symonenko’s charges. Instead, it responded by beating KPU legislators and trying to throw Symonenko out of the parliament.

KPU officials from the Donetsk region reported yesterday that a KPU official in the nearby village of Glinky, Vyacheslav Kovshun, had been tortured to death at a Ukrainian National Guard checkpoint in the night of July 22-23. He was stopped at the checkpoint, beaten, and repeatedly shot to the legs and chest. He was found dead.

These events point to the utterly reactionary character of the regime installed by the February putsch, which was carried out in close collaboration with Washington, Berlin, and their European allies. After the putsch, Svoboda officials filmed themselves beating Ukrainian television executives. Forces like Svoboda and the Right Sector militia—both of which glorify Stepan Bandera, who collaborated with Nazi SS units that carried out the Holocaust in Ukraine during World War II—now lead the Kiev regime’s forces in east Ukraine.

In his resignation speech yesterday, Yatsenyuk warned that the dissolution of his government might slow the pace of Kiev’s unpopular social cuts against the Ukrainian people to fund the civil war. These include billions of dollars in cuts to energy subsidies, social programs, and government workers’ wages, while not touching the hundreds of billions of dollars of ill-gotten wealth held by the oligarchs.

“Who wants to go to elections and simultaneously vote for unpopular laws?” Yatsenyuk asked. “History will not forgive us. Our government now has no answer to the questions: how are we to pay wages, how are we tomorrow morning going to send fuel for armored vehicles, how will we pay those families who have lost soldiers, to look after the army?”

As the crisis of the Kiev regime mounts, the Western powers and their allies continue to push further to the right in their campaign against Moscow. While this campaign is led by the United States and Germany, all of Washington’s imperialist allies are moving aggressively against Russia—now spearheaded by the Australian and Dutch governments, which are cynically exploiting the large numbers of citizens they lost on the MH17 flight.

While Washington has been unable to substantiate any of its charges that Russia is responsible for the crash, and evidence increasingly points to involvement by the Kiev regime itself, Australia and the Netherlands are seizing on the crash to justify a provocative intervention in east Ukraine.

Yesterday, Dutch Foreign Minister Frans Timmermans and Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop visited Kiev to discuss a military deployment to east Ukraine, ostensibly to secure the MH17 crash site, which is in territory held by anti-Kiev regime forces.

The Netherlands announced they would send 40 unarmed military police to east Ukraine, while Australia is reportedly sending 50 police to London as a first stop on the way to Ukraine.

The Dutch government is reportedly waging an international diplomatic campaign to post hundreds of Dutch soldiers on the crash site—ostensibly to protect investigators from pro-Russian forces—with the support of the Dutch media.

In the Netherlands, Elsevier’s commentator Eric Vrijsen demanded that Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte “threaten to send in these troops in order to up the pressure on the rebels and Russian President Vladimir Putin. And if he does this, he will probably have made up his mind to act on his threat …. The Dutch Special Forces (army commandos and the Marine Corps Marsofs) are internationally respected. Rutte doesn’t have these elite troops at his disposal for nothing.”

Such a deployment would be a reckless maneuver risking an escalation into a direct clash between NATO and pro-Russian forces in east Ukraine—that is, a NATO intervention in the Ukrainian civil war and the possible outbreak of war between NATO and Russia itself.

The threat of such a conflict erupting was underscored by rising border tensions between Ukraine and Russia. After Ukrainian forces shelled Russian border areas two weeks ago, killing one Russian civilian, Washington alleged yesterday that Russian forces are firing artillery from within Russia at Ukrainian military positions in east Ukraine.

Pressed again at a US State Department press briefing yesterday to provide some evidence for her claims, however, spokeswoman Marie Harf was unable to provide any. “This is just some pieces of info I’ve been able to get from our intelligence friends for you. I can’t tell you what it’s based on,” Harf said.


The Soaring Profits of the Military – Industrial Complex And the Soaring Costs of Military Casualties


Introduction: There are two major beneficiaries of the two major wars launched by the US government: one domestic and one foreign. The three major domestic arms manufacturers, Lockheed Martin (LMT), Northrop Grumman (NOG) and Raytheon (RTN) have delivered record-shattering returns to their investors, CEOs and investment banks during the past decade and a half.

he Israeli regime is the overwhelming foreign beneficiary of the war, expanding its territory through its dispossession of Palestinians and positioning itself as the regional hegemon. Israel benefited from the US invasion which destroyed Iraq, a major ally of the Palestinians; the invasion provided cover for massive Israel’s settler expansion in the Occupied Palestinian territories. In the course of its invasion and occupation Washington systematically destroyed Iraq’s armed forces and civil infrastructure, shredding its complex modern society and state. By doing so, the US occupation removed one of Israel’s major regional rivals.

In terms of cost to the United States, hundreds of thousands of soldiers who had served in the war zones have sustained severe physical and mental injuries, while thousands have died directly or indirectly through an epidemic of soldier suicides. The invasion and occupation of Iraq has cost the United States trillions of dollars and counting. Despite the immense costs to the American people, the military-industrial complex and the pro-Israel power configuration continue to keep the US government on a wartime economy – undermining the domestic social safety net and standard of living of many millions.

No peaceful economic activity can match the immense profits enjoyed by the military-industrial complex in war. This powerful lobby continues to press for new wars to sustain the Pentagon’s huge budget. As for the pro-Israel power configuration, any substantive diplomatic peace negotiations in the Middle East would end their naked land grabs, reduce or curtail new weapons transfers and undermine pretexts to sanction or attack countries, like Iran, that stand in the way of Tel Aviv’s vision of “Greater Israel”, unrivaled in the region.

The costs of almost 15 years of warfare weigh heavily on the US Treasury and electorate. The wars have been dismal failures if not outright defeats. New sectarian conflicts have emerged in Syria, Iraq and, now, Ukraine – opportunities for the US arms industry and the pro-Israel lobbies to make even greater profits and gain more power.

The on-going horrendous costs of past and continuing wars make the launch of new military interventions more difficult for US and Israeli militarists. The US public expresses wide-spread discontent over the burden of the recent past wars and shows even less stomach for new wars to profit the military-industrial complex and further strengthen Israel.


War Profits

The power and influence of the military-industrial complex in promoting serial wars has resulted in extraordinary rates of profit. According to a recent study by Morgan Stanley (cited in Barron’s, 6/9/14, p. 19), shares in the major US arms manufacturers have risen 27,699% over the past fifty years versus 6,777% for the broader market. In the past three years alone, Raytheon has returned 124%, Northrup Grumman 114% and Lockheed Martin 149% to their investors.

The Obama regime makes a grand public show of reducing the military budget via the annual appropriation bill, and then, turns around and announces emergency supplemental funds to cover the costs of these wars. . .thereby actually increasing military spending, all the while waving the banner of ‘cost cutting’. Obama’s theatrics have fattened the profits for the US military-industrial complex.

War profits have soared with the series of military interventions in the Middle East, Africa and South Asia. The arms industry lobbyists pressure Congressional and Pentagon decision-makers to link up with the pro-Israel lobby as it promotes even deeper direct US military involvement in Syria, Iraq and Iran. The growing ties between Israeli and US military industries reinforce their political leverage in Washington by working with liberal interventionists and neo-conservatives. They attack Obama for not bombing Syria and for his withdrawal of troops from Iraq and Afghanistan. They now clamor for sending US troops back to Iraq and call for intervention in Ukraine. Obama has argued that proxy wars without direct US troop involvement do not require such heavy Pentagon expenditures as the arms industry demands. The Obama regime has presented the withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan as a necessary step to reduce US financial and military losses. This was in response to Wall Street’s pressure to cut the budget deficit. Obama’s attempt to meet the demands of the US financial sector has come at the price of cutting potential profit for the military industrial complex as well as infuriating Israel and its fanatical supporters in the US Congress.

The Fight over the Military Budget: Veterans versus the Complex and the Lobby

In the face of rising domestic pressure to reduce the budget deficit and cut military spending, the US military-industrial complex and its Zionist accomplices are fighting to retain their share by eliminating programs designed to serve the health needs of active and retired soldiers. Soaring disability costs related to the recent wars will continue for decades. Veteran health care costs are expected to double to 15% of the defense budget in the next five years. The huge public cost of caring for soldiers and veterans means “bad news for defense stocks” according to financial analysts (Barron’s, 6/9/14, p. 19).

This is reason why the arms industries promote the closure of scores of Veterans Administration hospitals and a reduction in retiree benefits, using the pretext of fighting fraud, incompetence and poor quality service compared with the ‘private sector’. The same corporate warlords and lobbyists who clamor to send US troops to back to Iraq and to new wars in Syria and Ukraine, where young lives, limbs and sanity are at great risk, are also in the forefront of a fight to slash funding for the veterans’ medical care. Economists have long noted that the more dollars spent on veterans’ and military retirees’ health care, the less allocated for war materials, ships and aircraft. Today it is estimated that over $900 billion dollars will have been spent on long-term VA medical and disability services for veterans of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. That number is clearly set to rise with each new intervention.

The corporate warlords are urging Congress to increase co-pays, enrollment fees and deductibles for veterans, retirees and active duty personnel enrolled in military health insurance plans, such as Tricare, as well as limiting access to the VA.

The fight over Pentagon expenditures is a struggle over war or social justice: health services for troops and veterans versus weapons programs that fatten corporate profits for the arms industry.



About James Petras

He is the author of more than 62 books published in 29 languages, and over 600 articles in professional journals, including the American Sociological Review, British Journal of Sociology, Social Research, and Journal of Peasant Studies. He has published over 2000 articles in nonprofessional journals such as the New York Times, the Guardian, the Nation, Christian Science Monitor, Foreign Policy, New Left Review, Partisan Review, TempsModerne, Le Monde Diplomatique, and his commentary is widely carried on the internet.

His publishers have included Random House, John Wiley, Westview, Routledge, Macmillan, Verso, Zed Books and Pluto Books. He is winner of the Career of Distinguished Service Award from the American Sociological Association’s Marxist Sociology Section, the Robert Kenny Award for Best Book, 2002, and the Best Dissertation, Western Political Science Association in 1968. His most recent titles include Unmasking Globalization: Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century (2001); co-author The Dynamics of Social Change in Latin America (2000), System in Crisis (2003), co-author Social Movements and State Power (2003), co-author Empire With Imperialism (2005), co-author)Multinationals on Trial (2006).

He has a long history of commitment to social justice, working in particular with the Brazilian Landless Workers Movement for 11 years. In 1973-76 he was a member of the Bertrand Russell Tribunal on Repression in Latin America. He writes a monthly column for the Mexican newspaper, La Jornada, and previously, for the Spanish daily, El Mundo. He received his B.A. from Boston University and Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley.


An Open Letter to the Graduates of West Point: Refuting President Obama’s Lies, Omissions and Distortions


Introduction: On May 2014 President Obama delivered the commencement address to the graduates of United States Military Academy at West Point. Beyond the easy banter and eulogy to past and present war heroes, Obama outlined a vision of past military successes and present policies, based on a profoundly misleading diagnosis of the current global position of the United States

The most striking aspect of his presentation is the systematic falsification of the results of past wars and current military interventions. The speech is notable for the systematic omissions of the millions of civilian deaths inflicted by US military interventions. He glosses over the growth of NSA, the global police state apparatus. He presents a grossly inflated account of the US role in the world economy. Worse of all he outlines an extremely dangerous confrontational posture toward rising military and economic powers, in particular Russia and China.

Distorting the Past: Defeats and Retreats Converted into Victories

One of the most disturbing aspects of President Obama’s speech is his delusional account of US military engagements over the past decade. His claim that, “by most measures America has rarely been stronger relative to the rest of the world”, defies belief. After 13 years of warfare, the US has failed to defeat the Taliban. Washington is in full retreat and leaves behind a fragile puppet regime which will likely collapse. In Iraq the US was forced to withdraw after killing several hundred thousand civilians and fueling a sectarian war which has propelled a pro-Iranian regime to power. In Libya, the NATO war devastated the country, destroyed the Gadhafi government,thus undermining reconciliation, and bringing to power bands of terrorist Islamic groups profoundly hostile to the United States.

Washington’s effort to broker an accord between Palestine and Israel was a dismal failure, largely because of the Obama regime’s spineless attitude toward Israel’s land grabs, and new “Jews only” settlements. The craven pandering to the Jewish power configuration in Washington hardly speaks for the world’s “greatest power” … by any measure.

Through your economic studies you are surely aware that the US has been displaced by China in major markets in Latin America, Asia and Africa. China poses a major economic challenge: it does not have overseas bases, Special Forces’ operations in seventy-five countries; it does not pursue military alliances and does not militarily intervene in countries. Obama’s expansion of the US military presence off China’s coast speaks to an escalation of bellicose behavior, contrary to his assertions of “winding down” overseas military operations.

Obama speaks of defending “our core interests” militarily.Yet he threatens China over disputed piles of rocks in the South China Sea, overlooking the “core interests” of the 500 biggest US corporations with hundreds of billions of dollars invested in the most dynamic economy in the world and the second biggest trading nation.

Obama spoke of the threat of “terrorism” yet his policies have encouraged and promoted terrorism. Washington armed and promoted the Islamic terrorists which overthrew Gadhafi; backs the Islamic terrorists invading Syria; provides 1.5 billion in military aid to the Egyptian military dictatorship which is terrorizing the political opposition, via assassinations and arrests of thousands of political dissidents. The US backed the violent overthrow of the elected regime in the Ukraine and is backing the client regime’s terror bombing of the pro-democracy Eastern regions. Obama’s “anti-terrorism”rhetoric is in fact a cover for state terrorism, which closes the door on peaceful resolution of overseas conflicts, and leads to the multiplication of violent opposition groups.

Obama speaks to “our success in promoting partnerships in Europe and in the world at large”. Yet his bellicose policies toward Russia has deeply divided the US from the leading countries in the European Union. Germany has multi-billion dollar trade agreements with Russia and objects to harsh sanctions as does Italy, Holland and Belgium. Latin America has relegated the US centered Organization of American States to the dust bin of history and moved toward regional organizations which exclude the US. Washington has no “partners” backing its hostile policies toward Venezuela and Cuba. In Asia, Washington’s efforts to forge an economic bloc excluding China, runs against the deep and comprehensive ties that link South Korea, Taiwan and Southeast Asia to China. Washington’s closest partners are the least dynamic and most repressive: Israel, Yemen, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states in the Middle East; Egypt, Morocco and Algeria in North Africa; Colombia in Latin America ; and motley groups of sub-Sahara despots and Kleptocrats who squirrel billions of dollars into oversees bank accounts in New York and London far in excess of their countries’ health and educational budgets .

Obama’s diagnosis of the position of the US in the world is fundamentally flawed: he grossly understates the military losses, the decline of economic power,and the growing divisions between former regional allies .Above all he refuses to recognize the profound loss of faith by the majority of Americans in Washington’s foreign military and trade policies. The flawed diagnosis, the deliberate distortions of present global realities and the deep misreading of domestic public opinion cannot be overcome by new deceptions , bigger lies and the continuation and escalation of military interventions, in which you the newly minted officers will serve as cannon fodder.

Obama: Political Desperado in Search of an Imperial Legacy

Obama has marked a new phase in the escalation of a military centered foreign policy.He is presently engaged in a major military build-up of air and ground troops and military exercises in the Baltic States and Poland…all of which is pointing toward Russia and signaling that a possible ‘First Strike’ strategy is underway. Obama has been seized by a manic global military escalation..He is expanding naval forces off China’s coast. He has dispatched hundreds of Special Forces to Jordan to train and arm mercenaries invading Syria.He is intervening militarily in the Ukraine to bolster the Kiev regime.He has dispatched hundreds of military forces throughout Africa.He has allocated $1 billion for military expenditure along the European frontiers with Russia and $5 billion to boost the capacity of despotic regimes to repress popular insurgencies under the pretext of “fighting terrorism”.

Obama’s ‘vision’ of US foreign policy is clearly and unmistakably colored by a propensity to engage in highly dangerous military confrontations. His resort to multiple “Special Forces” operations, his increasing reliance on military proxies, is a reversion to 19th century colonial policies.Recruiting soldiers from one oppressed country to conquer another, is a throwback to old style empire building. When Obama speaks of “American leadership, as indispensable for world order” he deceives no one. The Washington centered world order is disintegrating. Disorder is the consequence of military intervention attempting to delay the inevitable.

The Obama Administration’s involvement in the violent coup in the Ukraine is a case in point: as a consequence of the rise to power of a junta headed by a billionaire “President”,power sharing with neo-fascists that country is disintegration, civil war rages and the economy is bankrupt. Obama’s war on Libya has led to a Hobbesian world in which warlords fight jihadists over shrinking oil sales. In Syria US backed ‘rebels’ have destroyed the economy and the social fabric of civil society.

No major country in South America follows US ‘leadership’. Even in the United States few American citizens back Obama’s hostile policies to Cuba and Venezuela.

Obama’s duplicitous rhetoric of talking peace and preparing wars has lost credibility. Obama is preparing to commit you, the newly commissioned officers of West Point, to new overseas wars opposed by the majority of Americans.

Obama will send you to war zones in which you will be pitted against popular insurgencies, in which you will be despised by the surrounding population. You will be asked to defend an Administration which has pillaged the Treasury to bail out the 15 biggest banks, who paid $78 billion dollars in fines between 2012 – 2013 for fraud and swindles and yet their CEO’s received double digit pay increases . You will be told to fight wars for Israel in the Middle East. You will be ordered to command bases in Poland and missles aimed at Russia.You will be sent to the Ukraine to advise neo-Nazis in the National Guard. You will be told to subvert Latin American military officials in hopes of inciting a military coup and converting independent progressive governments into neo-liberal client states.

Obama’s vision does not resonate with your hopes for an America committed to democracy, freedom and development. You face the choice of serving a political desperado intent on launching unjust wars at the behest of billionaire swindlers and armchair militarists or resigning your commission and joining the majority of American people who believe that America’s “leadership” should be directed at reducing the wealth and power of an unelected oligarchy in this country.



About James Petras

He is the author of more than 62 books published in 29 languages, and over 600 articles in professional journals, including the American Sociological Review, British Journal of Sociology, Social Research, and Journal of Peasant Studies. He has published over 2000 articles in nonprofessional journals such as the New York Times, the Guardian, the Nation, Christian Science Monitor, Foreign Policy, New Left Review, Partisan Review, TempsModerne, Le Monde Diplomatique, and his commentary is widely carried on the internet.

His publishers have included Random House, John Wiley, Westview, Routledge, Macmillan, Verso, Zed Books and Pluto Books. He is winner of the Career of Distinguished Service Award from the American Sociological Association’s Marxist Sociology Section, the Robert Kenny Award for Best Book, 2002, and the Best Dissertation, Western Political Science Association in 1968. His most recent titles include Unmasking Globalization: Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century (2001); co-author The Dynamics of Social Change in Latin America (2000), System in Crisis (2003), co-author Social Movements and State Power (2003), co-author Empire With Imperialism (2005), co-author)Multinationals on Trial (2006).

He has a long history of commitment to social justice, working in particular with the Brazilian Landless Workers Movement for 11 years. In 1973-76 he was a member of the Bertrand Russell Tribunal on Repression in Latin America. He writes a monthly column for the Mexican newspaper, La Jornada, and previously, for the Spanish daily, El Mundo. He received his B.A. from Boston University and Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley.


Brazil: Workers Struggle Trumps Sports Spectacle


Introduction: For decades social critics have bemoaned the influence of sports and entertainment spectacles in ‘distracting’ workers from struggling for their class interests. According to these analysts, ‘class consciousness’ was replaced by ‘mass’ consciousness.

They argued that atomized individuals, manipulated by the mass media, were converted into passive consumers who identified with millionaire sports heroes, soap opera protagonists and film celebrities.

The culmination of this ‘mystification’ – mass distraction –were the ‘world championships’ watched by billions around the world and sponsored and financed by billionaire corporations: the World Series (baseball), the World Cup (soccer/futbol), and the Super Bowl (American football).

Today, Brazil is the living refutation of this line of cultural-political analysis. Brazilians have been described as ‘football crazy’. Its teams have won the most number of World Cups. Its players are coveted by the owners of the most important teams in Europe. Its fans are said to “live and die with football” . . . Or so we are told.

Yet it is in Brazil where the biggest protests in the history of the World Cup have taken place. As early as a year before the Games, scheduled for June 2014, there have been mass demonstrations of up to a million Brazilians. In just the last few weeks, strikes by teachers, police, construction workers and municipal employees have proliferated. The myth of the mass media spectacles mesmerizing the masses has been refuted – at least in present-day Brazil.

To understand why the mass spectacle has been a propaganda bust it is essential to understand the political and economic context in which it was launched, as well as the costs and benefits and the tactical planning of popular movements.

The Political and Economic Context: The World Cup and the Olympics

In 2002, the Brazilian Workers Party candidate Lula DaSilva won the presidential elections. His two terms in office (2003 – 2010) were characterized by a warm embrace of free market capitalism together with populist poverty programs. Aided by large scale in-flows of speculative capital, attracted by high interest rates, and high commodity prices for its agro-mineral exports, Lula launched a massive poverty program providing about $60 a month to 40 million poor Brazilians, who formed part of Lula’s mass electoral base. The Workers Party reduced unemployment, increased wages and supported low-interest consumer loans, stimulating a ‘consumer boom’ that drove the economy forward.

To Lula and his advisers, Brazil was becoming a global power, attracting world-class investors and incorporating the poor into the domestic market.

Lula was hailed as a ‘pragmatic leftist’ by Wall Street and a ‘brilliant statesman’ by the Left!

In line with this grandiose vision (and in response to hoards of presidential flatterers North and South), Lula believed that Brazil’s rise to world prominence required it to ‘host’ the World Cup and the Olympics and he embarked on an aggressive campaign. . . Brazil was chosen.

Lula preened and pontificated: Brazil, as host, would achieve the symbolic recognition and material rewards a global power deserved.

The Rise and Fall of Grand Illusions

The ascent of Brazil was based on foreign flows of capital conditioned by differential (favorable) interest rates. And when rates shifted, the capital flowed out. Brazil’s dependence on high demand for its agro-mineral exports was based on sustained double-digit economic growth in Asia. When China’s economy slowed down, demand and prices fell, and so did Brazil’s export earnings.

The Workers Party’s ‘pragmatism’ meant accepting the existing political, administrative and regulatory structures inherited from the previous neo-liberal regimes. These institutions were permeated by corrupt officials linked to building contractors notorious for cost over-runs and long delays on state contracts.

Moreover, the Workers Party’s ‘pragmatic’ electoral machine was built on kick-backs and bribes. Vast sums were siphoned from public services into private pockets.

Puffed up on his own rhetoric, Lula believed Brazil’s economic emergence on the world stage was a ‘done deal’. He proclaimed that his pharaonic sports complexes – the billions of public money spent on dozens of stadiums and costly infrastructure – would “pay for themselves”.

The Deadly ‘Demonstration Effect’: Social Reality Defeats Global Grandeur

Brazil’s new president, Dilma Rousseff, Lula’ protégé, has allocated billions of reales to finance her predecessor’s massive building projects: stadiums, hotels, highways and airports to accommodate an anticipated flood of overseas soccer fans.

The contrast between the immediate availability of massive amounts of public funds for the World Cup and the perennial lack of money for deteriorating essential public services (transport, schools, hospitals and clinics) has been a huge shock to Brazilians and a provocation to mass action in the streets.

For decades, the majority of Brazilians, who depended on public services for transport, education and medical care, (the upper middle classes can afford private services), were told that “there were no funds”, that “budgets had to be balanced”, that a “budget surplus was needed to meet IMF agreements and to service the debt”.

For years public funds had been siphoned away by corrupt political appointees to pay for electoral campaigns, leading to filthy, overcrowded transport, frequently breaking down, and commuter delays in sweltering buses and long lines at the stations. For decades, schools were in shambles, teacher rushed from school to school to make-up for their miserable minimum-wage salaries leading to low quality education and neglect. Public hospitals were dirty, dangerous and crowded; under-paid doctors frequently took on private patients on the side, and essential medications were scarce in the public hospitals and overpriced in the pharmacies.

The public was outraged by the obscene contrast between the reality of dilapidated clinics with broken windows, overcrowded schools with leaking roofs and unreliable mass transport for the average Brazilian and the huge new stadiums, luxury hotels and airports for wealthy foreign sports fans and visitors.

The public was outraged by the obvious official lies: the claim that there were ‘no funds’ for teachers when billions of Reales were instantly available to construct luxury hotels and fancy stadium box seats for wealthy soccer fans.

The final detonator for mass street protest was the increase in bus and train fares to ‘cover losses’ – after public airports and highways had been sold cheaply to private investors who raised tolls and fees.

The protestors marching against the increased bus and train fares were joined by tens of thousands Brazilians broadly denouncing the Government’s priorities: Billions for the World Cup and crumbs for public health, education, housing and transport!

Oblivious to the popular demands, the government pushed ahead intent on finishing its ‘prestige projects’. Nevertheless, construction of stadiums fell behind schedule because of corruption, incompetence and mismanagement. Building contractors, who were pressured, lowered safety standards and pushed workers harder, leading to an increase in workplace deaths and injury. Construction workers walked out protesting the speed-ups and deterioration of work safety.

The Rousseff regime’s grandiose schemes have provoked a new chain of protests. The Homeless Peoples Movement occupied urban lots near a new World Cup stadium demanding ‘social housing’ for the people instead of new five-star hotels for affluent foreign sports aficionados.

Escalating costs for the sports complexes and increased government expenditures have ignited a wave of trade union strikes to demand higher wages beyond the regime’s targets. Teachers and health workers were joined by factory workers and salaried employees striking in strategic sectors, such as the transport and security services, capable of seriously disrupting the World Cup.

The PTs embrace of the grandiose sports spectacle, instead of highlighting Brazil’s ‘debut as a global power’, has spotlighted the vast contrast between the affluent and secure ten percent in their luxury condos in Brazil, Miami and Manhattan, with access to high quality private clinics and exclusive private and overseas schools for their offspring, with the mass of average Brazilians, stuck for hours sweating in overcrowded buses, in dingy emergency rooms waiting for mere aspirins from non-existent doctors and in wasting their children’s futures in dilapidated classrooms without adequate, full-time teachers.


The political elite, especially the entourage around the Lula-Rousseff Presidency have fallen victim to their own delusions of popular support. They believed that subsistence pay-offs (food baskets) to the very poor would allow them to spend billions of public money on sports spectacles to entertain and impress the global elite. They believed that the mass of workers would be so enthralled by the prestige of holding the World Cup in Brazil, that they would overlook the great disparity between government expenditures for elite grand spectacles and the absence of support to meet the everyday needs of Brazilian workers.

Even trade unions, seemingly tied to Lula, who bragged of his past leadership of the metal workers, broke ranks when they realized that the ‘money was out there’ – and that the regime, pressured by construction deadlines, could be pressured to raise wages to get the job done.

Make no mistake, Brazilians are sports minded. They avidly follow and cheer their national team. But they are also conscious of their needs. They are not content to passively accept the great social disparities exposed by the current mad scramble to stage the World Cup and Olympics in Brazil. The government’s vast expenditure on the Games has made it clear that Brazil is a rich country with a multitude of social inequalities. They have learned that vast sums are available to improve the basic services of everyday life. They realized that, despite its rhetoric, the ‘Workers Party’ was playing a wasteful prestige game to impress an international capitalist audience. They realized that they have strategic leverage to pressure the government and address some of the inequalities in housing and salaries through mass action. And they have struck. They realize they deserve to enjoy the World Cup in affordable, adequate public housing and travel to work (or to an occasional game) in decent buses and trains. Class consciousness, in the case of Brazil, has trumped the mass spectacle. ‘Bread and circuses’ have given way to mass protests.



About James Petras

He is the author of more than 62 books published in 29 languages, and over 600 articles in professional journals, including the American Sociological Review, British Journal of Sociology, Social Research, and Journal of Peasant Studies. He has published over 2000 articles in nonprofessional journals such as the New York Times, the Guardian, the Nation, Christian Science Monitor, Foreign Policy, New Left Review, Partisan Review, TempsModerne, Le Monde Diplomatique, and his commentary is widely carried on the internet.

His publishers have included Random House, John Wiley, Westview, Routledge, Macmillan, Verso, Zed Books and Pluto Books. He is winner of the Career of Distinguished Service Award from the American Sociological Association’s Marxist Sociology Section, the Robert Kenny Award for Best Book, 2002, and the Best Dissertation, Western Political Science Association in 1968. His most recent titles include Unmasking Globalization: Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century (2001); co-author The Dynamics of Social Change in Latin America (2000), System in Crisis (2003), co-author Social Movements and State Power (2003), co-author Empire With Imperialism (2005), co-author)Multinationals on Trial (2006).

He has a long history of commitment to social justice, working in particular with the Brazilian Landless Workers Movement for 11 years. In 1973-76 he was a member of the Bertrand Russell Tribunal on Repression in Latin America. He writes a monthly column for the Mexican newspaper, La Jornada, and previously, for the Spanish daily, El Mundo. He received his B.A. from Boston University and Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley.


The Rise of the European Right: Reaction to the Neoliberal Right


Introduction: The European parliamentary elections witnessed a major breakthrough for the right-wing parties throughout the region. The rise of the Right runs from the Nordic countries, the United Kingdom, the Baltic and Low countries, France, Central and Eastern Europe to the Mediterranean.

Most, if not all, of these emerging right-wing parties mark a sharp break with the ruling neo-liberal, Christian and Social Democratic parties who have presided over a decade of crisis.

The ‘new Right’ cannot be understood simply by attaching negative labels (‘fascist’, ‘racist’ and ‘anti-Semitic’). The rise of the Right has to be placed in the context of the decay of political, social and economic institutions, the general and persistent decline of living standards and the disintegration of community bonds and class solidarity. The entire existing political edifice constructed by the neo-liberal parties bears deep responsibility for the systemic crisis and decay of everyday life. Moreover, this is how it is understood by a growing mass of working people who vote for the Right.

The so-called ‘radical Left’, usually defined as the political parties to the left of the governing Social Democratic parties, with the exception of SYRIZA in Greece, have failed to capitalize on the decline of the neo-liberal parties. There are several reasons that account for the lack of a right-left polarization. Most of the ‘radical Left’, in the final account, gave ‘critical support’ to one or another of the Labor or Social Democratic parties and reduced their ‘distance’ from the political-economic disasters that have followed. Secondly, the ‘radical Left’s’ positions on some issues were irrelevant or offensive to many workers: namely, gay marriage and identity politics. Thirdly, the radical Left recruited prominent personalities from the discredited Labor and Social Democratic parties and thus raised suspicion that they are a ‘new version’ of past deceptions. Fourthly, the radical Left is strong on public demonstrations demanding ‘structural changes’ but lacks the ‘grass roots’ clientelistic organizations of the Right, which provide ‘services’, such as soup kitchens and clinics dealing with day-to-day problems.

While the Right pretends to be ‘outside’ the neo-liberal establishment challenging the assumption of broad powers by the Brussels elite, the Left is ambiguous: Its support for a ‘social Europe’ implies a commitment to reform a discredited and moribund structure. The Right proposes ‘national capitalism’ outside of Brussels; the Left proposes ‘socialism within the European Union’. The Left parties, the older Communist parties and more recent groupings, like Syriza in Greece, have had mixed results. The former have generally stagnated or lost support despite the systemic crisis. The latter, like Syriza, have made impressive gains but failed to break the 30% barrier. Both lack electoral allies. As a result, the immediate challenge to the neo-liberal status quo comes from the electoral new Right parties and on the left from the extra-parliamentary social movements and trade unions. In the immediate period, the crisis of the European Union is being played out between the neo-liberal establishment and the ‘new Right’.

The Nature of the New Right

The ‘new Right’ has gained support largely because it has denounced the four pillars of the neo-liberal establishment: globalization, foreign financial control, executive rule by fiat (the Brussels troika) and the unregulated influx of cheap immigrant labor.

Nationalism, as embraced by the new Right, is tied to national capitalism: Local producers, retailers and farmers are counterpoised to free traders, mergers and acquisitions by international bankers and the giant multinationals. The ‘new Right’ has its audience among the provincial and small town business elite as well as workers devastated by plant closures and relocations.

The ‘new Right’s’ nationalism is ‘protectionist’ – seeking tariff barriers and state regulations to protect industries and workers from ‘unfair’ competition from overseas conglomerates and low-wage immigrant labor.

The problem is that protectionism limits the imports of cheap consumer goods sold in many small retail shops and affordable to workers and the lower middle class. The Right ‘dreams’ of a corporatist model where national workers and industries bond to oppose liberal competitive capitalism and class struggle trade unions. As the class struggle declines, the ‘tri partite’ politics of the neo-liberal right is reconfigured by the New Right to include ‘national’ capital and a ‘paternalistic state’.

In sum, the nationalism of the Right evokes a mythical past of harmony where national capital and labor unite under a common communal identity to confront big foreign capital and cheap immigrant labor.

Political Strategy: Electoral and Extra-Parliamentary Politics

Currently, the new Right is primarily oriented to electoral politics, especially as it gains mass support. They have increased their share of the electorate by combining mass mobilization and community organizing with electoral politics, especially in depressed areas. They have attracted middle class voters from the neo-liberal right and working class voters from the old Left. While some sectors of the Right, like the Golden Dawn in Greece, openly flaunt fascist symbols – flags and uniforms – as well as provoking street brawls, others pressure the governing neo-liberal right to adopt some of their demands especially regarding immigration and the ‘deportation of illegals’. For the present, most of the new Right’s focus is on advancing its agenda and gaining supporters through aggressive appeals within the constitutional order and by keeping the more violent sectors under control. Moreover, the current political climate is not conducive to open extra-parliamentary ‘street fighting’ where the new Right would be easily crushed. Most right-wing strategists believe the current context is conducive to the accumulation of forces via peaceful methods.

Conditions Facilitating the Growth of the Right

There are several structural factors contributing to the growth of the new Right in Europe:

First and foremost, there is a clear decline of democratic power and institutions resulting from the centralization of executive – legislative power in the hands of a self-appointed elite in Brussels. The new Right argues effectively that the European Union has become a profoundly authoritarian political institution disenfranchising voters and imposing harsh austerity programs without a popular mandate.

Secondly, national interests have been subordinated to benefit the financial elite identified as responsible for the harsh policies that have undermined living standards and devastated local industries. The new Right counterpoises ‘the nation’ to the Brussels ‘Troika’ – the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank and the European Commission.

Thirdly, ‘liberalization’ has eroded local industries and undermined communities and protective labor legislation. The Right denounces liberal immigration policies, which permit the large-scale inflow of cheap workers at a time of depression level unemployment. The crisis of capitalism combined with the large force of cheap immigrant labor forms the material basis for right-wing appeals to workers, especially those in precarious jobs or unemployed.

Right: Contradictions and the Double Discourse

The Right, while criticizing the neo-liberal state for unemployment, focuses mainly on the immigrants competing with nationals in the labor market rather than on the capitalists whose investment decisions determine levels of employment and unemployment.

The Right attacks the authoritarian nature of the European Union, but its own structures, ideology and history pre-figure a repressive state.

The Right rightly proposes to end foreign elite control of the economy, but its own vision of a ‘national state’, especially one linked to NATO, multi-national corporations and imperial wars, will provide no basis for ‘rebuilding the national economy’.

The Right speaks to the needs of the dispossessed and the need to ‘end austerity’ but it eschews the only effective mechanism for countering inequalities – class organization and class struggle. Its vision of the ‘collaboration between productive capital and labor’ is contradicted by the aggressive capitalist offensive to cut wages, social services, pensions and working conditions. The new Right targets immigrants as the cause of unemployment while obscuring the role of the capitalists who hire and fire, invest abroad, relocate firms and introduce technology to replace labor.

They focus the workers’ anger ‘downward’ against immigrants, instead of ‘upward’ toward the owners of the means of production, finance and distribution who ultimately manipulate the labor market.

In the meantime the radical Left’s mindless defense of unlimited immigration in the name of an abstract notion of ‘international workers solidarity’ exposes their arrogant liberal bias, as though they had never consulted real workers who have to compete with immigrants for scarce jobs under increasingly unfavorable conditions.

The radical Left, under the banner of ‘international solidarity’, has ignored the historical fact that ‘internationalism’ must be built on the strong national foundation of organized, employed workers.

The Left has allowed the new Right to exploit and manipulate powerful righteous nationalist causes. The radical Left has counterpoised ‘nationalism’ to socialism, rather than seeing them as intertwined, especially in the present context of an imperialist-dominated European Union.

The fight for national independence, the break-up of the European Union, is essential to the struggle for democracy and the deepening of the class struggle for jobs and social welfare. The class struggle is more powerful and effective on the familiar national terrain – rather than confronting distant overseers in Brussels.

The notion among many radical Left leaders to ‘remake’ the EU into a ‘Social Europe’, the idea that the EU could be converted into a ‘European Union of Socialist States’ simply prolongs the suffering of the workers and the subordination of nations to the non-elected bankers who run the EU. No one seriously believes that buying stocks in Deutsch Bank and joining its annual stockholders meetings would allow workers to ‘transform’ it into a ‘People’s Bank’. Yet the ‘Bank of the Banks’, the ‘Troika’, made up of the European Commission, the European Central Bank and the IMF, set all major policies for each member state of the European Union. Un-rectified and remaining captive of the ‘Euro-metaphysic’, the Left has abdicated its role in advancing the class struggle through the rebirth of the national struggle against the EU oligarchs.

Results and Perspectives

The Right is advancing rapidly, even if unevenly across Europe. Its support is not ephemeral but stable and cumulative at least in the medium run. The causes are ‘structural’ and result from the new Right’s ability to exploit the socio-economic crisis of the neo-liberal right governments and to denounce authoritarian and anti-national policies of the unelected EU oligarchy.

The new Right’s strength is in ‘opposition’. Their protests resonate while they are distant from the command centers of the capitalist economy and state.

Are they capable of moving from protest to power? Shared power with the neo-liberals will obviously dilute and disaggregate their current social base.

The contradictions will deepen as the new Right moves from positions of ‘opposition’ to sharing power with the neo-liberal Right. The massive roundups and deportation of immigrant workers is not going to change capitalist employment policies or restore social services or improve living standards. Promoting ‘national’ capital over foreign through some corporatist union of capital and labor will not reduce class conflict. It is totally unrealistic to imagine ‘national’ capital rejecting its foreign partners in the interest of labor.

The divisions within the ‘nationalist Right’, between the overtly fascist and electoral corporatist sectors, will intensify. The accommodation with ‘national’ capital, democratic procedures and social inequalities will likely open the door to a new wave of class conflict which will expose the sham radicalism of the ‘nationalist’ right. A committed Left, embedded in the national terrain, proud of its national and class traditions, and capable of unifying workers across ethnic and religious ‘identities’ can regain supporters and re-emerge as the real alternative to the two faces of the Right – the neo-liberal and the ‘nationalist’ new Right. The prolonged economic crisis, declining living standards, unemployment and personal insecurity propelling rise of the nationalist Right can also lead to the emergence of a Left deeply linked to national, class and community realities. The neo-liberals have no solutions to offer for the disasters and problems of their own making; the nationalists of the new Right have the wrong -reactionary – answer. Does the Left have the solution? Only by overthrowing the despotic imperial rule of Brussels can they begin to address the national-class issues.

Post-script and final observations:

In the absence of a Left alternative, the working class voters have opted for two alternatives: Massive voter abstention and strikes. In the recent EU election, 60% of the French electorate abstained, with abstention approaching 80% in working class neighborhoods. This pattern was repeated or even exceeded throughout the EU – hardly a mandate for the EU or for the ‘new Right’. In the weeks and days before the vote, workers took to the streets. There were massive strikes of civil servants and shipyard workers, as well as workers from other sectors and mass demonstrations by the unemployed and popular classes opposing EU-imposed ‘austerity’ cuts in social services, health, education, pensions, factory closures and mass lay-offs. Widespread voter abstention and street demonstrations point to a huge proportion of the population rejecting both the neo-Liberal Right of the ‘Troika’ as well as the ‘new Right’.



About James Petras

He is the author of more than 62 books published in 29 languages, and over 600 articles in professional journals, including the American Sociological Review, British Journal of Sociology, Social Research, and Journal of Peasant Studies. He has published over 2000 articles in nonprofessional journals such as the New York Times, the Guardian, the Nation, Christian Science Monitor, Foreign Policy, New Left Review, Partisan Review, TempsModerne, Le Monde Diplomatique, and his commentary is widely carried on the internet.

His publishers have included Random House, John Wiley, Westview, Routledge, Macmillan, Verso, Zed Books and Pluto Books. He is winner of the Career of Distinguished Service Award from the American Sociological Association’s Marxist Sociology Section, the Robert Kenny Award for Best Book, 2002, and the Best Dissertation, Western Political Science Association in 1968. His most recent titles include Unmasking Globalization: Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century (2001); co-author The Dynamics of Social Change in Latin America (2000), System in Crisis (2003), co-author Social Movements and State Power (2003), co-author Empire With Imperialism (2005), co-author)Multinationals on Trial (2006).

He has a long history of commitment to social justice, working in particular with the Brazilian Landless Workers Movement for 11 years. In 1973-76 he was a member of the Bertrand Russell Tribunal on Repression in Latin America. He writes a monthly column for the Mexican newspaper, La Jornada, and previously, for the Spanish daily, El Mundo. He received his B.A. from Boston University and Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley.


Capitalists, Technocrats and Fanatics: The Ascent of a New Power Bloc


Introduction: The sweeping electoral victory of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in India is the latest expression of the world-wide advance of a new power bloc which promises to impose a New World Order harnessing ethno-religious fanaticism and narrowly trained technocrats to capitalist absolutism.

The far-right is no longer at the margins of western political discourse. It is center-stage. It is no longer dependent on contributions by local militants; it receives financing from the biggest global corporations. It is no longer dismissed by the mass media. It receives feature coverage, highlighting its ‘dynamic and transformative’ leadership.

Today capitalists everywhere confront great uncertainty, as markets crash and endemic corruption at the highest levels erode competitive markets. Throughout the world, large majorities of the labor force question, challenge and resist the massive transfers of public wealth to an ever reduced oligarchy. Electoral politics no longer define the context for political opposition.

Capitalism, neither in theory nor practice, advances through reason and prosperity. It relies on executive fiats, media manipulation and arbitrary police state intrusions. It increasingly relies on death squads dubbed “Special Forces” and a ‘reserve army’ of para-military fanatics.

The new power bloc is the merger of big business, the wealthy professional classes, upwardly mobile, elite trained technocrats and cadres of ethno-religious fanatics who mobilize the masses.

Capitalism and imperialism advances by uprooting millions, destroying local communities and economies, undermining local trade and production, exploiting labor and repressing social solidarity. Everywhere it erodes community and class solidarity.

Ethno-Religious Fanatics and Elite Technocrats

Today capitalism depends on two seemingly disparate forces. The irrational appeal of ethno-religious supremacists and narrowly trained elite technocrats to advance the rule of capital. Ethno-religious fanatics seek to promote bonds between the corporate-warlord elite and the masses, by appealing to their ‘common’ religious ethnic identities.

The technocrats serve the elite by developing the information systems, formulating the images and messages deceiving and manipulating the masses and designing their economic programs.

The political leaders meet with the corporate elite and warlords to set the political-economic agenda, deciding when to rely on the technocrats and when to moderate or unleash the ethno-religious fanatics.

Imperialism operates via the marriage of science and ethno-religious fanaticism- and both are harnessed to capitalist domination and exploitation.

India: Billionaires, Hindu Fascists and IT “Savants”

The election of Narendra Modi, leader of the BJP and long-time member of the Hindu fascist Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) para-military organization was based on three essential components:

(1) Multi-billion rupee funding from corporate India at home and abroad.

(2) Thousands of upwardly mobile IT technocrats mounting a massive propaganda campaign.

(3) Hundreds of thousands of RSS activists spreading the “Hindutva” racist doctrine among millions of villagers.

The Modi regime promises his capitalist backers that he will “open India”– namely end the land reserves of the tribes, convert farmland to industrial parks, deregulate labor and environmental controls.

To the Brahmin elite he promises to end compensatory quotas for lower castes, the untouchables, the minorities and Muslims. For the Hindu fascists he promises more temples. For foreign capitalists he promises entry into all formerly protected economic sectors. For the US, Modi promises closer working relations against China, Russia and Iran… The BJP’s ethno-religious Hindu fanaticism resonates with Israel’s notion of a “pure”Jewish state. Modi and Netanyahu have longstanding ties and promise close working relations based on similar ethno-racist doctrines.

Turkey: The Transition to Islamic-Capitalist Authoritarianism

Turkey under the rule of Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party has moved decisively toward one-man rule: linking Islam to big capital and police state repression. Erdogan’s ‘triple alliance’ is intent on unleashing mega-capitalist projects, based on the privatization of public spaces and the dispossession of popular neighborhoods. He opened the door to unregulated privatization of mines, communications, banks – leading to exponential growth of profits and the decline of employment security and a rising toll of worker deaths. Erdogan has shed the mask of ‘moderate Islam’ and embraced the jihadist mercenaries invading Syria and legislation expanding religious prerogatives in secular life. Erdogan has launched massive purges of journalists, public officials, civil servants, judges and military officers. He has replaced them with ‘party loyalists’; Erdogan fanatics!

Erdogan has recruited a small army of technocrats who design his mega projects and provide the political infrastructure and programs for his electoral campaigns. Technocrats provide a development agenda that accommodates the foreign and domestic crony corporate elite.

The Anatolian Islamists, small and medium provincial business elite, form the mass base – mobilizing voters, by appealing to chauvinist and ethnocentric beliefs. Erdogan’s repressive, Islamist, capitalist regime’s embrace of the “free market” has been sharply challenged especially in light of the worst mining massacre in Turkish history: the killing of over 300 miners due to corporate negligence and regime complicity. Class polarization threatens the advance of Turkish fascism.

Israel and the “Jewish State”: Billionaires , Ethno-Religious Fanatics and Technocrats

Israel, according to its influential promoters in the US, is a ‘model democracy’. The public pronouncements and the actions of its leaders thoroughly refute that notion. The driving force of Israeli politics is the idea of dispossessing and expelling all Palestinians and converting Israel into a ‘pure’ Jewish state. For decades Israel, funded and colonized by the diaspora, have violently seized Palestinian lands, dispossessed millions and are in the process of Judaizing what remains of the remnant in the “Occupied Territories”.

The Israeli economy is dominated by billionaires. Its “society” is permeated by a highly militarized state. Its highly educated technocrats serve the military-industrial and ethno-religious elite. Big business shares power with both.

High tech Israeli’s apply their knowledge to furthering the high growth, military industrial complex. Medical specialists participate in testing the endurance of Palestinian prisoners undergoing torture (“interrogation”). Highly trained psychologists engage in psych-warfare to gain collaborators among vulnerable Palestinian families. Economists and political scientists, with advanced degrees from prestigious US and British universities (and ‘dual citizenship’) formulate policies furthering the land grabs of neo-fascist settlers. Israel’s best known novelist, Amos Oz condemned the neo-fascist settlers who defecate on the embers of burnt-out mosques.

Billionaire real estate moguls bid up house prices and rents “forcing” many “progressive” Israelies, who occasionally protest, to take the easy road of moving into apartments built on land illegally and violently seized from dispossessed Palestinians. ‘Progressives’ join neo-fascist vigilantes in common colonial settlements. Prestigious urbanologists further the goals of crude ethno-racist political leaders by designing new housing in Occupied Lands. Prominent social scientists trade on their US education to promote Mid-East wars designed by vulgar warlords. Building the Euro American Empire : Riff-Raff of the World Unite!

Empire building is a dirty business. And while the political leaders directing it, feign respectability and are adept at rolling out the moral platitudes and high purposes, the ‘combatants’ they employ are a most unsavory lot of armed thugs, journalistic verbal assassins and highly respected international jurists who prey on victims and exonerate imperial criminals.

In recent years Euro-American warlords have employed “the scum of the slaughterhouse” to destroy political adversaries in Libya, Syria and the Ukraine.

In Libya lacking any semblance of a respectable middle-class democratic proxy, the Euro-American empire builders armed and financed murderous tribal bands, notorious jihadist terrorists, contrabandist groups, arms and drug smugglers. The Euro-Americans counted on a pocketful of educated stooges holed up in London to subdue the thugs, privatize Libya’s oil fields and convert the country into a recruiting ground and launch pad for exporting armed mercenaries for other imperial missions.

The Libyan riff-raff were not satisfied with a paycheck and facile dismissal: they murdered their US paymaster, chased the technocrats back to Europe and set-up rival fiefdoms. Gadhafi was murdered, but so went Libya as a modern viable state. The arranged marriage of Euro-American empire builders, western educated technocrats and the armed riff-raff was never consummated. In the end the entire imperial venture ended up as a petty squabble in the American Congress over who was responsible for the murder of the US Ambassador in Benghazi.

The Euro-American-Saudi proxy war against Syria follows the Libyan script. Thousands of Islamic fundamentalists are financed, armed, trained and transported from bases in Turkey, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Libya to violently overthrow the Bashar Assad government in Syria. The world’s most retrograde fundamentalists travel to the Euro-American training bases in Jordan and Turkey and then proceed to invade Syria, seizing towns, executing thousands of alleged ‘regime loyalists’ and planting car bombs in densely populated city centers.

The fundamentalist influx soon overwhelmed the London based liberals and their armed groups.

The jihadist terrorists fragmented into warring groups fighting over the Syrian oil fields. Hundreds were killed and thousands fled to Government controlled regions. Euro-US strategists, having lost their original liberal mercenaries, turned toward one or another fundamentalist groups. No longer in control of the ‘politics’ of the terrorists, Euro-US strategists sought to inflect the maximum destruction on Syrian society. Rejecting a negotiated settlement, the Euro-US strategists turned their backs on the internal political opposition challenging Assad via presidential elections.

In the Ukraine, the Euro-Americans backed a junta of servile neo-liberal technocrats, oligarchical kleptocrats and neo-Nazis, dubbed Svoboda and the Right Sector. The latter were the “shock troops” to overthrow the elected government, massacre the federalist democrats in Odessa and the eastern Ukraine, and back the junta appointed oligarchs serving as “governors”.

The entire western mass media white-washed the savage assaults carried out by the neo-Nazis in propping up the Kiev junta. The powerful presence of the neo-fascists in key ministries, their strategic role as front line fighters attacking eastern cities controlled by pro-democracy militants, establishes them as central actors in converting the Ukraine into a military outpost of NATO. Euro-America Empire Building and the Role of Riff-Raff

Everywhere the Euro-American imperialists choose to expand – they rely on the ‘scum of the earth’: tribal gangs in Libya, fundamentalist terrorists in Syria, neo-Nazis in the Ukraine.

Is it by choice or necessity? Clearly few consequential democrats would lend themselves to the predatory and destructive assaults on existing regimes which Euro-US strategists design. In the course of imperial wars, the local producers, workers, ordinary citizens would “self-destroy”, whatever the outcome. Hence the empire builders look toward ‘marginal groups’, those with no stake in society or economy. Those alienated from any primary or secondary groups. Footloose fundamentalists fit that bill – provided they are paid, armed and allowed to carry their own ideological baggage. Neo-Nazis hostile to democracy have no qualms about serving empire builders who share their ideological hostility to democrats, socialists, federalists and culturally ‘diverse’ societies and states. So they are targeted for recruitment by the empire builders.

The riff-raff consider themselves ‘strategic allies’ of the Euro-American empire builders. The latter, however, have no strategic allies – only strategic interests. Their tactical alliances with the riff-raff endure until they secure control over the state and eliminate their adversaries. Then the imperialist seek to demote, co-opt, marginalize or eliminate their ‘inconvenient’ riff-raff allies. The falling out comes about when the fundamentalists and neo-Nazis seek to restrict capital, especially foreign capital and impose restrictions on imperial control over resources and territory. At first the empire builders seek ‘opportunists’ among the riff-raff, those willing to sacrifice their ‘ideals’ for money and office. Those who refuse are relegated to secondary positions distant from strategic decision-making or to remote outposts. Those who resist are assassinated or jailed. The disposal of the riff-raff serves the empire on two counts. It provides the client regime with a fig leaf of respectability and disarms western critics targeting the extremist component of the junta.

The riff-raff, however, with arms, fighting experience and financing, in the course of struggle, gains confidence in its own power. They do not easily submit to Euro-US strategies. They also have ‘strategic plans’ of their own, in which they seek political power to further their ideological agenda and enrich their followers.

The riff-raff, want to ‘transition’ from shock troops of empire into rulers in their own right. Hence the assaults on the US embassy in Libya, the assassination of Euro-American proxies in Syria, Right Sector riots against the Kiev junta.


A new power bloc is emerging on a global scale. It is already flexing its muscles. It has come to power in India, Turkey, Ukraine and Israel. It brings together big business, technocrats and ethno-religious fascists. They promote unrestrained capitalist expansion in association with Euro-American imperialism.

Scientists, economists, and IT specialists design the programs and plans to realize the profits of local and foreign capitalists. The ethno-fascists mobilize the ‘masses’ to attack minorities and class organizations threatening high rates of returns.

The Euro-Americans contribute to this ‘new power bloc’ by promoting their own ‘troika’ made up of ‘neo-liberal clients’, fundamentalists and neo-Nazis to overthrow nationalist adversaries. The advance of imperialism and capitalism in the 21st century is based on the harnessing of the most advanced technology and up-to-date media outlets with the most retrograde political and social leaders and ideologies.



About James Petras

He is the author of more than 62 books published in 29 languages, and over 600 articles in professional journals, including the American Sociological Review, British Journal of Sociology, Social Research, and Journal of Peasant Studies. He has published over 2000 articles in nonprofessional journals such as the New York Times, the Guardian, the Nation, Christian Science Monitor, Foreign Policy, New Left Review, Partisan Review, TempsModerne, Le Monde Diplomatique, and his commentary is widely carried on the internet.

His publishers have included Random House, John Wiley, Westview, Routledge, Macmillan, Verso, Zed Books and Pluto Books. He is winner of the Career of Distinguished Service Award from the American Sociological Association’s Marxist Sociology Section, the Robert Kenny Award for Best Book, 2002, and the Best Dissertation, Western Political Science Association in 1968. His most recent titles include Unmasking Globalization: Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century (2001); co-author The Dynamics of Social Change in Latin America (2000), System in Crisis (2003), co-author Social Movements and State Power (2003), co-author Empire With Imperialism (2005), co-author)Multinationals on Trial (2006).

He has a long history of commitment to social justice, working in particular with the Brazilian Landless Workers Movement for 11 years. In 1973-76 he was a member of the Bertrand Russell Tribunal on Repression in Latin America. He writes a monthly column for the Mexican newspaper, La Jornada, and previously, for the Spanish daily, El Mundo. He received his B.A. from Boston University and Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley.



Για να πετύχουμε τον στόχο των αγώνων των προγόνων μας το 1821, των παπούδων μας και των πατεράδων μας το 1940 – 1944, και των αδελφών μας το 1973, και για να μην μας ξαναβάλουν οι μεγάλες δυνάμεις με τους ντόπιους συνεργάτες τους στο δράμα ενούς νέου εμφυλιου πολέμου η κάτω από μια νέα φασιστική χούντα. Το ΕΠΑΜ είναι το μόνο κινημα στην Ελλάδα που είναι δημοκρατικό και πατριωτικό, και που θέλει να έχει ο ίδιος ο λαός την διακυβέρνηση της χώρας στα χέρια του και όχι να τον αντιπροσωπεύουν κλέφτες, προδότες και δοσίλογοι. Το ΕΠΑΜ είναι το μόνο κινημα στην Ελλάδα που δείνει τα κατάληλα και απαραίτητα αντίδοτα για τα πνευματικά, πολιτιστικά, συναισθηματικά, ψυχολογικά και διανοητικά δηλητήρια που μας πότιζαν για πάρα πολλά χρόνια. Ελα μαζί μας λοιπόν να σώσουμε την Ελλάδα και να απελευθερώσουμε τον λαό μας!

Συμπατριώτη αδελφέ μου, ήρθε η ώρα να δείξεις τη ποιότητα σου!

Κοσμάς Λουμάκης


Φιλοξενούμενος της ΕΚΠΟΜΠΗΣ ΑΕ ο καθηγητής Πολιτικής Επιστήμης και πρώην Πρύτανης του Πάντειου Πανεπιστημίου κ.Γιώργος Κοντογιώργης.

Η εκδήλωση για την παρουσίαση των 42 υποψηφίων ευρωβουλευτών του ΕΠΑΜ τα είχε όλα… Κόσμο, παλμό και πολιτικά συνθήματα. Πρώτα απ’ όλα, όμως, έστελνε μήνυμα σε Ελλάδα και Ευρώπη.

“Τραγουδώντας και πολεμώντας, έλεγαν οι παλιοί, ότι πάνε στον πόλεμο”, ανέφερε ο Δημήτρης Καζάκης, σημειώνοντας πως “ο αγώνας είναι δύσκολος. Έχουμε μεγάλες απώλειες από το βάρος της καθημερινότητας, της ζωής, αλλά δεν το βάζουμε κάτω. Ο αγώνας είναι πολύ μεγάλος, όταν οι κυβερνώντες θέλουν να σε κάνουν δούλο”.

Η ομιλία και η συζήτηση με το κοινό του γ.γ. του ΕΠΑΜ Δημήτρη Καζάκη στην Θεσσαλονίκη (14 Μαΐου 2014, πλ. Ναυαρίνου), στην κεντρική προεκλογική συγκέντρωση του ΕΠΑΜ Θεσσαλονίκης για τις ευρωεκλογές.
Στην έναρξη της εκδήλωσης απηύθυναν χαιρετισμό οι υποψήφιοι ευρωβουλευτές του ΕΠΑΜ Αλεξάνδρα Γεροντάκη, Αντώνης Παπαντωνίου, Ζωγραφιά Δόγου και Δημήτρης Κυπριώτης.

Συζήτηση στο στούντιο της ΔΕΛΤΑ τηλεόρασης (Αλεξανδρούπολη) όπου φιλοξένησε το γ.γ. και υποψήφιο ευρωβουλευτή του Ε.ΠΑ.Μ. Δημήτρη Καζάκη στις 17 Μαΐου 2014.
Πηγή βίντεο: http://www.deltatv.gr/

Ε.Πα.Μ Επίσημη παρουσίαση των υποψηφίων ευρωβουλευτών Κρήτης με κεντρικό ομιλητή τον Γ.Γ Δημητρη Καζάκη

Oμιλία του γ.γ. του Ε.ΠΑ.Μ. και υποψήφιου ευρωβουλευτή Δημήτρη Καζάκη στο Εργατικό Κέντρο Χανίων στις 13/5/14 και παρουσίαση όλων των υποψήφιων ευρωβουλευτών του Ε.ΠΑ.Μ. της Κρήτης.

Κεντρική προεκλογική εκδήλωση του ΕΠΑΜ Αιγίου, την Κυριακή 11 Μαΐου 2014. Συμμετείχαν οι υποψήφιοι ευρωβουλευτές Λεωνίδας Χρυσανθόπουλος, Αλεξάνδρα Λαδικού, Αντώνης Παπαντωνίου, Γιάννης Σιδέρης, Γιάννα Σιόβα και Γιάννης Αλεξανδρόπουλος.

Απόσπασμα από την κεντρική ομιλία των υποψηφίων ευρωβουλευτών του Ε.ΠΑ.Μ. στο εργατικό κέντρο Κορίνθου την Τετάρτη 7 Μαΐου 2014.

Εκδήλωση του ΕΠΑΜ στην πλ. Φλέμινγκ της Ηλιούπολης, ενόψει ευρωεκλόγων, στις 8 Μαΐου 2014
Ομιλητές :
Δημήτρης Καζάκης, γ.γ. ΕΠΑΜ και υποψήφιος ευρωβουλευτής
Γρηγόρης Πιερρουτσάκος, υποψήφιος ευρωβουλευτής
Καλλιρρόη Δραμιτίνου, υποψήφια ευρωβουλευτής
Δημήτρης Κυπριώτης, υποψήφιος ευρωβουλευτής
Γιάννης Αθανασιάδης
πηγη : ΕΠΑΜ Γλυφαδας-Ελληνικου

Παρουσίαση όλων των υποψήφιων ευρωβουλευτών του ΕΠΑΜ και επίσης όλα τα σχετικά βιντεάκια (210 βίντεο)

Δείτε αυτές τις δυο καταπληκτικές ταινίες ντοκιμαντέρ για το πως φτάσαμε ως εδώ και πως απελευθερωνόμαστε επιτέλους

“ΟΥΣΤ ΚΑΘΑΡΜΑΤΑ” και “ΟΥΣΤ – Η Κραυγή της Ελλάδας”

“Ως Έλληνας, δημοκράτης που σέβεται και τιμά τους αγώνες και τις θυσίες της οικογένειάς του και του λαού του, βλέπω αυτές τις δύο ταινίες σαν δύο απαραίτητα αντίδοτα για τα πνευματικά, πολιτιστικά, συναισθηματικά, ψυχολογικά και διανοητικά δηλητήρια που μας πότιζαν για πάρα πολλά χρόνια. Αυτές τις δύο ταινίες θα πρέπει να τις δουν σε κάθε ελληνικό σπίτι γιατί δεν ειναι μόνο πληροφόρηση, ενημέρωση και γνώση αλλά ειναι έμπνευση και κίνητρο για να σηκώσει ο Έλληνας επιτέλους το κεφάλι του και να απελευθερώσούμε την πατρίδα μας τόσο από της εγχώριες όσο και της ξένες ύαινες,.. μια για πάντα!”

Κοσμάς Λουμάκης


(αν δεν μπορείτε να δείτε το βίντεο εδώ πατήστε το εικονίδιο του youtube)

Van Rompuy: If The Public Doesn’t Want EU Expansion, ‘We Do It Anyway’

In a crass and ill-timed intervention, the unelected president of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy has warned Vladimir Putin that the EU intends ultimately to control every country on the western flank of Russia.


by M.E. Synon 1 May 2014

In an interview with De Standaard newspaper, Van Rompuy speaks about his “dreams” that all the Balkan states will join the EU. He calls it an “inspiring thought” that in the long term “the whole of European territory outside Russia” will be tied in some way to the EU.

He admits he does not know if there is public support for such a move, “But we do it anyway.”

Van Rompuy’s comments, released in the midst of the tensions which have followed moves by Brussels to put Ukraine on the path to EU membership, give credence to Putin’s fears that ultimately the EU intends to put its tanks on Russia’s lawn.

Building a common EU defence is one of the strategic priorities for the Brussels elite who are trying to build “a country called Europe.”

Most people in Britain are unaware of it, but a commitment by Britain and the other member states to common foreign, security and defence policies was written into the Maastricht Treaty of 1992.

In recent years the EU has deepened the integration of the military forces of member states with the framing of the Common Security and Defence Policy.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Francois Hollande are the leading voices for a common defence force for the EU.

In 2008, a report by a respected Dutch think tank warned that the EU is pursuing a secretive “military space policy.” It accused the EU of using the cover of the European Space Agency to develop technologies such as the Galileo satellite system for use by military as well as civilian. authorities

Last July, Martin Schulz, the German socialist President of the European Parliament who is now one of the top candidates to be the next president of the European Commission, said: “We need a headquarters for civil and military missions in Brussels and deployable troops.”

At the same time the European Commission proposed that it should “own and operate” its own surveillance drones.

Last December at a European Council meeting, member states agreed to “deepen defence cooperation.” At a press conference afterwards, David Cameron insisted Britain would block EU institutions from owning and operating their own military assets.

However, the fact is there is nothing Britain can do to stop a group of EU member states from creating their own “intergovernmental” defence force and asking the EU to administer it.

Now in this latest interview, Van Rompuy has said Brussels intends in effect to create an EU national border from the Arctic Circle to the Turkish border with Iraq.

This could threaten Russia’s historic, trade and political ties with Eastern Europe, so it is unlikely Russians will believe Van Rompuy when he insists the EU does not intend to create a “geopolitical shift.”

As long ago as 2007, José Manuel Barroso, the Portuguese former Maoist who is the president of the European Commission, said he liked to compare the EU “to the organisation of an empire.” He said “We have the dimension of an empire. I believe it is a great construction.”

Van Rompuy’s interview makes it clear that the EU elite intend for the empire to go right to the edge of the Russian Motherland.

In reply to Van Rompuy’s interview, a spokesman for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office said: “Europe’s diversity means a one-size-fits-all Europe will not work. You cannot impose a federal, close-knit union on such a varied group of states. There is not the political will to do so.”

“Only 31 per cent of the people across the European Union have a positive view of the EU. Two-thirds believe their voice does not count in the EU. This is not the voice of people who think a ‘United States of Europe’ is the answer to their problems. You have to treat Europe like a network not like a bloc.”

UKIP deputy leader Paul Nuttall said Van Rompuy’s words “demonstrate the frightening expansionist mentality of federalist fanatics.” He said Van Rompuy “does show a rare glimpse of honesty when he admits that the EU’s desire to expand comes without any public approval.”


And let us remember :

Multiple Ways Kleptocrats and Militarists Fleece Americans


Introduction: American living standards are plunging and it’s not simply because they are paid less, work longer (or shorter hours) under highly stressful workplace conditions and pay a higher percentage of their income for health and pension coverage.

The ‘workplace’ is only one of several locations where American working people are experiencing a sharp decline in living standards. The new oligarchical Kleptocrats and political elites have elaborated new ways to fleece Americans. These include:

(1) Increased costs and declining quality of internet, cable and other communication systems.

(2) Intensive pervasive and perpetual surveillance by punitive espionage agencies eroding personal freedoms and violating the confidentiality of personal, political and business decisions affecting everyday life.

(3) Large scale, repeated financial swindles by the most active and influential private and publicly trading investment companies resulting in the loss of hundreds of billions of dollars in pensions and savings for tens of millions of middle and working class investors.

(4) Increases in taxes and charges, including sales taxes, social security deductions, medical co-payments and reductions in social services … This is a result of the government’s commitment to finance US corporate investments and bail-outs. Big business hoards their cash holdings abroad to avoid taxes on overseas profits. To pay dividends they borrow. The growth of corporate debt, concentrated in a few large corporations, holds the US taxpayer liable for any present or future collapse of the financial markets. This corporate-induced ‘hoarding of capital’ compromises present and future living standards. It plays a major role in the deterioration of employment, wages, social services and public infrastructure.

(5) The astronomical growth of state spending on wars of conquest, financial giveaways propping up right-wing dictatorships and building a vast network of global military bases, proxy wars and other empire building measures reduce living standards of Americans. By militarizing everyday life, citizens are subject to mindless repetitive propaganda designed to lower their mental capacity. State terror-mongering propagandists in the mass media distract citizens from their declining living standards. Political elites bully citizens to continue ‘sacrificing’ basic living standards. Video games reproduce the worlds of war and terror, reflecting the real world policies of the ruling class.

Video games allow Americans who know they no longer have influence on political decisions and whose living standards are in decline, to vicariously exercise power and realize favorable outcomes on their mobiles. Purchasing mobiles, video games and other gadgets enrich billionaires’— so-called “high tech” capitalists – and convert citizens into impoverished consumers. They inhabit a bubble of illusions and passivity in the face of growing economic inequalities and political-cultural impoverishment.

The Political Bases of Declining Living Standards

The case of Comcast, the communication monopoly’s seizure of internet, is illustrative of how politics and plunder converge. Comcast TWC, the largest communications company, presently will control 40% of the US broadband and one-third of the US cable television market. By controlling the internet, Comcast will monopolize the principal means of communication of most Americans. The Federal Communications Commissions (FCC), which is supposed to regulate the industry and prevent price gouging monopolies, is “dominated by senior former industry officials” (Financial Times, (FT) 4/14/, pg. 9). Almost every elected national politician from Obama down has received substantial campaign funds from Comcast. During Senate hearings on Comcast’s bid to monopolize the internet through the take-over of Time Warner Cable, Comcast CEO David Cohen smirked and brushed off the Senators puff-questions. FCC complicity, Senatorial whitewashing of the private monopoly, is only part of the story. The internet was developed largely by public funds as was Google’s search engine: the public sector took the risk and the private monopolists , in this case Comcast, harvest the profits.

Comcast charges Americans several times greater then what it costs to use the internet in Sweden, South Korea, Singapore and elsewhere. Yet, US average internet speed is as little as a tenth as fast as that in Japan. In other words the hundreds of millions of US citizens who rely on the internet spend more money for less internet quality in their work day and everyday life. Their work life is intensified, their free time is reduced and their living standards are diminished. With greater concentration of ownership, come greater inequalities in power and income, and a greater disparity of living standards. All of which is obscured by the main beneficiaries – the communication barons and their political cronies.

Declining Living Standards in the Era of the Police State

‘Living’ in the deepest and most intimate sense of the term, means the ability to share ideas, feelings and experiences with individuals, families, friends and citizens without the intrusive and pervasive presence of a punitive state apparatus. When a state spy apparatus intercepts, collects, files, analyzes and makes a police evaluation of citizen’s communications, scientists refer to it as a police-state. The gigantic growth of a police state and its permeation of civil society has dramatically changed for the worse the fundamental bases of inter-personal life and communications. Police state rule, has sharply deteriorated cultural, social, political and economic living conditions. The ‘standards’ for living have been harshly reduced. The ‘legal’, but arbitrary, executive prerogatives of the state have been enhanced. The parameters of the basic rights of citizens have shrunk. As police state expenditures grow and the subjects of surveillance increase, so do budgets and taxes.

Kleptocracy: The Highest Stage of Capitalism

Marx and Marxists for the greater part of the 20th century, focused on capital’s exploitation of labor and the resources of overseas colonies and neo-colonies. In the 21st century a new more dynamic and totally parasitic form of economy has emerged based in the dominant financial sector. Kleptocrats engaged in large-scale, perpetual financial swindles and the pillage of the public treasury greatly impoverish small investors, and the pension funds of employees and workers.

For the better part of two decades, major financial institutions have been engaged in systematic large scale swindles, involving the sale of fraudulent financial packets (dubbed ironically “securities”), profiteering based on insider trading and other illicit activity which is prejudicial to productive activity, investors, tax payers, salary, and wage workers.

Every major investment banks in the US and Europe has been repeatedly investigated, fined and rarely prosecuted. They pay a relatively light fine and return to criminal activity. Looking only at the mega-swindles, involving hundreds of billions of dollars, we would include Enron, the Information Tech “bubble” of the 1990’s to 2000, the Home Mortgage fraud, the Barron, Lehman and Bear Sterns scam. In the run-up to the 2008-9 financial crash , Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, Bank of America were part of the “pump and dump” of low grade home mortgage bonds and equities. The swindlers are recidivists and are so because of the complicity of top Government officials at every moment. State officials design the rules promoting Kleptocracy (deregulation), suspend safeguards, provide tax incentives, and eliminate risk via trillion dollar bailouts of the biggest investment kleptocrats when the swindlers cannibalize their assets and run out of new victims to swindle.

Under kleptocratic capitalism the apex of the system is occupied by the top fifty investment banks, hedge funds and speculators who ‘make markets’. They determine what ‘stocks or investment objects are targeted, to be pumped or dumped, at what rate and for what period of time. The entire activity of the kleptocratic elite has nothing to do with financing the ‘real economy’. Kleptocrats creates paper ‘values’ – paper assets at paper prices, for real victims and huge profits. The kleptocratic system operates like a chain. Kleptocratic speculators extract the savings and investments of a second tier of financial houses. They draw on real resources: savings, trust and pension funds. The second tier speculators are the ‘bag men’ for the dominant kleptocrats and they receive a minor share of the booty in exchange for conning the savings of producers. They write the prospectus to entice investment funds; they formulate the promise of lucrative returns. They send progress reports to clients in exchange for ‘commissions. They also ‘take the rap”, when the crises hits and bankruptcies, foreclosures and scams unfold.

The pension funds, the individual trusts and savings of workers and employees, resulting from decades of creating value in the real economy, forms the base of the pyramid. They have no influence on the political officials who promote, protect and bailout the kleptocrats. Under the kleptocratic elite ideology of “too big to fail”, the state eliminates all the risk for the klepto’s and imposes the losses on the second tier, who pass the losses on to the wage and salaried workers as taxpayers, via trillion dollar transfers from Treasury. Investors suffer via the loss of equity; workers via the loss of jobs, homes, income and social services. Given the vast chasm between the perpetual fraudulent transactions in the mega paper economy and the daily work routines at the bottom, there is great uncertainty, volatility, and insecurity in the work-life of the wage and salaried classes. The uncertainty and capriciousness of the ‘normal’ capitalist economic cycle, is vastly exacerbated by the turbulence caused by the mega-swindles, endless frauds and crooked trades, endemic to the kleptocratic stage of capital.

Kleptocrats and Militarists Together: They Shall Overcome

Just as kleptocrats rule the paper economy, political confidence men and women engage in imperial wars prejudicing the real economy. Imperial militarists extract wealth from the Treasury (the taxpayer) via perpetual political swindles. Imperial invasions and interventions of sovereign countries are ‘sold’ to the taxpayers as “wars on terror”; non-nuclear Iran is sold as a nuclear threat; the violent overthrow of the democratically elected Ukraine government by a pro Washington junta is sold as a “democratic transition”. Just as the kleptocracy’s “driving force” is repeated, large scale swindles, so the governing militarist elite’s “driving force” is the perpetual need to engage in warfare.

The ‘bridge’ between the kleptocrats and the militarists is the respectable financial press (Financial Times (FT), the Wall Street Journal(WSJ). They publicize and praise high level paper transactions (buy outs and mergers) and encourage imperial warfare everywhere and all the time. They editorialize in favor of wars which destroys lucrative trade and investment markets in the real economy because they are aligned with the kleptocrats linked to the paper economy. The Financial Times should change its name to the Military Times. The editors and columnists have supported wars destroying the Libyan, Iraq, Syrian and Ukrainian economies and back sanctions prejudicing trade with Iran. The financial press no longer promotes market relations of the real economy; it is embedded in the paper economy of the kleptos.

Kleptocratic activities have become ‘routinized’ and based on advanced technology and have created highly respected billionaires. Even as I write today (4/14/14) the FT reports that ‘insiders at some of the hottest private and publically traded web companies sold big personal stakes before the slump in stock companies’ (my emphasis) taking advantage of a bubble of their own creation (“pump”) to reap billions at the expense of small investors. Tell it to Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon, and Sheryl Sandberg, CEO of Facebook, who sold at the pre-slump peak, prior to the tech bubble bursting

Domestic Corporate Debt and Overseas Corporate Tax Havens

According to Standards and Poor (S and P), the rating agency, “the biggest US companies have added significantly to their debts during the past three years, at the same time as corporate cash piles have increased” (FT 4/14/14). The total cash holding of the 1,100 companies rated by S and P rose by $204 billion to 1.23 trillion between 2010-13. However, during the same time span their gross debts grew fivefold, rising from $748 billion to $4 trillion. Their net debt (gross debt minus cash holdings) rose 24 percent to $2.78 trillion. By holding cash overseas, US corporations avoid domestic taxes – increasing fiscal pressures, the tax burden on domestic producers and workers, heightening the regressive nature of the tax system Secondly, by loading up on domestic debt, the corporate elite crowds out local borrowers. Piling up debt increases corporate vulnerability to bankruptcy if and when interest rates rise. The corporate elite evading taxes via overseas cash piles include Apple, Microsoft, Cisco Systems, Chevron, and Merck among others. All told the top 25 multi nationals account for 43 percent of the total debt (FT 4/14/14).

Hoarding profits overseas avoids taxes. High domestic indebtedness results from the need to pay dividends and inflate returns to big shareholders. In other words, corporate elites escape taxes and increase economic insecurity for domestic job holders, both of which contribute to a decline in the material and psychological dimensions of ‘living standards’.

Kleptocracy and Militarism: Declining Living Standards

The rise of a powerful kleptocratic economic elite which ‘interpenetrates’ and shares power with a militarist political elite have joined forces to pillage the productive economy and the US Treasury. Their powerful links are the main reason for heightening class inequalities, political and social insecurities. They have driven American society into a permanent state of crises and wars. Over the past quarter century, Americans have lived through two major economic crashes, prolonged periods of stagnation and declining income, three major wars and a multitude of overt and covert military operations – all of which have eroded living standards.

Military propaganda saturates the mass media and permeates all mass spectacles. Stock reports, dominate the economic news. Investment speculators and swindlers are presented as cultural heroes. The gap between elite opinion and interests and those of the majority of citizens widens.

This leads politicians to greater dependence on billionaire campaign funders. The electoral process is unabashedly and totally controlled by the economic oligarchy. The vast majority of Americans recognizes and publically admit their total lack of political influence on all public issues of interest including those privileging the kleptocrats and the warlords.

The deeply felt and pervasive malaise resulting from social impotence in vital spheres of life is the clearest expression of the decline of political living standards. The shrinking of public involvement, the narrow focus of isolated individuals manipulating computerized gadgets , the replacement of face to face public engagement by impersonal electronic communications, are an expression of the decline of social living standards. The rise of ethno-religious chauvinism among klepto-elites is matched by the political warlords’ reliance on systematic deception and espionage of American citizens. Warlords and kleptocrats are enclosed in privileged living enclaves, including the private appropriation of former public spaces, but their intrusion into private communications define the diminished world of everyday life for the most Americans. Life expectancy may have increased but human life has decreased, drastically, over the past quarter of a century.


Blood and gore does not drip off the Saville suited clever inside trader. They never see or hear their victims, nor do they have an interest in them, except to fleece them collectively and anonymously.

America is ruled by a division of labor. The financial speculators, corporate tax evaders, investment bankers – the kleptocratic ruling class– pillage the treasury and productive economy. Their political counterparts manipulate, distract and police their exploited victims – to ensure that they submit or are intimidated if they protest.

When they political elites come up short, there are the new “opiums of the people’ videos, painkillers, terror threats, entertainment and sports spectacles.

But citizens are restless– as living standards continue to decline. Nobody believes in bailing out speculators because they are ‘too big to fail”. Nobody trusts the political leaders who lied their way to twelve year wars, adding others along the way. No one follows media pundit extremists in defense of kleptocrats and warlords. Passive resistance is widespread because it is clear to most Americans that living standards are in a free fall. Time awaits a popular backlash. Will it happen in our lifetime?



About James Petras

He is the author of more than 62 books published in 29 languages, and over 600 articles in professional journals, including the American Sociological Review, British Journal of Sociology, Social Research, and Journal of Peasant Studies. He has published over 2000 articles in nonprofessional journals such as the New York Times, the Guardian, the Nation, Christian Science Monitor, Foreign Policy, New Left Review, Partisan Review, TempsModerne, Le Monde Diplomatique, and his commentary is widely carried on the internet.

His publishers have included Random House, John Wiley, Westview, Routledge, Macmillan, Verso, Zed Books and Pluto Books. He is winner of the Career of Distinguished Service Award from the American Sociological Association’s Marxist Sociology Section, the Robert Kenny Award for Best Book, 2002, and the Best Dissertation, Western Political Science Association in 1968. His most recent titles include Unmasking Globalization: Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century (2001); co-author The Dynamics of Social Change in Latin America (2000), System in Crisis (2003), co-author Social Movements and State Power (2003), co-author Empire With Imperialism (2005), co-author)Multinationals on Trial (2006).

He has a long history of commitment to social justice, working in particular with the Brazilian Landless Workers Movement for 11 years. In 1973-76 he was a member of the Bertrand Russell Tribunal on Repression in Latin America. He writes a monthly column for the Mexican newspaper, La Jornada, and previously, for the Spanish daily, El Mundo. He received his B.A. from Boston University and Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley.



A WARNING TO UKRAINE – Greece Confronts EU-Imposed Humanitarian Catastrophe

by Dean Andromidas

Why would anyone want to join the European Union? The only sane reason to join an association of nations would be to enjoy expanded economic benefits and democratic rights. Well, the EU offers neither. It is not only its moribund economy, with high unemployment, collapsing living standards, etc., but it is now implementing a policy of mass murder. The most obvious case is Greece, where the EU has turned a debt crisis into a humanitarian catastrophe. In 2010, Greece had a debt to gross domestic product ratio of 125%. The EU bureaucrats declared this to be unsustainable, and Greece was forced into a bailout. At the end of the third quarter 2013, that ratio had risen to 183%. The government’s gross debt stands at EU339.6 billion. At least EU270 billion is now held by foreigners. Between the first quarter of 2008, and the third quarter of 2013, it has paid EU67 billion in interest alone.

The over EU200 billion bailout has exclusively gone to pay off creditors, and in the process, created ever-expanding new debt. Despite the widely held belief that German taxpayers will foot the bill for the bailout, the fact is that the individual countries of the euro group issue a guarantee for the bonds that are floated by the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), the bailout fund. The bonds are bought by banks and other institutions, and the Greek government pays off the bonds. Only if there is a default will the non-Greek taxpayers lose. For the banks, such as Deutsche Bank, the bonds are all but free, since once purchased, the bank goes to the European Central Bank (ECB) and receives new liquidity. This arrangement if great for the banks, but lethal for the people of Greece. Since signing the bailout agreement and implementing its memoranda, Greece has been put under the tutelage of the infamous Troika of experts, or more precisely debt collectors, from the European Commission, the European Central Bank, and the International Monetary Fund. Their policy has destroyed the economy, and is killing off the population by creating a humanitarian catastrophe. Some of the evidence:

• Official Greek unemployment has increased from an average of around 10% to 28%, but in reality, it is closer to 50%. Youth unemployment is an impossible 65%. Of the officially registered unemployed, only 16% are receiving any unemployment benefits. Nominal and real wages have been reduced respectively by 23% and 27.8%.

• One-third of the population lives below the poverty line. While no hard figures exist, the number of Greeks who have left the country seeking work is between 500,000 and 1 million. These are not the poor peasants of the 1950s and 1960s, but highly educated young people—doctors, engineers, academics, and scientists— the future of the country.

• The balance of trade has improved only because of a collapse of imports, while exports increased only marginally. In fact, there has been no real increase in exports since the nominal increase, given in euros, represents the petroleum products from the country’s refineries. There was no increase in the volume of petroleum exports, but only an increase in price. In point of fact, exports to the EU continue to decline. In the 1990s, 61% of Greek exports went to the EU; in 2012, the figure was 29.8%. The entire economy has shrunk by more than 25%, the official figure.


The Troika-run Greek Health Minister Adonis Georgiadis is denying lifesaving medical care to cancer sufferers, and others. Here Georgiadis (left) is confronted by an angry Greek audience in London, March 16, 2014.

• There is virtually no liquidity in the country. Despite that fact that banks get liquidity from the ECB for virtually nothing, retail interest rates are a usurious 8.3%, the highest since Greece joined the Eurozone.

• Greek banks are loaded with non-performing debts, while companies, including those in the tourist industry are being starved of credit.

The EU Flu Massacre of 2014

Mass murder is occurring in Greece as you reads these words. It is being done very efficiently by taking down the health system, on orders of the Troika. Use of the term “mass murder” is not rhetorical, as the following examples show. Look at the death toll during this year’s flu season. As of this writing, at least 110 people have died of influenza just in the last several weeks. This is not only the highest rate in Europe, but the second-highest absolute number. The Athens Medical Association (ISA) revealed on March 26 that by contrast, 155 people had died of flu in Spain, whose population is 46 million, four times that of Greece’s 11 million. In France, which has a population six times larger, 52 people died from the virus; while in Romania, which has twice as many citizens as Greece, and is officially the poorest country in the EU, just four people succumbed to the flu. There were also only four deaths in Sweden, which has a comparable population to Greece. Britain reported no deaths from the virus.

untitledccccMedical workers from social clinics and the main state hospital in Athens protest against cuts to health care, Jan. 31, 2014. Eight thousand doctors have been cut from the public health system.


Under “normal” conditions, Greece would have had perhaps 25 flu deaths. The balance of 85 deaths must be viewed as
murder, since it is admitted by the government that it did not purchase enough flu vaccine, and did not conduct an annual fluvaccination campaign for the most vulnerable, a fact that the ISA rightfully termed “criminal.” In a statement, the Medical Association charged that the cause of the flu deaths was the lack of vaccinations, and noted that pharmacists had reported a shortage of flu jabs and doses supplied to health centers of the state insurance fund, EOPYY. “It is tragic and criminal that people are dying for a vaccine that costs EU6 each,” the statement said.

EU Promotes Fascists

It is not surprising that the Greek Health Minister, Adonis Georgiadis, is a well-known ideological fascist who was recruited into the ruling New Democracy Party from the right-wing Laos party. He is a publisher and book dealer. Among his favorite authors, whose books he sells, is Konstaninos Plevris, the number-one fascist ideologue in Greece. His son, Thanos Plevris, is also in the ruling party, and serves as legal advisor to the Health Minister. Georgiadis, under orders of his Troika masters, is implementing a policy that kills. The British medical journal, Lancet has published a study in which it reports that the Greek government and the Troika are in a state of “denial” over the catastrophic consequences of their policy. It’s worse than “denial”—it is intentional: Georgiadis, asked by the Washington Post about the fact that the massive cuts in health care left an alarming number of cancer sufferers with having to pay for their own medications and even surgeries which they cannot afford, replied that, while there is a special fund (only EU17 million!) for emergency aid for those without insurance, “Illnesses like cancer are not considered urgent, unless you are in the final stages.” While the exact number of deaths from cancer is not available, it is widely known that hundreds, if not thousands, of cancer patients have no access to medical insurance. And, it is not just cancers; the same conditions apply to those suffering from most serious diseases, while the severely handicapped have seen their benefits cut dramatically.

Unprecedented death rates have been accomplished, according to Lancet, through savage cuts in funding of health care. The report showed how uninsured cancer patients are left to pay for their own lifesaving treatment as a result of losing their social security coverage due to long-term unemployment. It reports that the health-care budget has been cut by 25% since 2009, and the number of uninsured has increased from 500,000 in 2008, to at least 2.3 million today. Greece now spends less on health care than any of the pre-2004 EU members. For example, the public hospital budget was cut by 26% between 2009 and 2011; in the last two years it has been cut even more. The budget for medicines was slashed from EU4.7 billion in 2010, to EU2.88 billion in 2012, and then to EU2 billion for 2014. Doctors at the country’s hospitals have not been paid for six months, prompting strikes throughout the hospital system. Mental-health care has been savagely cut. Funding for the sector was cut 20% between 2010 and 2011, and by a further 55% between 2011 and 2012. Cases of depression have risen by 250%; suicides, by 45% between 2007 and 2011. Cuts in mosquito spraying have led to the resurgence of malaria, which was virtually wiped out 40 years ago. Thousands of pregnant women no longer have access to health care. The result is infanticide by decree of the Troika: Poor nutrition and lack of medical checkups have contributed to infant deaths, which had previously births, according to figures from the Greek National School of Public Health.

Under the guidelines established by the Troika, Georgiadis has shut down major sections of the national health-insurance program. Under the previous program, general practitioners worked for the national health insurance company, while maintaining their private practice. This gave the patient the choice of keeping the same primary doctor, which is the only way a competent general health system works. This system was closed down, essentially overnight, and all 8,000 doctors dismissed. The new system involves general clinics where doctors are hired on contract for as little as one month. Its implementation has been so slow that most of the country is left without access to general health care. Not surprisingly, Georgiadis has become a hated figure in Greece, and enters public places with caution. His reputation followed him recently to a public event in which he was the keynote speaker at Imperial College in London, where Greek students and academic staff had made it clear before the Minister’s appearance that they opposed his invitation to speak there. “The Minister has repeatedly bullied doctors and medical staff on national television, putting the blame on them for the existing problems, while advertising the need for budget cuts,” they said in a statement. They added, “The rise of Mr. Georgiadis in Greek politics is a symptom of the authoritarian, far-right turn of the Greek government.”

The EU’s Lawlessness

While the European Union ideologues never stop criticizing countries for not failing to adhere to the “rule of law,” the reality is that the EU itself is the biggest violator of the law, even its own treaties. Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Member of the European Parliament representing the Free Democratic Party of Germany, but of Greek descent, charged that the cuts in the Greek health-care system have set the country back decades. Speaking at the European Parliament in Brussels on March 5, Chatzimarkakis charged that what the EU allows the Troika to do in Greece goes against fundamental human rights. Slamming German Chancellor Angela Merkel and European Commission President José Manuel Barroso, Chatzimarkakis said, “There are a lot of legal studies that tell us that the legal security of human rights, basic civil rights, are not given anymore. Mrs Merkel and Mr Barroso present to us another Greece, and not the real Greece.” The United People’s Front (EPAM), a new Greek political party calling for Greece to drop the euro and return to the drachma, detailed in its election program for the European Parliamentary elections how the Troika’s policies violate EU treaties. Am ong a long list of violations they include the following:

• Treaty on European Union: Article 2 on human dignity, freedom, democracy and human rights; Article 3 on peace and well-being; Articles 145-150 on employment and 151-166 on social policy.

• The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU: Article 1 on human dignity; Article 14 on the right to education; Article 17 on the right to property (people have had their property confiscated because they were unable to pay the dramatically higher taxes, especially the property tax); Article 26 on the rights of the elderly; Article 28 on the integrity of persons with disabilities; Article 34 on the right to social security and social assistance.

And of course, Article 35 on the right to health care. In addition to EPAM, the other opposition parties—Syriza, Independent Greeks, Drachma 5, and Plan B— are demanding the suspension of the Troika’s Memorandum, cancellation of the majority of the debt, a Glass-Steagall banking reform, and other emergency measures to deal with the humanitarian catastrophe. In addition, EPAM, Drachma 5, and Plan B are calling for returning to the drachma.


Future Suspended – Το Μέλλον Ανεστάλη

in english

How does a global financial crisis permeate the spaces of the everyday in a city? Our final 35′ documentary film traces the multiple transformations of crisis-ridden Athenian public space and those who traverse it.

Future Suspended is divided in three sections. “Privatised” explores the legacy of mass privatisation projects that preceded the 2004 Olympics, placing them in the context of present day privatisation schemes. “Devalued” gazes at the ever-shrinking spaces of migrants in the city and the devaluation of their lives that comes as a result. “Militarised” shows how, in face of the crisis, this devaluation turns into a generalised condition.

Through its cinematic traversal of today’s Athens, “Future Suspended” traces the rise of the authoritarian-financial complex and how this shrinks public space in the city, fuelling social despair and anger in return.

Future Suspended is part of the research project at crisis-scape.net. The research team consists of Christos Filippidis, Antonis Vradis, Dimitris Dalakoglou, Ross Domoney and Jaya Klara Brekke. All music for Future Suspended was composed by Giorgos Triantafyllou.

This film is released under the Creative Commons BY-NC-ND licence.

Details here: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.­­0/deed.en_GB

στα ελληνικα

Πώς διεισδύει η παγκόσμια οικονομική κρίση στους καθημερινούς χώρους της πόλης; Το τελικό μας ντοκυμαντέρ, διάρκειας 35 λεπτών, ιχνηλατεί τις πολλαπλές μεταμορφώσεις του Αθηναϊκού δημόσιου χώρου σήμερα.

Το ντοκυμαντέρ χωρίζεται σε τρία μέρη: το πρώτο μέρος, με τίτλο “Ιδιωτικοποίηση”, διερευνά τις συνδέσεις ανάμεσα στην ανάπτυξη που χαρακτήρισε την περίοδο της Ολυμπιάδας του 2004 και τα σύγχρονα προγράμματα ιδιωτικοποίησης που λαμβάνουν χώρα μέσα στο πλαίσιο της οικονομικής κρίσης. Το δεύτερο μέρος, με τίτλο “Υποτίμηση”, εξετάζει τους τρόπους με τους οποίους συρρικνώνονται, σήμερα, οι αστικοί χώροι για τους/τις μετανάστες/ριες, και την επακόλουθη υποτίμηση της ζωής τους. Το τελευταίο μέρος, με τίτλο “Στρατιωτικοποίηση”, καταδεικνύει πώς με αφετηρία την κρίση, η υποτίμηση μετατρέπεται σε μια γενικευμένη συνθήκη—πώς η άνοδος του οικονομικο-αυταρχικού συμπλέγματος συρρικνώνει το δημόσιο χώρο στην πόλη, τροφοδοτώντας ως αποτέλεσμα την κοινωνική απόγνωση και οργή.

Μέσω κινηματογραφική διάσχιση της σημερινής Αθήνας, “Το Μέλλον Ανεστάλη” παρακολουθεί την άνοδο του αυταρχικού-οικονομικό συγκρότηματος και πώς μεσο αυτό συρρικνώνεται ο δημόσιος χώρος στην πόλη, τροφοδοτώντας την κοινωνική απελπισία και θυμό σε αντάλλαγμα.

Η ταινία αυτή υπό την άδεια CreativeCommonsBY-NC-ND. Πληροφορίεςεδώ: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.­­0/deed.en_GB


Defeating Fascism before it’s too Late

03.23.2014 :: Latin America


Introduction: Captain Jose Guillen Araque, of the Venezuelan National Guard, recently gave President Maduro a book on the rise of Nazism, warning that “fascism has to be defeated before it’s too late”! In retaliation for his prophetic warning, the patriotic young captain was shot by a US-backed assassin on the streets of Marcay in the state of Aragua on March 16, 2014.

This raised the number of Venezuelan soldiers and police killed since the fascist uprising to 6. The total killed is 33. The killing of a prominent, patriotic officer on a major street in a provincial capital is one more indication that the Venezuelan fascists are on the move, confident of their support from Washington and from a broad swath of the Venezuelan upper and middle class. They constitute a minority of the electorate and they have no illusions about taking power via constitutional and democratic means.

Captain Guillen Araque had stepped forward to remind President Maduro that the road to power for Nazi and fascist totalitarian groups has been littered with the corpses of well-meaning democrats and social democrats throughout contemporary history because of their failure to use their constitutional powers to crush the enemies of democracy.

The History of the rise of Fascism under Democracies

The term “fascist” in Venezuela is appropriately applied to the organized violent political groups currently engaged in mass terror in a campaign to destabilize and overthrow the democratically-elected Bolivarian government. Academic purist might argue that the Venezuelan fascists lack the racist and nationalist ideology of their German, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese predecessors. While true, it is also irrelevant. The Venezuelan brand of fascism is highly dependent on, and acts as a proxy for, US imperialism and their Colombian warlord allies. In one sense however, Venezuelan fascism’s racism is directed against its multiracial African-Amerindian Venezuelan working and peasant classes – as demonstrated by their vitriolic racism against the deceased President Hugo Chavez. The essential connection with earlier fascist movements is found in its (1) profound class hostility to the popular majority; (2) its visceral hatred of the Chavista Socialist Party, winner of 18 of the last 19 elections; (3) its resort to the armed seizure of power by a minority acting on behalf of the domestic and US imperial ruling classes; (4) its intention to destroy the very democratic institutions and procedures which it exploits in order to gain political space; (5) its targeting of working class institutions – communal councils, neighborhood associations, public health and dental clinics, public schools, transport, subsidized food stores, political meeting places, public credit unions, trade union organizations and peasant co-operatives; (6) and its support of capitalist banks, huge commercial landed estates and manufacturing firms.

In Germany, Italy, Spain, France and Chile, fascist movements also began as small terrorist groups, who gained the financial backing of the capitalist elite because of their violence against working class organizations and democratic institutions and recruited primarily among middle class university students, elite professionals (especially doctors) and active and retired higher military officers – united in their hostility to the democratic order.

Tragically and all too often, democratic leaders, operating within a constitutional government, tended to regard fascists as “just another party”, refusing or unwilling to crush the armed thugs, who combined terror in the streets with elections to gain state power. Constitutionalist democrats have failed or were unwilling to see the political, civilian arm of the Nazis as part and parcel of one organic totalitarian enemy; so they negotiated and debated endlessly with elite fascists who meanwhile destroyed the economy while terrorists pounded away at the political and social foundations of the democratic state. The democrats refused to send out their multi-million mass supporters to face the fascist hordes. Worse, they even prided themselves on jailing their own supporters, police and soldiers, who had been accused of using ‘excessive force’ in their confrontation with fascist street thugs. Thus the fascists easily moved from the streets to state power. The elected democrats were so concerned about criticism from the international and capitalist media, elite critics and self-appointed ‘human rights’ organizations, that they facilitated the takeover by fascists. The people’s right to the armed defense of their democracy had been subordinated to the pretext of upholding ‘democratic norms’ – norms that any bourgeois state under assault would have rejected! Constitutional democrats failed to recognize how drastically politics had changed. They were no longer dealing with a parliamentary opposition preparing for the next election; they were confronted with armed terrorists and saboteurs committed to armed struggle and the seizure of political power by any means – including violent coups-d’états.

In the lexicon of fascism, democratic conciliation is a weakness, a vulnerability and an open invitation to escalate violence; ‘peace and love’ and ‘human rights’ slogans are to be exploited; calls for ‘negotiations’ are preambles for surrender; and ‘agreements’ preludes to capitulation.

To the terrorists, the democratic politicians who warn about a “threat of fascism” while acting as if they were engaged in ‘parliamentary skirmishes’, become an open target for violent attack.

This is how the fascists came to power, in Germany, Italy and Chile, while the constitutionalist democrats, to the last, refused to arm the millions of organized workers who could have throttled the fascists and saved democracy and preserved their own lives.

Fascism in Venezuela: A Mortal Threat Today

The martyred hero, Captain Guillen Araque’s warning of an imminent fascist danger in Venezuela has a powerful substantive basis. While the overt terrorist violence ebbs and flows, the underlying structural basis of fascism in the economy and society remains intact. The subterranean organizations, financing and organizing the flow of arms to fascists-in-waiting remain in place.

The political leaders of the opposition are playing a duplicitous game, constantly moving from legal forms of protest to sub-rosa complicity with the armed terrorists. There is no doubt that in any fascist putsch, the political oligarchs will emerge as the real rulers – and will share power with the leaders of the fascist organizations. In the meantime, their ‘respectability’ provides political cover; their ‘human rights’ campaigns to free incarcerated street thugs and arsonists earn ‘international media support’ while serving as ‘intermediaries’ between the open US funding agencies, and the clandestine terrorist underground.

In measuring the scope and depth of the fascist danger, it is a mistake to simply count the number of bombers, arsonists and snipers, without including the logistical, back-up and peripheral support groups and institutional backers who sustain the overt actors,

To ‘defeat fascism before it is too late’, the government must realistically assess the resources, organization and operational code of the fascist command and reject the overly sanguine and ‘upbeat’ pronouncements emanating from some ministers, advisers and legislators.

First, the fascists are not simply a small band confined to pounding on pots and attacking municipal workers in the upper-middle class neighborhoods of Caracas for the benefit of the international and corporate media. The fascists are organized on a national basis; their members are active throughout the country.

They target vital institutions and infrastructure in numerous strategic locations.

Their strategy is centrally-controlled, their operations are decentralized.

The fascists are an organized force; their financing, arming and actions are planned. Their demonstrations are not ‘spontaneous’, locally-organized actions, responding to government ‘repression’ as depicted in the bourgeois and imperial media.

The fascists bring together different cross currents of violent groups, frequently combining ideologically-driven right-wing professionals, large-scale smuggling gangs and drug traffickers (especially in border regions), paramilitary groups, mercenaries and known felons. These are the ‘frontline fascists’, financed by major currency speculators, protected by elected local officials, offered ‘sanctuary’ by real estate investors and high-level university bureaucrats.

The fascists are both ‘nationals’ and internationals: They include locally paid thugs and students from upper-middle class families; paramilitary Colombian soldiers, professional mercenaries of all sorts, ‘contract killers’ from US ‘security’ outfits and clandestine US Special Forces Operatives; and fascist ‘internationalists’ recruited from Miami, Central America, Latin America and Europe.

The organized terrorists have two strategic sanctuaries for launching their violent operations – Bogota and Miami, where prominent political leaders, like ex-President Alvaro Uribe and US Congressional leaders provide political support.

The convergence of highly lucrative criminal economic activity and political terrorism presents a formidable double threat to the stability of the Venezuelan economy and the security of the state . . . Criminals and terrorists find a common home under the US political tent, designed to overthrow Venezuela’s democratic government and crush the Bolivarian revolution of the Venezuelan people.

The backward and forward inter-linkages between criminals and terrorists inside and outside the country, between Washington senior policymakers, street drug pushers and contraband ‘camels’, provides the international elite mouthpieces and the muscle for street fighters and snipers.

Terrorist targets are not chosen at ‘random’; they are not products of an enraged citizenry protesting social and economic inequities. The carefully chosen targets of terrorism are the strategic programs which sustain the democratic administration; first and foremost the mass social institutions forming the base of the government. This explains why terrorists bomb health clinics for the poor, public schools and centers for adult education in the barrios, the state subsidized food stores and the public transport system. These are part of the vast, popular welfare system set up by the Bolivarian government. They are key building blocks in securing massive voter support in 18 out of the last 19 elections and popular power in the streets and communities. By destroying the social welfare infrastructure, the terrorists hope to break the social bonds between people and government.

Terrorists target the legitimate national security system: Namely, the police, National Guard, judges, public prosecutors and other authorities in charge of safeguarding citizens. The assassinations, violent attacks and threats against public officials, the fire-bombing of public buildings and public transport are designed to create a climate of fear and to demonstrate that the state is weak and incapable of protecting the everyday life of its citizens. The terrorists want to project an image of ‘dual power’ by seizing public spaces and blocking normal commerce… and by ‘governing the streets through the gun’. Above all the terrorists want to demobilize and curtail popular counter-demonstrations by blocking streets and sniping at activists engaged in political activity in contested neighborhoods. The terrorists know they can count on their ‘legal’ political opposition allies to provide them with a mass base via public demonstrations, which can serve as a shield for violent assaults and a pretext for greater sabotage.


Fascism, namely armed terrorism directed at violently overthrowing a democratic government, is a real and immediate threat in Venezuela. The day-to-day, ups and downs of street fighting and arson are not an adequate measure of the threat. As we have noted, the in-depth structural and organizational supports underlying the rise and growth of fascism are far more important. The challenge in Venezuela is to cut-off the economic and political basis of fascism. Unfortunately, up until recently the government has been overly sensitive to hostile criticism from overseas and domestic elites who rush to defend fascists – in the name of “democratic freedom”. The government of Venezuela has enormous resources at its disposal to root out the fascist threat. Even if firm action causes an outcry from overseas liberal friends, most pro-democracy advocates believe it is incumbent upon the government to act against those opposition officials who continue to incite armed rebellion.

Most recently, there have been clear signs that the Venezuelan government, with its powerful democratic and constitutional mandate, is moving with awareness of the fascist danger and will act with determination to stamp it out in the streets and in the suites.

The National Assembly has voted to strip Congresswoman Corina Machado of her immunity as a deputy in the National Assembly so she can be prosecuted for inciting violence. The President of the National Assembly Diosdado Cabello has presented detailed documentary evidence of her role in organizing and promoting armed rebellion. Several opposition mayors, actively involved in promoting and protecting snipers, street thugs and arsonists, have been charged and arrested.

The majority of Venezuelans confronted by the rising tide of fascist violence support the punishment of these high officials engaged in or supporting sabotage. Without firm action, Venezuelan intelligence agencies as well as the average citizen agree that these ‘opposition’ politicos will continue to promote violence and provide sanctuary for paramilitary assassins.

The government has realized that they are engaged in a real war, planned by a centralized leadership and executed by decentralized operatives. Legislative leaders are coming to grips with the political psychology of fascism, which interprets Presidential offers of political conciliation and judicial leniency as weakness to be exploited by further violence.

The most significant advance toward stopping the fascist threat lies in the government’s recognition of the links between the parliamentary and business elite and the fascist terrorists: financial speculators, smugglers and big-time hoarders of food and other essential commodities are all part and parcel of the same fascist drive for power together with the terrorists who bomb public food markets and attack the trucks transporting food to the poor neighborhoods. One revolutionary worker said to me after a street skirmish: “Por la razon y la fuerza no pasaran!”(Through reason and force they will be defeated)…


Violence and Terror: The Ukrainian and Colombian Road to Empire Building

03.20.2014 :: Latin America – Analysis


Introduction: The two paths to 21st century empire-building-via-proxies are illustrated through the violent seizure of power in the Ukraine by a US-backed junta and the electoral gains of the US-backed Colombian war lord, Alvaro Uribe.

We will describe the ‘mechanics’ of US intervention in the domestic politics of these two countries and their profound external effects – that is how they enhance imperial power on a continent-wide basis.

Political Intervention and Proxy Regimes: Ukraine

The conversion of the Ukraine into a US-EU vassal state has been a prolonged process which involved large scale, long term financing, indoctrination and recruitment of cadres, organization and training of politicos and street fighters and, above all, a capacity to combine direct action with electoral politics.

Seizing power is a high stakes game for empire: (1) Ukraine, in the hands of clients, provides a NATO with a military springboard into the heart of the Russian Federation; (2) Ukraine’s industrial and agricultural resources provide a source of enormous wealth for Western investors and (3) Ukraine is a strategic region for penetrating the Caucuses and beyond.

Washington invested over $5 billion dollars in client-building, mostly in ‘Western Ukraine’, especially in and around Kiev, focusing on ‘civil society groups’ and malleable political parties and leaders. By 2004, the initial US political ‘investment’ in regime change culminated in the so-called ‘Orange Revolution’ which installed a short-lived pro-US-EU regime. This, however, quickly degenerated amidst major corruption scandals, mismanagement and oligarchical pillage of the national treasury and public resources leading to the conviction of the former-Vice President and the demise of the regime. New elections produced a new regime, which attempted to secure ties with both the EU and Russia via economic agreements, while retaining many of the odious features (gross endemic corruption) of the previous regime. The US and EU, having lost thru democratic elections, relaunched their ‘direct action organizations’ with a new radical agenda. Neo-fascists seized power and established a dictatorial junta through violent demonstrations, vandalism, armed assaults and mob action. The composition of the new post-coup junta reflected two sides of the US-backed political organizations: (1) neo-liberal politicos for managing economic policy and forging closer ties with NATO, (2) and neo-fascists/violent nationalists to impose order by force and fist, and crush pro-Russian Crimean ‘autonomists’ and ethnic Russians and other minorities, especially in the industrialized south and east.

Whatever else may ensue, the coup and the resultant junta is fully subordinated to and dependent on the will of Washington: claims of Ukrainian ‘independence’ notwithstanding. The junta proceeded to purge the elected and appointed government officials affiliated with the political parties of the previous democratic regime and to persecute its supporters. Their purpose is to ensure that subsequent managed elections will provide a pretense of legitimacy, and elections will be limited to two sets of imperial clients: the neo-liberals, (self-styled “moderates”) and the neo-fascists dubbed as “nationalists”.

Ukraine’s road to imperialist power via a collaborator regime illustrates the various instruments of empire building: (1) the use of imperial state funds, channeled through NGOs, to political front groups and the build-up of a ‘mass base’ in civil society; (2) the financing of mass direct action leading to a coup (‘regime change’); (3) the imposition of neo-liberal policies by the client regime; (4) imperial financing of the re-organization and regroupment of mass direct action groups after the demise of the first client regime; (5) the transition from protest to violent direct action as the major backdrop to the extremist sectors (neo-fascists) organizing the seizure of power and purge of the opposition; (6) organizing an ‘international media campaign’ to prop up the new junta while demonizing domestic and international opposition (Russia) and (7) political power centralized in the hands of the junta, convoking “managed elections” limited to the victory of one or the other pro-imperial pro-junta candidates.

In summary, empire-builders operate on several/levels: violent and electoral; social and political; and with selected incumbents and rivals committed to one strategic aim: the seizure of state power and the conversion of the ruling elite into willing vassals of empire.

Columbia’s Deathsquad Democracy: Centerpiece of the Imperial Advance in Latin America

In the face of a continent-wide decline of US influence in Latin America, Colombia stands out as a constant bulwark of US imperial interests: (1) Colombia signed a free trade agreement with the US; (2) provided seven military bases and invited thousands of US counter-insurgency operatives; and (3) collaborated in building large-scale paramilitary death squads prepared for cross border raids against Washington’s arch enemy Venezuela.

Colombia’s ruling oligarchy and military have been able to resist the wave of massive democratic, national and popular social upheavals and electoral victories that gave rise to the post-neo-liberal states in Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, Paraguay and Uruguay.

While Latin America has moved toward ‘regional organizations’ excluding the US, Colombia strengthened its ties to the US through bilateral agreements. While Latin America reduced its dependence on US markets, Colombia expanded its commercial ties. While Latin America reduced their military ties to the Pentagon, Colombia tightened them. While Latin America moved toward greater social inclusion by increasing taxes on foreign multinational corporations, Colombia lowered corporate taxes. While Latin America expanded land settlements for its landless rural populations, Colombia displaced over 4 million peasants as part of the US-designed ‘scorched earth’ counter-insurgency policy.

Colombia’s “exceptional” unwavering submission to US imperial interests is rooted in several large-scale, long-term programs developed in Washington. In 2000, President ‘Bill’ Clinton committed the US to a $6 billion dollar counter-insurgency program (Plan Colombia) which greatly increased the brutal repressive capacity of the Colombian elite to confront the popular grass roots movements of peasants and workers. Along with arms and training, US Special Forces and ideologues entered Colombia to develop military and paramilitary terror operations – aimed primarily at penetrating and decimating political opposition and civil society social movements and assassinating activists and leaders. The US-backed Alvaro Uribe, notorious narco-trafficker and the very personification of a ruthless imperial vassal, became president over a ‘Death-Squad Democracy’.

President Uribe further militarized Colombian society, savaged civil society movements and crushed any possibility of a popular democratic revival, such as were occurring throughout the rest of Latin America. Thousands of activists, trade unionists, human rights workers and peasants were murdered, tortured and jailed.

The ‘Colombian System’ combined the systematic use of para-militarism (death squads) to smash local and regional trade union and peasant opposition and the technification and massification of the military (over 300,000 soldiers) in fighting the popular insurgency and ‘emptying the countryside’ of rebel sympathizers. Large-scale multi-billion dollar drug trafficking and money laundering formed the ‘financial glue’ to cement a tight relationship among oligarchs, politicos, bankers and US counter-insurgency advisers – creating a terrifying high-tech police state bordering Venezuela, Ecuador and Brazil – countries with substantial popular mass movements.

The same state terror machinery, which decimated the pro-democracy social movements, has protected, promoted and participated in ‘stage-managed elections’, the hallmark of Colombia as a “death squad democracy”.

Elections are held under a vast overlapping network of military bases, where death squads and drug traffickers occupied towns and villages intimidating, terrorizing and ‘corrupting’ the electorate. The only ‘safe’ protest in this repressive atmosphere has been voter abstention. Electoral outcomes are pre-ordained: oligarchs never lose in deathsquad democracies, they are the empire’s most trusted vassals.

The cumulative effects of the decade and a half-long bloody purge of Colombian civil society by Presidents Uribe and his successor, Santos, have been to eliminate any consequential electoral opposition. Washington has achieved its ideal: a stable vassal state; a large-scale and obedient military; an oligarchy tied to US corporate elites; and a tightly-controlled ‘electoral’ system that never permits the election of a genuine opponent.

The March 2014 Colombian elections brilliantly illustrate the success of US strategic intervention in collaboration with the oligarchy: The vast majority of the electorate, over two-thirds, abstained, demonstrating the absence of any real legitimacy among the eligible voters. Among those who ‘voted’, ten percent submitted ‘spoiled’ or blank ballots. Voter abstention and ballot-spoilage was especially high in the rural regions and working class areas which had been subject to state terror.

Given the intense state repression, the mass of voters decided that no authentic pro-democracy party would have any chance and so refused to legitimize the process. The 30% who actually voted were largely urban middle and upper class Colombians and residents in some rural areas completely controlled by narco-terrorists and the military where ‘voting’ may have been ‘compulsory’. Of a total of 32 million eligible voters in Colombia, 18 million abstained and another 2.3 million submitted spoiled ballots. The two dominant oligarchical coalitions led by President Santos and ex-President Uribe received only 2.2 million and 2.05 million votes respectively, a fraction of the number who abstained (14 million). In this widely scorned electoral farce, the center-left and left parties made a miserable showing. Colombia’s electoral system puts a propaganda veneer on dangerous, highly-militarized vassal state primed to play a strategic role in US plans to “reconquer” Latin America.

Two decades of systematic terror, financed by a six-billion dollar militarization program, has guaranteed that Washington will not encounter any substantial opposition in the legislature or presidential palace in Bogota. This is the ‘acrid, gunpowder-tinged smell of success’ for US policymakers: violence is the midwife of the vassal state. Colombia has been turned into the springboard for developing an US-centered trade bloc and a military alliance to undermine Venezuela’s Bolivarian regional alliances, such as ALBA and Petro Caribe as well as Venezuela’s national security. Bogota will try to influence neighboring right and center-left regimes pushing them to embrace of the US Empire against Venezuela.


Large-scale, long-term subversion and organization in Ukraine and Colombia, as well as the funding of paramilitary and civil society organizations (NGO) has enabled Washington to: (1) construct strategic allies, (2) build ties to oligarchs, malleable politicians and paramilitary thugs and (3) apply political terrorism for their seizure of state power. The imperial planners have thus created “model states” – devoid of consequential opponents and ‘open’ to sham elections among rival vassal politicians.

Coups and juntas, orchestrated by longstanding political proxies, and highly militarized states run by ‘Death Squad Executives’ are all legitimized by electoral systems designed to expand and strengthen imperial power.

By rendering democratic processes and peaceful popular reforms impossible and by overthrowing independent, democratically elected governments, Washington is making wars and violent upheavals inevitable.



Financial Times : Schäuble revives push for Eurozone integration

Germany is pushing for changes to EU treaties “as soon as possible” after the May European elections, in an overhaul to fuse eurozone economic governance behind a budget chief and euro area parliament.

In interviews, speeches and articles, Wolfgang Schäuble, Germany’s finance minister, has given urgency and political impetus to Berlin’s longstanding ideas for a refashioned and more centralised eurozone.

Asked when he envisaged agreeing the treaties, he said “today is better than tomorrow” and called for negotiations to start straight after the European parliament elections in May.

These reforms to integrate the eurozone, he added, must be paired with measures to ensure those countries outside are not “systematically disadvantaged” – an approach that will be welcomed by Britain.

downloadIn a joint Financial Times article with George Osborne, the UK chancellor, he wrote that future treaty change “must include reform of the governance framework to put euro area integration on a sound legal basis, and guarantee fairness for those EU countries inside the single market but outside the single currency”.

Mr Schäuble’s intervention to restart the reform debate highlights Berlin’s determination that the EU should build on the eurozone’s fragile economic recovery from the financial crisis by creating institutions strong enough to withstand future turmoil.

The veteran finance minister’s pledge to fight for reform comes after the joint declaration in January from German chancellor Angela Merkel and French president François Hollande, pledging to work for closer economic and monetary union.

But the German government has now gone a step further, arguing in the FT that treaty change must also address one of key negotiating demands of Mr Cameron, the UK prime minister, before his planned 2017 referendum: the protection of the interests of euro “outs”.

Mr Schäuble, a long-term advocate of reform, wants to establish an institutional architecture for a common fiscal and economic policy, with a parliament, finance minister and budget to support countries in crisis and encourage reform.

He said it was “nonsense” to suggest the power for a eurozone commissioner to reject national budgets would impinge on sovereignty. “To stick to the rules is not a violation of budget sovereignty . . . of national sovereignty. We have moved sovereignty to the European level,” he said.

Germany’s renewed appetite for treaty reform will rattle some eurozone member states, which fear the centralisation of budget power would potentially trigger national plebiscites that could not be won.

Big gains for more radical, eurosceptic parties in the May elections could undermine efforts by mainstream parties such as Ms Merkel’s CDU to build a political consensus for strengthening the eurozone.

Acknowledging the populist threat in an interview with Handelsblatt, the business daily, Mr Schäuble said that the performance of France’s National Front in the recent local elections and the growth of eurosceptic parties elsewhere was “not a good development”.

But he took comfort from hopes that the Ukraine crisis could boost voter support for European integration, saying: “Europe always advances in a crisis . . . the crisis in Ukraine will make people in Europe more confidence about the value of European integration again, and motivate them to vote. Then the turnout would rise, and the eurosceptic forces would likely perform worse than many fear today.”

The finance minister forecast that the effect of the crisis for the German economy would be “manageable”. As for sanctions, German industry had made clear that if they were imposed it would be ready. “You have to convince Russia with diplomacy and economic pressure. Compliance with the rules and principles is not only in the interests of the west but also Russia.”


Media ‘staged’ Syria chem attack

BBC’s ‘total fabrication from beginning to end’ of Syria ‘atrocity'; call to revoke visas for intel agents posing as reporters in NATO targets; CIA caught infiltrating CNN, and Operation Mockingbird is back.

Seek truth from facts with UK Member of Parliament George Galloway, Illinois University Professor of International Law Francis Boyle, investigative reporter John Helmer, ordinary Syrians and Ukraine covergirl – ‘Julia’.

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

RT: “Stunning fakery” in alleged chemical weapons attack according to a former UK ambassador. Coming up…
Announcer: The British Broadcasting Corporation is accused of staging chemical weapons attack.
The CIA admits planting CNN reporters.
And international lawyers call for journalists inciting violence to be expelled.

RT: August 2013 – NATO leaders can’t get the public on side for the imminent bombing of Syria. Suddenly the BBC says it was filming a small rural hospital and a game-changing atrocity happened right there, the moment they were filming.

BBC report: We were filming the doctors working at this hospital when victims of an incendiary bomb attack on a school playground started pouring in.
BBC interview: Absolute chaos and carnage here. It must be some sort of napalm.

RT: But a highly sceptical public stayed hostile to military intervention. Exactly one month later the leaders are trying to pin a chemical weapons attack on Syria without success.

The BBC airs exactly the same footage, but digitally alters the word “napalm” for “chemical weapons”, hoping no one will notice.
BBC interview: Absolute chaos and carnage here. It must be some sort of chemical weapon.

RT: Not only did folks notice but it unleashed a massive public investigation which made some extremely disturbing findings.

Robert Stuart: This is the total fabrication, from beginning to end, of an atrocity, with BBC “reporter” Ian Pannell standing amidst a tableau of very bad actors. This is completely beyond the pale.

RT: This audio analysis by media investigator Robin Upton shows both versions are identical and from the same speech. The BBC then digitally altered the words from “napalm” to “chemical weapon”, the exact justification NATO was finding difficult to prove.

That game-changing allegation was made by two doctors that had travelled with the BBC, who claimed the number of sudden casualties is “overwhelming”.

What kind of doctor, notes media investigator Robert Stuart, gives interviews when she is surrounded by supposedly seriously burned and dying teenagers?
Nurse: Get anyone who isn’t a patient out of here.

RT: When a nurse does finally start to help, her order to “get anyone who isn’t a patient out of here” doesn’t apply to the cameramen. Even worse, notes Stuart, is the bizarre acting, which starts when the man in the centre gives the sign.

RT: Doctor Rola, on whose sole claim the BBC sends the napalm/chemical weapons allegations round the world, is actually the daughter of Syrian rebel Mousa Al-Kurdi.

The parallel to the Gulf War and “Nurse Nayirah” is stunning. Congressmen said the nurse’s tearful testimony that Iraqis were killing children swung their vote in favour of war.

“Nurse Nayirah” testimony: They took the incubators and left the children to die on the cold floor. (weeps).
RT: “Nurse Nayirah” became the mainstream’s darling, but once the vote had safely passed, she admitted inventing the whole thing, and was actually the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to Washington, lying to get the public to back war.

UK Member of Parliament George Galloway joins us, thank you very much for coming on. Why do we get almost identical claims before each war, which then prove lies?

George Galloway, UK Member of Parliament: Well, the Bush and Blair Corporation, as it became in the run-up to the Iraq war, has almost entirely lost its reputation for journalistic integrity.

A full inquiry must be launched into why the BBC used a piece of material which was not just wrong but was falsified, and falsified with the purpose of propelling our country into war. That’s not what the British public pays its BBC licence fee for, so that it can be tricked into a war.

RT: In a statement, the British Broadcasting Corporation says it stands by its report. The Syrian opposition denies the allegations. Investigators such as Robert Stuart note their many questions sent officially to the corporation remain unanswered. There are also numerous such precedents both in this war and previous invasions.

“Brilliant” is how a top Western official called tricking the public through routine faking of atrocities and commonly aired on mainstream bulletins. Nightly News show just a few cases of what happened next after mainstream cameras ended their reports.

Nightly News: It shows people putting on fake wounds, it shows some guys there, look there’s their head wounds “Peace everybody!You know we’re doing the right thing, we’re creating fake propaganda!” I mean it’s not even real atrocities.So there they’re lined up. There’s another video that shows some guy kicking his leg, with a fake blood wound.

Here’s a guy who wakes up from his funeral! Watch this. Oh, wait there, he’s awake, he’s not even really dead! So I mean this is just crazy what goes on. There was another video that was shot of a supposed massacre and you don’t see the whole thing.When you go to the Al Jazeera footage it shows real quick clips of a guy kicking his leg and he’s got blood coming out. It turned out to be fake blood.

RT: The so-called “activists” behind the fakes are by far the most popular source, despite them never being verified, and regularly disproved as fabrications to justify more NATO arms. The term “activist” may sound like a well-meaning Western campaigner or charity, but the Foreign Policy Journal notes it’s just Newspeak for “insurgents”.

The “official” source on Syria casualties, or what mainstream claims is “official”, is impressive-sounding organization The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. Reuters exposed the fact three years ago it was not an organization at all, or even working in Syria. It’s a single pro-insurgent supporter living in Coventry – England.

Here pictured at the Foreign Office, after instructions from Britain’s Foreign Minister himself.

In leaked footage, ordinary Syrians told the BBC they’re tired of its lies and the insurgents they’re cheerleading are a tiny minority led by foreign gangs.

BBC reporter: You don’t like the BBC?

Syrian citizen: BBC? No. Tell her. Tell her.
BBC reporter:Huh? Why?

Syrian: Because you’re talking very bad about Syria. Everybody when they hear BBC Arabic they can hear the lies about Syria – also Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya.

BBC: But what? But maybe Syria is like any country, some people support and some people don’t support?

Syrian: No-no, everybody support.

BBC reporter: So Syria is different?

Syrian: Very little people, maybe 10,000 like that but most people, 22 million, 23 million, support Bashar al-Assad. And we have not “demonstrations” – we have armed gangs.

RT: Pro-war media’s forced to resort to colossal lies since intelligence chiefs revealed to America’s top investigative reporter Sy Hersh that“Obama’s cronies are making it up”. All the evidence actually points to the jihadis staging the chemical attacks.

Sy Hersh, author, Whose Sarin?: The attack ‘was not the result of the current regime’, the high-level intelligence officer wrote in an email to a colleague. ‘The guys are throwing their hands in the air and saying, “How can we help this guy” – Obama – when he and his cronies in the White House make up the intelligence as they go along?’, said a former senior intelligence official. The distortion, he said, reminded him of the Gulf of Tonkin Incident.

Wag The Dog movie: – The president wants a white one.

- He wants a white one? The white? Let me talk to him.

- He’s mobilizing the sixth fleet.

RT: The thought a US president would start a horrific foreign war by staging a pretty female front as a victim made people laugh.

Wag The Dog: The young Albanian national fleeing in this video is attempting to escape terrorist reprisals in her village.

RT: Meet Julia, if that’s her real name, the celebrated face mass media call the “creator” of a viral video asking the US to help Ukraine. It was actually created by the State Department’s National Endowment for Democracy, to mask the fact Washington joined Ukraine’s thugs and murdered their way to power.

A leaked phone call with EU Foreign Minister Ashton revealed the opposition planned and executed the infamous sniper violence of Kiev, shooting both the police, and their own supporters in the back.

Studies found a total of 250 mainstream sources lied that the snipers belonged to Yanukovich. Only seven of the entire mass media even mentioned the bombshell leak and those that did framed the report to suggest it couldn’t possibly be true.

Former Wall Street Journal Editor Paul Craig Roberts calls the coverage of Ukraine a new low in the history of the mainstream, which is now simply what he describes as a “Ministry” of lies. Investigative reporter John Helmer’s uncovered the mainstream staging demonstrations, and attempts to provoke disorder.

He joins us, great to speak to you. One US scholar notes the coverage has now become “Orwellian”, what’s going on?

John Helmer, investigative reporter: So the weaker your government the more interested the leader might be in threatening Russia to look strong at home when it’s obvious he’s not strong at home, and couldn’t get re-elected. That’s particularly true of, let’s say, the French president or the prime minister Cameron at the moment, and arguably President Obama is not only a lame duck, but having great difficulty in putting together a winning coalition for the Democratic Party’s next candidate for president.

When you’ve got weak political leaders you need to look stronger than you are in public opinion in the media, so there’s this process of misleading and disinforming.

RT: A Senate Committee inquiry revealed CIA running mainstream media in the vast operation known as Mockingbird. More than 400 journalists and media chiefs claiming to watchdog the government were the exact opposite joining to mask US government crime at home and abroad.

The operation continues despite agency denials, Counterpunch discovered CIA imposing agents on firms like CNN. Former CIA exec Michael Scheuer notes British media are even closer to intel targets.

BBC report: Big pieces of wood, metal to use as barricades.

RT: Scheuer adds the BBC now takes the lead in regime change operations that cause “anarchy and violence”.

Let’s speak to Francis Boyle, Professor of International Law at Illinois University, great to talk to you. How can nations stop war media that now perform the CIA’s covert operations?

Francis Boyle, Illinois University Professor of International Law: Certainly have their visas revoked and sent packing home, because I really don’t understand why some of these countries keep European journalists, certainly the United States,why they let them into the countries, because they’re just using their coverage to provoke war and military intervention.

In addition, the Bush Jr. administration lifted what was supposed to be the previous prohibition that intelligence agents were not supposed to infiltrate the media. You know, you have to be very careful certainly dealing with US reporters whether or not they’re intelligence agents.

RT: Banning active units of the military, also known as “warstream media”, shows how serious the situation now is. Their policies aren’t popular with their own viewers, mainstream audiences are in freefall. CNN and MSNBC have shed half their entire viewership in the last year alone. The question is how many more coups will they stage or help before they lose the public’s trust altogether. Seek truth from facts. This is The Truthseeker.


They’ve Done It Before – They Try It Again Today!

President Obama, Wake Up America!

Full Page Open Letter As Published In The New York Times on Monday, November 1, 2010

They’ve Done It Before – They Try It Again Today!

The goal of the special corporate interests – namely the Oil and Drug Cartel – in the US today is to transform democratic society into a corporate dictatorship, thus enabling multi-trillion dollar corporate interests to exert direct control over the political executive and the country.

Towards this end they are instigating the radicalization of society and financing the election campaigns of their political stakeholders. This strategy is an exact copy of the Oil and Drug Cartel’s takeover of Germany in 1933 – a strategy executed with the help of the Cartel’s political and military stakeholders, the Nazis.

Download PDF Version

America at the Crossroads

Over the past two years, the social and political life in America has been radicalized and polarized in an unprecedented way. What appears as a’grass-root’ movement articulating anger towards the current government is, in fact, a strategically implemented campaign by special interests, namely the Oil and Drug Cartel, to regain control over the White House and the country.

Worse, fighting a battle for survival of its outdated technologies, these special interests can no longer survive in a democracy and must seek dictatorial powers. In this historic situation, the only way to protect democracy is to expose the historic record of the Cartel.

n Open Letters on July 16 and September 13, 2010, I have exposed in this newspaper the historical parallels between the political escalation in Germany in the 1930’s and that of the US today. Then and now, the Cartel financed the political destabilization of democracy, with the goal of replacing it with a corporate dictatorship.

In Germany, then, the Cartel succeeded in seizing power and launching WWII because people and politicians around the world ignored the early warning signs. In the USA, today, the Cartel has launched an all-out psychological war. Organizations like the ‘Tea Party’ are radicalizing society. The only way to derail their plan of destroying democracy is to expose the criminal history and the motives of these special interests.

Global Dimension of this Threat

New technologies in the area of energy and health threaten the multi-trillion dollar global monopolies of the Oil and Drug Cartel. The Cartel’s giant markets of outdated technologies are no longer compatible with democracy and can only be maintained in a glo­bal dictatorship of corporate interests.

A first step in the direction of establishing such a global corporate dictatorship has already been taken. The recently founded so-called ‘European Union’ in Brussels (the ‘Brussels EU’) is not a democratically elected or legitimized body. The so-called ‘EU-Commission’ – 27 technocrats appointed by Cartel interests – preside over the lives and fates of 500 million people across Europe by means of dictatorial ‘directives’ and ‘regulations’.

Largely unbeknown to the rest of the world, the so-called ‘European Parliament’ has no independent right of legal initiative and serves merely as a fig-leaf for this ‘Cartel Commission’.

Even more appalling is the fact that the entire ‘Brussels EU’ structure is the implementation of plans conceived before and during WWII by the Oil and Drug Cartel and their Nazi stakeholders. The goal then and now was to cement their economic rule by means of a ‘Central Cartel Office’ that determines essentially every aspect of life in Europe and, eventually, the rest of the world.

The historical facts and documents are available online at www.Nazi-Roots-Of-Brussels-EU.org.

The Strategic Role of the USA

The key country in the Cartel’s ‘survival strategy’ is the USA. Not only is the US the home base of most Oil and Drug corporations, it is also the strongest military power to defend these special interests.

A major setback for the Cartel was the fact that in 2008 the American people elected a President on a platform of ending the ‘tyranny of oil’ and of reforming health care, including a focus on prevention.

In order to reverse this vote, the Cartel must not only regain control of the US government but must try to fundamentally ‘reprogram’ the American people by financing the dissemination of doubt and deception. Towards this end, the Cartel has been mobilizing an army of stakeholders in the media and politics.

Lessons of History: From 1933 to 2010

The blueprint for this strategy of radicalizing society in preparation for war was pre-WWII Germany. The unobstructed implementation of this strategy in 1933 led to the overthrow of democracy, the installation of a dictatorship on behalf of the Oil and Drug Cartel and, eventually, to a military attempt to expand its global markets during WWII.

The records of the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal and of the US Congress unequivocally document that WWII was launched in the interest – and with the financial as well as technical support – of the German-based Oil and Drug Cartel (Bayer, BASF, Hoechst). Its goal was to seize control of the multi-trillion dollar global markets of oil, patented chemicals and drugs.

The psychological preparation of German society for this military conquest was the launch of a ‘racial war’ against Jewish and other non-Aryan people and the elimination of any political opposition. The key vehicle to execute this plan was the Nazi/Cartel-financed ‘grassroots’ movement – the ‘brownshirts’.

The systematic instigation of hatred, aggression, racism and other forms of psychological terror by the ‘brownshirts’ in pre-war Germany was the pre­condition for the next stage: the mass murder across the globe by the SS and German Wehrmacht in the Cartel’s attempt to control the world.

After WWII, the German Oil and Drug Cartel was dismantled and its shares transferred to US- and UK-based multinational oil and drug corporations. The Cartel’s criminal past was deliberately hidden from the public for one main reason: not to endanger its future attempts at world control.


1933 and Today: The Cartel Manipulates Public Opinion

Germany 1933:

  • In the 1930s, the radicalization of German society and growing physical violence against religious minorities and political opponents of the Nazi regime strategically prepared the sei­zure of power by the Coalition of the Oil and Drug Cartel with the Nazis.
  • In WWII, the Cartel and their Nazi accomplices dressed millions of German soldiers in a uniform that carried the allegedly devine blessing for the Nazi/Cartel global conquest. Harnessed with a belt buckle showing the Swastika and the slogan ’God With Us’ (‘Gott mit uns’), the Nazi/Cartel Wehrmacht inflicted death on tens of millions of people.

USA Today:

  • Today, the political climate in the USA is strategically poisoned by the stakeholders of the same special interests, namely the Oil and Drug Cartel. Physical violence against political opponents is increasingly replacing the political and social dialogue.
  • Today, the stakeholders of the Oil and Drug Cartel in politics and media are trying to lure the American people with deceptive slogans like ‘restoring honor’ and under the pretext of acting in the name of God. In the course of history, no name has been more abused to mask the greed of special interests than the name of ‘God’.

President Obama, you have the responsibility to disseminate this historic parallel to the American people in order to enable them to actively defend freedom and democracy.

The Goals of this Publication

  1. This information alerts the people of America that the radicalization of society and the polarization of political life is organized and financed by the Oil and Drug Cartel – with the goal to regain control over the White House and the country.
  2. It exposes the ‘Tea Party’ and other so-called ‘grassroots’ movements as agents of the Oil and Drug Cartel.
  3. It reveals the strategic aim of these groups: destabilization of the democratically elected government via the instigation of civil unrest – under the pretext of defending constitutional rights and carrying out the will of God.
  4. It exposes the frenzied attacks against the Obama health care plan – that promotes preventive and community-based health – as a maneuver to protect the economic privileges of the Drug Cartel and its multi-trillion dollar health care monopoly based on patented pharmaceutical drugs.
  5. It exposes all these tricks and maneuvers as blatant copies of the Oil and Drug Cartel’s take-over of Germany in the 1930s – with the help of their political stakeholders, the Nazis.
  6. Sharing these historical parallels with the American people, will allow them to recognize the criminal historic record of the Oil and Drug Cartel, as well as the deceptive stragtegies it has used throughout history. The message: ‘They’ve done it before!’
  7. With this knowledge, the American people have a clear choice for the coming elections.
  8. It gives the Republican party a choice too: stay committed to democracy – or go into oblivion as political puppets of the Cartel’s corporate dictatorship plan.
  9. It allows the people and governments of the world to focus their resources on the development and construction of a modern world, based on affordable renewable energy and science-based natural health.
  10. The dissemination of this message is a precondition for protecting democracy in America and lasting peace!


Dr. Matthias Rath

Dr. Rath has become a voice of conscience exposing the plans of the Oil and Drug Cartel behind recent global military conflicts and crises. Attacked by Cartel media the world over (www.wiki-rath.org), Dr. Rath and his Foundation have received prestigious awards for civil courage. The ‘Relay of Life’ Award (www.relay-of-life.org) from survivors of Auschwitz and other Nazi concentration camps was conferred with a clear mandate:



Neoliberalism as Social Necrophilia: The Case of Greece

By Panayota GounariTruthout | News Analysis


“You can use the 600 Euros that you will find on me to pay our health insurance. I paid the rent yesterday. I am sorry, my daughter, I could 2014_0321-4not take more suffering just to put a warm plate on the table – a bloody plate. Make sure that our daughter goes to college and never leave her alone. She should get the house that we have in the village.”

This is the suicide note of a 50-year-old woman to her husband. She jumped off a high wall in Crete, Greece, last week and is hospitalized in critical condition. She is one more victim of the deepening financial crisis that is trying the limits of Greek people since 2008. According to the Greek Census Bureau, there has been a 43 percent increase in suicides in austerity-chained Greece since the beginning of the crisis. Unofficial accounts bring the number to 4,000 deaths so far.

Greece is the most recent and historically unprecedented neoliberal experiment on a global scale. The neoliberal offensive is moving head on in the country and, if Chile “was the laboratory for the early phases, Greece has become the laboratory for an even more fierce implementation.” What we have in place right now in Greece can be best described as the “downsizing of a country” that brings profound changes in its social and economic fabric. Greece’s economy has shrunk by nearly one-third since 2007, and the debt has become unmanageable. Through cut-throat austerity measures, massive privatizations and cuts in the most sensitive sectors of public education and public health, the constant process of de-industrialization and the loss of sovereignty, it looks like “Greece will emerge as a poorer country, with a diminished productive base, with reduced sovereignty, [and] with a political class accustomed to almost neo-colonial forms of supervision.”

I glance through snapshots in the news: grim faces, desperate eyes, angry gazes, frustration, and, most of all, fear. The city of Athens is slowly turning into a cemetery for the living. The transformation of the city, both as a physical and as a symbolic space, is shocking to the eye; as a public space and a habitat for its people, it now gets fragmented into deserted stores “for rent,” broken façades and abandonment apartment windows and balcony doors tightly locked behind iron bars for “extra safety,” carton beds and, along them, homeless people’s possessions: an old dirty blanket, oversized worn out sneakers, plastic flowers, empty water bottles, stale bread. Different parts of the city palpably illustrate a degenerating social fabric, as more Greeks are now joining the ranks of what Zygmunt Bauman has called “human waste”: unemployed, working poor, immigrants, all the outcasts, victims of “economic progress,” preys of rampant neoliberal policies, “casualties,” real victims to what the Greek prime minister has recently called a “success story” on the road to privatization and the wholesale of Greece’s national assets and sovereignty.

Greece is radically and violently transformed into the land field of “wasted lives” in the giant trashcan of global capitalism. Witnessing as I do this novel form of social necrophilia that eats alive every inch of human life, workspace and public space, I cringe at the sound of the words “sacrifice,” “rescue” and making Greece, according to the claims of Greek PM Antonis Samaras, a “success story.” Whose sacrifice and whose rescue? Who succeeds and who loses? Numbers are telling.

Unemployment rates are currently climbing to 30 percent, the same percentage Greece had in 1961. As a point of comparison, unemployment in the United States in 1929 was 25 percent, and in Argentina in 2001, it was 30 percent. More than 70 percent of the unemployed have been out of work for more than a year, leaving most to rely on charity after losing monthly benefit payments and health insurance. This percentage does not include young people seeking a job for the first time, employees without insurance and part-timers. Unemployment is up 41 percent from 2011, and for those 15-24, it has reached 51.1 percent, doubling in only three years  and setting a negative record for a Eurozone country.

The IMF/European Central Bank recipe is generating wealth in the global financial casino, while 31 percent of Greeks live at risk of poverty, according to Eurostat (2012). These statistics put Greece in seventh place in poverty percentages among the 27 EU countries. More specifically, in Greece: 28.7 percent of children up to 17 years old; 27.7 percent of the population between ages 27-64; and 26.7 percent of Greeks older than 65 live in the poverty threshold.

By social necrophilia, I mean,.. economic policies and austerity measures that result in the physical, material, social and financial destruction of human beings…

There is an 11.8 percent increase in child poverty, raising the number of poor children to 465,000 in 2011. The Greek social and welfare state has been collapsing through draconian cuts in wages and pensions, massive layoffs and the violation of vested rights, of labor laws and of collective bargaining rights. All collective bargaining expired on May 14, 2013, and it has been replaced by individual contracts where workers become hostages of their employers. Base salary went tumbling down to 500 Euros monthly (400 for young people) – not to mention a retroactive salary cut of 22 percent (32 percent for youth) in February 2012.

In March 2013, the government announced additional pension cuts of up to 20 percent. According to the Labor Institute of the National Confederation of Greek Workers (2012), new measures dictated by the Troika (the European Central Bank, the European Commission and the International Monetary Fund) will lead to at least a 35 percent deterioration of salaried employees’ and pensioners’ lives. As an example, since the beginning of 2011, 113,268 people have disconnected their telephone landlines to decrease expenses. With a 19 percent increase in the cost of electricity, 350,000 people now live without electricity in Athens. Additional taxes on property have ravaged the middle class that is now “paying rent” in their own houses through new taxes and fines imposed. Quality of life is radically deteriorating for Greek people.

This neoliberal experiment, as currently implemented in Greece, breeds destructiveness and death and resonates with forms of “social necrophilia.” By social necrophilia, I mean the blunt organized effort on the part of the domestic political system and foreign neoliberal centers to implement economic policies and austerity measures that result in the physical, material, social and financial destruction of human beings: policies that promote death, whether physical or symbolic. The goal of the ongoing capitalist offensive in the form of a neoliberal doctrine is to destroy symbolically and physically the most vulnerable strata of the population, to put the entire society in a moribund state to impose the most unprecedented austerity measures that generate profit for the most privileged classes internationally.

Erich Fromm, Frankfurt School philosopher, social psychologist and psychoanalyst, provides both a metaphor from the realm of psychiatry, as well as the tools to make the case for a reified market society that is being forced to start loving death: its own. In his seminal work on the Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (1973), Fromm defines necrophilia as “the passionate attraction to all that is dead, decayed, putrid, sickly; it is the passion to transform that which is alive into something unalive; to destroy for the sake of destruction; the exclusive interest in all that is purely mechanical. It is the passion to tear apart living structures.”

In the case of the Greek neoliberal experiment, however, beyond destroying for the sake of destruction, there are real economic interests at stake. There are bets and speculations in casino capitalism, and the game is on in Greece for banks and other large financial organizations. Social necrophilia here can be understood as the state of decay, the material and social degeneration of society, and the destruction of social fabric, where illness and death loom for the poor as a result of an economy dying through specific political choices while profit goes to big banks and multinational corporations. Love of death or the politics of social necrophilia can be illustrated in Greece in a) the rise of fascism and b) the shocking increase in illness, suicide, addiction and spread of infectious diseases since the beginning of the crisis.


In the Anatomy of Human Destructiveness Fromm makes the case that necrophilia is a product of fascist thought, as he discusses the example of Spanish Falangists who used to shout, “long live death.” Fascism finds expression both in government discourses and policies as well as in the rise of neo-Nazi Party Golden Dawn. Love of death is currently manifested in Greece in that rise of Golden Dawn.

In a necrophilous state of affairs, the system in charge operates with the conviction that the only way to solve a problem or a conflict is by force and violence, both symbolic and material, usually failing to see other options.

In the context of the Greek crisis, a new form of political domination has emerged, a renewed model of fascism, or another example of “proto-fascism. The elected Greek coalition government has been systematically violating the Greek Constitution and shaking the foundations of parliamentary democracy by establishing a “side system” of legislation. Using “urgent legislative decrees” indiscriminately and regularly, the coalition government is bypassing Greek legislation to facilitate privatizations and sellouts. In addition, there is an institutionalized instability: Laws keep changing, and many laws are voted in and implemented with retroactive effect.

Beyond the constant constitutional violations, the disappearing public space is a central feature of Greek proto-fascism. The landscape taking shape since 2009 is not too far from the kind of totalitarianism Hannah Arendt wrote about: a “totalitarian government does not just curtail liberties or abolish essential freedoms; . . . It destroys the one essential prerequisite of all freedom, which is simply the capacity of motion which cannot exist without space.”

Motion is not only inhibited and/or prohibited, as for example, in the case of prohibiting demonstrations in the center of Athens when Troika officials visit, a practice reminiscent of the curfews during the German occupation of the ’40s. Furthermore, what motion there is, is watched, with heightened surveillance and cameras installed throughout Athens. In a necrophilous state of affairs, the system in charge operates with the conviction that the only way to solve a problem or a conflict is by force and violence, both symbolic and material, usually failing to see other options. This also explains the increased exponential violence employed by the state the last five years as manifested in shutting down protests, criminalizing dissent and activism and torturing arrested protesters as well as pre-emptive arrests in every mobilization.

Alongside symbolic violence manifested in economic, political and discursive form, there is an intensified move toward militarization and authoritarianism. To this end, and while massive layoffs are taking place in the public sector, the Greek state spends more money on hiring and training law enforcement officers. More interestingly, there are close ties between the police and the neo-Nazi party Golden Dawn, whose members are nostalgic of Hitler and the 1967 Colonels’ Junta. Golden Dawn – now pronounced a criminal organization – is involved in running “paramilitary operations that systematically attacked migrants, leftists and gay people.” Eighteen of its MPs are already incarcerated, and a number of its members have been involved in violent attacks, gun possession and even murder as in the fatal brutal beating of Pakistani immigrant Shehzad Luqman and the cold-blooded murder of Pavlos Fyssas, a young leftist anti-fascist activist and rapper.

The “public” is being abolished in favor of the private, through a process of devaluation, vilification and degradation. A case in point is the ongoing demonization of public functionaries, public school teachers and university professors, and doctors working in the public system of health as lazy, incompetent, in need of constant evaluation and with the Damocles sword of investigation should they dare to disagree. Everything “public” is left to decay, by cutting off funding, staff and support and creating a fertile space for corruption and violent competition.

Malaria, a disease officially eliminated 40 years ago, also made a comeback in 2012.

Public schools lack books and other materials, and in many areas in the north of Greece, children stay at home on very cold days because schools cannot afford to heat the classrooms. Teachers are suffering terrible cuts in their salaries, and universities barely meet their minimum functional needs with cuts in laboratory and support staff that hinder the appropriate working of the departments.

The Decaying Body

“It’s simple. You get hungry, you get dizzy and you sleep it off,”  said the mother of an 11-year old boy who has been suffering hunger pains at school.

Necrophilia is further manifested in physical terms in the ways the human body is degenerating, ravaged by illness, malnutrition, drug abuse, HIV and suicide. People looking for food in the trash. There are homeless people in every corner; mini slum communities all over downtown Athens. Walking south, toward the center, thousands of people wait in line to be served food by soup kitchens that provide over 30,000 free meals a day. Plenty of people queue up for possibly the only meal of their day. Welcome to the “human waste” line.

The Greek governments that assumed the role of the executioners of IMF/EU directives since the beginning of the crisis in 2008 have demonstrated a particularly necrophilous character, and they have done so unapologetically. Αn increasing number of children have been passing out in schools because of malnutrition; there are embarrassing shortages in public hospitals, where patients often have to buy their own gauze and medication from an outside pharmacy while admitted. People without health insurance with severe illnesses do not have access to treatment. Malaria, a disease officially eliminated 40 years ago, also made a comeback in 2012, with cases being noted in eastern Attica and the Peloponnese.

There are increasing numbers of suicides (close to a 43 percent hike) that rank Greece number one worldwide in suicides the past five years. There are alarming new cases of depression and mental illnesses. A recent study conducted by the University of Ioannina found that one in five people facing financial problems presents psychopathological symptoms. There is also a 200 percent increase in HIV cases. At the same time, significant funding is cut from psychiatric hospitals, public drug rehabilitation centers and other social and welfare provisions while the system tries to “abort” vulnerable social groups such as HIV-positive women, drug users and people with mental illness.

With the 40 percent surcharge the government has slapped on heating oil, thousands of households have remained cold during the winter while people are returning to wood stoves, the out-of-control use of which has generated poisonous toxic smog over the city of Athens. Bodily decay goes hand in hand with environmental destruction: Greek soil is ravaged as mineral resources are overexploited in the name of profit. Large forest areas, such as the Skouries forest in Halkidiki, are turning into vast mining sites, where private companies exploit the natural wealth of the country, while poisoning the soil, the air and the water.

The more human qualities are attributed to the markets, the more real people are robbed of their own human substance.

It is a challenging and complicated task to try to explain Greek people’s lack of massive organized resistance the last five years given the radical deterioration of their living conditions. There is almost a reconciliation with death looming everywhere; people are slowly getting used to terror. The initial manifestations – gatherings in squares, protests and other acts of disobedience – did not acquire a more organized and consistent character, despite small local victories and the existence of a movement that daily struggles on many levels and sites. The power elites used the initial shock and paralysis to spread fear through what Naomi Klein has termed the “shock doctrine.” It is common practice for business interests and power elites to exploit shocks in the form of natural disasters, economic problems, or political turmoil, as an opportunity to aggressively restructure vulnerable countries’ economies. In this vein, popular resistance and dissent are squashed through symbolic and material fear and violence ranging from “catastrophic” discourses in the media to very real torture and repression.

Shock helps the system implement antisocial and harmful policies that citizens would normally object to. Being in a state of shock as a country, says Klein, means losing your narrative, being unable to understand where you are in space and time. The state of shock is easy to exploit because people become vulnerable and confused. They are robbed of their vital tools for understanding themselves and their position in the sociopolitical context. People become unalive things and the market becomes alive. While people are slowly losing their humanity, with the government abandoning its social and welfare functions, “markets” become the new referent people should care and worry about, as if they were something alive.

Although lifeless things, markets acquire a soul and a character in the neoliberal discourse. One can observe an interesting phenomenon in the official government discourse, loyally reproduced by mainstream media: a continuous attempt to ascribe human properties to markets. The “market” as a noun, subject or object, is projected as the overarching authority, above and beyond everybody, the entity that should be kept happy and satisfied – another manifestation of necrophilia as people have to die to keep the market alive. The anthropomorphism of the market is illustrated when “markets” are used in the mainstream media in sentences such as “the markets showed satisfaction today” or “the market is struggling,” and “we need to convince the markets,” “we should appease the markets,” or “let’s wait and see how the markets respond.” The invisible market’s “reactions” give legitimacy to the “human sacrifices,” as all “market feelings” depend on increasing antisocial austerity measures that relegate a large part of Greek productive population to the unemployment trashcan. The more human qualities are attributed to the markets, the more real people are robbed of their own human substance. It seems as if the system needs to dehumanize people to “humanize” the market and then, possibly re-humanize them in the new market society, as a new kind of people robbed of any sense of agency.

In the Greek people’s quest to find their lost narrative, to “renarrativise” themselves in a collective way, the ability to consciously disobey and to fill the concept of hope with a real, feasible political project are two very important imperatives. To paraphrase Fromm, at this point in Greek history “the capacity to doubt, to criticize and to disobey” may be all that stands between the future for this country and its end. In articulating a political project and a narrative against capitalist necrophilia, there is a need to put at the core critical and radical thought that, when blended with the love of life, may take the struggle to the next level. Instead of getting confined to reforming or amending the current situation, people need to strive to imagine that which is not, desire it and work hard to make it happen.


* This article draws on my forthcoming book chapter “Neoliberalism as Social Necrophilia: Erich Fromm and The Politics of Hopelessness in Greece” to appear in Miri, S., Lake, R. & Kress, T. Reclaiming the Sane Society: Essays on Erich Fromm’s Thought. Boston: Sense Publishers.

1. Hall, S., Massey, D. & Rustin, M. (2013). After Neoliberalism: Analyzing the Present. In Hall, S., Massey, D. & Rustin, M. (Eds.) After Neoliberalism? The Kilburn Manifesto; London, UK: Soundings, p. 12.

2. Sotiris, P. (2012). The Downsizing of a Country.

3. Ibid.

4. Bauman Z. (2004). Wasted Lives: Modernity and its Outcasts. Cambridge, UK: Polity, p. 4.

5.INE GSEE/ADEDY. (2012). Greek economy and employment: Yearly Report 2012. Athens, Greece.

6. Eurozone Unemployment Reaches New High (2013, January 8). BBC

7. Greek National Committee of UNICEF. (2003). State of Children in Greece 2013. Athens: Greece.

8. Fromm, E. (1973). The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness. New York: Henry Holt, p. 369.

9. Ibid

10. Giroux, 2008, p. 21-22). Giroux, H. (2008). Against the Terror of Neoliberalism Politics Beyond the Age of Greed. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

11. Hannah Arendt The Origins of Totalitarianism (1973, p. 466)

12. The Guardian

13. Alderman, L. (2013, April 17). More Children in Greece are going Hungry. The New York Times.

14. Henley, J. (2013, May 15). Recessions can hurt but Austerity kills.

15. Klein: Klein, N. (2008). The Shock Doctrine. New York: Henry Holt.

16. Edmonds, L. (2013, April 26) “Is Greece in Shock?” Naomi Klein tells Enet how her bestseller The Shock Doctrine relates to Greece. Eleytherotypia Online.

17. Fromm, 1981


Panayota Gounari is associate professor of applied linguistics at the University of Massachusetts Boston. She holds a Ph.D. in Language and Literacy Education/Cultural Studies in Education from Pennsylvania State University. She has earned a BA in classics with a concentration in historical and comparative linguistics from the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, and an MA in Applied Linguistics from UMass Boston. Her research focus is on the role of language and discourse in education, in human agency and in social transformation, and the implications for critical pedagogy. She has co-authored “The Hegemony of English” (in 2003) and co-edited “The Globalization of Racism” (in 2005) with D. Macedo. Both books have been translated into many languages. More recently she has co-edited “Critical Pedagogy: A Reader” (in Greece with G. Grollios). She has published numerous articles and book chapters.



Mankind’s serious condition has reached life-threatening levels

Within the human societies that have developed some form of civilization, ie any kind of forward thinking and development, a parasitic organism has become entrenched since long and has now put the host body (all of mankind) in mortal danger. The parasite needs to be treated just like a fatal parasite and not as a familiar “itch”…

A parasite is an uninvited guest, an organism that lives attached to another organism (a host animal,  a host plant, a host community) and it takes its nourishment from the host organism.. Mankind as a whole, if seen from a sociological view as one living organism, has also its uninvited guest,  an organism that lives attached to it and that sucks the life out of the host organism/humanity. The word comes from the Greek para, “by”, and sito, “food” or “feed”. The study of parasites is called parasitology. Among the ancient Greeks and today’s Greeks the term is used originally, partly on religious officials who were paid by the receipt of ‘full boarding’ and about the companions to senior officials who came along in official contexts. The word took on the meaning of a lower sense of sponger… TODAY  ONE  CAN WITHOUT PROBLEMS AND WITH  A PROPER SCIENTIFIC PRECISION IN SOCIAL SCIENCES, CALL THE ENTIRE EURO-AMERICAN BANKING-, BUSINESS-, AND POLITICAL-ELITE AND THE SO CALLED UPPER CLASS, PARASITES. However, to varying degree if one want to be fair in their assessment of humanity’s foremost health risk.

The host organism can survive and possibly survive the parasite, but can also succumb when it is not able to feed itself and the parasite.

In biology a distinction is made between some forms of parasites,.. a distinction also sociology can make, and parasites can then easily be identified whithin the host body, humanity, namely:

  • Animals that steal food from other organisms is called kleptoparasites. Kleptoparasites in the body of mankind is THE FINANCIAL ELITE, THE POLITICAL ELITE and THE UPPER CLASS
  • A parasite that lives entirely within its host is called endoparasit, if it lives partly outside its host it is called ektoparasite. Within the body of mankind they are both called  MONARCHIES, OLIGARCHIES, PLUTOCRACIES, PSEUDO-DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENTS and MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS

Parasites are harmful organisms, they are animals that cause humans damage by such as the spread of disease, or by damaging food, clothing, buildings, crops or other property. Mankind’s parasites, in order to feed themselves are damaging food, crops, homes communities and countries,… by spreading the mental toxins that damage the human intellect, the mental health, the community character and the psycho-social immune system to such a degree that melancholy, apathy and irrational, self-destructive tendencies occurs in the host organism/humanity.

The term harmful organisms can be seen as a classification of species/communities from a utilitarian paradigm which focuses on this animals/communities benefit for humans and mankind. Animals/communities that is hurting people are seen, from this perspective, as harmful organisms .

Most often it is enough to balance the pH level in the body to get rid of parasites and in human societies, it is about balancing the human-values level by a truly blind and functioning justice and real democratic and altruistic basis for all people’accessibility to life essentials and development opportunities.

A community which to its biggest part live and feed on other people’s creative power, ingenuity and inspiration.. on the work of others, others ‘sacrifices, the health of others, other people’s property, other people’s food, home, land, savings, are undoubtedly the monarchs’, the dukes’, the bankers’ and the multinational business leaders’ community. When these through extortion gain control of armies and weapons and the power to procure for themselves control of the courts, the political systems, governments and by that the human societies, the danger becomes fatal to the entire organism. This is just where we find ourselves today.

Those who actively, sober, thoughtful and above all, in a relevant and appropriate way resist and fight against this mankind’s most dangerous parasite rampage, are mankind’s only hope for recovery and survival. Everything else is, at this point, just useless ‘sugar pills’, ‘pacifiers’ and ‘baby blankets’ for the spineless…

Kosmas Loumakis

Athens 07-01-2014


in Swedish


the text is an adaptation of Wikipedia’s description of the parasite

Mänsklighetens allvarliga sjukdomstillstånd har nått livshotande nivåer

Inom de mänskliga samhällen som har utvecklat någon form av civilisation, dvs någon form av framåtsträvande och utveckling, har en parasitorganism bitit sig fast  sedan länge och nu befinner sig värdkroppen (hela mänskligheten) i livsfara. Parasiten måste behandlas just som en livshotande parasit och inte som en bekant “klåda”…

En parasit är en objuden gäst, en organism som lever vidhäftad vid en annan organism (ett värddjur eller en värdväxt) och tar sin näring ifrån denna.. Mänskligheten som helhet, om den från en samhällsekonomisk synvinkel ses som en levande organism, har också en objuden gäst, en organism som lever vidhäftad på och som suger livet ur värdorganismen/mänskligheten. Ordet kommer från grekiskans para, “vid”, och sitos, “mat” eller “föda”. Studiet av parasiter kallas parasitologi. Hos forntidens och dagens greker användes och används uttrycket ursprungligen dels om religiösa tjänstemän som betalades genom att de uppbar ’helpension’, dels om medföljare till högre ämbetsmän som medbjöds i officiella sammanhang. Ordet fick med tiden en lägre mening av snyltgäst… IDAG KAN MAN UTAN PROBLEM OCH MED TILLBÖRLIG VETENSKAPLIG PRECISION INOM SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAPERNA KALLA DEN EURO-AMERIKANSKA BANK-, AFFÄRS-, OCH POLITISKA ELITEN FÖR PARASITER. Dock i olika grad om man vill vara rättvis i sin bedömning av mänsklighetens absolut främsta hälsorisk…

Värdorganismen kan fortleva och eventuellt överleva parasiten men kan också duka under när den inte förmår föda både sig själv och parasiten.

Inom biologin skiljer man på några former av parasiter, vilket också samhällsvetenskapen kan göra och då kan parasiterna med lätthet  identifieras inom värdkroppen, mänskligheten, nämligen:

  • Djur som stjäl föda ifrån andra organismer kallas för kleptoparasiter. Kleptoparasiter i den mänskliga samhällskroppen är FINANSELIT, POLITISK ELIT och s.k ÖVERKLASS
  • En parasit som lever helt inuti sin värd kallas här endoparasit, om den lever endast delvis inne i sin värd kallas den ektoparasit. Inom den mänskliga samhällskroppen kallas både endoparasiter och ektoparasiter MONARKIER, OLIGARKIER, PLUTOKRATIER, PSEUDO-DEMOKRATISKA REGERINGAR och MULTINATIONELLA FÖRETAG.

Parasiter är skadedjur, de är djur som vållar människan skada genom till exempel spridning av sjukdom eller genom att skada livsmedel, kläder, byggnader, grödor eller annan egendom. Mänsklighetens parasiter, för att kunna föda sig själva och skada livsmedel, grödor, hem och samhällen, sprider de mentala gifter som skadar det mänskliga intellektet, den mentala hälsan, samhällskaraktären och immunförsvaret till sådan grad att melankoli, apati och orationella, självdestruktiva tendenser uppstår hos värdorganismen/mänskligheten.

Begreppet “skadedjur” kan ses som klassificering av olika djurarter/samhällsgrupper från ett utilitaristiskt paradigm där man fokuserar på detta djurs/samhällsgrupps nytta för människor och mänskligheten. Djur/samhällsgrupper som därvidlag är till skada för människor ses, från detta perspektiv, som skadedjur.

Oftast räcker det med att balansera ph-värdet i kroppen för att göra sig av med parasiter och i de mänskliga samhällena handlar det om att balansera människo-värdet genom en i sanning blind och fungerande rättvisa och en verklig demokratisk och altruistisk grund för fördelning av människans livsnödvändigheter och utvecklingsmöjligheter.

En samhällsgrupp som till sin absolut största del lever och när sig på andras skapandekraft, uppfinningsrikedom och inspiration,.. på andras arbete, andras uppoffringar, andras hälsa, andras egendomar, andras föda, hem, mark och besparingar, är ju otvivelaktigt monarkernas, grevarnas, bankirernas och de multinationella företagsledarnas samhällsgrupp. När dessa genom utpressning får kontroll över armeer och vapensystem och makten att förskaffa sig kontroll över domstolar, politiska system, regeringar och därmed de mänskliga samhällena, är faran livshotande för hela organismen. Just där befinner vi oss idag.

De som aktivt, nyktert, genomtänkt och framförallt på ett relevant och adekvat sätt bekämpar denna mänsklighetens farligaste parasits framfart, är mänsklighetens enda hopp om tillfrisknande och överlevnad. Allt annat är numera tyvärr betydelselösa ‘sockerpiller’, ‘napp’ och ‘snuttefilt’ åt de ryggradslösa…

Kosmas Loumakis

Athen 07-01-2014


på Engelska


texten är en bearbetning av Wikipedias beskrivning av parasiten


Opening and closing speech of Dimitris Kazakis – on EPAM’s INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE in Athens


Opening speech and closing speech, further down, of Dimitris Kazakis on the INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEBT, NATIONAL CURRENCY & DEMOCRACY in Keramikos – Athens, Saturday 30 November and 1 December 2013

After the end of this post click on “the whole conference” to see whole conference


“Dear fellow fighters, friends and invitees…

I welcome you, on behalf of the political board, to the international conference hosted by the United People’s Front (EPAM) where we’ll discuss the subjects of debt, national currency and democracy.

This meeting, for all of us fighting against the ‘memorandum occupation’, the euro and the EU, is a very important event. Not only because we’ll have the opportunity to enrich our effort with the experience of other countries whose people face similar problems and situations but also because we get the chance to get to know each other and make relationships of fellowship and coordination in the common fight of all of eurozone’s and EU’s people and beyond, against the worst authoritarianism the world has known since the ancient regime that was brought down by the great French Revolution.

What’s happening in Greece is the living example of the way in which the eurozone and the EU are evolving into a new super-state embodiment, the European Federation, as called by Barroso himself at the ‘State of the Union’ in September 2012. What is being done in Greece created and continues to create the legal and political precedent for this transformation.

The first thing the eurozone looked into, after the crisis broke out in Greece, was to isolate the country on the one hand and on the other hand, impose a state of colonial occupation that is novel in the European historical timeline.

Greece was forced, from the first moment, to ‘irrevocably and unconditionally waive all immunity’, as mentioned verbatimin the loan agreements.* By doing this, the eurozone lenders were free to put the country under a state of liquidation and clearance. The average Greek citizen was officially turned into a debt slave. A peon. Forced to give up on essential rights on their work, its product and their own life in order to pay a debt that is impossible to pay off.

It’s the first time in history since the era of feudalism, that a people, a whole nation is officially turned into a peon and has a state of peony imposed, that is a debt serfdom. Not just as a result of actions, something the IMF has been doing for decades in Latin America, Africa and elsewhere, but officially, by signing colonial loan agreements on demand of the eurozone itself.
And all that thanks to the fact that Greece is in the eurozone and has given up its own essential means of fiscal, monetary and credit policy. The lenders, of course, looked to have loan agreements according to which peony, the debt serfdom, is presented as a voluntary request of Greece. The Greek people themselves.

In this crime, the lenders were aided by the furthermost assistance and ultimate support of a totally corrupt, sold-out and treasonous political system which didn’t hesitate to perform a coup and abolish every aspect of constitutional order of the country in order to serve the interests of the most rapacious circles of the euro and the money markets.

So, we think that as of the 6th of May, 2010 and up to this day, Greece is under occupation. Colonial occupation. One with an aim for the mass extinction of the Greek people and the plunder of the social and natural wealth of the country by its lenders. In a very short time, we had foreign commissioners arriving and occupying key positions of the state mechanism. In addition to the Troika. In this day, the state cannot proceed to any act without the prior suggestion or approval by the foreign commissioners. Even the judicial/legal system has been put under their wing. Even the military forces and the defense system of the country. In essence, the absolute being of the state has been abrogated.

With the assistance of the internal political system, of the contemporary collaborationists, the modern Quislings, in just three years, more than 400 laws were introduced on demand of the lenders and the Troika. More than 27 legislative acts that are of similar content to the old Royal Decrees, as well as dozens of other Cabinet acts under orders from above and beyond. For the Greek people, there is no vital sector that is crucial to them – in labor, society and politics – that hasn’t changed vastly on their expense, by abolishing their most essential of rights.

After all this, the Greek people have no sovereign ownership rights in their country. They can’t decide for themselves on anything that concerns them. Even the right in private ownership has been brutally bludgeoned. Everything in the country, the public and private wealth of the Greek citizens, is now available to the lenders and the euro-system. And the trade-off? The average Greek today, being even more indebted than when the Troika first came.

It’s not just that the public debt keeps rising… The country was forced to borrow again, mainly in order to keep funding the external debt, during the period of 2010-2013, more than 320 billion euros. That is more than what the public debt was before 31-12-2009 but even so, continues to owe more than 325 billion euros.

To the private debt of the Greeks – which exceeds the amount of 230 billion euros – another 45 billion were added in the last three years. It’s debt towards the Tax Office, with the sole purpose of confiscating real and mobile private property. At the same time, the average citizen saw 1 in 4 people losing their jobs. Every work right was abolished. They saw 1 in 3 losing even the possibility of insurance, while the base salary was reduced by at least 40%. Saw the regime of general poverty and unemployment going hand-in-hand with a regime of absolute immunity, where the worker is literally a derelict.

They watched as 3 out of 4 workers, who still have the “luxury” of having a job, either getting blackmailed and paid under even the base salary or facing delayed payments. Today, 3 out of 5 workers that have a job, face 5-month-old delayed payments. That is, they haven’t been paid for 5 months on average. The average Greek citizen saw the majority of self-employed workers getting destroyed with a single stroke. They make up 32% of the total employment figures. They saw half of small and medium-sized businesses shutting down, while the big ones have their earnings, suppliers and workers ravaged by their owners, so that they can flee Greece or vastly reduce their activities. They saw the volume of investment dropping extremely from 22% of GDP in 2009 to 12% today, turning Greece to the country with the biggest disinvestment worldwide. They also saw poverty and hardship double in two years. Rampaging immigration, notably of the younger generations, close to the levels of the ’60s – a time when the Greek society was faced with the biggest immigration wave it ever had. They saw – in a two year period, from 2011 to 2012 – the population decreasing by 80,000 in absolute figures, for the first time in the post-War period.

After all this, is the 98% of the Greek population, who according to measurements expect the worst, in the wrong? No. They’re absolutely right. If we keep following the same path, if we hold on to the euro – especially now, on the road to the European Federation, as declared by the prior Maoist Barroso – now that the right of composing and publishing the state budget, while the European Commission has officially obtained the status of a super-government, with the ECB having direct supervision and control of the banking system under its absolute jurisdiction, in the eurozone and the EU.

For us, the dilemma is clear: You either come in terms with the current situation and just seek ways of managing it better with increasingly worsening effects for the people or you overturn it. There is no middle ground. As long as we wait for a divine intervention, a miracle, we’ll keep experiencing absolute destruction. Not only us in Greece but all the peoples of the eurozone. A realistic approach is one that doesn’t leave the people open to today’s threats. One that doesn’t allow them to sink any more into anguish and despair, poverty and extinction. Our duty is majorly patriotic. Primarily nation-liberating against the worst continental regime that’s been imposed upon the people since Hitler.

Another Europe is indeed feasible. A Europe whose peoples will be free, sovereign and owners of their countries, where they will solely decide for their present and their future. Only such a Europe of independent, autonomous and sovereign peoples can turn into a continent of true peace, democracy and brotherhood.

Brotherhood cannot exist where peoples are slaves of the markets, the banking cartel and the supranational instruments of European integration. Suppression only brings wars. Wars of conquering and enslavement, which can only be responded to with an uprising of the entirety of the people.

One thing is certain: The Greek people won’t allow its extinction. And it’s that close, just that close, to the moment when it will take matters into its own hands. And be assured that it’s ready to assist all other peoples in their fight by any means. In the common fight of all of the peoples of Europe. And not just Europe…

The Greek people have done this before. They’ve set the example. They stood their ground, first winners against the Nazi hordes, for democracy, freedom and national sovereignity. Despite all the sacrifices they suffered. And they will set the example for all peoples again.

2014 will be the year of the Greek people. It will be a landmark year for democracy and freedom in all of Europe. Like it was then, on the 28th of October, 1940, when the Greek people were called to the fight against the fascist invader. First to the battle against the fascists and to defeat them. And now, against the new fascism, the fascism of the markets, against which they will score the first victory on behalf of all European peoples.

Thank you very much.”

* “The Borrower hereby irrevocably and unconditionally waives all immunity to which it is or may become entitled, in respect of itself or its assets, from legal proceedings in relation to this Amendment, including, without limitation, immunity from suit, judgement or other order, from attachment, arrest or injunction prior to judgement, and from execution and enforcement against its assets to the extent not prohibited by mandatory law.”

Excerpt from the “AMENDMENT TO THE EUR 80 000 000 000 LOAN FACILITY AGREEMENT” text

Αναρτήθηκε από ΔΗΜΗΤΡΗΣ ΚΑΖΑΚΗΣ στις 11:25 π.μ.

closing speech


the whole conference 

A SPEECH FOR GREECE at the International Conference of the United People’s Front (EPAM)



by JIM REYNOLDS, Vice Chairman, Campaign for an Independent Britain (CIB)

Dear Friends,

My name is Jim Reynolds and I am a Vice Chairman representing the Campaign for an Independent Britain. On behalf of our organisation, I come to  Greece in full hearted  friendship for the Greek people and for our colleagues from all over Europe, who are fighting for the return of democratic self government to their countries and deliverance from their debt slavery , enforced by that imperial project, the Euro currency.  We in the Campaign for an Independent Britain are from all parties and none. We come from right, left and centre and all we want is our country back!

Our organisation was formed in 1969 under a different name as a cross-party coalition, opposed to “Common Market” entry in 1973. It is an umbrella group, supported by public donations, to which other Eurosceptic organisations are affiliated. We campaign for the restoration of full national sovereignty to the United Kingdom by its withdrawal from the obligations of the treaties of the European Union and the repeal of the European Communities Act 1972 (as amended), so that Parliament may legislate freely and may co-operate with other nations as it sees fit. We are a “broad church” of political opinion but will not tolerate racists or extremists and reject any organisation known to be motivated by anti-democratic intentions.

Our country has been betrayed by certain Prime Ministers. Edward Heath in 1972 took us into what was then called a Common Market – on a narrow vote in Parliament of 309 to 301, whilst concealing from all MPs the terms of entry. Harold Wilson in 1975 claimed he had secured new terms of membership and, aided by a lavishly funded campaign, the full support of the BBC and almost all British newspapers, he secured a 67% vote by 65% of the electorate to stay in.

In 1983, the men who later became our Prime Ministers, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, gained their seats in Parliament for the first time by promising, if elected, to take us out of the European Union – but changed their minds when elected.

Over many years we have printed and distributed millions of factual leaflets on many subjects and organised public gatherings and films. We have a website  HYPERLINK “http://www.freebritain.org.uk/”www.freebritain.org.uk  . In 2010, after our most recent general election to Parliament, we supplied every member of the House of Commons and of the House of Lords with a booklet entitled “ A HOUSE DIVIDED: Can parliament serve Two Masters, the Nation and the European Union?”. I have brought a number of copies with me to make them available to you. It tells of the lies and deceits perpetrated in order to maintain public support for the EU  – and of the loss of our Parliamentary sovereignty.

Turning now to those countries of Europe which, with us have joined the EU -Something very strange has happened to the countries of Europe over the last fifty years through the deceit of our politicians – the leaders who should be serving the interests of their own  peoples who elect them. By  meeting together with politicians from other countries in the EU they have increasingly discovered that, as a class, they have more in common with each other and with the bankers than they do with the people they are supposed to serve. Little by little they have created a super – state structure to which they have given their loyalty and obedience  which  should  only be   to their own countries and peoples.

In any other age this would have been called treason and would have been punished as such. They are people who dress like us, look like us and talk like us but whose loyalty is elsewhere – to that strange anti-democratic structure in Brussels. What was presented to us as a free association of sovereign nations co-operating in trade always was intended to develop into  a super-state, a single despotism over all the peoples of Europe.

Britain was slowly enmeshed in this plot against its own people by  its political class – but not without a struggle. As a country, we had spent all of our money and much of our blood to free the countries of Europe from fascism and the natural goodwill of democrats towards their fellows in other European countries was gradually subverted to this evil project.

One man who saw this clearly in the Forties was the Labour Foreign Secretary, Ernest Bevin.

A man of the working class, he was intensely suspicious of the early moves towards European integration. He knew enough of Greek mythology to coin a keenly true but amusing mixed metaphor. He said of the European project.

“If you open that Pandora’s box, you don’t know how many Trojan horses will come flying out”.

Unfortunately for us and for Europe, Ernest Bevin was overruled by American pressure. Britain was bankrupt and the Americans controlled the flow of dollars. In fact, we have evidence that the CIA funded the European Movement from the beginning, just as the American government today puts diplomatic pressure on our country, telling us that we must stay in the EU.

Well, whilst the Trojan Horse was originally a Greek stratagem against the Trojans, there are now whole herds of them from Brussels within the walls  of  Greece today – and in every EU country.  Wherever you see that ring of stars announcing another project assisted by the EU, a little bit of your country has been shaped to suit the policy makers of Brussels.  Around all these projects – and the ones you don’t see or hear of – are the people who do well out of them. Some of them are gradually entrapped bit by bit, often unwittingly at the time, into giving their first loyalty to their Brussels paymasters.

The Commissioners in Brussels and the heads of government of other EU countries are far away and, whilst we can rage about what they do, there is little we can do to affect them. They are hermetically sealed in a world of privilege beyond our reach. It was our own, treacherous  politicians who delivered us into the hands of these people. In doing it they became more like them, as prophetically described by the poet G.K. Chesterton eighty years ago.

“They have given us into the hand of new unhappy lords,

Lords without anger and honour who dare not carry their swords.

They fight by shuffling papers; they have bright dead alien eyes.

They look at our labour and laughter as a tired man looks at flies”

Brussels has not taken any power from our countries  which has not been handed over by our own politicians and officials. Sometimes in the mistaken belief that it was somehow for the peace and good of Europe – we have let them do it. Sometimes we were just too late to stop them. Now  is the time to insist that they take back the power – our power to rule ourselves –  and bring it home where it belongs – each in our own country.

And if they won’t do it, then throw the rogues out!

By meeting together,  co-ordinating our efforts and sharing information, we can each be much more effective in in our own countries where  the real fight is.

I mentioned  Ernest Bevin, the socialist politician of the Nineteen Forties, as one who understood the dangers of the European project. The last British politician to stand against the creation of the EU superstate was very different politically – Margaret Thatcher.  The President of the EU Commission, Jacques Delors, had proposed more or less what we have now – The EU Commission as the executive government of the EU, the so-called EU parliament as its token democratic assembly and the European Council of heads of government as its senate.

To each of these proposals in turn, Mrs Thatcher said “No!” “No!” “No!” and so was betrayed by the europhiles in her own party whose loyalty was to the EU and not to the most solemn oath they had sworn to their own sovereign and country.  That is the rottenness at the heart of every EU member state, not just Britain.

If we had been meeting just over a month ago on October 28th , we could have joined with our Greek friends in celebrating “No!” day, the anniversary of Greece’s short response to the ultimatum by the Italian dictator Mussolini. The admiration which Britain then felt for Greece standing up to a much bigger country is reflected today in our support for your campaign to restore your country’s honour and self government. It is a common struggle which we share, so I share the sentiment of Lord Byron

“The mountains look on Marathon -

And Marathon looks on the sea;

And musing there an hour alone,

I dreamed that Greece still might be free;

For standing on the Persians’ grave,

I could not deem myself a slave”



Are we really free to choose and is the people’s power acknowledged? “Debt Management” is a short documentary on the illusion of freedom (the case of the “boiling frog”) and the illusion of choice (as in the example of “Plato’s cave”), from an economic perspective. The Greek crisis is just another round in the constant struggle between those who take decisions that determine the will of whole societies and the real power of the people. How can entire societies become powerless, from an economic point of view? By what means is that being achieved in modern Europe?

see the whole documentary here

Debt Management – Διαχείριση χρέους (Ελληνικοί υπότιτλοι, Greek subs)

without Greek subtitles


Maria Delivani N., economist, former dean of the University of Macedonia.
Craig Wherlock, since 2008 “Journalist of the crisis.”
Didac S. – Costa, sociologist.
Albert Broomhead, economist and analyst.
Dimitris Kazakis, economist, author, columnist.
General co Kastrinakis P. Alexander.
In Charis.



Μαρία Δεληβάνη Ν., οικονομολόγος, πρώην πρύτανης του Πανεπιστημίου Μακεδονίας.
Craig Wherlock, από το 2008 «δημοσιογράφος της κρίσης».
Didac S.- Costa, κοινωνιολόγος.
Albert Broomhead, οικονομολόγος, αναλυτής.
Δημήτρης Καζάκης, οικονομολόγος, συγγραφέας, αρθρογράφος.
Γενική επιμέλεια Αλέξανδρος Καστρινάκης Π..
Στη Χαρούλα.

Money – The World’s Most Dominant Religion

1. Money, Banking and the Federal Reserve

This extraordinary documentary, made by the Mises Institute in 1996, is the clearest, most compelling explanation ever offered of the Fed. (42 mins)

2. Conspiracies – Iraq:

A 2006 Sky documentary revealing the only WMD Saddam Hussein had, was the Euros he charged for Iraqi oil. As this was a direct challenge to the US petrodollar, Hussein had to go. (46 mins)

3. Money As Debt:

A fast-paced and highly entertaining animated feature. It explains today’s banking system in terms that are easy to understand. (47 mins)

4. Woody Harrelson Presents – Ethos:

Presented by actor & activist Woody Harrelson, this powerful 2011 documentary blows the lid off our corrupt monetary and political system. (70 min)

5. The Money Fix – Monetary Reform:

This movie examines the human & the natural world. We learn how we can empower ourselves by redesigning the economy at the community level. (80 mins)

6. The Secret of Oz:

Governments should issue debt free money. This is the solution as revealed by L. Frank Baum in “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. (112 mins)

Hellenism is in danger, humanity is in danger


A paradigm is a set of values and norms that is publicly accepted and acknowledged as the suitable ones, and can be said to be the basic values of a certain civilization

An anti-Hellenic lobby paved the way for the establishment of the Rothschild-Zionist dogma

Before the global elite can launch a long desired global paradigm shift, an induced shift of the main and basic human values and norms, the old foundations, must first be accused, slandered and falsified and facts must be distorted. Various other cultures have had to endure this throughout history (North-South American Indians, Celts, Persians, Arabs, Africans, Polynesians and others). However now it’s not about the destruction of a culture but the destruction of the whole of the Hellenic foundations of the western civilization. The globalists, who themselves claim that they are *Zionists and this regardless of whether they are Jewish or not, now aim to replace the basic human values that is the base of western societies, by a very aggressive propaganda opposing the old values, freedom, justice, humanityHellenism is the cradle of the values ancient Phariséeism or Rothschild-Zionism detest.

Hellenism = Hellenistic (also called classical) schooling, education and upbringing, ie classical Greek literature-philosophy-science-arts-music-theater-athletics-pancration (martial arts), taught properly in balance and in an adequate symbiosis with each other,.. plus a moral approach towards the human and humanity, has proved to offer the most essential safeguards against tyranny, despotism, monarchy and oligarchy – Hellenism, as a broader term, originates from the word ellinismos (describes the genetic, geographic, cultural and spiritual roots of the Hellenes/Greeks) and is NOT limited to only the classical period of ancient Greece and later Rome, as Wikipedia and many other encyclopedias suggest. The word describes the ENTIRE history of the Hellenes (the Ionian and the Doric tribes). Hellenism has throughout the recorded history been *Zionisms and its predecessors, the Pharisees, enemy No. 1. This of course, because it represents a direct threat to what later became the *Zionist worldview, the Zionist dogma. Hellenism highlights the importance of human freedom, it develops free thinking and offer the spiritual and intellectual tools, so that each individual can be able to develop  independent, free, critical thinking. *Zionism, in which the individual and free critical thinking is seen as a weakness for the collective and in which the individual is seen as merely a cog in a larger machinery, considered the Hellenic thoughts about the free human as nonsense and even as dangerous for the community. This ‘attitude’ towards Hellenic teachings is also what is diligently spread in the schools and in the common encyclopedias today.

This is why today the concept of freedom is distorted and changed into freedom without responsibilities (capitalism, neo-liberalism)or even into, too much freedom is dangerous for the human societies (conservatism, totalitarianism, autocracy).

“when truth has been peeled out of history, all that is left of it, is a worthless story”


Since about 70 years now an anti-Hellenic lobby has deliberately been spreading false teachings and pseudo-arguments among secondary school’s, college’s and universities, with the aim to undermine the classic, Hellenistic education. Anyone who is a bit familiar with the recorded facts in the history of mankind notice this without difficulties, primarily through the major encyclopedias obvious omission and distortion of important knowledge and facts about the legacy of the Greeks. On closer examination you can very easy discover a deliberate manipulation of facts behind the history of the Hellenes, their discoveries, their knowledge, their origin and their language.

Pure cultural persecution has been conducted against Hellenism from a Rothschild-Zionist lobby among academics, with the aim to undermine the possibilities for students to discover the genuine European heritage and the real western spiritual origin and instead replace it with a Rothschild-Zionist worldview. 

Tens of thousands of worried academics worldwide, has been sounding the alarm about this over decades. A large number of professors from all over the world argue that there is a deliberate anti-Hellenic lobby within the academic world, that want to remove Greek education in general from the curriculum in the major universities. A climate thrives in these where Hellenism is considered to be “overrated” and as being based on an up-picking of achievements of neighboring cultures. All such claims can of course be rebutted quite thoroughly and without any difficulties at all, not least by the neighboring cultures own literature, but the damage is still done because the vast majority of the students never make an effort to search for the real facts on these issues. They tend to stick to the common approach to this heritage. An approach to knowledge which by itself actually proves the increasing dissociation from the Hellenic approach to knowledge  It seem fairly unnecessary to most people to question the established encyclopedias, popular science magazines and some of the top universities ways to convey the valuable heritage of the Greeks. It is to most even less likely that, in our “enlightened” time, someone would deliberately distort the truths about our existence, our origins and our true history.

Brave professors, lecturers and academics as Mary Lefkowitz, Victor Hansen and Bruce S Thornton among many others have alarmed about this. Since it exists so much written in Greek, which through the ancient original texts, proves that the ‘anti-Hellenic lobby’ is spreading sheer lies about Greek culture, the Latin replaced classical Greek a few decades ago as the language of literature, philosophy and science. Most major encyclopedias today therefore ignore the actual, original texts (relatively undetected) and refers only to them through – far too often – very shallow interpretations and pure guesses by translators who have tried to comprehend the thinking of the ancient Greeks. They could have let the Classic Greek remain and even teach it more in its talking form, so that every student himself/herself could read the original texts and interpret them himself/herself. After all more than 85% of the books and scrolls in the infamous Library of Alexandria was in Greek. Why must the saved remains  of these books content be explained to the world today by a bunch of interpreters?

Short idea-historic retrospective on Pharisèeism or Rothschild-Zionism and Hellenism:

The Hebreo-Chaldean tribes:

praised the ‘importance of the collective’ and built their world view and their view on the human and humanity largely on religion, mythology, the natural conditions, ‘necessities’ for the survival of the tribes and pure superstition. ‘Science’, Philosophy and Religion in these cultures had to comply with eachother and the authority, the ‘king’, the ‘emperor’, the ‘demigod’, the ‘prophet’, who was considered to have direct contact with “God” and could therefore NOT be criticized openly. He was infallible and his word could not be questioned. Any ‘weakness’ of their authority was supposed to cause chaos and anarchy in a society. They were “theocentric”, ie with a god and a priesthood (Sanhedrin) in the center of their societies. They felt in these tribes that they needed and that they wanted a ‘shepherd’, THEIR ‘shepherd’. From around 1 500 BC the elite of the Sanhedrin, ie the highest Jewish council of the synagogue of ancient times and today’s Rothschild-Zionism (not necessarily Jewish), has always seen Hellenism as its archenemyThis, because automatically, through its main characteristics, its literature and its ancient mystery traditions, Hellenism forms a constant threat to the Rothschild-Zionism’s worldview and its fundamental views on the human and humanity. Precursors of Rothschild-Zionism is actually NOT the whole of Sanhedrin but only a specific group within the ancient Sanhedrin, the highest Jewish council in the synagogue, namely the Pharisées. If you look deeper in their key political, religious, Jewish currents as a common denominator, then the Rothschild-Zionists today are the heirs of the Pharisees. Phariséism was a Jewish, religious, political party who interpreted the Torah and the law of Moses literally, but also rigidly (it was dictated instead of inspired) so the actual ethos and the spirit of the law became rigid and stiff and thus an extremely favorable tool for elitism, racism and tyranny. Today’s fundamentalism, extremism and racism in any religion or ideology is based on this kind of a rigid ethos.

The Ionian and Doric tribes:

ie the Hellenes (Greeks), praised the individuals importance and placed the human being in the center of their concern and they built their worldview and their view on Humanity on critical observations, science and knowledge of the human role in nature and in universe. They were “anthropocentric”, with the human being in the center and they looked at the world and mankind from an investigative perspective based on their own observations and studies. They did not live particularly different from their neighbors, but THE WAY THEY LOOKED UPON HOW THEY LIVED constituted their uniqueness in comparison with ALL other cultures in the ancient world. They examined everything from a critical perspective and this critical, investigative approach they also turned towards their own functions, behavior, institutions, ideas and thinking. Where most other cultures saw more or less similar patterns the Greeks, through their perspective, distinguished details, differences and exceptions. They could place their focus of observation beyond nature, humans and even the gods and examine everything from a rational, investigative, scientific perspective. The Greeks had the ability to see life steadily and see it whole, rather than remain enslaved by custom, tradition, superstition, nature or by the brute force of the political and clerical elite. It sought to free itself from the ‘shackles’, the kind of existence that often dictate people’s lives through dogma, creeds, traditions, customs and practices, and therefore breed non-examined, ingrained, ‘mechanical’ behavior patterns and routines. The Hellenes wanted to be fully ‘conscious’ in their perception and their behavior. To them it was therefore essential that Science, Philosophy and Religion were decoupled from each other, in order for free thinking to develop at all. This was something that was unthinkable in ALL the other cultures as this view was seen as dangerous and as a threat to the order, the monarchy and the clerical elite.

The biggest achievement, with this approach to life was the birth of the organized, critical thinking and thus the concept of freedom. Something that before the Greeks, existed only for kings and emperors with their courts. From this critical thinking, an organized idea that all human beings are born free and independent and therefore has the right to form and decide about their lives, was born,.. so therefore for instance slavery was seriously criticized and later abolished in ancient Athens around 300 BC (about 2000 years before anyone else). They showed by their celebration of the development of human qualities, that they did not want to be dependent on any ‘shepherd’, but that they themselves were capable of becoming the best ‘shepherds’ for their own lives, as long as they learned to understand microcosmos and macrocosmos and the natural principles that govern nature and universe.

The Hebrews were looking for “God” outside themselves and the Hellenes were looking for “God” in themselves…

It is really this ancient schism between two contradicting idea-worlds and spiritual traditions,… this “schizophrenia” between Hellenism and Phariséeism, today’s Rothschild-Zionism, that the ruling classes have tried to crowd into ONE in the ‘modern Western civilization’. This paradox and this fundamental clash of ideas, is what really reflects the whole Western society in all its institutions, its culture its societies, its social character and its basic views on humans and Humanity.

  • We believe that we base our societies and ‘democratic’ states on noble values, but everywhere we structurally violate these values on a daily basis for the sake of financial profit, power and self-pleasure.
  • We believe that we are freer than others, but we captivate ourselves more than any other culture by the shackles of materialism and the devotion of only the physical, the flesh..
  • We say that we defend freedom and human rights, but its obvious that the western Governments and institutions doesn’t count in all of humanity in the same standards.

We claim Hellenism in our spoken words and our writings but we are devoted to Rothschild-Zionism in our thoughts, behavior and our practiced values, our institutions and our administrations. In our so called ‘democratic institutions’, a tremendous dehumanization of others is an accepted ingredient in our relations to others. In fact every bizarre paradox that we discover in the western societies can be traced back to this particular cultural and spiritual “schizophrenia” between Hellenism and Phariséeism or Rothschild-Zionism.

Today Rothschild-Zionism is striving to bury Hellenism and go back to pre-Hellenic idea-worlds where:

  • the kings (today’s: royalties, financial elite, corporate leaders and bankers)
  • the emperors (today’s: leaders of superpowers and international nations-unions, international organizations, cartel’s and alliances)
  • the priests (today’s: pseudo-science, media, entertainment and show business)
  • the demigods (today’s: ruling elite and their celebrities and norm”gurus”)

are again telling humans and humanity what’s best for us.

We are again deceived to believe that we are unable to deal with our lives without the elite’s directions and laws. For that paradigm-shift to be fully implemented the pure and original Hellenic ingredients in human thinking has to first be ridiculed, humiliated and forgotten by humanity. Exactly what has been going on in most human institutions since world-war II.


Kosmas Loumakis

Stockholm 2013-10-22


*Zionism is normally considered to be Theodore Herzl’s organized Jewish movement for the achievement of a country for the Jewish people, the Jewish state of Israel. In this article though when I refer to Zionism I describe Rothschild’s version of Zionism (identical to the ancient Phariseeism), which actually is more about the cultural “hijacking” of the true Jewish religion and their traditions, in order to serve an oligarchic family’s aims for global power, with the current state of Israel as its shield and its vehicle towards this goal and with the USA as its guard.  There are Christian Zionists and Muslim Zionists no matter how strange that can sound, simply because today’s Rothschild-Zionism has very little to do with the real Jewish religion but a lot with the aims of these families and their plans with the state of Israel. They consider themselves as “kings” and “emperors” of humanity and they are using Israel and the Jews in order to fulfill that quest.

Varför kräver inte Internationell Rättvisa gripandet av ‘topparna’?

Uppladdad på Athenianvoice 29-08-2014



“Fred kommer inte att komma till Aten (Mänskligheten) förren de som inte skadats blir lika upprörda som de som skadats.”

“Den nation som insisterar på att dra en bred skiljelinje mellan den stridande människan och den tänkande människan rikserar att finna att dess strider utkämpas av idioter och dess tänkande görs av fegisar.”


De två citaten ovan, ger två mycket viktiga, grundläggande varningar, som är absolut nödvändiga att ta hänsyn till för att kunna upprätthålla en sann demokrati. De är extraherade från tal om de peloponnesiska krigen av den Atenska, historikern, filosofen och generalen, Thucydides, från fyrahundratalet f.Kr.

Det första är om risken med att försumma människor som lider under förtryck och tyranni, och det andra om vikten av att poliskår och armé bildas av medborgarna själva för försvaret av demokratin, medborgarna och allas bästa (i stället för en professionell poliskår och en armé som alltid kommer att vara benägna att tjäna eliten).

Exakt försummelsen av mänskligt lidande och de professionella polisenheterna och arméerna (dirigerade av privata intressen) provocerar idag fram ett klimat där demokratin tar emot slag efter slag från dem som gynnas av dess förstörelse. Rättvisan är till en farligt hög grad i händerna på desamma. Hydran av de största bankfamiljerna och deras underdåniga förmånstagare har kommit att äga de flesta största företagen under de två senaste århundradena, under vilka de i hemlighet och i allt högre grad organiserat sig själva som kontrollanter av regeringar världen över och som skiljedomare om krig och fred.

Om vi ​​inte förstår detta kommer vi att vara oförmögna att förstå de verkliga orsakerna till de två världskrigen och det förestående tredje världskriget, ett krig som med största säkerhet kommer att börja som en följd av USA’s försök att ta och kontrollera Centralasien. Den enda utvägen är att USA skall backa ur – något folket i USA och världen vill, men inte eliten.

Internationell Rättvisa måste, av den västerländska opinionen,”tvingas” att vidta åtgärder mot de största bankfamiljerna och deras “bråkstakar”. Västvärldens medborgare behöver producera precisa, adekvata och omfattande stämningar emot dem i både nationella och internationella domstolar. Det är ju främst västvärldens pseudo-demokratiska regeringar som har lagt rättvisa åt sidan alltför länge och som har misslyckats med att faktiskt någonsin tillämpa verklig demokrati, på grund av sina förpliktelser till dessa bankfamiljer och deras underdåniga förmånstagare. Det är dessa, de högst förrädiska förpliktelserna som har gjort de flesta medborgarna i världen mycket arga och några mycket hämndlystna därför att dessa förpliktelser har visat sig betyda nykoloniala avtal och överenskommelser, emot sitt eget folks och sina länders bästa.

Att stå utanför Bilderberg-möten, parlament, WTO-och G7-toppmöten skrikandes slagord och upplysa dem om att vi vet vilka de är och vad de håller på med, framkallar inte ens svett på deras pannor längre. De har säkerhetspolisen, kravallpolisen, nationalgardet, de paramilitära säkerhetsföretagen, arméerna (privata, nationella och internationella), lego-arméer och löst eller helt allierade kriminella gäng och miliser. De folkvalda “politikerna” på inrådan av sina blodsugar-rådgivare  ser också till att mycket snabbt och i princip obemärkt av allmänheten rösta igenom de nya lagstiftningarna, som försvarar den överdrivna användningen av repressiva krafter och övervåld. De måste se till att våldet mot sina egna medborgare blir, “juridiskt giltiga åtgärder”. För allmänhetens säkerhet och för att hålla ordning i samhället, hävdar man, samtidigt som landets konsitutionsutskott och högsta domstol har ‘åkt på fisketrur’! Detta trots att det är allmänheten de slår, sparkar, sliter i, sprayar med tårgas och vattenkanoner, skjuter gummikulor på, massarresterar, torterar och terroriserar – och trots att det är själva samhället som har blivit attackerat av sina bankirer och affärsmän med deras välsignelse och tillåtelse. Odemokratiskt och författningsstridigt påtvingade lagstiftningar javisst,.. men juridiskt giltiga tills folken förenas och i organiserad form ogiltigförklarar dessa lagstiftningar.

Faktum är att den mest effektiva formen av organisering emot Mammons tyranni kallas DEMOKRATI, men inte i dess nuvarande lamslagna, ögonbindelförsedda, stumma, finans-dikterade, utpressade form. Inte i sin “rösta-vart-fjärde-år-och-betala-dina-skatter-och-lämna-resten-till-oss-för-vi-vet-bättre” form. Den formen är den som fört oss till denna bräckliga position i första hand. Vi måste leta efter lösningar i grundvalarna för sann demokrati för att förstå hur vi kan bygga de lämpliga ‘försvarslinjerna’ mot, plutokrati och tyranni med den. Dess ursprungliga form,.. den gamla pre-romerska, atenska formen, är fortfarande den enda verkliga grunden för demokratiskt “iordningsställande och organisering av en stats och ett mänskligt samhälles affärer och angelägenheter”. Det är den enda kända formen som verkligen kan ge kollektiv frihet, individuellt och socialt självbestämmande och ett konsekvent självförsvar åt ett helt folk eller en nation, alltså den enda som verkligen kan kallas demokrati. DEN FORMEN ÄR VAD DAGENS ROVGIRIGA, FINANSIELLA ELIT FRUKTAR MER ÄN NÅGOT ANNAT I DENNA VÄRLD. De har stött på den några gånger i historien, och de tyckte inte om den alls.

Det tog dem över ett sekel och en hel del konspirationer, hemlighetsmakerier, manipulation och infiltration att verkligen återhämta sig sedan fransmännen slog dem i ansiktet med den. Och beakta att att det slaget samt det som amerikanska revolutionen gav sina kolonisatörer, var bara smekningar i jämförelse med vad en sann och mogen demokrati verkligen kan göra, emot dessa självutnämnda “kungar” och “kejsare” av mänskligheten. Fransmännen och amerikanerna liksom de flesta andra, som har höjt en anda av frihet mot tyranner, har inte i tillräcklig utsträckning implementerat de ursprungliga och viktigaste principerna för demokrati, dem som Thucydides varnade om. De lyckades lämna otroligt demokratiska konstitutioner efter sig till mänskligheten, men misslyckades med att också lämna efter sig de nödvändiga praktiska säkerhetsspärrarna för att på ett adekvat sätt kunna skydda sina konstitutioner och dess grundläggande demokratiska principer. Säkerhetsspärrarna som bl.a Solon, Thucydides och Perikles, i det antika Aten hade identifierat som absolut avgörande för att en sann demokrati skall kunna försvara sig emot, och överleva, konspirationer av plutokratisk, kleptokratisk och oligarkisk karaktär, d.v.s tyranni!

I Frankrike under 1700-talet, var de allra flesta av de enkla människorna analfabeter och därför omedvetna om dessa antika men fortfarande grundläggande principers existens, så de kunde inte kräva dem från revolutionen. Detta faktum lockade även Robespierre själv att bli en självutnämnd “rektor” åt det franska folket och en maktberusad tyrann och hans storhetsvansinne ledde slutligen också till förlusten av sitt huvud,.. bokstavligen. I Amerika hade revolutionen samma problem med analfabetismen, plus faktumet att de som kämpade i frihetskriget kom kulturellt och etniskt från många olika bakgrunder, så de kunde tystas och göras belåtna med endast några smulor i jämförelse med vad ett verkligt informerat och enat folk kan uppnå.

I dag är vi i en helt och hållet annan situation för i väst i dag, är nästan ingen analfabet (åtminstone officiellt), så idag kan vi verkligen kräva att alla de grundläggande principerna skall återställas och skyddas på ett sätt som bara den pre-romerska, grekiska demokratin, någonsin har gjort. Den romerska, post-grekiska, formen av demokrati å andra sidan lade – genom en rigid byråkrati och alldeles för många mycket onödiga och komplicerade lagar – grunderna för det som fortfarande passerar som demokrati i världen idag. Rom, den vulgära, imperialistiska imitatören av den Hellenska kulturen banade verkligen vägen för plutokratiska och kleptokratiska konspirationer genom de många “kryphål” som den romerska lagstiftningen hade lämnat öppna, utan hänsyn till de grundläggande atenska principerna och den ursprungliga centrala medborgargrundsynen som bör vara grunden för lagen i en demokrati.

Vår värsta fiende i dag, som hindrar oss från att förena oss, är inte analfabetismen som i slutet av 18-talet utan det är desinformationen och den statligt sanktionerade, vilseledande propagandan.

Att enas betyder inte alls att vi måste komma överens om allt, eller ens att vi måste tycka om varandras politiska åsikter. Det betyder bara att vi måste identifiera och fokusera på det verkliga och mycket farliga gemensamma hotet mot oss alla, och emot vårt hus (vår individuella och sociala frihet, vårt land, våra naturresurser och våra grundlagar). Det betyder att använda förnuft och logik före passion, för att tillsammans och med förenade krafter först eliminera detta hot. För utan att vårt hus verkligen är vårt, är det ganska meningslöst att argumentera om hur man delar upp det sinsemellan, vilka husregler som skall gälla eller hur vi bäst använder dess resurser.

Om vi väntar på ett samtidigt globalt uppror, använder vi inte logik eller förnuft, utan bara dumt och barnsligt hopp och det kommer bara att tillåta att Ukraina-effekten och Syrien-effekten sprider sig globalt. Att bara hoppas på något i den nuvarande situationen, betyder egentligen att man redan har givit upp och bara väntar på att hjälp skall komma från någon annanstans eller någon annan. “Hjälpen” som kommer från “någon annanstans” och från “någon annan” erbjuds idag gladeligen från bank-familjernas lego-arméer, dödspatruller och miliser, som leds av NATO. Med Ukraina-effekten och Syrien-effekten, menar jag extremister och blodtörstiga, fanatiska slaktare som släppts loss av just dessa bankfamiljer, för att de skall fungera som “revolutionärer som försvarar sitt land”, och förhindra att den verkliga majoriteten av landets befolkning förenar sig och kräver verklig demokrati. Detta är vad som väntar oss alla om inte alla drar upp byxorna, kavlar upp ärmarna och verkligen enas på ett adekvat sätt mot tyrannerna. Det är bevis på stor dumhet eller stor feghet, eller båda, att förvänta sig att tyranner skall rädda mänskligheten från tyranner. I synnerhet när det enda man har ‘kurage’ nog att göra, som en påstådd politisk reaktion, är att fortfarande endast delta i deras löjliga vänster-höger charad. I dag är det som att välja om man vill knuffas över klippkanten med bank-familjernas högra hand eller deras vänstra hand.

“Frihet ges  aldrig frivilligt av förtryckaren; den måste krävas av de förtryckta.”

Dr Martin Luther King, Jr

Så, svaret på frågan i rubriken till denna artikel är helt enkelt: Därför att de fortfarande fria människorna i världen, inte förenar sig, organiserar sig och kräver det starkt nog!

Följaktligen är den mest avgörande motståndshandlingen idag, den enade, bestämda och välorganiserade handlingen som kommer att tvinga internationell rättvisa att reagera starkt mot den globala Hydran av Mammons plundrare, ockupanter och krigsherrar, och äntligen ställa dem till svars för sina upprepade och ytterst grova brott mot mänskligheten.


Dockspelarna i fängelse!

Bankfamiljernas Hydra flyger högt, alldeles för högt och dess huvuden leker gudar med hjälp av Icaros vingar och till och med nu när dessa vingar är svedda och de ständigt tappar höjd (färre och färre tror på deras sagor), vägrar de inse att vingarna endast är av vax och löstagbara och att de, de facto INTE kan flyga utan dem. Hydran har under lång tid lärt sig att agera som om den befinner sig bortom åtal och ovanför lagen, men den glömmer bort att solen smälter vax.


Förblindade av arrogans och stolthet kan de inte se sitt fall komma mer än Icaros kunde, och detta är det yttersta beviset på inte bara deras blindhet, utan även deras enkelspåriga sinne. Mänskligheten måste, i sin sociala karaktär och sin gemensamma inställning till livet, kollektivt  hitta Daedalus* (Icaros fars) balans mellan “att flyga för högt och för lågt”. Balans mellan girighet och behov så att säga. Balansen kan inte återställas på kollektiv nivå, när störningarna har blivit standard, om mänskligheten och samhället själva inte behandlar sina obalanser med relevans och enighet. Balans kommer med sanning, själviakttagelse, kunskap om mikrokosmos och makrokosmos och med den genuina viljan att respektera de naturliga principer som upprätthåller livet.  Början av en sådan behandling av obalansen är att noggrant och effektivt ta itu med de värsta störningarna och dess orsaker. Med det menas att applicera stränga rättsliga påföljder och att inrätta oberoende och konstitutionellt skyddade praktiska, rättsliga skyddsåtgärder som skyddar de fundamentala demokratiska principerna och medborgarna från maktmissbruk.

Mänskligheten måste, förutom att kräva mycket höga fängelsestraff också kräva annektering av deras förmögenheter, för att kompensera åtminstone delar av de omätbara skadorna som de har orsakat mänskligheten, samt berövandet av alla deras offentliga funktioner, sitt social-ekonomiska inflytande och sina medborgerliga rättigheter (precis som man gjorde i den atenska demokratins gryning). De och alla deras gelikar, deras ‘tjänare’ och deras ‘hangarounds’ kan inte längre tillåtas ha något inflytande på varken den offentliga eller den privata inflytelserika sektorn. Mänskligheten och de mänskliga samhällena måste en gång för alla markera och statuera exempel genom att visa att man riskerar starkt att förlora allt, precis allt, utom mat, vatten och husrum, om man behagar utsätta den för omfattande och livshotande fara. Dessa påföljder är helt i linje med de ursprungliga rättsliga och praktiska aspekterna av demokrati.

Vi måste förenade, oupphörligt och mycket högt och officiellt fråga våra rättsliga myndigheter: Varför ställs inte de mäktigaste bankfamiljernas ’överhuvuden’, direktörerna, ordförandena och styrelserna, cheferna, ministrarna, agenterna och befälhavarna för deras företag, organisationer och institutioner inför rätta? Det står ju klart genom hela “bibliotek av bevis “, vilka som i själva verket återigen sätter världen och mänskligheten i ett mycket kritiskt läge.

I mänsklighetens kollektiva samvete anklagas de allvarligt för att:

  • ha uppnått sin makt och skapat sina förmögenhet genom bedrägeri, stöld, manipulering av offentlig förmögenhet, förtroendevalda, hela samhällen och genom brott mot mänskligheten, krigsförbrytelser och folkmord.
  • avsiktligt och på ett förutbestämt sätt ha skapat mycket allvarliga problem, väntat på de noggrant framkallade reaktionerna och sedan presenterat sina egna önskade lösningar.
  • ha manipulerat marknader, regeringar, domstolar, nationer, samhällen, arméer och kontinenter genom hemliga militära och paramilitära operationer, propaganda, utpressning, mord, hot och terror.
  • genom bedrägeri, lögner och svek medvetet ha orsakat ekonomiska kriser, geopolitiska kriser, krig, inbördeskrig, revolutioner, diktaturer och att alltid ha finansierade båda sidor i stora konflikter så att de inte skulle avslutas innan den önskade geo-strategiska, politiska och socioekonomiska målen uppnåtts.

Över 100 miljoner människor dog bara under 1900-talet i krig och väpnade konflikter som framprovocerats, förorsakats och utlösts av dem och deras företag, organisationer och institutioner.

Något viktigt att tänka på här är att lagen i en demokrati (den grekiska formen) är tänkt att uttrycka den gemensamma moralen och den etiska grundsynen hos folket, och inte att försvara själviska begär och den finansiella, politiska och prästerliga elitens brott (den romerska formen). Vi måste därför högljutt fråga: När kommer internationell rättvisa att reagera i enlighet med dessa, av mänskligheten brett stödda anklagelserna?

Naturligtvis kommer detta inte att ske utan mycket kraftiga påtryckningar från folken. Det absolut första västvärldens medborgare och de demokratiska krafterna måste organisera sig runt nu, är det officiella kravet på sina nationella högsta domstolar, konstitutionella kommittéer och utskott och den Internationella brottmålsdomstolen, att föra brottslingarna från dessa bankfamiljer och deras organisationer inför rätta för hög förräderi, brott mot mänskligheten, krigsförbrytelser och folkmord. Vilken trovärdighet har annars människors demokratiska kamper egentligen? Om de kämpande människorna inte visar också i praktiken att de anser att dessa män och kvinnor är högst livsfarliga för mänskliga samhällen och för mänskligheten, varför skulle rättvisan bry sig, kan ju vissa hävda?

Uppenbarligen måste den för närvarande trötta och ganska döva Internationella Rättvisan och dess domare och åklagare idag bli påminda om vad själva syftet med den var. Den måste av de förenade folken bli ’tillsagd’ att göra vad den bildades för att göra, och att inte ge efter för utpressning och hot eller förväntade klass-skyldigheter. Om de inte kan motstå eller undvika en sådan underkastelse, bör de inte hålla sådana positioner en minut längre. De bör avgå och lämna sina platser till mer modiga och okuvliga “väktare av lagen”. Mänskligheten måste mycket starkt nu kräva detta från internationell rättvisa genom att omplacera de stora och massiva  protesterna till högkvarteren och domstolarna i stället för utanför parlamenten (som inte har någon vidare makt att tala om idag).

Internationell Rättvisa grundades i första hand för att skydda folk, nationer och mänskligheten från förtryck och tyranni genom att försvara de grundläggande mänskliga och medborgerliga rättigheterna och folkens rättighet att motstå tyranni och försvara nationell och internationell demokrati och frihet. Nåväl, det gör den inte! Om den gjorde det, skulle vi ha sett det och känt av det under de senaste fyra åren, när mänskligheten faktiskt mer än någonsin tidigare, genom massiva protester mot orättvisor, diktatoriska politiska beslut och nykoloniala ekonomiska lösningar, har visat att den vill ha sann rättvisa. Den skulle ha svarat och reagerat på de mycket motiverade massiva reaktionerna och protesterna mot nyliberala privatiseringar och skrotningen av mänskliga och medborgerliga rättigheter. Egentligen gjorde de faktiskt det, men jag menar inte ett gensvar som först och främst är polisvåld och massiva, repressiva åtgärder och strategier mot offren, utan ett gensvar med de befintliga rättsliga verktygen emot förövarna.

Att försvara mänskligheten nu innebär att omedelbart och genom befintlig internationell folkrätt och de lämpliga praktiska mekanismerna (deras arresteringar och åtal), på ett tydligt och bestämt sätt visa dessa bankfamiljer och deras allierade att hela folk, nationer, kulturer och mänskliga samhällen inte kan utpressas, hotas och terroriseras av några bank familjer utan att de blir allvarligt och på ett relevant sätt straffade för det. Existerar dessa domare och åklagare över huvud taget i annan form än som en utrotningshotad art, undrar jag, och förväntar vi oss mod, rättfärdighet och anständighet varifrån endast feghet, orättfärdighet och oanständighet existerar?


Kosmas Loumakis

Karlshamn 21-08-2014



*Daedalos var en hantverkare, anses vara uppfinnaren av snickeri-yrket, som byggde labyrinten åt Minos, kung av Kreta. Minos fängslade honom och hans son Icaros, men de flydde med hjälp av vingar som Daedalos gjort och fäst med vax. Icaros flög dock för nära solen och omkom.

Denna ‘myt-historiska’ (mix av mytologi och historia) story förklarar Människans fall ner i avgrunden av egoism och narcissism och Människans möjlighet att övervinna dessa självdestruktiva egenskaper genom balans och måttfullhet.



Η Εξομολόγηση ενός οικονομικού δολοφόνου (ταινία-ντοκιμαντέρ)


Όσα θα θέλατε να μάθετε για το χρέος και το ΔΝΤ, αλλά δεν είχατε κανέναν για να ρωτήσετε. Η ταινία καταγράφει τις εξομολογήσεις του αμερικανού οικονομολόγου και πράκτορα της Εθνικής Υπηρεσίας Πληροφοριών των ΗΠΑ Τζών Πέρκινς στον Στέλιο Κούλογλου, καθώς και την εσωτερική πάλη του πρωταγωνιστή ανάμεσα στο φόβο και στην ανάγκη να πει την αλήθεια.

Ο Πέρκινς συμμετείχε την δεκαετία του ‘70 σε μια ομάδα οικονομικών δολοφόνων όπως αυτοαποκαλούνταν τα ίδια τα μέλη της. Στόχος της ομάδας, η οποία συνεργαζόταν με την Παγκόσμια Τράπεζα, το Πεντάγωνο και την CIA ήταν η οικονομική και πολιτική υποδούλωση χωρών του Τρίτου Κόσμου, μέσα από την προσφορά δανείων που οι χώρες δεν μπορούσαν να εξοφλήσουν.

Αν κάποιοι από τους προέδρους των χωρών-στόχων δεν υπέκυπταν στους εκβιασμούς των οικονομικών δολοφόνων, οι τελευταίοι καλούσαν την CIA για να τους ανατρέψει με πραξικόπημα ή να τους δολοφονήσει. Ο Στέλιος Κούλογλου έπεισε τον Τζων Πέρκινς να ταξιδέψουν μαζί στον Ισημερινό όπου είχε δολοφονηθεί ο πρόεδρος της χώρας και να ζητήσει συγνώμη από τον λαό σε μια θυελλώδη δημόσια εκδήλωση η οποία αποτελεί και τον αφηγηματικό κορμό της ταινίας.

Το φιλμ, διάρκειας 90 λεπτών, είναι γυρισμένο σε ύφος film noir καθώς στην υπόθεση μπλέκονται μοιραίες γυναίκες, συγγενείς δολοφονημένων που ζητούν να μάθουν τι απέγινε στα αγαπημένα τους πρόσωπα και πράκτορες της CIA.

«Η εξομολόγηση ενός οικονομικού δολοφόνου» έχει προβληθεί στους κινηματογράφους της Νέας Υόρκης, του Λος Αντζελες και πολλών πόλεων του Μεξικού και της Αργεντινής, ενώ έχει προβληθεί σε δεκάδες διεθνή Φεστιβάλ και τηλεοπτικά δίκτυα. Κέρδισε το βραβείο κοινού στο Διεθνές Φεστιβάλ Κινηματογράφου και Ανθρωπίνων Δικαιωμάτων που διεξάγεται στην Σαραγόσα και το δεύτερο βραβείο καλύτερου ντοκιμαντέρ στο Διεθνές Φεστιβάλ Ντοκιμαντέρ της Σεούλ.

Η ταινία είναι συμπαραγωγή της εταιρείας Lynx, του Ελληνικού Κέντρου Κινηματογράφου και της ΕΡΤ. Στις δραματοποιημένες σκηνές παίζουν οι ηθοποιοί Γιάννης Χατζηγιάννης, Κωνσταντίνος Βελέντζας, Τάκης Στάγκος και Ναταλία Λιονάκη. Διευθυντής φωτογραφίας είναι ο Διονύσης Ευθυμιόπουλος και ο Μανώλης Κονσολάκης ενώ το μοντάζ έκανε ο Κενάν Ακάουι. Την μουσική της ταινίας έχουν γράψει οι Active Member.



Ακολουθούν δύο άρθρα του βραβευμένου σκηνοθέτη πολιτικών ντοκιμαντέρ Στέλλιου Κούλογλου σχετικά με το μπλέξιμο της Ελλάδας στη Διεθνή Κερδοσκοπία και Εταιρειοκρατία:

α) Ελλάδα: όμηρος οικονομικών δολοφόνων 

β) Το προτεκτοράτο – πειραματόζωο

Οι παραθέσεις με λόγια του Πέρκινς στο τρίτο βίντεο αυτής της σελίδας βασίζονται σε άρθρο της Ελευθεροτυπίας του 2011 με τίτλο Η Ελλάδα έχει πέσει θύμα οικονομικών δολοφόνων , που παρουσιάζει συνέντευξη του Τζον Πέρκινς με θέμα την Ελλάδα.

Χωρίς εθνική κυριαρχία και αυτοδιάθεση δεν μπορεί να υπάρξει προκοπή

Λογότυπο ΕΠΑΜ



Δείτε πόσο ανήμπορες είναι οι αγορές κεφαλαίου με τους εξαγορασμένους δικαστές και τους πολιτικούς τους μπροστά σε μια χώρα που ξέρει να υπερασπίζεται την εθνική της κυριαρχία. Δείτε τι ατομικό όπλο κρατά στα χέρια του ένας λαός απέναντι σε κάθε αποικιοκρατική επιβουλή, όταν ξέρει να προασπίζεται την εθνική του αυτοδιάθεση.

Ο λόγος περί Αργεντινής. Δεν ξέρω αν το προσέξατε, αλλά ακόμη να καταρρεύσει η οικονομία της και να πνιγεί στο χάος η κοινωνία της, σχεδόν ένα μήνα μετά την επίσημη πτώχευση της χώρας από το δικαστικό σύστημα της Νέας Υόρκης και τους διεθνείς οίκους ανοχής, όπως S&P, Fitch,Moody’s.

Κι ενώ οι κασσανδρικές προφητείες συνεχίζονται από τα έμμισθα παπαγαλάκια, η κυβέρνηση της Αργεντινής κατέθσε νόμο που κάνει δυνατή την πληρωμή των ομολογιούχων της σε Αργεντίνικο δίκαιο και από την κρατική τράπεζα Nación Fideicomisos S.A. Η κυβέρνηση της Αργεντινής δίνει διορία έως το τέλος Σεπτεμβρίου στην Bank of New York Mellon της Νέας Υόρκης να πληρώσει – σύμφωνα με την σύμβαση που έχει υπογράψει με την Αργεντινή – τους ομολογιούχους, είτε με, είτε χωρίς την συγκατάθεση του δικαστή Γκρίεζα. Διαφορετικά θα ασκήσει το έννομο δικαίωμά της να αλλάξει εκπρόσωπο πληρωμής.

Ο Γκρίεζα και οι αγορές λύσσαξαν με την απόφαση αυτή. Ο δικαστής των κερδοσκόπων την κήρυξε “παράνομη”, χωρίς να έχει καμιά ούτε αρμοδιότητα, ούτε δικαιοδοσία. Απεφάσισε μάλιστα να καταδικάσει την Αργεντινή σε πριφρόνηση του δικαστηρίου του, θεωρώντας προφανώς είτε από γεροντική άνοια, είτε από υστερική σκοπιμότητα, ότι η συγκεκριμένη χώρα είναι κάποιος κακομοίρης φτωχοδιάβολος, π.χ. σαν κι αυτόν που δολοφόνησαν οι ένστολοι ομογάλακτοί του στο Μιζούρι. Κι επομένως πρέπει να νιώσει το αδίστακτο χέρι του νόμου για να μάθει να μην σηκώνει κεφάλι.

Η απάντηση του υπουργείου οικονομικών της Αργεντινής είναι χαρακτηριστική:

“Το γεγονός ότι δήλωσε ως «παράνομο» ένα νομοσχέδιο που αποστέλλεται από το Εκτελεστικό στο Κογκρέσο δίνει και πάλι απόδειξη της περιφρόνησης του στην εθνική κυριαρχία της Αργεντινής και την πλήρη άγνοια του σχετικά με τη λειτουργία των δημοκρατικών θεσμών. Δεν του αρκεί το ότι εμποδίζει την καταβολή στους κατόχους των ομολόγων που συμμετέχουν στην αναδιάρθρωση του χρέους του 2005 και του 2010 με κατάχρηση της δικαιοδοσίας του… Τώρα επιχειρεί, κατόπιν αιτήματος από τα “ληστρικά αμοιβαία κεφάλαια”, να επιβάλει όρους στο ίδιο το Κογκρέσο, το οποίο είναι το ανώτατο νομοθετικό σώμα του Έθνους.”

“Όταν μιλάνε για περιφρόνηση του δικαστηρίου, αποτυγχάνουν να δουν ότι η Αργεντινή είναι κυρίαρχο κράτος και διαθέτει ασυλία,” δήλωσε με τη σειρά του ο Καπιτάνις, κυβερνητικός εκπρόσωπος στην καθημερινή ενημέρωση τύπου την Τετάρτη 20/8, σχετικά με την απόφαση του Γκρίεζα. Εν τω μεταξύ, ο Καπιτάνις δήλωσε επίσης ότι “μεγάλες συγκεντρώσεις υπερεθνικών ομάδων” επιδιώκουν να “επιβάλουν όρους στην Αργεντινή προκειμένου να γυρίσει πίσω στο φαύλο κύκλο του χρέους και στον μόνιμο εκβιασμό που έχει υποστεί.”

Οποιοσδήποτε παρακολουθεί τις εξελίξεις γνωρίζει ότι η δήλωση του Καπιτάνις είναι απολύτως ακριβής. Πρόσφατα το Economist (23/8) έγραφε τα εξής: “Η Αργεντινή διαθέτει το δεύτερο σε μέγεθος απόθεμα σχιστολιθικού αερίου στον κόσμο, το περισσότερο στην Vaca Muerta. Μια έρευνα από την Διοίκηση Πληροφοριών Ενέργειας των ΗΠΑ (EIA), αναφέρει ότι ο τομέας κατέχει 16,2 δις βαρέλια σχιστολιθικού πετρελαίου και 308 τρισεκατομμύρια κυβικά πόδια (TCF) σχιστολιθικού φυσικού αερίου. Αυτό είναι περισσότερο πετρέλαιο σχιστόλιθου από ότι διαθέτει το Μεξικό και περισσότερο σχιστολιθικό φυσικό αέριο από ότι διαθέτει η Βραζιλία. Είναι αρκετά για να ικανοποιήσουν την τρέχουσα ζήτηση ενέργειας της Αργεντινής για πάνω από 150 χρόνια, και θα μπορούσε να καταστήσει την χώρα εξαγωγέα πετρελαίου και φυσικού αερίου για άλλη μια φορά.”

Είναι ποτέ δυνατόν να επιτρέψουν να χαθεί ένας τέτοιος πλούτος από τις διεθνείς αγορές; Είναι ποτέ δυνατόν να επιτρέψουν σε μια εθνικά κυρίαρχη κυβέρνηση να αξιοποιήσει αυτόν τον πλούτο προς όφελος του λαού και της χώρας της; Όχι βέβαια. Να γιατί επιδιώκουν την κατάρρευση της Αργεντινής. Μόνο που δεν μπορούν να κάνουν απολύτως τίποτε σ’ έναν λαό που ξέρει τι σημαίνει εθνική αυτοδιάθεση και σε μια κυβέρνηση που υπερασπίζεται την εθνική κυριαρχία της χώρας της.

Κι εκεί είναι το κουμπί. Ότι κι αν πουν, ότι κι αν κάνουν δικαστές τύπου Γκρίεζα, όσο κι αν πιέζουν οι ισχυροί, όσες αποφάσεις και να πάρουν οργανισμοί σαν τον ΠΟΕ εναντίον της Αργεντινής, όλα θα αποτυγχάνουν και θα σπάνε στον ανάχωμα της εθνικής κυριαρχίας και ασυλίας της Αργεντινής.

Αρκεί η κυβέρνηση να παραμείνει ακλόνητη στην υπεράσπιση των θεμελιωδών δικαιωμάτων της χώρας της. Αρκεί να συνεχίσει να μην δανείζεται από το εξωτερικό, από τις διεθνείς αγορές κεφαλαίου. Αρκεί να ενισχύει τις διακρατικές της σχέσεις στη βάση του αμοιβαίου οφέλους, όπως έχει κάνει μέχρι τώρα. Και αρκεί να ξεκαθαρίζει το εσωτερικό μέτωπο από τις δυνάμεις εκείνες της εγχώριας ολιγαρχίας που έχουν ταυτιστεί με τις αγορές. Με βασικό μοχλό το βάθαιμα της δημοκρατίας για τις αδύναμες τάξεις και την αγωνιστική επαγρύπνηση του λαού που ξέρει πώς να απαντήσει άμεσα και πρακτικά στο δίλημα: Patria o Buitros. Πατρίδα ή Γύπες.

Αναρτήθηκε από ΔΗΜΗΤΡΗΣ ΚΑΖΑΚΗΣ στις 2:17 μ.μ.

Πρέπει να διαγραφεί το χρέος προς την εφορία, αλλιώς δεν μπορεί ν’ αλλάξει τίποτε.

Λογότυπο ΕΠΑΜ



Πόσες δόσεις θέλετε για να πληρώσετε την εφορία; 6 ή 100; Μην σας απασχολεί που έτσι ή αλλιώς δεν θα μπορείτε να πληρώσετε τον Ενιαίο Φόρο Ακινήτων. Ούτε να σας απασχολεί το γεγονός ότι ο συγκεκριμένος φόρος έχει σχεδιαστεί για να μπορέσει τελικά η εφορία των τοκογλύφων να δημεύσει την ιδιωτική περιουσία. Θα σας κάνουν “εκπτώσεις”. Γι’ αυτό και μην ανησυχείτε. Άλλωστε όπως λένε όλοι εν χορώ, η οικονομία πάει καλύτερα και οι πιο πορωμένοι ηλίθιοι σας διαβεβαιώνουν ότι έρχονται καλύτερες ημέρες.

Κρατηθείτε, έρχονται καλύτερες μέρες…

Μέχρι και η αντιπολίτευση έχει αποδεχθεί αυτό το παραμύθι. Το ΚΚΕ έχει ήδη ανακοινώσει ότι έχουμε μπει σε “καπιταλιστική ανάκαμψη”, όπως και οι Σταθάκηδες του ΣΥΡΙΖΑ που βλέπουν βελτίωση, αλλά με συνέπειες για τους εργαζόμενους. Τώρα τι σόι αριστερά – υποτίθεται ταξική και αντικαθεστωτική – είναι αυτή που είναι έτοιμη να χάψει ότι παραμύθι σερβίρει η κυβερνώσα συμμορία, αρκεί να βάλει το δικό της πρόσημο, είναι αλλουνού παπά ευαγγέλιο

Οπότε Έλληνα κακομοίρογλου κάτσε στον καναπέ σου να πιστεύεις ότι εφόσον άπαντες σου λένε ότι η οικονομία πάει καλύτερα, τότε γιατί να μην περιμένεις ότι ίσως, μπορεί να ελαφρώσουν τα βάρη σου; Το μόνο που χρειάζεται είναι να περιμένεις τις εκλογές, ήσυχα-ήσυχα, να κοιτάς τη δουλίτσα σου, να σκύβεις το κεφάλι σε κάθε ξεπούλημα της πατρίδας, να καταπίνεις κάθε προσβολή στην (ανύπαρκτη) αξιοπρέπεια και την οικογένειά σου για να ψηφίσεις αυτόν που θα σου τάξει τα περισσότερα.

Κι έτσι στήνεται η σικέ αντιπαράθεση που θα μας πάει στις επόμενες εκλογές. Δείτε για παράδειγμα την αντιπαράθεση για την φορολογία. Κυβερνώντες και δελφίνοι της αντιπολίτευσης μάχονται για να πείσουν ότι ο καθένας για την πάρτη του είναι πιο ικανός στην αύξηση της φορολογίας.

Περιουσιολόγια, φορολογία υψηλών εισοδημάτων και κεφαλαίων, πάταξη της φοροδιαφυγής, κοκ. Τα ίδια και τα ίδια. Το μόνο που τους απασχολεί είναι πώς θα αυξήσουν τα φορολογικά βάρη, σ’ έναν ήδη υπερφορολογημένο λαό. Αλλά μην ανησυχείτε, η ηγεσία του ΣΥΡΙΖΑ μας διαβεβαιώνει ότι θα φορολογήσει και το μεγάλο κεφάλαιο.

Κουβέντα για το χρέος προς την εφορία

Κανείς δεν λέει κουβέντα για το συσσωρευμένο χρέος προς την εφορία λόγω της φορολογίας που έχει επιβληθεί τα χρόνια του μνημονίου. Δεν πρέπει να ξεχνάμε ότι το παλιό χρέος των φορολογουμένων προς την εφορία ξεπέρασε τα 61 δις ευρώ τον Ιούνιο. Σ’ αυτά προστέθηκαν και άλλα 6,2 δις ευρώ νέο χρέος προς την εφορία μέσα στο πρώτο εξάμηνο του 2014. Σύνολο 67,2 δις ευρώ οφειλές προς την εφορία. Δηλαδή το χρέος προς την εφορία ισοδυναμεί αισίως τουλάχιστον με το 35% του ΑΕΠ.

Αν από αυτό το σύνολο των οφειλών αφαιρέσουμε τα 4,6 δις ευρώ που χρωστούν οι πρώην ΔΕΚΟ, οι δημοτικές επιχειρήσεις, κοκ, αλλά και τα 9,5 δις ευρώ που προέρχονται από “πτωχευμένες επιχειρήσεις”, τότε το συνολικό τρέχον χρέος προς την εφορία ανέρχεται σε 53,1 δις ευρώ. Αυτό σημαίνει ότι ο κάθε φορολογούμενος χρωστά κατά μέσο όρο στην εφορία γύρω στα 8.850 ευρώ. Μέχρι το τέλος του έτους η μέση οφειλή ανά φορολογική δήλωση είναι σίγουρο ότι θα έχει υπερβεί τα 9.200 ευρώ, όταν το 2013 είχε φτάσει λίγο πάνω από 8.200 ευρώ.

Mέσα σ’ ένα χρόνο δηλαδή η αύξηση του χρέους των ελλήνων πολιτών προς την εφορία είναι σίγουρο ότι θα ξεπεράσει τελικά το 12%. Με το λαϊκό εισόδημα να προβλέπεται ότι θα μειωθεί γύρω στα 6% έως το τέλος του έτους.

Μπορεί ποτέ να εισπραχθεί αυτό το χρέος; Σε καμιά περίπτωση. Ακόμη κι αν δεχτούμε ότι όντως η ελληνική οικονομία μπαίνει σε διαδικασία ανάκαμψης, που δεν ισχύει ούτε στα πιο υστερικά όνειρα των σεσημασμένων ψυχασθενών της κυβέρνησης. Το σίγουρο είναι ότι το χρέος θα αυξηθεί ακόμη περισσότερο καθ’ ότι η επιδρομή της εφορίας γίνεται όχι τόσο με έκτακτους φόρους, αλλά με μόνιμους, στους οποίους πάνω από το 70% των φορολογουμένων δεν διαθέτει φοροδοτική ικανότητα για να ανταποκριθεί. Κι έτσι το χρέος προς την εφορία θα αυξάνει κάθε χρόνο.

Αν σ’ αυτό προσθέσετε και τους νέους φόρους σαν τον Ενιαίο Φόρο Ακινήτων, αλλά και τους άλλους που θα προβλέπει ο νέος προϋπολογισμός, τότε ακόμη και ο πιο αφελής μπορεί να αντιληφθεί πόσο θα εκτινάσσεται το χρέος προς την εφορία μήνα το μήνα, χρόνο το χρόνο. Ακόμη και για εκείνους που μέχρι σήμερα τα κουτσοκατάφερναν και δεν είχαν χρέη προς την εφορία.

Το χρέος προς την εφορία πρέπει να διαγραφεί.

Τι πρέπει να γίνει μ’ αυτό το χρέος; Κυβερνώντες και δελφίνοι της αντιπολίτευσης υπόσχονται δόσεις, κι άλλες δόσεις, άπειρες δόσεις. Κάντε μόνοι σας τον υπολογισμό και θα δείτε τι σημαίνει να πληρώνεις ένα χρέος πάνω από 9.000 ευρώ ανά φορολογική δήλωση, που αναπόφευκτα θα αυξάνει κάθε χρόνο. Μέχρι βιβλικής τετάρτης γενεάς να προβλέψουν δόσεις, το χρέος αυτό όχι μόνο δεν θα μπορεί να πληρωθεί, αλλά θα αυξάνει.

Τι πρέπει να γίνει; Το αυτονόητο. Να διαγραφούν τα χρέη που φορτώθηκαν στα νοικοκυριά και τους μικρομεσαίους λόγω της μνημονιακής φορολογίας και φυσικά να καταργηθούν όλοι οι δημευτικοί φόροι. Έτσι ή αλλιώς δεν μπορούν να πληρωθούν.

Μα αυτό θα έχει δημοσιονομικό κόστος, θα μας πουν. Ανοησίες, απαντάμε. Το 2013 από το σύνολο των 62,3 δις ευρώ που έφτασαν οι οφειλές προς την εφορία τον Δεκέμβριο, ο κρατικός προϋπολογισμός εισέπραξε 3,2 δις ευρώ από τις εκβιαστικές ρυθμίσεις που επιβάλλει το υπουργείο των τοκογλύφων στους φορολογούμενους. Λίγο πάνω από το 5% της συνολικής οφειλής. Μέχρι τον Ιούνιο του 2014 από τα 67,2 δις ευρώ συνολικές οφειλές προς την εφορία, οι εισπρακτικοί μηχανισμοί κατόρθωσαν να εισπράξουν μόλις 1,7 δις ευρώ. Μόλις το 2,5% των συνολικών οφειλών.

Τα εισπραττόμενα ποσά έναντι των οφειλών είναι ασήμαντα και μπορούν εύκολα να αντικατασταθούν για παράδειγμα από την φορολογία των πολυεθνικών, που σήμερα χαίρουν φορολογικής ασυλίας, αλλά και από την είσπραξη των βεβαιωμένων τελών εισαγωγής που μέχρι πέρυσι – σύμφωνα με την έκθεση του Ελεγκτικού Συνεδρίου – ανέρχονταν στα 3,9 δις ευρώ. Η κυβέρνηση αρνείται να τα εισπράξει γιατί κάνει πλάτες σε κυκλώματα που εισάγουν προϊόντα, κυρίως πετρέλαιο, από τρίτες χώρες, για να τα πουλήσουν ως ελληνικά.

Τα κυκλώματα αυτά, τα οποία περιλαμβάνουν πολυεθνικές, εφοπλιστές και μεσάζοντες δικτυωμένους με τα κυβερνώντα κόμματα, ποτέ άλλοτε δεν ανθούσαν όσο σήμερα. Το λαθρεμπόριο με κυβερνητικές πλάτες έχει γίνει καθεστώς και συμβάλλει καίρια ακόμη και στην εικονική αύξηση των εξαγωγών της χώρας.

Επομένως δεν υπάρχει κανένας ουσιαστικός δημοσιονομικός λόγος, που να αποτρέπει την άμεση διαγραφή των οφειλών προς την εφορία. Όχι μόνο δεν θα επιβαρυνθούν τα έσοδα του κράτους, αλλά θα απελευθερωθούν από τον δήμιο της εφορίας τα νοικοκυριά και οι μικρομεσαίοι με ευεργετικές επιπτώσεις στην οικονομία.

Μην σας εξαπατούν, χωρίς διαγραφή δεν γίνεται τίποτε…

Τότε γιατί δεν τολμά ούτε καν η αντιπολίτευση να ξεκινήσει τις προτάσεις της για το φορολογικό από αυτή την αναγκαία διαγραφή; Γιατί κάνει γαργάρα το τεράστιο αυτό ζήτημα; Τι νόημα έχει να μιλάς για φορολογική δικαιοσύνη και αναμόρφωση του φορολογικού συστήματος, αν δεν ξεκινάς από το αυτονόητο; Αν δεν ξεκινάς δηλαδή με την διαγραφή των οφειλών προς την εφορία.

Πώς μπορεί να σχεδιαστεί δίκαιη φορολογική πολιτική χωρίς να μηδενιστεί το κοντέρ; Πώς μπορεί να εκτιμηθεί η πραγματική φοροδοτική ικανότητα των φορολογουμένων, όταν πνίγονται ήδη στα χρέη προς την εφορία; Πώς μπορεί να υπάρξει πάταξη της φοροδιαφυγής όταν η φοροδιαφυγή έχει γίνει ζωτικό μέσο επιβίωσης για την συντριπτική πλειοψηφία των νοικοκυριών στην Ελλάδα, αλλά και των μικρομεσαίων επιχειρήσεων;

Και για να τα πούμε καθαρά και σταράτα. Όποιος προτείνει φορολογικές αναμορφώσεις χωρίς να ξεκινά με την απαραίτητη και εξαιρετικά επείγουσα διαγραφή των ήδη υφιστάμενων οφειλών προς την εφορία, να είστε σίγουροι ότι σχεδιάζει νέα φορολογική επιδρομή σε βάρος των λαϊκών στρωμάτων που πνέουν ήδη τα λοίσθια. ΄

Αλλωστε δεν μπορεί να υπάρξει φορολογία του μεγάλου κεφαλαίου, των ολιγαρχών αυτής της χώρας, όσο ισχύει η ελευθερία κίνησης του κεφαλαίου και των κερδών εντός της ευρωζώνης. Όποιος ισχυρίζεται το αντίθετο είτε είναι απατεώνας, είτε ανίδεος. Όμως γι’ αυτά, αλλά και για το πώς πρέπει να είναι ένα δίκαιο φορολογικό σύστημα, θα αναφερθούμε σε άλλο σημείωμα.

Αναρτήθηκε από ΔΗΜΗΤΡΗΣ ΚΑΖΑΚΗΣ στις 11:41 π.μ.

Ας μην φτάσουμε στο απροχώρητο για να αντιληφθούμε το προφανές!

Λογότυπο ΕΠΑΜ


Τις προάλλες παρακολουθούσα ένα ρεπορτάζ στα ρωσικά μέσα για την κατάσταση στην Ανατολική Ουκρανία. Στην πόλη Λουγκάνσκ, η οποία βομβαρδίζεται ανηλεώς από το αποκαλούμενο Ουκρανικό πυροβολικό, ένα παιδί γύρω στα 16 εξηγούσε στο δημοσιογράφο πώς το προηγούμενο βράδυ μια οβίδα έπεσε στο σπίτι του και το κατέστρεψε ολοσχαιρώς. Μέσα στα ερείπια έχασε τους δυο γονείς του και την 7χρονη αδελφούλα του, για να επιβιώσει ως εκ θαύματος το ίδιο με τη γιαγιά του.

Θέλετε η ομοιότητα του παιδιού αυτού με τον μικρό μου γιό, θέλετε το γεγονός ότι στην ανατολική Ουκρανία εξελίσσεται μια απίστευτη σφαγή αμάχων διαστάσεων Γάζας με ακόμη περισσότερα θύματα, για την οποία αδιαφορούν σχεδόν οι πάντες, με έβαλε σε πολύ σκοτεινές σκέψεις. Το περιστατικό αυτό είναι ένα από τα εκατοντάδες που συμβαίνουν σε καθημερινή βάση στην περιοχή.

Ο άμαχος πληθυσμός που δεν θέλει, ή δεν μπορεί να εγκαταλείψει τις εστίες του, είναι ένα εύκολο θύμα για το πυροβολικό μεγάλης απόστασης των Ουκρανών μισθοφόρων. Επειδή δεν μπορούν να καταλάβουν τις πόλεις, οι μισθοφόροι τις βομβαρδίζουν από μακριά, εκ του ασφαλούς, αδιάκριτα και σαρωτικά με στόχο τον άμαχο πληθυσμό. Γιατί; Όχι μόνο γιατί είναι ένας εύκολος στόχος, αλλά πρωτίστως γιατί είναι ο άμαχος πληθυσμός που στηρίζει και συντηρεί τους αντάρτες. Χωρίς την υποστήριξη από τον άμαχο πληθυσμό δεν μπορεί να υπάρξει ένοπλη αντίσταση μέσα στις πόλεις.

Σ’ αυτόν τον βομβαρδισμό δεν μπορούν να ανταπαντήσουν οι αποκαλούμενοι “σεπαρατιστές” αντάρτες που βρίσκονται καλά οχυρωμένοι στις παρυφές των πόλεων. Δεν έχουν τα μέσα. Κι έτσι οι μισθοφόροι του Κιέβου δολοφονούν μαζικά αμάχους, χωρίς να νοιάζεται κανένας. Εξασφαλίζουν έτσι την “καθαρότητα” της “φυλετικής” σύνθεσης του πληθυσμού της Ουκρανίας, όπως την θέλει το νεοναζιστικό καθεστώς του Κιέβου. Φυσικά οι φρικιαστικές εικόνες αυτού του πολέμου δεν φτάνουν σχεδόν ποτέ στα δυτικά μέσα “ενημέρωσης”.

Σ’ ένα από τα ρεπορτάζ του CNN σε πόλεις και χωριά της κεντρικής και δυτικής Ουκρανίας, οι δημοσιογράφοι ανακάλυπταν πόσο πλατύ έχει γίνει το κίνημα άρνησης της στράτευσης από τον πληθυσμό. Πρωτοστατούν οι γυναίκες. Μανάδες και σύζυγοι. Στις ερωτήσεις των αμερικανών δημοσιογράφων γιατί δεν ανταποκρίνονται στα “φύλλα πορείας” της κυβέρνησης του Κιέβου για να πολεμήσουν για την “πατρίδα” τους, η απάντηση είναι αφοπλιστική: γιατί να πολεμήσουν τα παιδιά και οι σύζυγοί μας; Εμείς θέλουμε ειρήνη! Αν θέλουν να πολεμήσουν, να πάνε αυτοί που ήταν στην Μaidan!

Ακόμη και οι δημοσιογράφοι του CNN σχολίαζαν ότι η κυβέρνηση του Κιέβου δεν διαθέτει το απαραίτητο λαϊκό έρεισμα. Κι επομένως η σφαγή θα πάρει ακόμη μεγαλύτερες διαστάσεις, από την στιγμή που το μόνο ουσιαστικό στήριγμα του νεοναζιστικού καθεστώτος του Κιέβου είναι οι ΗΠΑ, το ΝΑΤΟ και η ΕΕ.

Και το ερώτημά μου είναι το εξής: Μα καλά που ήταν όλος αυτός ο κόσμος τον καιρό της Maidan; Πόσο δύσκολο θα ήταν να οργανωθεί μια τεράστια πορεία προς το Κίεβο σε αντιπαράθεση με τηνMaidan; Αν ο πληθυσμός που σήμερα σφαγιάζεται μαζικά στην Ανατολική Ουκρανία, αλλά και εκείνος που καλείται σήμερα να θυσιάσει τα παιδιά του για το καθεστώς του Κιέβου, είχε έγκαιρα αντιδράσει μαζικά ενάντια στο πραξικόπημα της Maidan, σήμερα δεν θα υπήρχε ούτε πόλεμος, ούτε τίποτε.

Για σκεφτείτο λιγάκι. Οι περισσότεροι Ουκρανοί παρακολουθούσαν αμήχανα τις εξελίξεις, θεωρώντας ότι σ’ αυτούς δεν μπορεί να συμβεί αυτό που συμβαίνει για δεκαετίες τώρα στη Γάζα και γενικά στην Παλαιστίνη. Κι έτσι έμειναν στον καναπέ τους, να παρακολουθούν τα τεκταινόμενα στη χώρα τους μέσα από τις τηλεοράσεις. Και να σήμερα. Μέσα σε λίγους μήνες η χώρα τους έχει μετατραπεί σε πεδίο μαζικής σφαγής.

Πόσο, λέτε, ότι απέχουμε εμείς από αυτή την κατάσταση; Η νοοτροπία δυστυχώς που δέρνει την πλειοψηφία του ελληνικού πληθυσμού, είναι η ίδια. Ασχολείται – με την αμέριστη βοήθεια του πολιτικού και επικοινωνιακού συστήματος – με τις δόσεις και τα “λάθη” του ΕΝΦΙΑ, τις πολιτικές μεταγραφές στα κομματικά κυκλώματα και γενικά περιμένει ότι οοι εκλογές όπως και να έχουν, θα δώσουν λύση στα πράγματα. Κι έτσι ασχολείται με το μεροδούλι, μεροφάι, αναμένοντας κάποιον από τους δελφίνους της εξουσίας να του λύσει το πρόβλημα. Άλλωστε όλοι μαζί, δεξιοί και αριστεροί, του λένε ότι θα πάνε καλύτερα τα πράγματα, χωρίς να χρειαστεί να ξεκουνηθεί. Τι το καλύτερο;

Η νοοτροπία αυτή δεν είναι απλά τυπική του ραγιά. Σήμερα είναι το πρελούδιο της απόλυτης καταστροφής. Η χώρα μας έχει μπει ήδη σε ανάλογη τροχιά μ’ εκείνη της Ουκρανίας. Οι εκλογές που θα έρθουν – όποτε έρθουν – απλά θα βαθύνουν την κρίση και θα κάνουν την κοινωνική και πολιτική αναμέτρηση πιο επιτακτική. Απλά ελπίζω ότι θα συνειδητοποιήσουμε έγκαιρα ότι χωρίς να ξεκουνηθούμε, χωρίς τη δική μας μαζική κινητοποίηση, λύση δεν δίνεται. Όποιος κι αν ανέβει στην κυβέρνηση.

Ελπίζω να μην την πάθουμε όπως οι Ουκρανοί. Να μην είναι τα δικά μας παιδιά που μέσα στα άγρια ξημερώματα θα ξυπνούν από τις οβίδες, ή τους πυραύλους για να ψάξουν τους νεκρούς τους μέσα στα χαλάσματα του ίδιου του σπιτιού τους. Κι αυτό εξαρτάται αποκλειστικά από εμάς και κανέναν άλλο. Προς Θεού, δεν πρέπει να βρεθούμε στην κατάσταση των Ουκρανών να λέμε γιατί δεν ξεσηκωθήκαμε έγκαιρα και αφήσαμε τα πράγματα να φτάσουν ως εδώ.

Και να θυμάστε. Ίσως η πιο θανάσιμη, η πιο μοιραία αυταπάτη σήμερα είναι αυτό που λένε οι περισσότεροι για να δικαιολογήσουν την απραξία τους: έλα μωρέ, αυτά δεν μπορούν να συμβούν στην Ελλάδα. Μόνο που η ιστορία διδάσκει ότι όποτε κυριάρχησε αυτή η αυταπάτη σε τόσο κρίσιμες καταστάσεις σαν τις σημερινές, ο λαός το πλήρωσε ακριβά, το πλήρωσε με το αίμα των παιδιών του.

Αναρτήθηκε από ΔΗΜΗΤΡΗΣ ΚΑΖΑΚΗΣ στις 8:18 π.μ.

Ήρθε η ώρα της Αργεντινής

Λογότυπο ΕΠΑΜ



Η προσπάθεια να εμφανιστεί ότι η Αργεντινή καταρρέει συνεχίζεται. Βέβαια, πιο ήσυχα τώρα, χωρίς ντόρο, καθώς δεν είδαν αυτό που ποθούσαν, δηλαδή την κατάρρευση μιας ολόκληρης χώρας, επειδή οι αγορές την κήρυξαν σε πτώχευση. Τέλος πάντων, ακόμη κι αν δεν καταρρεύσει σήμερα, θα καταρρεύσει σίγουρα αύριο, μας λένε οι εκδιδόμενοι επί χρήμασι της πολιτικής και της δημοσιογραφίας.

Καθώς πάμε σε “διαπραγματεύσεις” τον Σεπτέμβριο για την περίφημη “βιωσιμότητα” του ελληνικού χρέους και το παραμύθι θα πάει σύνεφο, τόσο από τους κυβερνώντες, όσο και από την αντιπολίτευση, καλό είναι να έχουμε εμπεδώσει τα διδάγματα από την Αργεντινή.

Τι μας δίδαξε η περίπτωση της Αργεντινής;

Πρώτο: Η διαγραφή του χρέους από μια χώρα, έστω και του μεγαλύτερου μέρους του, χωρίς “προϋποθέσεις”, δυσβάσταχτα ανταλλάγματα υπέρ των  δανειστών και επιβολή ξένης επιτροπείας τύπου ΔΝΤ και τρόικας, γίνεται πάντα με μονομερή ενέργεια. Όπως το έκανε η Αργεντινή το 2004. Κι ο λόγος είναι απλός. Η κυβέρνηση χρησιμοποιεί προκειμένου να σβήσει έστω το μεγαλύτερο μέρος του χρέους, το απαραβίαστο της εθνικής της κυριαρχίας ως βασικό διαπραγματευτικό ατού.

Σε διαφορετική περίπτωση εγκαταλείπει το όπλο της εθνικής της κυριαρχίας και παραδίδεται στις καλές προθέσεις των δανειστών. Δεν υπάρχει ούτε ένα παράδειγμα αναδιάρθρωσης χρέους παράδειγμα με σβήσιμο του μεγαλύτερου μέρους, χωρίς η κυβέρνηση της χώρας να μην προχώρησε σε μονομερείς ενέργειες. Όλες οι άλλες αναδιαθρώσεις ήταν σαν της Ελλάδας. Υπέρ των δανειστών και με αποικιοκρατικά ανταλλάγματα.

Δεύτερο: Η κατάρρευση μιας χώρας που οδηγεί στην απελπισία τον πληθυσμό της, δεν είναι προϊόν της επίσημης πτώχευσής της, αλλά των πολιτικών που εφαρμόζονται. Έτσι η Αργεντινή όσο εφάρμοζε πιστά τις πολιτικές του ΔΝΤ, υπό την αποικιοκρατική του κηδεμονία, οδηγήθηκε σε επίσημη πτώχευση και κατάρρευση το 2001-2002. Τώρα που η Αργεντινή δεν ακολουθεί τις συνταγές του ΔΝΤ και ούτε είναι έρμαιο των δανειστών της, το γεγονός ότι οι αγορές την κήρυξαν σε επίσημη πτώχευση δεν οδήγησε σε κατάρρευση την οικονομία της, ούτε σε απελπισία τον πληθυσμό της.

Τα τρομοκρατικά σενάρια που πλασάρονται στην Ελλάδα αν τυχόν υπάρξει “ανεξέλεγκτη χρεοκοπία” δεν συνιστούν τίποτε περισσότερο από την πρόθεση των κυβερνώντων να επιβάλουν καθεστώς κατάρρευσης και χάους στην χώρα σε περίπτωση που ο λαός, ή οι συνθήκες επιβάλλουν αθέτηση πληρωμών προς τους δανειστές. Μόνο με πρόθεση των κυβερνώντων οδηγείται μια χώρα στην καταστροφή υπό συνθήκες πτώχευσης. Και πότε έχουν την πρόθεση οι κυβερνώντες; Όταν υπηρετούν τυφλά τους δανειστές. Σε καμιά άλλη περίπτωση.

Τρίτο: Όταν μια χώρα σταματά να πληρώνει τους δανειστές της και οι αγορές την κηρύσσουν σε πτώχευση, το μόνο που παθαίνει είναι ότι δεν μπορεί να δανειστεί ξανά για ένα διάστημα από τις διεθνείς κεφαλαιαγορές. Μπορεί μια οικονομία να αναπτυχθεί χωρίς εξωτερικό δανεισμό; Ναι μπορεί. Απόδειξη η Αργεντινή που πάνω από μια δεκαετία εξυπηρετεί το χρέος που έχει απομείνει, πληρώνει μισθούς και συντάξεις – που δεν περικόπτει συνέχεια – και χρηματοδοτεί την ανάπτυξή της, χωρίς προσφυγή στον εξωτερικό δανεισμό. Και μάλιστα οι ρυθμοί ανόδου της Αργεντινής χωρίς εξωτερικό δανεισμό ήταν πολύ μεγαλύτεροι από την εποχή που ήταν δανειζόταν συνέχεια.

Ο εξωτερικός δανεισμός δεν επιβάλλεται από τις ανάγκες ανόδου, ή ανάπτυξης μιας οικονομίας, αλλά από τις διαπλοκές της εξουσίας με τους άρχοντες των κεφαλαιαγορών. Η κερδοσκοπία με τα κρατικά χρέη είναι μια από τις πιο επικερδείς τοποθετήσεις κεφαλαίων στη διεθνή αγορά. Το μόνο που έχει να κάνει κανείς είναι να εξαγοράσει πολιτική εύνοια και έτσι να εξασφαλίσει ότι το κράτος δεν θα πάψει ποτέ να εξυπηρετεί τα δάνειά του. Έστω κι αν από την εξυπηρέτηση πεθαίνει ο λαός και ξεπουλιέται η χώρα.

Αυτός είναι κι ο βασικός λόγος που οι κυβερνήσεις επιμένουν να δανείζονται και να εξυπηρετούν τα χρέη τους, ακόμη κι όταν το κράτος, η οικονομία και η κοινωνία καταρρέουν. Οι μίζες για τους κυβερνώντες, που αφήνουν τα κρατικά χρέη και η διαχείρισή τους, δεν συγκρίνονται με κανενός είδους “δοσίματα” τύπου Siemens, ή άλλες δωροληψίες από προμήθειες και έργα.

Τέταρτο: Μήπως η Αργεντινή όταν μονομερώς διέγραψε το χρέος αποκλείστηκε από τις αγορές; Μήπως τίναχθηκε στον αέρα το εξωτερικό της εμπόριο; Κάθε άλλο. Το εξωτερικό της εμπόριο εκτινάχθηκε και η Αργεντινή ως χώρα προσέλκυσε περισσότερες επενδύσεις στην πραγματική της οικονομία μετά την διαγραφή του χρέους της, απ’ ότι πριν. Αυτή είναι η αλήθεια.

Βέβαια, μας λένε κάποιοι πονηροί της λεγόμενης αντιμνημονιακής αντιπολίτευσης, η Ελλάδα είναι άλλη περίπτωση. Το χρέος είναι πολύ μεγαλύτερο, η χώρα είναι σε χειρότερα χάλια και ανήκει στην ευρωζώνη. Αυτό τι σημαίνει; Ότι δεν ισχύουν όσα ίσχυσαν στην Αργεντινή, ή ακριβώς το αντίθετο; Το γεγονός ότι η χώρα μας δεν έχει ούτε καν την ελευθερία επιλογής πολιτικών και διεθνών σχέσεων, είναι ένας επιπλέον πολύ επιτακτικός λόγος για να ακολουθήσουμε το ταχύτερο δυνατό το παράδειγμα της Αργεντινής. Προσπαθώντας παράλληλα να εφαρμόσουμε τα διδάγματά της με καλύτερο τρόπο.

Τα πράγματα είναι ξεκάθαρα. Όποιος λέει ότι θα διαπραγμετευτεί με τους δανειστές εντός της ευρωζώνης, όπου η Ελλάδα δεν μπορεί όχι μόνο να ασκεί εθνική κυριαρχία, αλλά ούτε καν έχει τη δυνατότητα ελευθερίας επιλογής, για να μειώσει το χρέος, είτε είναι μια ακόμη περίπτωση Σαμαραβενιζέλου, είτε απλά είναι επικίνδυνα ηλίθιος. Τόσο απλά είναι τα πράγματα.

Όταν σας λένε διαφορετικά, ρωτήστε τους: πείτε μας που, πώς και πότε έγινε ουσιαστική διαγραφή χρέους υπέρ του λαού χωρίς να ακολουθηθεί ο δρόμος που ακολούθησε η Αργεντινή; Κι αν σας αναφέρουν τη συνδιάσκεψη του Λονδίνου του 1953, που υποτίθεται ότι διέγραψε το 60% του χρέους της Γερμανίας, να τους στείλετε στον Τσίπρα αδιάβαστους. Μιας και η συγκεκριμένη συνδιάσκεψη δεν έγινε για να διαγράψει, αλλά για να φορτώσει τα προπολεμικά χρέη στην τότε Δυτική Γερμανία και μάλιστα με όρους αποικίας του ΝΑΤΟ. Πάνω σ’ αυτά τα χρέη που της φόρτωσαν οι Αγγλοαμερικάνοι, της έκαναν σκόντο. Ωραία διαγραφή! Και ακόμη πιο ωραίο παράδειγμα για να ακολουθήσει η Ελλάδα!

Άλλοι πάλι αρέσκονται να δημαγωγούν με τα οικονομικά προβλήματα και τις πιέσεις που δέχεται η Αργεντινή. Ναι, η Αργεντινή έχει οικονομικά προβλήματα. Μόνο που κανένα απ’ αυτά δεν συγκρίνεται με την κατάρρευση του 2001-2002. Και επίσης δεν είναι αποτέλεσμα τη μη πληρωμής του χρέους, αλλά των βαθύτερων διαθρωτικών προβλημάτων της Αργεντίνικης οικονομίας που δεν έχουν ακομη αντιμετωπιστεί.

Το σίγουρο είναι ότι οι πιέσεις εναντίον της Αργεντινής εντείνονται και θα ενταθούν ακόμη περισσότερο προκειμένου οι γύπες των αγορών και της πολιτικής να ξεφορτωθούν την κυβέρνηση Κίχνερ. Ή έστω να την αναγκάσουν να ενδώσει και να επιστρέψει την χώρα και τον λαό της στις ζωφερές αγκάλες του ΔΝΤ και των αδίστακτων συμφερόντων που εκπροσωπεί.

Μονόδρομος η διεθνοποίηση της υπόθεσης

Η κυβέρνηση Κίχνερ απάντησε σ’ αυτή την πίεση με προσφυγή στο διεθνές δικαστήριο της Χάγης κατά των ΗΠΑ. Η Αργεντινή αναφέρει στην αίτησή της ότι οι ΗΠΑ έχουν “διαπράξει παραβιάσεις εναντίον της κυριαρχίας της Αργεντινής και των ασυλιών της, όπως και άλλες παραβιάσεις ως αποτέλεσμα δικαστικών αποφάσεων που υιοθετήθηκαν από τα δικαστήρια των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών.” Φυσικά οι ΗΠΑ αρνήθηκαν την δικαιοδοσία του δικαστηρίου, τρέμοντας τυχόν απόφασή του υπέρ της εθνικής κυριαρχίας της Αργεντινής.

Η διεθνοποίηση της αντιδικίας και η μετατροπή της σε διακρατικό ζήτημα του διεθνούς δικαίου, είναι σίγουρα ο ορθός δρόμος για την Αργεντινή. Ελπίζουμε μόνο να μην μείνει μόνο στην προσφυγή, ιδίως τώρα που οι ΗΠΑ αρνήθηκαν την δικαιοδοσία του διεθνούς δικαστηρίου. Η κυβέρνηση της Αργεντινής είναι υποχρεωμένη να μετατρέψει την όλη υπόθεση σε ένα από τα πιο σοβαρά εμπόδια στις σχέσεις της με τις ΗΠΑ.

Κάτι τέτοιο θα έπρεπε να το είχε κάνει από την πρώτη στιγμή, αρνούμενη να υπαχθεί στην δικαιοδοσία του δικαστηρίου της Νέας Υόρκης. Και στην περίπτωση δικαστικών αποφάσεων ερήμην της, να θέσει το όλο ζήτημα ως καίριο πρόβλημα που επιρεάζει βαθιά τις διακρατικές σχέσεις της Αργεντινής με τις ΗΠΑ μιας και προσβάλεται η εθνική της κυριαρχία και οι ασυλίες που διαθέτει ως κυρίαρχο κράτος. Δυστυχώς η μετριοπάθεια βλάπτει όταν έχεις να τα βάλεις με γύπες των αγορών και της πολιτικής.

Ο εσωτερικός “αντίπαλος” του λαού της Αργεντινής

Η θεμελιώδης αδυναμία της Αργεντινής είναι ότι διαθέτει μια οικονομία όπου βασιλεύουν τα ιδιωτικά τραστ και καρτέλ, τα ιδιωτικά μονοπωλιακά συμφέροντα, τα οποία ελέγχουν ακόμη και σοβαρές υποδομές της χώρας, όπως το νερό, η ενέργεια, οι τηλεπικοινωνίες. Η Αργεντινή επίσης υποφέρει από μια ιδιαίτερα συντηρητική αριστροκρατία, η οποία όχι μόνο κατέχει το μεγαλύτερο μέρος της αξιοποιήσιμης γης από την εποχή της ισπανικής αποικιοκρατίας, αλλά ιστορικά στήριξε τον δικτατορα Βιντέλα μαζί με τις πολυεθνικές εξ ΗΠΑ. Η κάστα αυτή, που θεωρεί τον εαυτό της απόγονο της ευρωπαϊκής αριστοκρατίας και των παλιών καλών προνομίων της, αντιμετωπίζει τον υπόλοιπο πληθυσμό ως ιθαγενείς.

Οι μεγάλοι ολιγάρχες δεν έχουν πια καμιά διάθεση να υπομείνουν τον “λαϊκισμό” της Κίχνερ και πολύ περισσότερο του υπουργού οικονομικών της Κισίλοφ, το οποίον – δικαίως ή αδίκως – χαρακτηρίζουν με αποτροπιασμό ως “μαρξιστή”. Κι όλα αυτά γιατί ιδίως τα δυο τελευταία χρόνια προχώρησαν στην εθνικοποίηση των πετρελαίων, επέβαλαν ανώτατο όριο στις τιμές βασικών υπηρεσιών προς τον πληθυσμό και υποστηρίζουν ανοιχτά ότι πρέπει να επικεντρωθεί η οικονομία όχι τόσο στις εξαγωγές, αλλά στην εσωτερική κατανάλωση και την υποκατάσταση των εισαγωγών από εγχώρια παραγωγή.

Η κατεύθυνση αυτή είναι όντως η μοναδική για να αντιμετωπίσει η οικονομία της Αργεντινής τα διαρθρωτικά της προβλήματα όπως εκδηλώνονται με τον πληθωρισμό, την ανεργία και κυρίως την ιδιαίτερα εκτεταμένη προσωρινή απασχόληση με χαμηλές αμοιβές. Ο άλλος δρόμος είναι να ξαναπέσει στον φαύλο κύκλο που την οδήγησε τελικά στην κατάρρευση του 2001. Αν και αυτή τη φορά τα συμφέροντα που καραδοκούν, δεν θα της επιτρέψουν να ξαναϋπάρξει ως ανεξάρτητο και κυρίαρχο κράτος, που μπορεί να πτωχεύει και να διαγράφει χρέος μονομερώς.

Οι ολιγάρχες ξέρουν πολύ καλά ότι στο βαθμό που η κυβέρνηση Κίχνερ προχωρήσει σ’ αυτή την κατεύθυνση, θα αναγκαστεί να ενισχύσει τον παρεμβατικό ρόλο του κράτους, να εθνικοποιήσει τις κρίσιμες υποδομές που σήμερα βρίσκονται ακόμη στα χέρια ιδιωτών και να μετατρέψει την άνοδο των αμοιβών της εργασίας, δηλαδή την αγοραστική δύναμη των πλατύτερων μαζών του πληθυσμού, σε βασική κινητήρια δύναμη της οικονομικής ανόδου. Κι επομένως το καθεστώς προνομίων και μονοπωλιακής ασυδοσίας που απολαμβάνουν ακόμη και σήμερα, κινδυνεύει. Και κινδυνεύει άμεσα.

Αυτός είναι ο λόγος που συμπαρατάσονται με τους γύπες εξ ΗΠΑ. Στα ΜΜΕ που ελέγχουν έχει αρχίσει μια ολόκληρη εκστρατεία εναντίον της “ανεύθυνης” Κίχνερ και του “μαρξιστή” Κισίλοφ. Το χειρότερο όμως δεν είναι αυτό. Έχουν αρχίσει την φαιά προπαγάνδα στα πιο καθυστερημένα και καταπονημένα στρώματα. Οι εταιρείες τους που απασχολούν το μεγαλύτερο μέρος της φτωχολογιάς με προσωρινή, ή εποχική απασχόληση για ψίχουλα, έχουν αρχίσει να “ενημερώνουν” ότι με την “πτώχευση”, οι πιο χαμηλόμισθοι θα χάσουν τη δουλειά τους. Δεν είναι αλήθεια, αλλά γι’ αυτόν που ζει μεροδούλι, μεροφάι, ακόμη και η σκέψη αποτελεί σοκ.

Τι χρειάζεται σήμερα η Αργεντινή

Η κυβέρνηση δεν μπορεί να απαντήσει σ’ αυτή την ενορχηστρωμένη επίθεση από το εσωτερικό και το εξωτερικό, παρά μόνο με έναν τρόπο. Με ένα ολοκληρωμένο εθνικό σχέδιο οικονομικής ανασυγκρότησης με βασικό μοχλό τον προϋπολογισμό δημοσίων επενδύσεων και τις διακρατικές συμφωνίες που έχει αποδείξει ότι μπορεί να εξασφαλίσει προς το συμφέρον της χώρας. Πρέπει να προχωρήσει αποφασιστικά με ένα πανεθνικό σχέδιο εθνικοποίησης των κρίσιμων τομέων της οικονομίας, όπως είναι το υπέδαφος της χώρας και ο μεταλλευτικός πλούτος του, το δίχτυο ενέργειας, το νερό, οι μαζικές μεταφορές, οι τηλεπικοινωνίες.

Όλα αυτά θα δώσουν ανάσα και πνοή στην οικονομία. Θα διαλύσουν τις μονοπωλιακές καταστάσεις και θα επιτρέψουν στην μικρομεσαία ιδιωτική επιχειρηματικότητα να αναπτυχθεί ραγδαία, προσφέροντας τοπική ανάπτυξη, απασχόληση και εισόδημα. Θα δώσει τη δυνατότητα να οικοδομηθεί ταυτόχρονα ένα ολοκληρωμένο δίχτυο κοινωνικής ασφάλισης για όλους του εργαζόμενους και τις οικογένειές τους στη βάση της δωρεάν υγείας, παιδείας και κοινωνικής πρόνοιας που διασφαλίζουν την αξιοπρέπεια και την κοινωνική άνοδο των πολιτών.

Η οικονομία της Αργεντινής ήδη από το 2013 εμφανίζει σημάδια στασιμότητας. Οι εκβιαστές της ελπίζουν σε μια βαθιά ύφεση που θα κλονίσει την πολιτική κυριαρχία των δυνάμεων που στηρίζουν την κυβέρνηση στην πορεία που έχει επιλέξει. Είναι σίγουρο ότι θα κάνουν ότι είναι δυνατό για να προκαλέσουν περισσότερη οικονομική δυσπραγία για την Αργεντινή μέσα από ένταση των απολύσεων στο όνομα της ύφεσης, δημιουργία έντονων πληθωριστικών πιέσεων με τεχνητές ελλείψεις, διακοπές παροχής υπηρεσιών και μονοπωλιακά υψηλές τιμές, κερδοσκοπική πίεση στο νόμισμα για να εξαντληθούν τα συναλλαγματικά αποθέματα της χώρας ώστε να την αναγκάσουν να βγει να δανειστεί από τις διεθνείς αγορές με τους δυσμενέστερους δυνατούς όρους οικονομίας και πολιτικής.

Το οικονομικό περιβάλλον αυτό είναι ιδανικό και για μια ακόμη επιχείρηση “πορτοκαλί επανάστασης”, όπως στην πλατεία Maidan της Ουκρανίας. Κάτι άλλωστε που ξένα και ντόπια κυκλώματα το προσπάθησαν πριν ένα χρόνο στο Μπουένος Άιρες κινητοποιώντας την χρυσή, αλλά αργόσχολη νεολαία της μεσαίας τάξης, που συναρπάζεται από την χολιγουντιανή εικόνα του “αμερικανικού τρόπου ζωής” και δεν συγκινείται από εθνικές ανεξαρτησίες και πατριωτισμούς. Η επιχείρηση απέτυχε παταγωδώς, χωρίς να σημαίνει ότι δεν θα την ξαναδούμε να αναβιώνει, αν η κυβέρνηση δειλιάσει και δεν απαντήσει έγκαιρα στον οικονομικό πόλεμο που δέχεται η χώρα της.

Η πρώτη αντίδραση της κυβέρνησης

Οφείλουμε βέβαια να πούμε ότι η κυβέρνηση της Φερνάντεζ Κίχνερ φαίνεται να το αντιλαμβάνεται. Την Παρασκευή 8/7 η Φερνάντεζ μιλώντας στην εθνική τηλεόραση της χώρας της εξήγγειλε μέτρα και πολιτικές για να αντιμετωπιστεί η επιβράδυνση και η στασιμότητα στην οικονομία της. Τα προβλήματα αυτά έχουν να κάνουν με την βαθύτερη διάρθρωση της οικονομίας της Αργεντινής, η οποία στηρίζεται στον εξαγωγικό προσανατολισμό και στην ιδιωτική μονοπωλιακή εκμετάλλευση. Αυτό οφείλει να αλλάξει ριζικά και το ταχύτερο δυνατόν.

Η Φερνάντεζ κάλεσε τους Αργεντίνους “να καταναλώνουν γιατί είναι ο μόνος τρόπος για να εξασφαλιστεί η οικονομική δραστηριότητα.” Ναι, σωστό, αλλά χρειάζεται εισόδημα. Και μάλιστα αυξανώμενο εισόδημα στα λαικά στρώματα, των οποίων η κατανάλωση έχει αποδειχθεί ότι δεν επιβαρύνει το εξωτερικό εμπορικό ισοζύγιο. Αν δεν υπάρξει δραστική αύξηση των εργατικών απολαβών και του λαϊκού εισοδήματος, η αύξηση της κατανάλωσης θα παραμείνει ευχή, ή αυστηρά υπόθεση των πιο παρασιτικών στρωμάτων του πληθυσμού με ότι αυτό σημαίνει για την οικονομική και πολιτική κατάσταση της χώρας.

Σχετικά με την απασχόληση η κυβέρνηση της Αργεντινής εξήγγειλε ένα πρόγραμμα για την αποφυγή των απολύσεων, ιδιαίτερα στις επιχειρήσεις που λαμβάνουν κρατική στήριξη. Ανακοινώθηκε επίσης η ανανέωση του στόλου των μέσων μαζικής μεταφοράς, οδικής και σιδηροδρόμου με σκοπό την εξοικονόμηση του χρόνου μετακίνησης για τους εργαζόμενους, αλλά και την μείωση του κοστους.

Ανακοινώθηκαν επίσης και παρεμβάσεις στην αγορά ακινήτων, αλλά όλα αυτά απέχουν από το να είναι ένα ολοκληρωμένο σχέδιο ανασυγκρότησης της οικονομίας. Το παλιό “μοντέλο” της παραγωγής από μεγάλες συγκεντρώσεις ιδιωτικού κεφαλαίου με στόχο την εξωτερική αγορά, πνέει τα λοίσθια και δεν μπορεί να δώσει πια ούτε καν τους ρυθμούς ανόδου της προηγούμενης περιόδου. Για να επιβιώσει αυτό το “μοντέλο” θα πρέπει να συντριβούν όλες οι πολιτικές, κοινωνικές και οικονομικές κατακτήσεις της τελευταίας δεκαετίας, ή θα πρέπει η Αργεντινή να αλλάξει “μοντέλο” επειγόντως.

Ένα είναι σίγουρο. Ήρθε η ώρα για την Αργεντινή να προχωρήσει αποφασιστικά μπροστά. Μόνο έτσι θα γλυτώσει μια για πάντα και από τους γύπες της παγκόσμιας οικονομίας και πολιτικής. Μόνο έτσι θα δικαιώσει τις προσδοκίες του λαού της. Διαφορετικά θα την δούμε να αφανίζεται, όπως είδαμε να συμβαίνει στην Ουκρανία και αλλού στη λατινική Αμερική. Η παγκόσμια οικονομία των κεφαλαιαγορών σήμερα δεν ανέχεται πια συγκροτημένα κράτη, ακόμη και με την παραδοσιακή έννοια του όρου.


Δημοσιεύτηκε στο Χωνί, 17/8/2014

Στην δεξιά πολυκατοικία το ΕΠΑΜ…

Λογότυπο ΕΠΑΜ



Πρώτα ήταν ο κ. Πολύδωρας που οι δικοί του εξ Ιωαννίνων είχαν ανακοινώσει ότι το ΕΠΑΜ συμπεριλαμβάνεται στις διεργασίες της αντιμνημονιακής δεξιάς πολυκατοικίας. Τώρα ήρθε η σειρά του κ Μάκη Ανδρονόπουλου στο Κουτί της Πανδόρας. Ξέρετε του γνωστού δημοσιογράφου Βαξεβάνη.

Ο εν λόγω λακές της Κουμουνδούρου κ. Μ.Α., ανακάλυψε ότι το ΕΠΑΜ όχι μόνο ανήκει στη δεξιά πολυκατοικία – η οποία παρεμπιπτόντως τρίζει, συμφωνα πάντα με τον καλό και απολυτως έντιμο δημοσιογράφο – αλλά κι εγώ ο ίδιος πασχίζω να προσκοληθώ σε κάποιον. Αλλά, ευτυχώς για μένα, δεν με θέλει κανείς, γιατί – λέει ο καλός μας δημοσιογράφος – κουβαλάω την μυρωδιά της δραχμής που δεν την θέλει κανείς.

Μην ρωτήσετε πού τα βρήκε όλα αυτά ο καλός δημοσιογράφος. Ούτε από πού προκύπτουν όλα αυτά. Στην Ελλάδα δημοσιογράφος δεν είναι εκείνος που παρατηρεί και αναλύει την πραγματικότητα, αλλά εκείνος που προσαρμόζει την πραγματικότητα στα μέτρα του, ή απλά εκτελεί εντολές. Όπως τον βολεύει κάθε φορά. Ανάλογα με τις ιδεοληψίες που τον διακατέχουν, ή την διατεταγμένη υπηρεσία στην οποία βρίσκεται.

Δεν γνωρίζω τι ισχύει για τον εν λόγω δημοσιογράφο του κ. Βαξεβάνη. Κι ούτε με ενδιαφέρει. Το μόνο που με ενδιαφέρει είναι η ευκολία που ξεστομίζει τέτοια ψέματα. Πού τα στηρίζει όλα αυτά; Μα στο γνωστό γκεμπελικό: λέγε, λέγε, όλο και κάτι θα μείνει. Τώρα τι σχέση ο γκεμπελισμός με την δημοσιογραφία, είμαι σίγουρος ότι ο κ. Βαξεβάνης ως έμπειρος δημοσιογράφος θα ξέρει να μας απαντήσει.

Το γιατί το κάνει ο κ. Μ.Α., ο καθένας ας βγάλει τα συμπεράσματά του. Απλά θεωρεί καθήκον του να περιγράφει την πολιτική κατάσταση σύμφωνα με τα συμφέροντα της Κουμουνδούρου. Βλέπετε οι ιδεολογικές, πολιτικές και ταξικές συγγένειες δεν κρύβονται. Πριν ήταν οι δημοσιογράφοι του Πολύδωρα, τώρα οι δημοσιογράφοι του Κουτιού της Πανδώρας. Κοινός στόχος; Το ΕΠΑΜ. Να αμαυρωθεί το Μέτωπο ως πολιτική πρόταση εθνικοαπελευθερωτικού χαρακτήρα, πέρα και πάνω από διαχωριστικές γραμμές αριστεράς και δεξιάς μέσα στο λαό.

Πάντως κάτι καλό πρέπει να κάνουμε εμείς εδώ στο ΕΠΑΜ. Για να πάρει τέτοια προαγωγή η χυδαία λασπολογία και από τους επαγγελματίες “ανώνυμους” του διαδικτίου να περάσει στους επώνυμους της δημοσιογραφίας, σημαίνει ότι τόσο ο γράφων, όσο και το ΕΠΑΜ ενοχλεί. Και ενοχλεί πολύ. Ιδίως όταν συνεχίζει να απευθύνεται στον απλό κόσμο και μάλιστα μακριά από τους εμφυλιοπολεμικούς διαχωρισμούς, πάνω στους οποίους έχει στηριχθεί το σημερινό πολιτικό σύστημα στο σύνολό του.

Πάντως, θα ήθελα να πληροφορήσω τον καλό δημοσιογράφο του κ. Βαξεβάνη κάτι που είμαι σίγουρος ότι το ξέρει πολύ καλά. Αν ήμουν της προσκολλήσεως, όπως τόσοι και τόσοι, θα είχα βάλει νερό στο κρασί μου, θα στρογγύλευα τόσο πολύ αυτά που λέω ώστε να το παίζω καμπόσος, αλλά να μην ενοχλώ τα ιερά και όσια του καθεστώτος κι έτσι όχι μόνο εκπομπή στο “κόκκινο” θα είχα, ή θα εμφανιζόμουν ως γιαλαντζί αντιμνημονιακός όπου αλλού ήθελα, αλλά θα πόζαρα και για βουλευτής. Ψάξτε αλλού κύριοι για προσκολλήσεις και συγκολλήσεις συμφέροντος και ξέρετε ότι θα βρείτε πάμπολλες όχι μόνο στη δεξιά πολυκατοικία, αλλά και στο οικείο σας πολιτικό περιβάλλον.

Η Αργεντινή μας δείχνει το δρόμο της λύτρωσης

Λογότυπο ΕΠΑΜ


Όμοιος τον όμοιο και η κοπριά στα λάχανα. Αυτή την λαική παροιμία μου έφεραν στο νου οι εικόνες με τους τρυφερούς εναγκαλισμούς του Γιούνκερ με τον Σαμαρά. Παιδιά του ίδιου φυράματος. Όπως ο Σαμαράς, έτσι κι ο Γιούνκερ είναι γέννημα θρέμμα κομματόσκυλο από τα γεννοφάσκια του, εκ φύσεως φιλοχρήματος, αργόσχολος, άεργος κι επομένως ιδανικός ως πολιτικός καριέρας.

Ο πατέρας του Ζαν Κλοντ υπηρέτησε στα βάφεν ες-ες κατά την κατοχή και μάλιστα πολέμησε στο ρώσικο μέτωπο, αλλά δεν δικάστηκε ως δωσίλογος γιατί ισχυρίστηκε ότι τον στρατολόγησαν “με τη βία”. Σαν παλιό στέλεχος του “κόμματος της δεξιάς” – όπως ονομαζόταν επίσημα το κόμμα αυτό όταν κατείχε την εξουσία πριν και κατά τη διάρκεια του πολέμου και το οποίο συνεργάστηκε με τους ναζί στην κατοχή – και οι διασυνδέσεις του στον πολιτικό υπόκοσμο της χώρας του, έκαναν τους συμμάχους να τον στρατολογήσουν με σκοπό το παλιό κόμμα του να συνεχίσει να κυβερνά υπό νέα ενδυμασία λιγότερο προκλητική, ως χριστιανοδημοκρατικό κόμμα.

Αυτός λοιπόν, ο γιος του ναζί, που χάρις στις κομματικές του διασυνδέσεις απέκτησε χωρίς να κοπιάσει ιδιαίτερα τα απαραίτητα ακαδημαικά διπλώματα ώστε να φαντάζει ότι διαθέτει όλα τα τυπικά προσόντα, έφτασε να είναι πρωθυπουργός ενός κρατιδίου που φυσιολογικά δεν θα έπρεπε να υπάρχει. Το δουκάτο του Λουξεμβούργου είναι ένα παρά φύση κράτος-υβρίδιο που συντηρείται από τις μεγάλες δυνάμεις για πάνω από ένα αιώνα, μόνο και μόνο ως καταφύγιο για τις βρωμοδουλιές τους. Κυρίως για την διαμετακομιδή κεφαλαίων, που συνήθως είναι λίγο ως πολύ ύποπτα. Από το εισόδημα που δημιουργεί αυτή η διαμετακομιδή και το ξέπλυμα χρήματος ζει το Λουξεμβούργο. Δεν διαθέτει ουσιαστικά καμιά άλλη πηγή εσόδων, ούτε και λόγο ύπαρξης.

Κράτος – συμμορία

Πρόκειται για ένα κράτος συμμορία στην καρδιά της Δυτικής Ευρώπης. Ο πρώην πρωθυπουργός ενός τέτοιου κράτους, τυπικό είδος πολιτικού Αλ Καπόνε, δεν θα μπορούσε παρά να ήταν το ιδανικό πρόσωπο για να ηγηθεί πρώτα του eurogroup και ύστερα της άτυπης κυβέρνησής του, της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής. ‘Αλλωστε το γεγονός ότι ο πατέρας του υπήρξε ένστολος ναζί, έκανε την επίσημη Γερμανία να αισθάνεται εξαιρετικά οικεία με τον Ζαν Κλοντ, ο οποίος έτσι εξασφάλισε την ολόθερμη υποστήριξη της Μέρκελ.

Αυτός λοιπόν, που αν θυμάστε είχε δηλώσει παλιότερα κατά τη σύνοδο του ΔΝΤ στις αρχές Οκτωβρίου 2010, ως πρόεδρος τότε του eurogroup, ότι ήταν “φανερό” ότι η Ελλάδα θα αντιμετωπίσει κάποια μέρα αυτό το πρόβλημα, δηλαδή θα οδηγηθεί σε χρεοκοπία, “ήξερα ακόμα ότι η Γαλλία και η Γερμανία κέρδιζαν τεράστια ποσά από τις εξαγωγές τους προς την Ελλάδα, αλλά δεν θα μπορούσα να πω δημόσια αυτό που γνώριζα…”. Τα θυμάστε αυτά, ή πάσχετε από καθ’ έξη πολιτική αμνησία όπως ταιριάζει σε κάθε εθελόδουλο ραγιά;

Αυτός λοιπόν ήρθε στην Ελλάδα και όπως μας πληροφόρησαν τα γνωστά μέσα μαζικής εξαπάτησης, παρείσχε νέα στήριξη στην Ελλάδα, όπως συνηθίζεται να αποκαλείται συνθηματικά η συμπαράσταση στους συμμορίτες της ίδιας κόζα νόστρα, που έχουν την εξουσία και στην χώρα μας. Και σαν να μην έφτανε αυτό, σε ερώτηση του περιβόητου ΣΚΑΪ, υπογράμμισε ότι “η χώρα σας θα ήταν ένα καλό παράδειγμα για να μην γίνει η Αργεντινή αυτό που έγινε.”

Κατάρρευση επενδύσεων

Μάλιστα. Μας σώσανε και δεν γίναμε Αργεντινή! Η Ελλάδα στα τέσσερα αυτά χρόνια υπέστη την χειρότερη ύφεση της μεταπολεμικής της ιστορίας. Τουλάχιστον. Αν και από την ύφεση αυτή δεν πρόκειται η Ελλάδα να ανακάμψει ποτέ, όσο συνεχίζει την ίδια πορεία. Συρρικνώθηκε όσο καμιά άλλη οικονομία του ΟΟΣΑ. Η κατάρρευση των επενδύσεών της ελληνικής οικονομίας την έχει κατατάξει ήδη στον πάτο του συνόλου των οικονομιών παγκόσμια. Τέταρτη από το τέλος, μαζί με χώρες σαν την Γουινέα-Μπισάο, την Ζουαζιλάνδη, την Υεμένη. Το επίσημο ποσοστό ανεργίας έχει εξασφαλίσει στην Ελλάδα παγκόσμια πρωτιά. Για να μην μιλήσουμε για εισόδημα, εργασία, φτώχεια, μετανάστευση και μαζική εξόντωση των πιο αδύναμων τμημάτων του πληθυσμού. Κι όλα αυτά γιατί μας σώσανε.

Για να δούμε τώρα τι συμβαίνει με την Αργεντινή. Η κυβέρνηση της Φερνάντεζ Κίχνερ αρνείται πεισματικά εδώ και σχεδόν τρία χρόνια να συμμορφωθεί με τις απαιτήσεις συγκεκριμένων επενδυτικών κεφαλαίων, που έχουν αγοράσει κρατικά ομόλογα της Αργεντινής μετά την χρεοκοπία της το 2001 και τώρα απαιτούν να πληρωθούν στο σύνολο της ονομαστικής τους αξίας. Αρνείται να συμμορφωθεί με μια εξωφρενική απόφαση αμερικανικού δικαστηρίου που εξωμειώνει έναν κυρίαρχο λαό με τους ιδιώτες κερδοσκόπους γνωστούς στις αγορές ως “γύπες”.

Γιατί “γύπες”; Διότι πρόκειται για κερδοσκόπους που ειδικεύονται στην αγορά χρεοκοπημένων κρατικών ομολόγων και ύστερα εκβιάζουν με δικαστικές αποφάσεις τα κράτη που τα έχουν εκδόσει προκειμένου να πληρωθούν στο σύνολο της ονομαστικής τους αξίας. Έτσι και στην περίπτωση της Αργεντινής. Αγόρασαν κρατικά ομολόγα μετά την χρεοκοπία του 2001 περίπου στο 3% της ονομαστικής τους αξίας και τώρα απαιτούν να πληρωθούν όχι μόνο στο 100%, αλλά και να καταβληθούν όλοι οι προβλεπόμενοι τόκοι.


Από τον Νοέμβριο του 2012 η κυβέρνηση της Αργεντινής εκβιάζεται με όπλο τις αποφάσεις ενός υπέργηρου δικαστή της Νέας Υόρκης, οι οποίες έχουν σκοπό να γονατίσουν ένα κυρίαρχο κράτος και να το εξαναγκάσουν να γίνει ξανά υποχείριο της διεθνούς κερδοσκοπίας. Δεν πρέπει να παραξενεύεται κανείς από τις εξωφρενικές αποφάσεις αυτού του δικαστή. Στις ΗΠΑ αν έχεις χρήματα και διασυνδέσεις είναι απολύτως σίγουρο ότι θα βρεις κάποιον δικαστή να σου δώσει δίκιο, ότι κι αν ισχυρίζεσαι. Όσο άδικο, όσο παράνομο κι αν είναι.

Και ο υπέργηρος δικαστής Γκρίεζα δεν είναι καθόλου τυχαίος. Οι απόψεις του ταιριάζουν περισσότερο σε αποικιοκράτη δικαστή της βικτωριανής περιόδου, ή σε δικαστή του αμερικανικού νότου την εποχή της δουλείας. Αντιμετωπίζει χώρες και κυβερνήσεις σαν της Αργεντινής όχι ως κυρίαρχα κράτη στα πλαίσια της διεθνούς κοινότητας, αλλά ως ένα είδος ατίθασου νέγρου, που η εκλαμπρότητά του οφείλει να δώσει το απαραίτητο μάθημα ώστε να μην ξανασηκώσει κεφάλι.

Από την αρχή της καριέρας του καλλιέργησε μια ιδιαίτερα φιλική, θα λέγαμε, προδιάθεση υπέρ των οικονομικά ισχυρών που προσέφευγαν στη δικαστική του κρίση. Πόσο μάλλον τώρα που πίσω από τους κερδοσκόπους, στέκεται μια ολόκληρη οργάνωση, την American Task Force Argentina (ΑΤFA), η οποία όπως λέει η ίδια “είναι μια συμμαχία οργανώσεων που ενώθηκαν για μια δίκαιη και ισότιμη συμφιλίωση με την αθέτηση πληρωμής του χρέους της κυβέρνησης της Αργεντινής το 2001, το χρέος της κυβέρνησης της Αργεντινής και την επακόλουθη αναδιάρθρωση. Τα μέλη μας εργάζονται με τους νομοθέτες, τα μέσα μαζικής ενημέρωσης, και άλλα ενδιαφερόμενα μέρη για να ενθαρρύνει την κυβέρνηση των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών να συνεχίσει σθεναρά μια διευθέτηση μέσω διαπραγματεύσεων με την κυβέρνηση της Αργεντινής προς το συμφέρον Αμερικανών ενδιαφερομένων.”

Σκιώδεις οργανώσεις

Επίσημα αυτό το λόμπι περιλαμβάνει σκιώδεις έως ύποπτες οργανώσεις, ακραίες νεοσυντηρητικές ενώσεις και κερδοσκοπικά κεφάλαια γύπες. Επικεφαλής της είναι παλιά στελέχη της διοίκησης Κλίντον, αλλά και του Μπους. Η εκστρατεία έχει σαν στόχο να αντρέψει με κάθε τρόπο την κυβέρνηση Φερνάντεζ, η οποία στην προπαγάνδα του λόμπι ταυτίζεται με τους μουλάδες στο Ιράν. Πάνω από 7 εκατ. δολάρια φέρεται να έχει διαθέσει το συγκεκριμένο λόμπι προκειμένου να εξαγοράσει ευμενή δημοσιότητα στον αμερικανικό και διεθνή τύπο, αλλά και πολιτική επιρροή. Επίσης φέρεται να συντονίζει τις ενέργειες αντίστοιχων ιδιωτικών οργανώσεων και ιδρυμάτων μέσα στην Αργεντινή, που αντιπολιτεύονται από θέσεις ταυτόσιμες με εκείνες του λόμπι. Με το αζημίωτο πάντα.

Τα στελέχη του λόμπι, αλλά και οι οργανώσεις που το απαρτίζουν συνθέτουν την εικόνα μιας οργάνωσης βιτρίνα για επιχειρήσεις υπονόμευσης και αποσταθεροποίησης. Σαν κι αυτές που κατά κόρο χρηματοδοτούνται από τον “μαύρο προϋπολογισμό” εθνικής ασφαλείας των ΗΠΑ. Αυτός μάλλον είναι κι ο λόγος που οι κερδοσκόποι δεν εξασφάλισαν μόνο τις δικαστικές αποφάσεις του Γκρίεζα, αλλά και την συνεποικουρία του Ανωτάτου Δικαστηρίου των ΗΠΑ, μαζί και της κυβέρνησης Ομπάμα. Έστω κι αν οι δικαστικές αποφάσεις αυτές παραβιάζουν κατάφωρα ακόμη και το Σύνταγμα των ΗΠΑ.

Το θανάσιμο αμάρτημα

Ποιο είναι το τόσο θανάσιμο αμάρτημα της Αργεντινής; Μετά από μια τρομακτική περίοδο αυστηρης εφαρμογής των συνταγών του ΔΝΤ από τις πιο διεφθαρμένες κυβερνήσεις που γνώρισε η χώρα μεταπολεμικά, η Αργεντινή κατέρρευσε ολοκληρωτικά τον Δεκέμβριο του 2001. Μέσα σ’ ένα χρόνο, το 2002, η Αργεντινή έχασε σχεδόν το 64% του ετήσιου ΑΕΠ της σε σύγκριση με το 2001. Ενώ το επίπεδο επενδύσεων έπεσε από το 21% του ΑΕΠ το 1998 στο 10,7% το 2002.

Για να έχουμε ένα μέτρο, ας συγκρίνουμε Ελλάδα και Αργεντινή εκείνες τις χρονιές. Το 2001 η Αργεντινή είχε ΑΕΠ περί τα 269 δις δολάρια, τρέχουσες τιμές, ενώ η Ελλάδα λίγο πάνω από 131 δις δολάρια. Το 2002 το ΑΕΠ της Αργεντινής είχε γκρεμιστεί στα 97,4 δις δολάρια, ενώ της Ελλάδας ανερχόταν στα 148 δις δολάρια. Πάντα τρέχουσες τιμές. Το επίπεδο επενδύσεων για την Ελλάδα το 2001 ήταν 23,2% του ΑΕΠ και το 2002 ήταν 22,3%.

Εκτίναξη της ανεργίας

Το αποτέλεσμα αυτής τα κατάρρευσης ήταν να εκτιναχθεί η ανεργία και η φτώχεια. Η επίσημη ανεργία ήταν το 1998 στο 14,7%, το 2001 ήταν 19,2% και το 2002 ανέβηκε στο 22,4%. Στα τέλη του 2001 η ακραία φτώχεια στην Αργεντινή, δηλαδή το ποσοστό του πληθυσμού που δεν είχε να φάει σε τακτική βάση, είχε φτάσει το 14%, ενώ στα τέλη του 2002 έφτασε το 30%. Ο πληθυσμός που βρισκόταν κάτω από το όριο φτώχειας στα τέλη του 2001 ήταν κοντά στο 40%, ενώ στα τέλη του 2002 είχε φτάσει στο 60%. Η κοινωνική έκρηξη ήταν αναπόφευκτη, όπως αναπόφευκτη ήταν και η διακοπή εξυπηρέτησης του δημόσιου χρέους που τότε ανερχόταν γύρω στα 132 δις δολάρια.

Από τότε αρχίζει μια περιόδος κοινωνικών και πολιτικών αναμετρήσεων στην Αργεντινή. Ο λαός στους δρόμους αρνιόταν να πληρώσει άλλο την τοκογλυφία των διεθνών αγορών και τις συνταγές του ΔΝΤ. Οι κυβερνήσεις προσπαθούσαν να εξισσοροπήσουν την κατάσταση και να επανεκινήσουν τις πληρωμές του χρέους. Έως το 2004 όπου μια πανεθνική πολιτική απεργία διαρκείας, μαζί με μαχητικές διαδηλώσεις του λαού, ανέβασαν στην κυβέρνηση τον Νέστορ Κίχνερ. Με τον λαό στους δρόμους, ο Νέστορ Κίχνερ προχώρησε σε δυο θεμελιώδεις επιλογές. Αφενός, ανακοίνωσε την μονομερή περικοπή του δημόσιου χρέους κατά 70% και κάλεσε σε διαπραγμάτευση τους ομολογιούχους έτσι ώστε να ανταλλάξουν τα παλιά τους ομόλογα με τα καινούργια. Αφετέρου, έδιωξε οριστικά το ΔΝΤ από την χώρα και από τότε η Αργεντινή αρνείται ακόμη και τη διαμεσολάβησή του σε ότι αφορά την διαπραγμάτευση του χρέους της.

Οι επιλογές αυτές μαζί με την αντιστροφή των πολιτικών ιδιωτικοποίησης του κράτους και περιορισμού των δαπανών του, που εφαρμόζονταν πριν και οδήγησαν στην κατάρρευση, αποτέλεσαν μέγιστο casus beli για τις διεθνείς αγορές. Από τότε που άλλαξε πορεία η Αργεντινή ανέκαμψε εντυπωσιακά. Το ΑΕΠ της το 2013 ανερχόταν κοντά στα 500 δις δολάρια τρέχουσες τιμές, όταν η Ελλάδα μετά βίας κρατιέται στα 248 δις δολάρια. Το επίπεδο επενδύσεων στην Αργεντινή ανέρχεται στα 23,4% του ΑΕΠ και η επίσημη ανεργία έχει κατέβει στα 7% για το 2013. Η ακραία φτώχεια που συνδέεται με την πείνα έχει πέσει γύρω στο 5% του πληθυσμού, ενώ το ποσοστό που βρίσκεται κάτω από το όριο φτώχειας ήταν κοντά στο 16% του πληθυσμού το 2013.

Η σύγκριση με την Ελλάδα

Για κάντε μια σύγκριση με την κατάσταση που βρίσκεται η Ελλάδα σήμερα με τουλάχιστον το 40% του πληθυσμού της κάτω από το όριο φτώχειας και θυμηθείτε ξανά τα λόγια του Ζ. Κ. Γιούγκερ: Σας σώσαμε και δεν γίνατε Αργεντινή.

Μήπως αποκλείστηκε από τα ξένα κεφάλαια η Αργεντινή; Ούτε κατά διάνοια. Το πιο σημαντικό είδος ξένου κεφαλαίου για μια οικονομία είναι οι Άμεσες Ξένες Επενδύσεις (ΑΞΕ), που αφορούν επενδύσεις στην πραγματική οικονομία. Η Αργεντινή το 1998 είχε εισροή ΑΞΕ της τάξης των 7,2 δις δολάρια, τρέχουσες τιμές. Τη διετία 1999-2000 είχε ιστορικό ρεκόρ εισροής ΑΞΕ της τάξης των 31 δις δολαρίων. Ο λόγος ήταν απλός. Ήταν η διετία του γενικού ξεπουλήματος κατ’ επιταγή των δανειστών και του ΔΝΤ. Πουλήθηκαν τα πάντα, όλες οι υποδομές, οι ακτές, το νερό, η ενέργεια, οι μεταφορές, κοκ. Το κράτος κατέβασε τις δαπάνες του στο 23% του ΑΕΠ. Τεράστια επιτυχία! Σαν την περίπτωση της Ελλάδας σήμερα.

Τη διετία της κατάρρευσης οι ΑΞΕ που εισήλθαν στη χώρα ανήλθαν μόλις στα 3,2 δις δολάρια για το 2001 και 1,0 δις δολάρια για το 2002. Τι έγινε μετά την πτώχευση και κυρίως μετά την ανακοίνωση της μονομερούς διαγραφής του χρέους από την κυβέρνηση Κίχνερ; Το 2003 εισήλθαν 1,6 δις δολάρια σε ΑΞΕ, το 2004 αυξάνουν σε 4,3 δις δολάρια, ενώ το 2005 που επιχειρείται και η πρώτη φάση της ανταλλαγής ομολόγων, οι εισροές ΑΞΕ φτάνουν τα 5,3 δις δολάρια. Έως το 2008 οι εισροές είχαν αυξηθεί κοντά στα 9 δις δολάρια, πολύ περισσότερα από τα 7 δις δολάρια που ήταν ο ετήσιος μέσος όρος της δεκαετίας 1990-2000, όπου ξεπουλήθηκαν και διαλύθηκαν τα πάντα. To 2012 ξεπέρασαν τα 12 δις δολάρια, ενώ το 2013 παρουσιάστηκε μια κάμψη και έφτασαν στα 9 δις δολάρια.

Επενδύσεις και ξεπούλημα

Συνολικά η Αργεντινή τα χρόνια χωρίς το ΔΝΤ και υπό καθεστώς διαγραφής χρέους, προσέλκυσε επενδύσεις από το εξωτερικό σχεδόν διπλάσιες από τις αντίστοιχες της περιόδου πριν την κατάρρευση. Μύθος λοιπόν και μπουρδολογία αυτό που λένε ότι η χώρα που θα διαγράψει το χρέος της δεν θα μπορεί να προσελκύσει ξένες επενδύσεις. Ή το άλλο που λένε, ότι μόνο με ξεπούλημα και διάλυση της χώρας μπορείς να προσελκύσεις ξένες επενδύσεις.

Ας συνέλθουμε επιτέλους κι ας δούμε κατάματα την πραγματικότητα. Η Αργεντινή κατόρθωσε να διαγράψει το μεγαλύτερο μέρος του χρέους και να διώξει το ΔΝΤ. Από τότε γνωρίζει ανάπτυξη όσο ποτέ πριν – παρά τα όποια προβλήματά της – σε συνθήκες πολύ καλύτερες για τον πληθυσμό της απ’ ότι ήταν τις τελευταίες τέσσερις δεκαετίες. Κι όλα αυτά χωρίς να έχει ανάγκη να δανείζεται από τις διεθνείς αγορές, ούτε για την εξυπηρέτηση του χρέους της, ούτε για να καλύπτει τα ελλείμματά της. Η γενική κυβέρνηση το 2002 είχε 23% του ΑΕΠ έσοδα και 38% έξοδα, ενώ το 2013 είχε 42% του ΑΕΠ έσοδα και 44% έξοδα.

Πώς κατόρθωσε η Αργεντινή να διαγράψει το χρέος της; Με τον μοναδικό τρόπο που υπάρχει. Μονομερώς. Μόνο έτσι μπορεί να διαγραφεί έστω το μεγαλύτερο μέρος του χρέους, χωρίς η χώρα και ο λαός να φορτωθεί “προϋποθέσεις”, δισβάσταχτα ανταλάγματα και ξένες επιτηρήσεις, όπως συμβαίνει στην Ελλάδα. Θυμηθήτε αυτό όταν θα σας μιλήσουν ξανά για διαπραγμάτευση με τους δανειστές, για ευρωπαϊκές συνδιασκέψεις και όλα τα άλλα κωμικοτραγικά. Θυμηθείτε το αυτό για να μην σας δουλεύουν ψιλό γαζί.

Αν θέλεις να διαγράψεις χρέος, έστω και μέρος του, υπάρχει μόνο ένας τρόπος. Όποια νομικοπολιτική προσέγγιση κι αν επιλέξεις. Το ανακοινώνεις μονομερώς στους δανειστές και μετά τους καλείς σε διαπραγμάτευση, ξεκαθαρίζοντας ότι δεν πρόκειται να κάνεις πίσω. Ακριβώς όπως η κυβέρνηση της Αργεντινής, η οποία ακόμη και για το διακρατικό της χρέος πέτυχε συμφωνία με τη Λέσχη των Παρισίων, χωρίς την διαμεσολάβηση του ΔΝΤ και χωρίς να δεχτεί όρους και περιορισμούς στην άσκηση της πολιτικής της.

Μπορούμε κι εμείς. Αρκεί να το θελήσουμε, αρκεί να το απαιτήσουμε σαν λαός και δεν πρόκειται να πάθουμε απολύτως τίποτε. Οι δανειστές μας θα πάθουν. Ακόμη και σε πτώχευση να μας κηρύξουν οι αγορές δεν σημαίνει τίποτε για ένα κράτος που δεν έχει ανάγκη να δανείζεται από τους διεθνείς τοκογλύφους και δεν έχει πολιτικούς που παραδίδουν την εθνική του κυριαρχία σε ξένες επιτροπείες. Τί έπαθε δηλαδή η Αργεντινή που την πτώχευσαν; Απολύτως τίποτε. Καμιά συνέπεια. Παρά τον πόλεμο που δέχεται.

Μπορούμε κι εμείς. Πότε θα το καταλάβουμε για να γλυτώσουμε τα πολύ χειρότερα; Πότε θα λυτρωθούμε από την εθελοδουλεία μας και όλους αυτούς τους αλήτες που μας έχουν πουλήσει για δουλοπάροικους στους δανειστές;

Δημοσιεύτηκε στο Χωνί, 10/8/2014

Αναρτήθηκε από ΔΗΜΗΤΡΗΣ ΚΑΖΑΚΗΣ στις 5:23 μ.μ.

Μια χώρα τελείως ανοχύρωτη

Λογότυπο ΕΠΑΜ


Το σύστημα Tetra που υποστήριζε τις τηλεπικοινωνίες της ελληνικής αστυνομίας έχει πάψει να λειτουργεί από τις αρχές αυτού του μήνα. Η εταιρεία Motorola που διέθετε και διαχειριζόταν το συγκεκριμένο σύστημα, έδωσε εντολή και η ελληνική αστυνομία έμεινε ουσιαστικά “τυφλή” και “κουφή”, ιδίως στο κέντρο επιχειρήσεών της.

Οι λόγοι είναι απλοί. Αλλάζουν οι όροι “συνεργασίας” της εταιρείας παρόχου με τα κυκλώματα της κυβέρνησης. Νέα κυβερνητική σύνθεση, νέος υπουργός, νέοι συνεργάτες, νέοι “όροι” για να γίνονται δουλειές με το δημόσιο. Απ’ ότι φαίνεται, είτε οι κυβερνώντες ζητάνε περισσότερα για να συνεχιστεί η σύμβαση με την Motorola, είτε θέλουν να βάλουν και άλλους στη δουλειά. Ίσως την πολύ γνώριμη και γαλαντώμα με τους πολιτικούς μας, Siemens.

Και πώς γίνεται η “μπίζνα”; Αφήνει η κυβέρνηση να οδηγηθεί σε κρίση το όλο θέμα και μετά με την μορφή του “κατεπείγοντως” κανονίζονται τα δοσίματα. Έτσι ή αλλιώς δεν υπάρχει μεγάλη σύμβαση με το δημόσιο που το αντίτιμό της να μην περιλαμβάνει ένα 20-50% “υπέρ πίστεως και πατρίδος”, δηλαδή υπέρ κομματικού ταμείου και κυβερνώντων. Που το ξέρουμε; Βοά η αγορά.

Βέβαια, το γεγονός ότι με τον τρόπο αυτό έχει πληγεί καίρια η επιχειρησιακή δυνατότητα της ελληνικής αστυνομίας και κατά προέκταση η ασφάλεια του έλληνα πολίτη, δεν απασχολεί κανέναν. Έχουμε όλοι μας εθιστεί να θεωρούμε την αστυνομία ως ένα σώμα πραιτωριανών των κυβερνώντων, που δεν μας καίγεται καρφί.

Κι έτσι θα θεωρήσουμε απολύτως φυσιολογικό το γεγονός ότι κανείς από την φυσική ηγεσία του σώματος δεν θα παραιτηθεί από ευθιξία για να καταγγείλει την όλη κατάσταση. Ούτε βέβαια περιμένουμε κάτι ουσιαστικό από τους συνδικαλιστές που μόλις την προηγούμενη Τετάρτη διαδήλωσαν για την επερχόμενη διάλυση των ασφαλιστικών ταμείων τους και την μισθολογική τους υποβάθμιση.

Ιερό το δικαίωμα ενός εργαζόμενου στην ασφάλιση και σε αξιοπρεπείς αμοιβές αντίστοιχες με τις ανάγκες του, του ίδιου και της οικογένειάς του, αλλά δεν μπορεί να φέρεις εθνόσημο, να δίνεις όρκο στο σύνταγμα και την πατρίδα και ύστερα να θεωρείς “δουλειά” σου την υπακοή σε παράνομες πράξεις και εντολές της πολιτικής ηγεσίας. Δεν είναι “δουλειά” να βάζεις πλάτη σ’ ένα ολόκληρο καθεστώς που για να το υπερασπίσεις πρέπει να τσακίσεις τον λαό. Αυτό σε υποβιβάζει σε πραιτωριανό και επίορκο.

Είναι σίγουρο λοιπόν ότι δεν θα δούμε κανέναν από την φυσική ηγεσία της ελληνικής αστυνομίας να νοιάζεται για την επιχειρησιακή διάλυση του σώματος. Το μόνο που τους ενδιαφέρει είναι να λειτουργούν ως γιουσουφάκια των υπουργών. Σιγά μη νοιαστούν για τους πολίτες. Το πολύ-πολύ να τους δούμε να το παίζουν “εθνικόφρονες” με την ΧΑ.

Μήπως θα δούμε τον κ. Ρακιντζή, τον γνωστό επιθεωρητή δημόσιας διοίκησης, να μαίνεται ως άλλος ταύρος εν υαλοπωλείο για την κατάσταση αυτή, που σε μια ευνομούμενη πολιτεία προσιδιάζει με πράξη εσχάτης προδοσίας από την πολιτική ηγεσία; Όχι βέβαια. Εδώ ο κ. Ρακιντζής εν μέσω απίστευτης ασυδοσίας και αυθαιρεσίας, διαπίστωσε πρόσφατα ότι η δημόσια διοίκηση έχει “βελτιωθεί”. Έλα Θεέ στον τόπο σου! Ο εν λόγω κύριος και οι εισαγγελικοί λειτουργοί της χώρας έχουν άλλες πιο σοβαρές υποχρεώσεις. Να νομιμοποιούν το ξεπούλημα της χώρας.

Το πιο σοβαρό όμως είναι το εξής: Πώς είναι δυνατόν να εξαρτάς την επιχειρησιακή δυνατότητα των σωμάτων ασφαλείας από ιδιώτες παρόχους και μάλιστα πολυεθνικές; Ιδίως σ’ ένα τόσο κρίσιμο κομμάτι, όπως είναι οι επικοινωνίες.

Καταλαβαίνετε τώρα γιατί μερικοί απ’ εμάς φωνάζουμε ότι οι επικοινωνίες των ενόπλων δυνάμεων της χώρας εξαρτώνται πια από τα βίτσια της Deutsche Telecom, δηλαδή από την κρατική εταιρεία του Βερολίνου; Καταλαβαίνετε ότι ουσιαστικά οι ένοπλες δυνάμεις της χώρας δεν διαθέτουν αξιόπιστες επικοινωνίες; Δεν διαθέτουν ούτε καν δορυφορικές επικοινωνίες από τότε που οι κυβερνώντες ιδιωτικοποίησαν τον Hellasat.

Μας έχουν μετατραψεί σκόπιμα σε μια εντελώς ανοχύρωτη χώρα. Εύκολος στόχος, ή λεία για οποιονδήποτε.

Αναρτήθηκε από ΔΗΜΗΤΡΗΣ ΚΑΖΑΚΗΣ στις 11:12 μ.μ.

%d bloggers like this: